"It's interesting you call me part of a regime that believes in democracy."
A writing error? Your country believes in democracy, YOU DO NOT.
Your president doesn't believe in democracy either. He wants to destroy it.

You still support Trump after he committed an insurrection.
It's your duty as a citizen to defend your Constitution.
I assume you pledged allegiance (to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all) many times. That republic is based on The Constitution.
Republicans have claimed to support The Constitution, for decades.
That is your side saying that supporting The Constitution is being an American.

Now you are supporting a president who should have never been elected in the first place, but who should also be in prison for treason.

You can think saying "socialist" is an argument, but it's not.
All party programs are assessed by our 'Rule of Law Committee'. My Socialist Party's program has the most Constitutional program of all 18 assessed parties.
The right-wing parties are all violating our Constitution.
You are NOT reasoning, stop fooling yourself.

Everything else you are saying is not applicable. Even if Trump would be the best president ever, he is still a traitor who should have never been elected the second time.
It doesn't make you "American" to support low gas prices or by supporting Israel.

The national guard being sent into American cities, against their will, is Anti-American to the core. How about those state's rights, you are always crying about?

It's not about crime, because Trump is pardoning tons of criminals, rapists and pe.do.philes. He's also pardoning the most corrupt politician ever. It all shows you who he identifies with, and you couldn't care less.

Trump is accusing many American citizens of being Anti-American, for not supporting HIM. The opposite is true. Supporting a traitor to America is Anti-American.

Besides the insurrection, the conspiracy to defraud the American voter, the stealing of classified documents, the r@pe, the hiding of his prostitute visits with campaign money, the corruption with Elon Musk and letting Elon Musk meddle your Congress approved government funding, Trump never stopped breaking the law. Below is a list. It's Anti-American to support a president and his administration breaking the law that clearly and consistently. You utter disrespect for law and order is sickening, and the hypocrisy makes it even worse.

Then there is the clear move to fascism. Liberals and lefties already warned about Project 25 being authoritarian, but Trump denied any association with it, because it had 5% support of the American voters. It was clear he was lying, but your side kept lying with him. Now, Project 25 is over 60% implemented and they are working hard for 100%. Besides that, Trump has been demonstrating every characteristic of an authoritarian. That's everything The Constitution was designed to prevent, by your founding fathers

If you even address these point at all, you will just deny, deflect, or make excuses.

In any case, it's bullshit to say that I have no idea what I'm talking about, because all these point are verified by at least 50% of Americans. Only MAGA is denying them, without good reason, and that side is getting smaller by the day. The majority of Americans want him gone. I'm with them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Violation of Constitutional Duties (subject of House impeachments / official findings):
• Abuse of Power / Soliciting Foreign Interference (Ukraine phone call) — House impeachment (Article: abuse of power); allegation that the president solicited a foreign government to interfere in a U.S. election to benefit his campaign. (Impeachment / House finding; not convicted by Senate)
• Obstruction of Congress / Defiance of Congressional Subpoenas (Ukraine inquiry and other congressional investigations) — House cited obstruction-of-Congress behavior for withholding documents and directing executive branch noncooperation with subpoenas. (Impeachment / House finding; not criminally convicted for that act)
• Incitement of Insurrection / Failure to Faithfully Execute Office (Jan. 6 events) — House of Representatives impeached the president for “incitement of insurrection” tied to January 6, 2021 and related efforts to block certification of the 2020 election; the allegation is that the president’s words and conduct foreseeably encouraged violent attempts to obstruct the constitutional process. (Impeachment / House finding; Senate acquitted)
• Undermining the Rule of Law via Interference with DOJ and Special Counsels — Credible allegations that the president repeatedly attempted to influence, pressure, or replace Department of Justice officials or special counsels to affect investigations (examples include public and private pressure on DOJ/AG officials and statements about firing prosecutors/special counsels). (Allegation; documented by contemporaneous reporting, testimony, and filings)
• Violation(s) of the Emoluments Clauses (foreign and domestic) — Multiple lawsuits and legal complaints alleged that accepting benefits from foreign and domestic entities (hotels, foreign state visits, payments) violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses by receiving gifts/benefits from foreign states and domestic entities while in office. (Civil lawsuits filed; courts addressed standing and other issues; allegations considered credible in legal analysis though results varied)
• Failure to “Take Care” / Abuse of Office via Conditioning Federal Benefits/Resources for Political Aims — Allegations that certain actions (e.g., withholding funds, leveraging federal resources, or conditioning official acts) were at odds with the constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws and office; raised in congressional investigations and legal/policy analyses. (Allegation; documented in testimony and records)

Law violations proven in court (criminal convictions, civil findings & judgments, jury verdicts or plea agreements):
• Donald J. Trump — Criminal conviction (New York County): 34 counts of first-degree falsifying business records (hush-money / Stormy Daniels scheme) — Jury verdict finding guilty on 34 counts (May 30, 2024). (Criminal conviction — jury)
• The Trump Organization (corporate entities) — Criminal conviction (New York) — Convicted of multiple corporate crimes including tax-related offenses; company fined and corporate liability entered following trial (December 2022). (Corporate criminal conviction — jury/verdict)
• Allen Weisselberg (Trump Organization CFO) — Guilty plea / conviction (New York) — Pled guilty to multiple counts of tax fraud and related offenses (plea August 2022); cooperated/testified. (Guilty plea / conviction)
• Stephen K. Bannon — Criminal conviction (contempt of Congress) — Convicted for criminal contempt for defying a House Jan. 6 committee subpoena; sentenced to jail (conviction July 2022; sentence imposed; sentence later served). (Criminal conviction — jury/verdict/sentence)

Civil judgments & jury findings (monetary awards, findings of liability):
• E. Jean Carroll — civil jury findings & damages against Donald J. Trump (defamation / sexual-abuse findings) — Jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in related civil suits; juries awarded multi-million dollar damages (multiple trials; combined awards and judicial findings). (Civil jury findings — damages awarded)
• New York State (Letitia James) — civil fraud judgment against Donald J. Trump, Trump Organization, and related defendants — State court judge found defendants liable for business fraud and ordered disgorgement/monetary penalties and corporate remedies (Feb 2024 decision and subsequent judgment orders). (Civil judgment — state court; judgment and remedies ordered though appeals followed)

Law violations under active investigation or subject to unresolved indictments/charges (open or paused prosecutions, indictments not yet resulting in final conviction):
• Federal Special Counsel (classified documents / Mar-a-Lago) — Indictment and criminal charges filed by special counsel alleging unlawful retention of classified documents, obstruction and related counts; case saw motions, appeals, and at certain points was paused or motions to dismiss were litigated; status shifted with post-election prosecutorial decisions. (Federal indictment / special counsel investigation — ongoing or paused/appealed depending on docket developments)
• Federal Special Counsel (Jan. 6 / election-related federal case) — Indictment(s) alleging obstruction of a joint session of Congress, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and related counts tied to the January 6 events and efforts to overturn the 2020 election; charges were brought by the Special Counsel; litigation and challenges to prosecutorial authority and immunity were part of the record. (Federal indictment / investigation — active or in litigation)
• Fulton County, Georgia (state RICO / election interference indictment) — State indictment in Fulton County alleging racketeering and related offenses connected to efforts to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election results; procedural litigation included challenges to the prosecutor’s participation (disqualification motions), pauses, and appeals; some co-defendants pleaded guilty while main defendants (including Trump) had filings/pleas of not guilty pending reassignment of prosecution in some phases. (State indictment / investigation — active but subject to procedural rulings and reassignment)
• Other state and local investigations by attorneys general, US Attorneys, and civil litigants — Various inquiries and civil enforcement actions (e.g., financial-disclosure and business practice probes, investigations into campaign finances, and separate state/county investigations) remained open or in litigation in multiple jurisdictions. (Multiple active investigations / civil enforcement matters)

Documented and credible law violations (well-documented allegations, sworn testimony, admissions, or factual findings that are credible but not necessarily criminal convictions):
• Payments and reimbursements connected to the Stormy Daniels matter and related bookkeeping entries — Documented in trial evidence and testimony (Michael Cohen testimony, bank and accounting records); resulted in criminal charges and the New York conviction noted above. (Documented; led to criminal conviction in New York)
• Repeated misstatements of asset values on financial statements used to obtain loans/insurance — Alleged in State AG civil case and found in part by a state court judge as fraudulent business practices (Letitia James civil case). (Documented & judicial finding in civil context)
• Extensive documented contacts, communications, and alleged coordination with state election officials, operatives, and lawyers regarding post-2020 election strategies — Supported by contemporaneous records, call logs, emails, and testimony (used in investigations and indictments). (Documented in filings and investigative records; relevant to racketeering/election-related probes)
• Public and private statements and communications that contradict sworn testimony or contemporaneous records (e.g., disputes over what was said or done in particular meetings/phone calls) — Documented in testimony and contemporaneous notes (e.g., White House and national security staff notes, transcripts of calls) and used as factual support in congressional inquiries. (Documented; used as evidence in impeachment and investigatory processes)
• Serial use of executive or administrative actions that legal analysts concluded posed real legal or ethical violations (conflicts of interest; use of official acts to benefit private businesses; mixing official travel/events with personal business) — Documented in reporting, ethics complaints, and legal analyses; several civil suits and complaints raised these issues. (Documented & credible; varied legal outcomes in courts)

I guess you don't understand soft diplomacy. It was benefiting your country.
China does, so they are making lots of deals with other countries to get deals
on their natural resources. Now you have to buy them from China, if they feel
the desire to sell them to you. Do you think that's smart strategy?

The funny thing is that you think you are providing reasons for your ideas on trans people in the military. You're not, it's just a gut feeling that they are icky. You had some point with trans-women in female sports. How does this idea, of an unfair advantage, apply to trans people fighting for your country?
I would just tell trans people to not fight for your country. A country that actively persecutes you doesn't deserve your duty. Join the protests instead.

1) How are you going to pay for it then? That's Trump trying to destroy it, by calling it insolvent. This is not good, dumb-ass. If you want to privatize social security that's your mistake, but people who paid into it are entitled to it.

2) Good for you. Now you will have people looking like butch guys into the women's bathroom and people looking like women in the men's bathroom. Why do you want this?

3) That never happened anyway.

4) Yes you will, it will just happen in shady rooms, where the woman might die as well.

5) No you stupid ass, most prices of goods are up, by a lot.

6) Israel is just waiting until they can start the genocide again. I see no willingness from them to stop. Ukraine is still going on. He has achieved nothing in relation to Iran. he is escalating against Yemen, he is talking about going back to Afghanistan, he is killing citizens of several South-American countries in open waters, without permission of their governments (imagine Cuba blowing up a boat full of Americans), he is allowing Israel to attack Lebanon and Syria.

7) He did promise to deport illegal immigrants, which is a legitimate cause. He is however breaking the law in many ways, ignoring judges, disappearing many documented immigrants and sicking a violent military force on American citizens, who get beaten up or have their property destroyed without good cause. They are doing raids of whole city blocks, violently arresting everyone, including citizens and zip-cuffing naked children. They are arresting people who's only crime is being non-white. But, your not safe if you're white either. They arrest white foreigners visiting the country for political reasons. They recently detained a white cop for allegedly being illegal. To everyone except MAGA, it was clear Trump would do that, and no one except MAGA is thinking it's acceptable.

Women have known for ever that they can use sexual attraction to their advantage.
But why would they let there employer use their sexual attraction for their employer's advantage? Is it mutually beneficial enough for them to agree to that? Is it beneficial to women in general, for them to want employers to benefit from benefiting from their sexual attraction?

Men are at a disadvantage here. There are way less jobs for men to use their sexual attraction to their advantage. I would expect you to not like that.

Personally, I see it as a freedom of expression. However, that freedom of expression should be actually free. If there are only a few places like Hooters, with specific branding, that provides enough freedom for women to chose, but I am against allowing this dress code for all restaurants, or for women's sports. It should not be exploited and it should not limit women in doing what they want to do, if they don't want to market their sexual attraction, or have it exploited, simultaneously.

I'm not against prostitution or porn either, as long as women are free to chose
and they are not exploited.

I'm not sure if Hooters, prostitution or porn are contributing to 'reproduction and distribution of humans', because it could also just encourage solitary relief, but I'm indifferent to that effect, because I think that there are already more than enough humans on this planet. It's possible that the population of humanity has exceeded
the long-term carrying capacity of its environment. It's resulting in the collapse of the environment's life-support systems, followed by a population crash. To microbio-
logists this is known as the death-phase.

I'll give you a chance to argue against anything I said here, but let's not make it too political. I think it's still just bordering on sociology.

Thanks, I think you will find it interesting.

"How One Tiny Country Rivals American Farming"
only registered users can see external links

Of course, I am a little proud when I watch this video,
but I'm happy it isn't just a puff piece, and it is discussing problems too.

There is one issue they are NOT raising. It's the cost versus the benefit.
Watch the video and pick up on how much this is costing my country.

This is what they say about the value of the goods it creates: $140 Billion.
Now compare that with our GDP of that same year: $1,228 Billion.
Then decide if it's good economics to keep doing this, at this scale.

Explain the educational part then. Is it advancing knowledge on biology, economy, sociology?

You understand me, you're just trying to be cute.

All the people that Trump is calling anti-American have birth certificates
saying they are US citizens too.

There IS no evidence, just your regime saying shit.
If you blow up boats and all the people, into very tiny pieces,
you're also destroying the evidence. I think that's deliberate.

It also doesn't matter. Your party called itself the party of law and order.
This is breaking the law, whether you like it or not.
If you want the law to be there when you need it, defend it.

The "libtard regime" isn't breaking the law 24/7,
nor are they pissing on The Constitution.

The Biden administration was democratically elected,
and acted democratically the whole term of Biden.
They pulled your country out of the Covid crisis.
Trump was elected due to him lying 24/7 and cheating.
There is also good evidence that they rigged election machines to help him win. He should have already been sent to prison for his attempt to steal the election, but this is another crime that he should be investigated for. Then he needs to go to prison, with all his conspirators.

You cannot name anything real that would make the Biden a failure.
If you say 'inflation', thinking that's an argument, Trump is WORSE.
Also, Biden didn't cause that high inflation, Trump IS causing it now.
Trump made the dollar drop 10% in nine months. That's the fastest drop since George W. Bush's first administration (2001-2005), where the dollar fell by over 40% relative to the euro from its peak in October 2000.
Republicans are fuck-ups, all of them, and Trump is the worst.

Your last paragraph is utterly irrelevant, idiot. It doesn't make a difference for Trump being an utter fool and criminal.

Exactly! Why am I always telling you about fallacies?
--------------------------------------- added after 3 hours
I'm not allowing that political discussion here. This topic is about science and education, not about politics.

Oh sure, the least violent protests ever are a problem,
but Trump sending the national guard to American cities is not.
He's saying it's an 'emergency' and you are saying everything is fine.
That's you telling me clearly that you know Trump is lying.

They are holding "no kings" protests, because Trump is giving himself more power than any president and king since the 1700's ever had in the US.
It's the exact thing that the founding fathers tried to prevent.
They intended for the Legislative branch (Congress) to make laws, the Executive branch (President) to enforce laws and the Judicial branch (Courts)
to interpret laws. Trump wants to nullify them all and BE the law.

“He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”
“A lot of people are saying maybe we’d like a dictator.”

Are you one of those people, who is saying "maybe we’d like a dictator"?

Sure, you don't have a government job.
Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
This is applicable to a whole lot of things you deny the existence of.

I was talking about this: "no you got that wrong. there were no rights
until someone brain washed people into thinking they had some".
You are calling your founding fathers "someone brain washed people".

You want to reject the one most important idea that makes us human,
the ability to make moral choices. The invention of human rights is one
of the most important moral choices that humanity ever made.
It's a moral choice that Christianity never accomplished.
Still, all religions propose an idea of "Universal Human Dignity".
It looks to me that you even reject that.

When did Trump say anything like that your life is worth a lot?
I'm not asking about your value to the economy or to him,
but just your value as a sentient being with hopes and dreams,
and him recognizing that every human being has that value.

I know he values your loyalty, but stand up to his demand for loyalty once
and you are worth less than a cockroach to him. Tell me I'm wrong.

I don't know, but that doesn't impede me to argue about it.

I agree, but this influencer is telling people that they are not.
It was a treasure trove of logical reasoning errors.

I only like carrots raw in farmer salade. It's what we call bread salade with thin strips
of white cabbage, carrot and celery.

Funny how you're a complete individualist and proponent of personal responsibility on almost every issue, except on the issue of consuming some chemicals or biological agent to experience some temporary buzz, with the risk of getting addicted. Why isn't this people's own responsibility? It cannot be the harm to society, because you support lots of other issues that are dependent on people's personal responsibility for it to not harming society.

Fire ants are a part of nature. They were here before humanity, and they serve an important role in the balance of nature. Find a way to co-exist with them.

Which ideas of authoritarianism do you not agree with?
I see Trump agreeing with all of them. Below is a complete list of characteristics of authoritarianism. They all fit Trump like a glove, and I've never seen you disagree with Trump on anything. You only argue against them with whataboutisms, but never by disagreeing with Trump when he clearly represents them or moves towards them.

Since when do I dodge agreeing with socialism? I AM a socialist.
What I do not agree with is your ignorant straw-man of socialism.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complete and commonly accepted set of authoritarian traits:
- Concentration of executive power (weak checks and balances).
- Erosion of the rule of law (selective enforcement, immunity for loyalists).
- Weak or manipulated elections (e.g., delegitimizing results, changing rules).
- Suppression or delegitimization of opposition (political parties, movements, critics).
- Restriction of civil liberties (press, speech, association).
- Delegitimization or erosion of independent institutions (courts, civil service).
- Use of state power to entrench incumbency (patronage, coercion, legal manipulation).
- Dehumanization of opponents / nationalist or exclusionary rhetoric.
- Glorification of “strong leaders” / personalist rule.
- Exceptionalism or “higher cause” justification (e.g. “If it saves the nation, anything is allowed”).
- Militarization or paramilitary tolerance (use or endorsement of violence to achieve political goals).
- Attacks on electoral legitimacy / peaceful transition of power.
- Control or co-optation of the bureaucracy, judiciary, and media.
- Undermining of factual truth and creation of a controlled narrative.

Look at what phart posted and how he thinks of The Constitution.
These are the people who always shouted about The Constitution the loudest.
Now they happily vote for people who tell them that their life is worth nothing.
Can you explain their thinking to me? You live among these numbskulls.

You are supporting it!

Your previous administration defended and protected your Constitution.
You are supporting treason.

Damn fool, it's impossible for me to be a traitor to America,
because I'm not an American.

I defend my own Constitution, you shit on yours.

Your American values are LIBERAL values, defined by your founding fathers.
You have them rolling over in their graves at 10,000 RPM.

I want you to vote for someone who is NOT trying their best to destroy humanity.
That's MY business too, I'm part of that humanity.

Do you understand how much people sacrificed, to give you that vote?
Poor, exploited people, all over the world, suffered and died for that right.
Then they finally found some wise people, who put their right into law and created a system to protect their right; The Constitution, and a government that was designed in a way to to protect and defend it. You, as a voter, have the responsibility towards those people, to use your vote well, and to consider its effects, on ALL the people.

When you have a choice between Biden and Trump, you vote for the lesser EVIL.
You vote for the one who respects your vote, to vote again, for better options.
Biden was in no way a threat to democracy, Trump IS, and his supporters LIKE it.
Biden didn't do enough to save humanity, but Trump is speeding up the destruction.

Yes, it's your choice, but I'm angry that you don't understand that you have a RESPONSIBILITY to at least fucking INFORM YOURSELF.
My vote doesn't affect you. If my country goes NAZI, one big nuke cures that.
If your country goes NAZI, we are ALL FUCKED!!!

Hey, Cody8789, do you have an answer?
Do you think that it's OK to say what you said, and then just bugger off?
I have come to expect more from you. Was I wrong?

Breakdown of the ~$96.7 billion total (2022):

Payroll taxes (for social insurance programs)
Social Security taxes: $25.7 B
Medicare taxes: $6.4 B
Unemployment insurance taxes: $1.8 B

Federal income taxes (i.e. payable to IRS but not payroll) — included in the federal component of the ~$59.4B. The detailed number in that report is ~$19.5 B for federal income taxes.

State & Local Taxes (from the ~$37.3B) broken down:
Sales & excise taxes: $15.1 B
Property taxes: $10.4 B
Personal & business income taxes: $7.0 B
Other state‐local taxes: $0.5 B
Additionally, $4.2B paid to other states by purchases / cross-state effects etc.

Phart, can you do any research, instead of just saying shit?
Are you afraid that you might LEARN something?

Peter Thiel is fucking crazy.
Your VP is his loyal lapdog. He shares his 'vision'.
Do you want this guy to control your politics?
only registered users can see external links

Guys like him have a 'vision' for YOU. And they are achieving it.
Watch this interview, completely. It's your DUTY to your country.

Can't spend 1 hr of your life to inform yourself about who you are putting in power,
then start with these short clips.

He can't answer if he wants the human race to endure:
only registered users can see external links

Talking about the antichrist:
only registered users can see external links
(see the whole video for his ideas on this)

You guys hate transgenders and transvestites.
Peter Thiel thinks that's nothing ("pathetically little").
starting 35s in: only registered users can see external links

Guys like you don't want ANY modernist changes, but you are supporting THIS guy,
who wants to completely collapse the US and the world, so HE and his tech-bros
can take power. He is funding the tools of total technological control, so he can submit
the people to HIS future, where he is one of the immortal gods who control YOU.

Are you dropping everything you ever said, so you can support this fucking crazy guy, because he is a billionaire who's funding your favorite politicians?

Eh, that's r@pe, you know. If you were also under@ge, that's a horrible crime.
Maybe it was exciting in the end, but I'm sure it could have been just as exciting,
but less terrifying, if they had just seduced you (assuming you were of age).

But, the US is doing "fine".

And I DON'T, because they have proven themselves to be fucking liars.

It's a problem when you like authoritarian regimes for their authoritarianism.
There is no need for authoritarianism to keep drugs under control.
Healthy and happy people usually don't get addicted to drugs.
That the US has such a drugs problem is because life in the US SUCKS,
for most people. Your solution is making life in the US suck WORSE.

"It is not happening in the bedroom. It's happening in a store."

Maybe it's not the condoms they are embarrassed about, but the size.
When I used them, I needed XL condoms. Not for the length, but for the circumference. Of course, they don't know that, if you buy them. People think
you have a 8.5 inches schlong, while almost half isn't getting rolled out.

It didn't achieve ANY of the goals they had for Brexit.
It did create all the problems that everyone predicted.
I agree, independence is a good thing, so is COOPERATION.
The UK had a big voice in the EU. Now they are getting screwed.
That has created economic problems, resulting in poverty and crime.

My Socialist Party is a not in favor of leaving the EU, they are often classified as
'Soft Eurosceptic' or critical rather than outright oppositionist. That is, they see the EU
as having positive potential, but believe that its structure, powers, budget, and priorities need significant reform to ensure it serves people rather than big business.

Do you think they didn't think of that?
No, they FAFOed, and created organized crime, with the Prohibition.
People were just as drunk as before, but it created more problems.

You have tried it your way for DECADES. It didn't work.

It can only work, if the repression is worse than the actual problem.
Everywhere they tried it my way, it works. Less suffering, on all fronts.
And especially; more freedom. I like freedom. I don't think you do.
I wouldn't like to be frisked 10 times a day by militarized cops.
I like my streets to be clear of criminals AND COPS.

It sounds like fun, until it actually is done to you, by people who hate you.
It's only fun and games, if it's done for fun and games.
I'm sure that you can find some people who are willing to provide it,
with a happy end, instead of a painful and permanent end.

[The study, led by Wright State University analyzed data from 246 deceased drivers in Montgomery County, Ohio, between January 2019 and September 2024. It found that 41.9% had active THC in their blood, with average concentrations of 30.7 ng/mL, well above the legal driving limits in many states.

These elevated THC levels suggest recent use, as THC can impair driving by slowing reaction times, impairing coordination, and affecting judgment. The study's findings remained consistent even after Ohio legalized recreational cannabis in 2023, highlighting that legalization did not reduce the prevalence of THC in fatal crashes.

However, it's important to note that the presence of THC in a driver's system doesn't necessarily prove impairment at the time of the crash. Unlike alcohol, which has a clear legal threshold for impairment, THC's effects can vary based on individual tolerance, timing of use, and other factors. Additionally, the study did not account for other substances that may have been present, such as alcohol, prescription medications,
or other drugs, which could also contribute to impairment.]

I agree, drugs and pot are not good for your health, and they can of course be dangerous when driving under the influence. So does alcohol. Alcohol remains a leading cause of traffic-related fatalities in the United States, surpassing both illegal and legal drugs, including cannabis. However, they will never outlaw alcohol again, because they found out the hard way, that it will cause MORE problems than it will solve.
Why don't you take that knowledge and apply it to drugs and pot?

You want your right to own guns, no matter how many people it kills.
Other people want the right to use pot or the occasional line of coke.
That's called liberty. You regulate it, to reduce harm.

Legalize, tax and regulate, combined with improvement of (mental) healthcare.
That's the recipe to reduce those traffic deaths, ODs AND drugs related crime.
The fact that you don't support it, shows that YOU don't care about people's lives.

ChatGPT: "Senator Warren's assertion is correct in stating that undocumented immigrants are not entitled to Medicaid or Medicare benefits. However, it's important to note that while they are generally ineligible for these programs, they may receive emergency medical services under Medicaid if they meet other eligibility criteria."

Like I said many times: lots of undocumented immigrants are paying taxes.
If they pay into a system, they should be 'entitled' to use the system.

1) Stocks do not represent the economy, unless YOU want it to.
2) Cutting taxes for the wealthy is good for stocks, not for the working class.
3) The dollar has lost 9%–11% of its external value so far this year.
EUR/USD was 1.02 in January. It climbed to 1.18 in September.
That combined with inflation makes it 41,742.5. The real value is actually declining.
If your dollar drops 50%, you might see a Dow of 80,000. The number is useless.

Still, I just made over $1750 selling my AMD stock. I had it for avg. 1 year.
It's the last American stock that I had. Many experts expect a crash.
I'm buying Chinese stocks now (BYD and XPeng). Also looking at TSMC.

It's not strange to think that Trump is causing crashes intentionally,
so he gets lots of money from his friends making big bucks from trading.
Every time he causes a crash, he relaxes some tariffs afterwards
or he delays them some more. Then the stocks go up again.
If the stock goes down far enough, I will buy Amazon and AMD again.
I don't get the intel, but I can anticipate their moves. It's not 4D chess.
Cheating is a game for losers, but that has been Trump's strategy all along.

Trump is really hurting your economy with this trick, but that's all part of his strategy. He's destroying the government and giving control to the billionaires, with him pulling the strings (that's what he thinks, but they will eliminate him at any point when he oversteps his usefulness. He gets a heart attack and JD Vance takes over. He's a loyal dog for Peter Thiel, who wants his tech feudalism. It's very funny how the South is now serving the carpetbaggers.). In any case, they win, you lose.

The UK isn't part of Europe anymore.

If this is an issue in your working environment, find another employer:
only registered users can see external links

It has become impossible to distinguish reality from parody.

The reason IS CHAOS. Why? Because people prefer tyranny only over chaos.
That's their end goal: TYRANNY. I guess you like that.

I can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time.
I'm speaking out against fascism everywhere.

No, the US is doing far from fine.

I believe that. Liberals and lefties have some catching up to do.
If I was living in your country, I would be stocking up too.
Mass shootings are not the highest priority, if fascists are gearing up.

"The insurrectionist" Trump? Yes, I'm keeping a close eye on him.
He's doing everything that I predicted he would do.

I take the word of almost every other world leader, over the word of Trump.

Ever heard of helicopters? They could shoot out the outboard engines.
If they can blow up the boat with a missile, they can disable it or force it to stop.

If they trow out the dope, it would be ON VIDEO. We have SEEN it blow up.

Instead they blow up the evidence and expect everyone to trust them.
Fuck that, your lying regime has ZERO CREDIBILITY LEFT.
The US might be worse liars than Russia now.

Present the evidence. Is it anything like Bush had on the WMDs?

I don't do cock-shaming, I do brain shaming. His brain is pathetic.
I wouldn't mind sucking that dick, if it was part of a moral person.

You are not real Americans. People who STILL support Trump are TRAITORS.

How many times have you pledged allegiance "to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."?

You guys don't give a shit about liberty and justice for all.
You are fucking TRAITORS to America.

If you start about the "under God" part, adding that in 1954 was treason too,
to the First Amendment.

When people kill people with guns, you say
"Guns don't kill people, people kill people."

So why is there no responsibility for people to not do drugs?
"Drugs don't kill people, people who take too much of them kill themselves."

I don't support drug dealers, I want to take them out of business.
Legalize, tax and regulate some of them, ban the most dangerous drugs.
I support those policies, BECAUSE THEY WORK. Your policies DON'T.

"Wait for the evidence to surface idiot."
Are they diving for the evidence?

If a government kills people, they need to show on what evidence they did that.
They don't need an investigation, they should show the investigation that resulted
in their action.

By the way, even if they find 100 tons of cocaine, it's STILL no justification to kill them
in international waters. You're the one who should know better. It's your own law, idiot. Better protect it, or your legal protections will be violated at some point.
Correction, your legal protections are already violated. Trump is ignoring your elected representatives in Congress every single day.

"How they know will not be disclosed to a socialist like you."
They better will, because they are bringing lots of people to my camp, this way.
Trump's approval ratings are atrocious. He's the least popular president ever.
He knows he has no chance to win the midterms, so he is already working on ways
to steal the election, or not have elections at all. He's a traitor.
Everyone who supports Trump is a traitor too.

Do you want laws to protect you, when your side loses,
or will you accept what the other side thinks you deserve?

Did they present that evidence for all of these attacks?
In any case, even if they actually have drugs in the boat, as long as they
don't enter American waters, they are not yours to act against.
Also, smuggling drugs is not a capital offense.

The Trump regime is breaking many laws, plain and simple.

There are already stories from grieving widows calling it bullshit.

It's murder, plain and simple. One of the 273 reasons to impeach him.
There is just no use, because 0 Republicans will ever vote to impeach.

Every KKK member either voted for Trump or they didn't vote at all.

You are telling on yourself; if you think that the KKK would be damn hypocrites, if they voted for Obama and Kamala Harris, that's you saying that they should vote for Trump, because their ideas match with Trump's ideas. You are destroying your own point.