Yes. So, again you're wrong.

You mean correct. You've crawled back into your box as has CAT because you have nowhere to go and are unwilling to admit that your sacred verification process is deeply, deeply flawed. My suggestion is however not. It is not me that is unwilling to admit anything. Amen brother.

I understand perfectly. If you had one photo when a member initially joined to verify their sex and the account was opened and limited to staying said sex it doesn't matter what they delete/post/ delete in the future, they would always be listed as that sex. Now, tell me why that can't be done..... "Verification by other members"?? As I've already illustrated numerous times and not a single person has been willing to admit, that system is the most easily corrupt system. What I'm proposing is not, and could by the way also be carried out by other members. So, again, I ask you and any of the other "verified" royalty - why is this a bad idea? The truth although no one will admit it is because it would drive literally hundreds of members from the site. I find the whole thing actually quite funny.

Still not then. "Talk to admin".

Sister.

Wow. Another "adult" joins the discussion.

- and not a single person has been able to tell me how this magical verification process proves anything or stops revenge porn. Can you? I really how in wrong and that you can.

My answer to this is simple. Bollocks. For a community where you can choose to do something or not they're are glaringly large holes for wankers to abuse. One simple requirement that I propose to even post on the site would eradicate that issue. Asking already "logged" members to jump through hoops can't and will never work, why? - because the majority can't. As such, the site can't exist with only "legitimate" members. That's why my suggestion has been hit with such hostility.
Your opinion of " they're easy to spot" is not a vindication for them existing.

18 out of how many members?? Hardly a democracy is it? It's ridiculous for any of you to even consider that you're really any different to an "unverified" member. Again, I revert to this faux opinion that you're more genuine than Joe Bloggs that creates a profile.

Again, you have not addressed my point - that the verification process serves nothing more than to give people like you some sort of faux feeling of aristocracy. It is completely worthless and still allows incredibly easy avenues of falsehood and abuse You have still failed to tell me what you've based you comment "afraid of falling in love with a man" on. How many times are you going to try and deflect my questions and points? Having a go at me for something else doesn't qualify.

Also, instead of yours and CAT's diversion tactics, I'd like either of you, or indeed anyone else to respond and tell me exactly how is this magical verification process that you all seem so heavily invested in: a) In any way fit for purpose. b) Better than my suggestion. Or as you've previously said, have I not got the right to question a "10yr, verified member"?? Absolutely laughable.

Really. You may be of the sad inclination that might allow you to "fall in love" with a person on the Internet. I am however not. I say again, just saying something doesn't make it true, therefore you have an obligation to say what you're basing your opinion on. This should be very interesting...

Really? How pathetic. An adult site, I feel like I'm back in school with the level of debating skills.

Ah, the old " I've got nowhere to go now, I'll come out with some other nonsense '. Well dodged.

Right, this is an apples and oranges scenario. Imagine this : John (for any number of reasons) wants to share intimate (and identifiable) photos of his girlfriend/wife, Julie. He "borrows" her ID and goes through your sacred verification process with no issues. He then merrily posts any photos he likes of Julie for any number of years and you ask think that because he's "verified" it's all legit. Not exactly watertight is it?!
Now, say you put something in place like I've been advocating whereby you have to post a photo (non identifiable) while holding a piece of paper giving your Syd name and the date. John is incredibly unlikely to manage to do that of Julie without her consent and/or asking "what the fuck is this for?!".
Now, I don't know how many times I have to say this before it registers - my point from the very beginning was to specifically root out men that are posting photos of a women AND pretending to actually be that woman is conversation and involvement with others on the site. On top of that, it would absolutely stop any instances of "revenge porn"..
Now, if you can't grasp what I'm saying or are unwilling to give it any thought then I absolutely give up. You can't as they say educate pork.

What?! You really are not the sharpest tool in the shed are you. This is an "adult" site yet you and your dad little minions have to resort to school ground name calling and vulgarity at the first opportunity. Pathetic, and as I'm getting a little tired of saying a clear indication that you've already lost the argument. Congratulations.

Very simply by doing what the few actual women on the site did - take a photo with their name (Syd name obviously). Anonymous and can't be faked. It's not rocket science, this is what I've been saying from the start. There was such uproar over the prospect of it for one reason and one reason only - the number of members that aren't posting as three sex that they are.
Being "verified" proves fuck all, as I've illustrated with your driving licence "foolproof" bullshit. How would one of these individuals get a photo of of their wife's cunt with their Syd name written next to it? Well, they can't; ergo, my method is in fact the better option.

That's just not true if it?? No one is real by my standards, now you're plumbing the depths of desperation to make a point. Are you telling me it would not be incredibly easy for a husband (or wife) to do that to the spouses I'D? And that is exactly my point, men pretending to be women. I yet again, you're making my point for me and doing even know it.

- I'd also take you up on your statement about truth. Look back through the posts and find me any evidence whatsoever that justifies the infantile, school yard name calling as based on truth. Yet again, you're using language that anyone can type but it's based on absolutely nothing. I look forward to your sensible, fact backed, intelligent response.

And someone that knows you and had access to that document couldn't have? I don't "come after" anyone, I deal in fact and truth.

You're great at name calling an insults. An incredibly weak and valueless debating technique. Congratulations on a glaringly low level of intellect.

You are openly chastising someone in their attempt to do nothing more than out people engaging in this despicable behavior. That is complicit, in my opinion. Apparently though, you're not allowed opinions on this site, people feel, and I quote " intimidated, bullied, pressured & victimised". This is an ADULT site, posting ADULT content, every single member has the right to say fuck off or ignore another member. "But I was offended!". Fuck off snowflake, and grow a pair. What a load of absolute nonsense.I do like a healthy debate though, so I look forward to having a chuckle at all the other shit that will flow from you.

When I get time I'll answer all of your questions, I'll do them one at a time though - I don't want to overload your intellect, I appear to have already done that with Bella.

Don't be so fucking lazy. There's photos (and videos) of me inserting my testicles into my wife's vagina. As previously said, don't let they truth get in the way of a good story. Twat.

I have got no interest in interacting with the women in this site, I never have done. So, no, not more than likely. Inaccurate guesswork at best. I refer you back to my intentions of weeding out those posting revenge porn, it's not rocket science. People keep using the term fake when chastising me about this. Iit is not fake pictures, Internet pictures or anything else "fake" I'm trying to call out. It is men pretending to be women in conversation and revenge porn. It's very simple, but please, don't let the truth get in the way of a good story!

I'm glad you said members.

Who are few and far between, but again, well done for missing the point entirely.

Blah blah blah. Advocating revenge porn I see, good work.

Unlike the majority of people here, I wont run away from a discussion and blacklist anyone.

Who rattled your cage?

Get one of these and use your balls to fuck! /h5sh81k30ke8pic.html

Check out Swingcouple42 also. Absolutely ridiculous.

If I give you a cell phone, are you more or less likely to make a phone call?

Are you being naive, ignorant or intentionally thick as fuck?

Not had many mass shootings though....

Well you are wrong, so apology accepted. What should I be concerned about? And how am I trying to shock people?

Again, mashing incorrect assumptions. I tried to open dialogue with the member 4 times. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story though.

I completely agree. However, it should not be for people to go running their mouth off with an opinion if they can't be bothered to take any time to research the facts. Your question puzzles me, the fact that I have no pics of it should be answer enough. Is this something you want to see?!

You're good, tell me another.

If anyone would like to check the blatant plagiarism by Randy999, they need to look at his avatar (a term which thanks to Bella I am now familiar), and then the images of JC on page 2 of my profile. Apparently they're not the same image. 😂😂

And my subsequent response:
Very intelligent, but I suppose when you've backed yourself into such a ridiculous, infantile corner that's all you have left. No wonder numbers on this site are falling at such a rate of knots when there's people like you sniping (incorrectly) at innocent people. What does it say about this site (and you) that you are willing to see such a blatant example of plagiarism go unchecked?! Sweet dreams.

Rest assured, every single picture or video on my page are genuinely us. I would be interested to hear which ones are believed to be fake and why though!

Exactly, I'm not the one causing issues. Live and let live, turn the other cheek etc - you know, good Christian values!

- that someone on this site can be offended like that. Don't you see the irony in being offended while choosing to ignore some fundamental teachings of said religion - thou shall not covert thy neighbour's wife.....

Blows my mind.