Lol interesting thread...I get everyone's view here, I suppose it's only natural to seek others of a similar age..however I totally get John, as personally speaking I happen to know my cock is really no different now at 32 than when i was a lot younger! funny that really, cocks must age well or something? I swear mine's no different than what it looked when I was 18, though I definately hard a hard one a lot more then!!
By #166058 at 25,Apr,12 10:27
yes take a look on my profile i have a few new ones of y soft shaven cock
By #152681 at 25,Apr,12 01:50
yup
By #68656 at 24,Apr,12 09:58
Just the usual enquiry, without opinion or prejudice, as to why there is an age stipulation which discriminates against a large percentage of group members.?
Also what is the fundamental difference between the genitals of a male aged 25 and under to those of a male aged over 25.??
Perhaps the original poster could clarify those points please.
By #254122 at 24,Apr,12 10:40
im only interested in cock around my age so under 25 is that bracket
By #68656 at 24,Apr,12 10:59
We understand the ageist aspect and that is your perogative, however please specifically and comprehensively answer the main point of the enquiry which is,
"Also what is the fundamental difference between the genitals of a male aged 25 and under to those of a male aged over 25.?? "
By #150239 at 24,Apr,12 14:24
John, I understand your quiry of this young man, but don't see the need for it. He is young and is more comfortable with his peers. I know he is missing out quite a lot by this limitation, but time will heal most of that. I am over 70 and have found a significant number of younger (usually middle age) men who only want to be with seniors like myself. Is that also being ageist and, if so, is there something wrong with it? I think not. They have their reasons and many of these reasons make good sense. I guess my point is that we ought to ease up these kinds of personal preference and save our challenges for those who suggest violating c-h-i=l-d-r-e-n, relatives, a-n-i-m-a-l-s or are racists, h-a-t-e mongers or attack religious tenets.
Also what is the fundamental difference between the genitals of a male aged 25 and under to those of a male aged over 25.??
Perhaps the original poster could clarify those points please.
"Also what is the fundamental difference between the genitals of a male aged 25 and under to those of a male aged over 25.?? "