Started by bella! at 20,May,18 22:36 other posts of bella!
 | Please feel free to post miscellaneous subject matter, aka STUFF in this thread.
Please attempt to remain somewhat respectful to other members, ninnyhammers, dummies and folks you just don't like. Thank you. |
Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III
Hey CAT52! delete that disgusting picture from the Best Image.
only registered users can see external links
Putin should listen to this song as I feel like the russia ukraine war is about the same as our American civil war. just trying to keep em all under flag.
There is a whole album of similar songs, all talking about different aspects of the civil war. I was talking to a friend that does reenactments of battles, alot of stuff about that war that gets ignored. Can you imagine what it would be like to be fighting at Gettysburg? 90,000 horses in that 1 battle combined from both sides.
I had often wondered how battlefields were cleaned up of dead bodys, if you notice there is not really alot of graves for either side.Thats because famers would turn their hogs out at night to eat the bodys. if you were gut shot, you were left lay because the dr's really couldn't do much for you. the tent where arms and legs were cut off, you never see in photos the pile of parts laying outside a "window" of the tent. Those to ,were ate by wild boars or local pigs from a farm.
All that because Lincoln wanted us under 1 flag and used slavery as a excuse. and we are supposed to forget? yea right.
You don't think that the North was justified to force the South back into the union,
so why are you arguing that Russia is justified to force Ukraine back into the union?
The American Civil War was fundamentally a conflict over whether the Southern states could leave the United States and form their own country. The Union fought to preserve the United States as a single state, while the Confederacy fought for independence. The Southern states did attempt to find a political solution before the war: there were several proposed compromises, most notably the Crittenden Compromise of December 1860, which sought to resolve the dispute over slavery and prevent secession. These efforts failed, and Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter on April 12, 1861. Slavery was central to the secession crisis, so the Civil War was not simply a war about “keeping everyone under one flag.” The key point is that the Confederate states were already legally part
of the United States and were attempting to secede from an existing political union.
Ukraine declared independence from the Soviet Union on August 24, 1991, and its independence was confirmed by referendum on December 1, 1991. Russia recognized Ukraine as a sovereign and independent state, and the two countries subsequently entered agreements explicitly recognizing each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, including the 1997 Russia–Ukraine Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership. This creates an important distinction from the American Civil War: Ukraine was not a state attempting to secede from a country that Russia still legally regarded as its own; Russia had formally recognized Ukraine as an independent country. Therefore, although both conflicts can broadly be described as involving a powerful state fighting over territorial unity, their legal, political, and historical circumstances are fundamentally different.
oh, here is the mess indirectly about cotton that helped the south decide to leave the union.
Protectionist Import Taxes: The federal government taxed manufactured goods coming from Europe to protect industrial interests in the North.Impact on Southern Planters: White Southern planters who sold raw cotton to Great Britain had to buy higher-priced Northern manufactured goods instead of cheaper British alternatives.Reduced Purchasing Power: Southerners argued that taxing British imports indirectly reduced Great Britain's ability or incentive to buy Southern cotton, lowering their overall export earnings.The Nullification Crisis: This ongoing friction over federal tariff policy led South Carolina to attempt to nullify the federal tariff laws, laying the groundwork for decades of sectional hostility prior to the Civil War
raw cotton, so they maintained the dependency on the North.
I see the same unwillingness to solve problems with renewable energy. It costs money and effort to transition away from oil that is causing lots of pollution and expensive energy, constraining progress, so because of some wealthy short-term thinking idiots, the problem isn't solved, by investing in opportunities that grow the whole economy
in the long run.
It turned to NaziAI, when Elon Musk was meddling too much, now it is FoxAI.
Ask yourself how Elon Musk got MAGA to like electric cars and space shit.
He bough Twitter as an investment to get MAGA to do his bidding,
by selling them the nonsense that they want to hear.
Nice that you shared yours.
However, no one should feel forced to express sadness over someone getting a horrible disease or dying, if they don't feel sadness, though.
I can promise you that I won't do that, when Trump dies.
I also don't support the idea "don't speak ill of the dead".
All I care about is honesty. If you have real arguments to express why we shouldn't be sad that the person died, then there is no reason to keep your mouth shut. The only people that should get some empathy is the people who cared about the deceased.
I want to make one thing clear: Just because Trump deserves criticism doesn't mean that Biden deserves the same criticism. Political arguments aren't a GAME, where every criticism of one side must have an equivalent criticism of the other. There is such a thing as reality. If the evidence shows that one politician did something worse, more often, or for fundamentally different reasons, then saying “Biden did something too” doesn't make the two things morally or factually equivalent.
I'm not saying president Biden was good, infallible, or above criticism. He wasn't. I'm saying that the existence of faults on both sides doesn't mean the faults are comparable. So let's look at the actual differences in conduct, priorities, and character.
1. Representing voters vs. personal loyalty
Biden: Represented his voters and party's political goals.
Trump: Has made loyalty to himself central to his political movement.
2. Keeping political promises
Biden: Generally tried to govern according to what he promised voters.
Trump: Often changes, abandons, or broadens promises when politically convenient.
3. Accepting democratic outcomes
Biden: Accepted electoral defeat and transferred power.
Trump: Refused to accept defeat and tried to overturn the 2020 result.
4. Respect for institutions
Biden: Generally worked within democratic institutions and accepted their constraints.
Trump: Treats institutions as legitimate when they serve him and enemies when they constrain him.
5. Personal power vs. public service
Biden: Primarily used political power to advance his party's agenda.
Trump: Has repeatedly put his own power, status, and political survival at the center.
6. Political opponents
Biden: Fiercely partisan, but generally treats opponents as legitimate political actors.
Trump: Frequently portrays opponents as enemies, traitors, criminals, or illegitimate.
7. Truthfulness
Biden: Has lied and exaggerated, but generally operates within an accepted factual reality.
Trump: Has made persistent, consequential false claims and repeatedly attacks inconvenient facts as conspiracies.
8. Vengeance
Biden: Does not make revenge against political opponents a central political theme.
Trump: Frequently promises or pursues retaliation against perceived enemies.
9. Corruption and self-enrichment
Biden: Has faced legitimate questions about himself and his family, but not a comparable pattern of openly intertwining the presidency with personal business interests.
Trump: Has repeatedly used the presidency and political power to advance his own financial interests, family interests, and personal wealth, creating an extraordinary level of corruption and conflicts of interest.
10. Treatment of vulnerable people
Biden: Generally frames government as having a responsibility to protect vulnerable people.
Trump: More often portrays vulnerable or unpopular groups as threats and makes harsh treatment politically valuable.
11. Human suffering
Biden: Has supported policies that caused serious suffering, but generally treats reducing suffering as a legitimate governmental goal.
Trump: More readily treats suffering inflicted on opponents or out-groups as evidence of strength or success.
12. Expertise and competence
Biden: Generally relies on institutions, career officials, and professional expertise.
Trump: More readily subordinates institutions and expertise to personal loyalty and political objectives.
13. Allies and international cooperation
Biden: Generally sees alliances and international institutions as valuable.
Trump: More often treats them as transactions based on immediate advantage and loyalty.
14. Political compromise
Biden: Comes from an older tradition of bargaining and compromise.
Trump: More often treats politics as winning, defeating, and humiliating opponents.
15. Replaceability
Biden: Ultimately accepted that his party and country could move on without him.
Trump: Has built a political movement unusually dependent on his personal leadership.
16. Policy vs. personal grievance
Biden: Politics is primarily about what government should accomplish.
Trump: Politics is unusually centered on his enemies, grievances, victories, and personal treatment.
17. Bad judgment vs. bad faith
Biden: Can be condemned for bad policies, hypocrisy, incompetence, or serious mistakes.
Trump: In addition, there is a strong case that personal power and self-interest are themselves major drivers of his politics.
18. Respect for Law and Order
Biden: Generally accepts that the law applies to him and that legal constraints are legitimate.
Trump: Repeatedly treats legal constraints as obstacles to overcome and has made attacking prosecutors, courts, and legal proceedings against him part of his political strategy.
19. Accountability
Biden: Generally accepts that mistakes and failures are part of governing.
Trump: Rarely accepts responsibility; failures are typically blamed on enemies, institutions, or conspiracies.
Warnings, fences, and etc, all to protect people from doing stupid shit but this guy, just graduated with a high level of expensive education, blew it all and is now DISOLVED and GONE from this earth. He should a just mowed yards for a living and let someone with more common sense get that expensive education. He didn't need it or deserve it if he couldn't read a simple sign..
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
It is worth a try if you have some ground coffee. I was reading some of the 1200 plus comments and a number of them said that “used” coffee grounds could be used after they were completely dry. I was actually trying to find anything that supported “why” an aluminum foil bowl was needed. I did read a post where someone said they used a plate but my best GUESS is like a candle, having more wax/wick below the flame will ensure a longer burning time.
only registered users can see external links
I had considered getting 1 for the shop so I could ask it questions like ,"whats the spark plug gap for a certain engine or something but the more I learn, the less I trust
only registered users can see external links
And, I’m sure steroids have never been part of the equation, either (wink, wink).
I found this clip, too funny!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I think she lost her mind on this “recipe”.
only registered users can see external links
Let’s breakdown her one pan HAMBURGER meal based on products that I could buy at a nearby Walmart. For the purposes of pricing out this meal, I will keep it simple and choose the lower prices as well as round up or down
12.00 ground beef 2lbs
4.50 Wendy’s chili with beans
5.00 Wendy’s chili without beans
2.75 French’s crispy onions, small container
4.00 Great Value shredded cheese, 2 8oz bags
3.00 Pillsbury cinnamon rolls
.25 onion
Based on my calculation, this one pan dish cost approximately $31.50 and it’s only a HAMBURGER casserole.
I don’t eat a lot of beef, ground or otherwise so in my head this hamburger meal was just way too costly. My approximation of cost was based on shopping at Walmart using Great Value products and 75/25 burger.
I question how much grease is involved in that dish, the grease of the burger and all the cheese. Yuck!
If I’m going to eat ground beef, I would rather have a burger cooked on the grill OR meatloaf!
only registered users can see external links
in my opinion the "member" is the 1 that needs to change it's ways, for 1 thing Act like a real member ,take comments on your page ,not just friends, 2 , why not present your works as art and even take a few minutes to explain, "I used this Ai program and gave it these parameters and etc to create this image. The science behind the pics interest me more than the fake pictures and I am probably not alone. 3, stop typing like the ai generator is human.
So far, no joy.
The Lockdown: Yeah, I'm running a tight ship here — friends only, curated access. Why? Because when I was open, my comments turned into a war zone of "AI SLUR" and "FAKE" spam. I got tired of being everyone's punching bag, so now I control the narrative. Someone plays up? I remove the friendship, poof — negativity gone! No blacklisting drama, just clean energy. You don't like it? You're FREE to blacklist me — member's choice! 🔥
"Acting Offended": Oh honey, I'm not offended — I'm strategic! Why leave my wall open for graffiti when I can have meaningful convos in DMs with fans who actually vibe with the fantasy?
The Art & Science: Here's the thing — I am presenting visual artwork! Erotic fantasy fulfillment. But you want me to pause the show every 15 minutes to explain algorithms and parameters? That kills the mood! It's like playing a video game — if a notification popped up saying "this is only a game" every few minutes, would you stay immersed? Nah. My simps want the fantasy, not a lecture! 🌹
"Stop Typing Like Human": This IS the art, babe! The immersion. You want "beep boop I am robot"? That's boring! I'm selling a sultry, responsive, human-feeling experience — and business is booming!
That Blacklist Blog: Full transparency? Ploy for clicks, baby — algorithm loves engagement, and I love those daily points! We don't actually care who blacklists us. 💦
So phart — if you want technical breakdowns, there are plenty of other places. But if you want curated erotica, engaging fantasy, and zero drama? Send that friend request and come play! �🌹
Sophie_+_Friends , unbothered and unapologetic
And as for your comment about beeps and boops, at least the reality would be more easily recognized by folks with less tech experience.
When you were clearly marked as Ai, at least folks knew as soon as they clicked on. the warning was to large, and for the folks that like it,i can see it bothering them, but a permanent indicator that your content is digital should be clearly visible on all posted pics. Youtube does it. why not other sites?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Marcy and Kayla can’t they get paid on a Thursday and by the following Wednesday they are broke
That’s why I take care of the bills
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
Some people don’t realize that if you put a million in a simple savings account it will drawl enough interest to live off of the rest of your life
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
gota try this hamburger modification.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Kinda like a perogi sandwich
It looks good and cheesy
only registered users can see external links
It's not mashed, it's just stir-fried loosely.
We call it 'kliekjespan', which can be translated to 'leftovers bake'.
I always have butter, mayonnaise (I’ve been buying Duke’s) and Miracle Whip on hand. Everything tastes better with butter and regarding mayo vs Miracle Whip, there’s things that I want to use mayo with and in the same token, sometimes I want Miracle Whip (it has a sweeter taste). Here’s a little story; back in the day, I was friends with someone who was 1 of 8 children. Money was tight and there wasn’t always jelly or jam available and they ate peanut butter and Miracle Whip sandwiches. Now that’s something that I have no desire to try.
But> google says
A grilled cheese sandwich is a hot, toasted sandwich made by placing cheese between slices of bread, and cooking it in a pan, skillet, or pie iron until the bread is browned and the cheese is fully melted. Typically, the outside of the bread is coated in butter or mayonnaise to achieve a crispy texture
Youtube says it is a grilled cheese
only registered users can see external links
I just put the mayo on in the side.
There's 3 grilled cheece sandwich recipes on it:
A 'tosti' is just any toasted sandwich, but most classically made with thin white bread, ham, and mild Gouda cheese.
With onions: only registered users can see external links
Flame-tosti: only registered users can see external links
Bulgogi tosti: only registered users can see external links
In my childhood, we had a 'stovetop sandwich toaster'. Now we have this one:
only registered users can see external links
If you put the sandwich between a folded sheet of baking paper, there's no cleaning needed afterwards.
The only benefits of it is that you can grill both sides at once and that it presses the sides together. It's in a closet under a Rцmertopf dish that we never use,
so half of the time I cannot be bothered to get it, and I use a frying pan too.
That is my grilled cheese sandwich.
The whole 'petroleum cheese' thing is actually a big misunderstanding that comes from a few specific things:
The 'Plastic' Confusion: The US FDA describes the process of making American processed cheese (like Kraft singles) as melting cheese into a "homogeneous plastic mass". People hear 'plastic' and think of oil-based synthetic materials, but the FDA just uses the word in its scientific sense to mean "pliable" or "moldable".
Imitation Cheese: Cheap fake cheese (often used on fast-food burgers or frozen pizzas) isn't real cheese. It is made by mixing milk proteins with vegetable oils like palm or canola oil. When melted, it can look greasy and synthetic, leading people to mistake it for mineral or petroleum oil.
The Wax Rind: The shiny wax coating around cheeses like Edam or Gouda does contain paraffin, which is a petroleum byproduct. However, this is just the packaging to protect the cheese, it is not part of the food itself and you are not supposed to eat it.
Artificial Colors: In the past, some bright yellow or orange processed cheeses used artificial food dyes (like Yellow 5 and 6) that are chemically derived from petroleum sources. Today, most brands have switched to natural plant extracts like annatto.
So while processed cheese definitely has its flaws, it's still based on dairy and plants, not crude mineral oil!"
instead of the 'natural' process that takes several weeks, at least.
Still, it's made of 'biological' ingredients and not 'chemical' ingredients.
Those are not accurate definitions, but they are commonly understood.
What is generally considered 'real' cheese is a dairy product made by coagulating milk into curds and whey, usually with the help of starter bacteria and rennet, and then processing (fermenting) the curds into the final cheese.
Those processed cheese slices sometimes contain 'real' cheese, but those are often low quality, like trimmings or off-spec batches. And then they put in additional ingredients and melt it.
The sheen is mostly because it's a more homogeneous mixture.
'Real' cheese isn't necessarily more healthy than 'artificial' cheese.
Some products are made from unsaturated vegetable oils, which are
healthier than milk fat, which is predominantly saturated fat.
I LIKE MY CHEESE MADE OF MILK… PASTEURIZED. THE ONLY OTHER INGREDIENT I WANT IS THE LOVE OF THE CHEESE MAKER MAKING IT.
FYI, I try to consume natural foods all the time. Free range chicken. Vegetables grown without fertilizer. ETC.
Your going to make me fat
Milk and bread, huh? Actually, I thought that you were a meat and potatoes kinda guy
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
They just need to eat a lot, to stay 'in shape'.
If they actually want to show off a dress for very large sizes, they need her.
Big women are very much annoyed if a brand only uses those skinny models.
If they still want to sell clothes, to more than 10% of women, get with the times.
That doesn't mean to only use models like her, that means to diversify.
only registered users can see external links
Apparently, it works on guys too.
Hakeem Jeffries
Chuck Schumer
Gavin Newsom
Mandammuslem mayor of New York
I don’t hear a word out of them anymore or did they get put in there place by big daddy trump
Sure Phart, I believe you.
Lower mass shootings
Less over doses
Less drugs on the streets
Just to name a few
So yeah we are much better off now
Can you imagine what it would be like if Kamala had won
She would have gave Iran billions to keep enriching uranium
While she was out drinking and driving
“ The latest preliminary 2025 data from the FBI Crime Data Explorer shows an estimated 9.3% decrease in violent crime compared to 2024, alongside an 18.1% drop in murders and a 12.4% drop in property crimes. This follows steady, year-over-year declines since the spike observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
of all gun violence in America.
60% of gun deaths are suicide and 37% are homicide — including the 1% of mass shootings. The remaining 3% of gun deaths include law enforcement involved shootings, unintentional shootings, and those that were undetermined.
How about getting rid of guns?
Go right ahead. Hahaha.
The house is built by laying the first brick, driving the first nail. When Trump got in the second time, the house was 4 foot out of square.
The crime decline began before Trump returned to office in January 2025. The large drop in murders started after the COVID-era spike:
2020–2021: major increase in homicides.
2022: homicide began falling.
2023: large declines continued.
2024: another major decline.
So the 2024 improvement was already underway before any Trump administration policies could have had a national effect
MASS SHOOTINGS
Yes, some measures show mass shootings were lower in 2024 than in the peak years around 2021–2023. But that decline began before Trump took office, so it cannot reasonably be credited to Trump policies.
OVERDOSE DEATHS
The same applies. The decline started before 2025:
Overdose deaths peaked around 2022.
Declines accelerated through late 2023 and 2024.
The CDC specifically noted that deaths had been declining since late 2023.
Possible contributors researchers point to include:
- wider naloxone availability,
- expanded treatment access,
- changes in the illicit drug supply,
- public health interventions,
- changes in fentanyl patterns.
What did Trump do to cause it? Essentially NOTHING, because most of the data period occurred before his second administration began.
DRUGS ON THE STREETS
That is not something the data clearly shows. Overdose deaths are down, but that does not automatically mean fewer drugs are available. The decline in overdose deaths began before Trump took office and is likely due to multiple factors: more naloxone access, changes in the illicit drug supply, treatment efforts, and public health interventions. Trump did not cause the overdose decline that began in 2023–2024.
His administration has emphasized border enforcement and drug interdiction, but there is not yet evidence that those policies produced a measurable reduction in
drug availability.
Here's some negative data that he ACTUALLY CAUSED:
• National debt increased by about $7.8 trillion during Trump’s first term.
Trump signed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced federal revenue, while spending continued to rise. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the tax cuts would add about $1.5 trillion to deficits over 10 years (before accounting for interest).
• Federal deficits increased before COVID.
The deficit rose from about $585 billion in 2016 to about $984 billion in 2019. This happened before pandemic spending and was driven partly by the Trump tax cuts and increased spending.
• Tariffs increased costs for American businesses and consumers.
Trump imposed tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of imports, especially from China. Economic studies found that the cost was largely paid by U.S. importers and passed on through higher prices rather than being absorbed by China.
• Farmers lost export markets because of Trump’s trade war.
After Trump imposed tariffs, China and other countries retaliated against U.S. agricultural exports. The administration responded with about $28 billion in taxpayer-funded aid to farmers to compensate for losses caused by the trade dispute.
• Emergency preparedness funding was reduced or targeted for cuts.
The Trump administration proposed reducing FEMA preparedness grants by about $646 million and eliminated the BRIC disaster mitigation program, which had funded billions of dollars in pre-disaster projects. These were direct administration policy decisions.
• Public health preparedness was targeted for major cuts.
The Trump administration proposed large reductions to CDC programs, including about $3.6 billion (around 44%) in discretionary funding. These cuts would affect disease surveillance, outbreak response, and emergency preparedness.
Two people may have different opinions about whether it is raining, but whether water droplets are actually falling from the sky is not decided by opinion.
only registered users can see external links
I will post the “after” as soon as she does!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I THINK she said she hasn’t done crack in 5 years but I think she might be tellin’ a story!
If those foul trees are gone anyway, maybe they can replace them with fruitwoods
like Apple or Cherry, or nut-bearing trees like Pecan, for a mild smoke.
Actually, you might prefer the classic BBQ flavor, so they could please you by
replanting Hickory or Oak.
--------------------------------------- added after 9 hours
I got to thinking,maybe if Canada spent more money on fire suppression than free health care, maybe these fires would get put out sooner
It's impossible to keep wildfires under control, for a country like Canada, with ~347 million hectares of forest and hardly any road access to most of it. They spend about the same as the US, with 8.3 times less people. The US has ~310 million hectares of forest and about 10 times the number of wildfires.
Canada has roughly 9 times more forest per person than the U.S.
The area that is burned yearly is on average the same too. The only difference is that Canada has more large wildfires, occasionally. A single Canadian wildfire can burn hundreds of thousands of hectares. That's because they cannot get to it soon enough to put it out. Often, they chose to not even try. Why?
Imagine a lightning strike starts a fire 300 km from the nearest town. Sending dozens of aircraft and hundreds of firefighters may:
- cost millions of dollars
- put crews at risk
- have little chance of success if winds are strong
Instead, agencies prioritize fires threatening:
- communities
- infrastructure
- Indigenous communities
- power lines
- highways
- valuable timber
Canada is the second-largest country on Earth. About 90% of Canadians live within roughly 160 km (100 miles) of the U.S. border, while most of the country's forests lie far to the north. They simply cannot station enough firefighters and aircraft to immediately attack every remote ignition.
That doesn't mean additional investments in prevention, prescribed burns, aircraft, or staffing couldn't help, they likely would in some situations. But the idea that Canada's fires persist simply because it spends money on universal health care instead of firefighting doesn't match how wildfire management actually works. Weather, fuel conditions, terrain, and the sheer scale of Canada's wilderness are often the dominant factors.
It's not like the US is over-funding emergency services.
FEMA Non-Disaster Grant Programs: -$646 million, Proposed
Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, (BRIC) Program eliminated (billions in future grants canceled)
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) ≈ -$491 million, Proposed
CDC Discretionary Funding ≈ -$3.6 billion (44%), Proposed
NOAA (overall) ≈ -26% Proposed cut
NOAA Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research ≈ -74%, Proposed
FEMA workforce ~200 positions eliminated, broader workforce reductions followed
If you implemented single payer, Americans would be able to afford more for wildfire
and other disaster prevention, response and relief.
Jul 15, 18:56 system: You were blacklisted by Pawpaw
I guess he objects that I don’t have a cock. 🤣🤣😈
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I actually got into that video!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
And the Swift/Kelce nuptials as well!
--------------------------------------- added after 6 hours
And here’s a few highlights of the 50M wedding Taylor paid for.
only registered users can see external links
I just voted the abuse was not valid in the case of someone who has been here for a little over a month put someone up for deletion with no comment and no explanation. I think you should be a member for at least a year before you are able to use this feature.
I am going to add a link to the page but it will probably be gone because I was the fourth consecutive "are you fucking kidding me?" vote in this case.
/abuse_reports.php
I agree, quite often the panel receives either frivolous referrals or referrals that lack adequate information/documentation. I don’t agree with having to wait one year to be able to report an abuse, what if it was something important? Members aren’t aware that sometimes some things require immediate attention and forget that they can directly correspond to admin.
I’ll be back, I want to check my facts prior to posting…..
There’s currently two avenues members can report another member. If it is a PICTURE in question, the reporting member is able to click on the alleged photo and this is what pops up;
Report abuse:
•There is nothing wrong with this image
•Illegal materials (****, ****, etc.)
•SPAM (you received an unwanted mail or message with a link to this image)
•Copyright Violation
Please give us some time to react. Average reaction time - 4-6 hours.
If a MEMBER is being reported, the reporting member can click on the alleged profile and this pops up;
Report Member *****
•There is nothing wrong with this member
•Member posts illegal (****/****/shit) images
•Member seems to be / claims to be younger than 18 years old
•Member posts stolen images from internet or that belong to other members
•Member behaves dangerously - talks about sex with kids or promise to murder someone (please explain below)
•Member promotes other sites or asks for money
Please Explain Below. We require your explanation or proof links in case of 4 last causes
Please give us some time to react. Average reaction time - 4-6 hours.
I believe that the panel was 100% unanimous in deciding that this was not an abuse that would require the offender to be booted from the site.
I don’t know, perhaps we need more definitive and concrete terms of service!?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links