Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Why are most Americans circumsised? It is a shame and there is no need!

This is an Adult Discussion Forum of Show It Off Site
If you wish to participate you should register on that site and write there

Started by #202700 at 10,Nov,11 18:04
So why get circumsised? What is the point? (no pun intended) unless it is medically appropriate it is against basic human rights, and should be outlawed!!!



Similar topics: 1.Complimenting women is becoming pointless   2.Native Americans??   3.New on Netflix: American Circumcision   4.Americans v English   5.Democrats refuse to vote on relief money unless $35 million goes to Kennedy center  

New Comment

Comments:
By #94227 at 18,Jan,12 07:13
Plain and simple. It's raise to maintain with concerns to personal hygeine. Plus it is a part of the Jewish religion.


By #149428 at 18,Dec,11 01:27
because...uncut dicks are disgusting looking, while cut dicks are nicer looking
By #105042 at 17,Jan,12 22:43
Donґt know what pills you are taking, but please take less of it.
By #225414 at 17,Jan,12 23:13




By #205743 at 10,Nov,11 18:47
If there was no need for it, then it would not be happening.

It looks better, is cleaner, helps prevent the spread of disease and viruses such as aids, hiv, urinary tract infections, penile cancer etc...ALL PROVEN and supported by the medical community.

But mainly it just looks better and is more attractive and desireable to see.

So many uncircumcised guys are upset that they are not circumcised. It frusterates them so much that all they know how to do in return is attack it and be against it. When in reality all they want is to be circumcised.

You can't justify being uncircumcised in a predominantly circumcised society.....It's as simple as that. You will never fit in so to speak and that is just how it is. Nothing you say or do will ever change the fact that the majority of boys and men in our society are Circumcised and that it is HEAVILY favorable by both males and females alike.
By #6568 at 10,Nov,11 18:57
Actually no, there is NO "PROVEN" evidence for any of those things,...as I suspect you know already.


If you wish to be circumcised then that is your privalege and pleasure, but DO NOT add to this barbaric procedure which is too often perfromed for ignorance, but sometimes greed and worse, on tiny infants who cannot defend themselves,...it is a grotesque abuse of their human rights perpetrated by those who should be defending them.


Finally, to take you first joke,..er, I mean statement, the "need" for removing most of the tactile nerve ends and pleasure receptors from a tiny baby's penis is because a vicious and deformed society hates the idea that he may grow up to enjoy the sensual pleasure and become a tactile lover of his partner,...rather than be inured with the brutality that is so evident among the mutilated masses.


....When YOU were mutilated why did they not remove your ears too?.....that would have been cleaner and more hygenic for you and you would not have been able to listen to any whispers about anything sexual.
By #105042 at 10,Nov,11 21:51
I am with you though just optically I have absolutely no problem with cut dicks, some look good and some uncuts do not.

Itґs not a question of what looks better or not. And health? To James Bond: First: AIDS is a consequence of infection with HIV and HIV is mostly transmitted by semen and the virus doesnґt care if it swims in the semen of a cut or uncut cock. Sorry but thinking like this is bullshit. Being cut DOESNґT minimize the risk of any infection!

The main thing for me is - beside of such stupid and also dangerous arguments - that I donґt understand how any parents can take the responsability of letting cut their babys, seeming to have more confidence in any quack doctor than in nature itself??

I admit I have a european understanding of human rights also. The freedom to choose how we want to be or think or look like and also live. Why not taking out the blind gut of any new born, it COULD cause trouble.

Please notice: Iґm NOT against cut men, I am just against the reasons it was done. Hmm, well WHAT reason? I donґt see any than just wanting to socialise and being part of some majority WITHOUT any other reason.
By #205743 at 14,Nov,11 18:49
@ Paul D

Your are in heavy DENIAL over the medical proof that being circucmised indeed reduces the risks of contracting HIV and other STD's as well as urinary tract infections etc...

This has been Medicaly studied, proven, and documented. Not in America, but in Africa. Where the study took place does not discredit the validity of the study in any way.

The only difference between here and over there is that the medical community actually decided to do studies on it where as our part of the world has not.

So you can ignore the proof that theses studies have delivered and be in denial over it if you want, but it ain't gonna help you by doing so.

The inner lining of the foreskin is what makes uncircumcised males so much more receptive to contracting viruses and bacteria as it contains special cells that absorb these viruses and bacteria into the blood stream.

By removing the foreskin, these special cells are also removed instantly reducing the risk of contraction of these diseases.

In an uncircumcised male,the forskin traps and allows semen,blood,vaginal fluids, feces etc. Until the male fully cleans under it. The time between the sexual act and the cleaning can be quite long. This is is what causes the increase of disease to the uncircumcised male.
By #105042 at 16,Nov,11 22:17
Okay, anyone knowing me by comments knows that I rarely want to be rude.


But mate, you are so fucking wrong. Donґt believe in any study you have not ordered yourself! You discredited yourself by naming an african research. Sorry for all africans, I donґt mean it this way, but any poor people will tell you whatever you like for small money.

My goodness. If you think being cut will prevent you from getting ANY sexual transmitted diseases - go on and enjoy your life!

If stupity was a gift it would be Christmas every day.
By #205743 at 17,Nov,11 16:20
Watched an whole Television Documentry on it.Interviews with doctors,nurses, lawyers,politicians etc...

The study is real and it is accurate.

The inner lining of the foreskin is what makes uncircumcised males so much more receptive to contracting viruses and bacteria as it contains special cells that absorb these viruses and bacteria into the blood stream.

This is a MEDICAL FACT.
By #222660 at 06,Jan,12 03:42
Based upon that foolish and ignorant argumet we'd be sewing up intfant vaginas by the million and stitching our ****'s mouths shut. Both have hundreds more "special cells that absorb these viruses into the bloodstream".

But no ... we teach our **** about personal and oral hygiene. Male penile hygiene is just as important, but clearly some dopey parents think it's simpler to chop it off than teach a boy how to clean it.

Those cells of which you speak (Lymphatic vessles for the educated) are actually the a vital part of the very defence mechanism that kills invading germs. UTIs etc are quickly eradicated before they enter the bloodstream on an intact penis. Too bad if that safety net is gone tho ... isn't it?

Don't even get me started on the scaring, growth stunting and loss of sexual stimulation routinely caused by circumcision. No you're right, it is much safer to hide a potential problem - even chop it off - than educate our kids on how to deal with them. Better get bubs teeth removed and glue his ears shut whilst we're at it. D'oh!




By #1501 at 02,Jan,12 12:32
I do no see why it should be done to **** without their consent. There is NO medical evidence to support it.

I guess about 50% look mutilated.


By #183011 at 04,Jan,12 22:18
Do your ears give you infections by having skin over the opening that captures urine and is a bug trap for all sorts of viral nasties?
By #222660 at 16,Jan,12 02:09
Well yes... actually. The inner ear (where infections settle) is quite well protected and is indeed a "trap for all sorts of viral nasties" ... ever swum in a dam or a lake? Ideal place to pick up an ear infection!
And of course you realise that urine is a natural disinfectant ... you would have heard of the "piss on a sting" remedy? Guys with PA piercings, for instance, don't need a disinfectant such as an ear piercing would require as their urine keeps the new piercing clean until such a time as it heals.
We can't get an infection from our own body waste!



By yellowman at 07,Dec,11 13:41 other posts of yellowman 
I do believe that you are wrong regarding the majority being circumcised.
Apart from that, from a personal point of view, whilst there certainly are good-looking circumcised dicks as there are unattractive uncut dicks, overall I would say that an uncut dick is generally far more attractive, much more fun to play with and certainly more sensitive.
It is my view that unless there is a medical reason boys should not be circumcised. It is something they may wish to consider once they are an adult.
By #1501 at 02,Jan,12 12:35
Agreed!


By #222660 at 04,Jan,12 09:59
Hillarious posting "Mr Bond"!
This is the most ill-informed, inaccurate and ... well ignorant response to any forum posting I have ever read.
Its quite sad that an adult male would even begin to believe the utter rubbish you have written here ... let alone spruke it as "fact". I won't even attempt to respond to your comments ... except to say that they are basically all categorically wrong.
I suggest you go do some research ... you will discover that you've been grossly misguided in your rather arrogant opinion on this subject.



By #210252 at 22,Nov,11 02:14
as a young boy in the 60's in America I was the only boy in my school that was uncicumsised . It made me feel a bit strange however nobody ever gave me any grief about it . You know , P.E locker rooms showers and the like . boys can be cruel . back then I wanted to be like the other boys but the older I got the happier I was being uncut . I am just as God made me and I'm good with that . Never had any problems with the ladies in my life and in fact they have all had great fun checking out the forskin . Good hygene is a must but thats true with any part of our bodies . I think too much is being made about this subject . Take care of what you have and be happy . Dont judge
By #99581 at 05,Jan,12 03:45
well said will



By #217327 at 04,Jan,12 12:07
I've never been with a chick and had her say "I wish you weren't circumcised." Sorry but just cosmetically alone it's totally worth it...
By #94263 at 04,Jan,12 15:09
and on the flip side. I've never been with a woman and had her say "I wish you were circumcised". As a cosmetic issue it is something you can never reverse if you don't like it, so you have to be really sure it's what you want.



By #199737 at 04,Jan,12 08:18
I'm not circumsised. Why? i don't know but i love circumsised cocks!
By #6568 at 04,Jan,12 12:00
Well it could be because you live in a country with a civilised enlightened view of personal and sexual liberty, and where giving medical aid to the populace is NOT seen as a way to wealth....Where the newborn infant is seen to need nurture and care rather than fastbuck mutilation,....where doctors scientists and legislators have taken the time to see that parts of the human anatomy serve purpose and function.....



By #198367 at 02,Jan,12 11:43
I agree my fellow Australian, my whole family is circumcised from my great grand fathers, its a topic that its starting to really fuck me off, I am done and so is my 3 year old son. A cock is a cock cut or uncut... cheers my fellow Australian.... I find person that bring this topic up are uncircumcised. I don't understand there problem, and bring the fucking topic up all the time... Really HOW gives a flying fuck if your circumcised or not, a fuck is a fuck as long as you get a fuck and get it in the hole...
By #6568 at 03,Jan,12 22:32
....Well thank you anyway for the highly intelligent input....



By #88520 at 02,Jan,12 12:13
Always fascinates me how hard some of you cut guys seem to think it is to keep an uncut dick clean, don't you guys shower?

Circumsision may have made sense long ago when it was harder to maintain personal hygiene, but today it shouldn't be an issue in developed countries. I can understand if people want to have it done for aestetical reasons though, we all prefer different things.


By #194738 at 26,Nov,11 00:28
The argument that circumcision was used to reduce masturbation is completely wrong. Surveys have revealed that circumcised males masturbate more frequently that uncircumcised ones.
The religious argument that some fictitious God directed men to get circumcised is also false. Man is generally very sensible & he would have observed that those that had little or no natural foreskin had much less or no problems with infection etc., so it's only reasonable to see why it was done. Infection, disease transmission & odour would have been very good reasons for removing the foreskin.
If you really think about most religious rules & traditions you will see that are the result of experience, observation & common sense & certainly not the direction of some non-existent god.
By #6568 at 16,Dec,11 17:15
...Yes, man is "VERY SENSIBLE"!!!!!!!.....just cast a glance around you,...have a good look at planet Earth......


.........So, God is NOT to blame for the routine mutilation of tiny defenceless infants?.....Nice to know HE is after all a loving caring god then.... Perhaps you need to tell this to the religous types as they seem to think it's ONLY for God!

Oh, and could we have a link to the "surveys" that show mutilated men masturbate more please?



By #194738 at 10,Dec,11 23:48
If American health insurance companies prefer circumcision, & they do very extensive research into health problems that cost them money, then the argument that being uncircumcised has less health problems & dangers has really been blown right out of the water.
If health insurance payouts are higher in uncircumcised men then perhaps any sensible guy would be circumcised.
By #6568 at 16,Dec,11 17:10
Strange that this is NOT repeated anywhere else in the world, and that there are NO proven studies or statistics to back it up.....

........Of course, any American insurance 'study' would have been carried out by American doctors and we already know how implicated they are in this horrible and barbaric fraud that is foisted on american manhood.



By #201583 at 10,Dec,11 16:23
In America we are taught to wash our hands after we pee. Think about it, you get up and take a shower. Then you put on clean clothes, and start your day. You touch this and that, pet your dog, contaminating your hands with germs, bacteria, and viruses. Then you walk into the bathroom and pull your clean dick out with dirty hands, and making your dick dirty. Giving bacteria a perfect place to live. Moral to the story, wash your hands before you touch your dick. It's not that hard. Same can apply to the ladies.

So to remove some kids foreskin just because we are naturally unhygienic and lazy, circumcision is welcome and encouraged by medical insurance companies because they won't lose as much money. What k-i-d truly washes his hands anyhow, and to get him to wash his hands twice would be next to impossible.


By #59855 at 17,Nov,11 20:48
From Matt's Wife: Anyone that wants to compare male and female circumcision is an idiot
By #6568 at 18,Nov,11 08:07
.....Well that's YOUR opinion, which I personally respect,...now how about you respect other peoples opinions about male circ......

....And, by the way, there are indeed similarities between the two, the main one being that there is no actual reason to practice it by ANY society without due regard to the rights of the infant/young individual.

By #205743 at 18,Nov,11 17:47
@ Matt's Wife: I totaly agree,

Male circumcision and FGM (which is incorrectly called female circumcision) have nothing in common and are two completely different procedures.

Female circumcision only removes the clitoral hood (female foreskin) while FGM removes a girls clitoris itself.

If the HEAD of a boys penis was removed durring a circumcsion, then yes by all counts that would be barbaric and mutilation, Just as if the clitoris of a female is removed it is also barbaric and mutilation.

However in both female and male, circumcision only removes the foreskin and nothing more.

Think of the clitoris as the female PENIS HEAD. That is what it is.
By #59855 at 18,Nov,11 18:33
From Matt's Wife: Ahhhhhh but that is what people in some places call it and they use it as a way to destroy young women
By #205743 at 18,Nov,11 20:56
@ Matt's wife.

It may be what people in some places call it, but this error is due to lack of Medical Education and does not change the fact that Female Circumcision is not the same thing as FGM.

They are two totaly different things and they have always been two totaly different things, and they will continue to be two totaly different things.

People will Combine the terms "female circumcsion" with Female genital mutilation" because it makes a perfectly normal and healthy procedure (female circumcision) look horrible and nasty. Otherwords it is the use of a LIE in order to manipulate how the procedure is viewed.
By #59855 at 20,Nov,11 06:11
From Matt's Wife:That is the point, they try to combine the two things to make it look like male circumcision is mutilation which it is not
By #6568 at 20,Nov,11 10:03
....Er,..what IS it then?
By #81941 at 20,Nov,11 10:53
A procedure which was developed to prevent masturbation.
By #205743 at 20,Nov,11 16:44
@ Bottomrabbit, Circumcision was not developed to prevent masturbation. It was commanded by God thousands of years ago to be a physical sign of a covenant between himself and the jewish people.
By #6568 at 20,Nov,11 17:07
....So did God happen to impart a reason for this, or how this apparent oversight in his design process occured?





By UKdude22 at 08,Dec,11 19:50 other posts of UKdude22 
I see you've opened another profile to start arguments, are you really that pathetic and needy?






By steve8211 at 08,Dec,11 18:28 other posts of steve8211 
I am cut and wished sometimes I wasn't. I believe it should be your choice if you want to get it done. As long as you wash it everyday,and grant it as young kids we always liked to wash it in the shower,Hell I still do! I just wonder what it would feel like to have all that skin,it looks like it would be fun to play with. This is just my looming. You guys that are not cut should not be ashamed cause you can get cut,but us cut guys can't grow it back like it was.


By #182522 at 10,Nov,11 20:42
I'm very glad my husband is circumsised! I don't like the look of uncircumsised cocks. They are ugly and gross me out! I understand that some women like them and to each their own I just don't. Some men like hairy pussy I also think that's gross, not wrong just not my preference.
By yellowman at 07,Dec,11 13:56 other posts of yellowman 
Oh thank you!! From what I've seen of it your cunt is ugly too and that certainly grosses me out!!



By Ray10754 at 10,Nov,11 19:06 other posts of Ray10754 
I often wounder why this topic keeps coming up amongst sites like this,It is time for all to just get over it and not worrie why or why not someone is cut or not.In my honest oppinion,I have read most of the posts on here and other sites,and I totlay agree with most of them,weather negitive or positive about the subject,everyone is entitled to there oppinion and there own beleifs,but to sit here and squable over it amongst grown adults is beyond my comprehention,Neither side will win the battle,so why dont we all just enjoy the sites and have fun????
By #6568 at 10,Nov,11 19:10
I agree, however, there is the matter of the tiny innocents who have their foreskins torn off against their human rights for no tangible reasons other than ignorance of the parents, greed on the part of doctors and vicious satisfaction of a deformed society.

By #205743 at 18,Nov,11 17:59
It keeps comming up because of the anguish and frustration of UNCIRCUMCISED men who feel the need to constantly challenge those who are circumcised or those who support circumcision in order to make themselves feel happy and justified by keeping their foreskin....which in reality they want removed.

It's an inner battle between should I get circumcised or should I just keep trying to come up with reasons why not to.

Circumcised people....We are happy being circumcised and have no desire to argue or debate the subject UNTIL we are attacked by an person who tells us we have been Mutilated or that our penis does not function properly. So understand.......It is the anti-circs who fuel this debate and not those of us who support circumcision. We circumcised guys were just sitting here minding our own business when a bunch of anti-circ people with their mentaly ill conceived theories decided to attack our circumcised status. When attacked, one defends themselves, that is the natural reaction.
By yellowman at 07,Dec,11 13:49 other posts of yellowman 
So if people disagree with your views and opinions you regard them as being mentally ill???????????????????
It seems to me that on this particular thread you are the one getting awfully wound up about the subject. It makes me wonder if your argument should not perhaps be turned on its head and it is you that are feeling anguish and frustration at having been circumcised. After all, those men who are uncut and long to be cut have no need to feel anguish or frustration - all they need do is make arrangements to be cut - simple. Whereas for the circumcised guys they have a long and tedious process to try to rectify their situation, with varying degrees of success.




By MoeJoe at 01,Dec,11 10:05 other posts of MoeJoe 
This discussion gets old afterwhile...when you are 5 minutes old fresh out of the womb....I don't think anyone is asking you whether you want to be cut or not, so if you got circumcised at birth you can either lament about it for the rest of your life and blame your parents and society, or deal with it and enjoy what you have. Cut cocks or uncut cocks...they're all great.....admire what you have and admire all the others too.
By #6568 at 01,Dec,11 12:00
I absolutely agree with you!......

.......But if people could get over their ignorance and disrespect for other humanbeings then routine mutilation "when you are 5 minutes old and fresh out of the womb" might, thankfully be ended......
By MoeJoe at 07,Dec,11 11:06 other posts of MoeJoe 
Agreed....like racism and bigotry, it's just another form of ignorance.




By #59855 at 14,Nov,11 18:09
From Matt's Wife: The one thing I do like about these threads is it makes it very easy for me to see who I never want to chat with. I find it amazing that these asshats will come on a site like this and call over half of the members mutilated. What a bunch of fucking jerks
By #6568 at 14,Nov,11 18:56
And, for my part I have no wish to "chat" with anyone who advocates the routine sexual mutilation of tiny infants without even the kindness of anaesthetic, and for no proven reason,...... so, it looks like we are 'all done here'.......
By #205743 at 14,Nov,11 22:53
I don't personaly know anyone who advocates routine sexual mutilation on tiny infants.

I do however know people who advocate the beneficial procedure called circumcision on newborn babies.

Ah I get it you are just another tool who lables circumcision as "mutilation" .

You can call it whatever you makes you feel better about yourself old man. But I can tell you one thing that's for sure, the Majority of doctors, nurses, men, women, boys, grils etc. on this planet in no way consider circumcision "mutilation" As a matter of fact it is considered the exact Opposite of mutilation which is commonly known as (beautification).
By #59855 at 15,Nov,11 03:19
From Matt's Wife: Well put bond
By #161491 at 15,Nov,11 04:24
So I suppose you have no problem with the fact that this troll is prancing around on this site telling one uncut guy after another that they are "nasty." That's perfectly OK, right?
By #59855 at 15,Nov,11 16:55
From Matt's Wife: @gaydude, you obviously don't know me very well if you think thats ok with me. Both sides are wrong.
By #161491 at 15,Nov,11 17:23
Perhaps so, but that's not the impression you've given in this thread. You've called an anti-circ extremist an "asshat" while offering your support to a pro-circ extremist who's going around calling all uncut dicks "nasty," not to mention being an ageist bigot ("old man").


I've seen so many threads like this one, and they always go south very quickly. Doesn't take much to figure out why.
By #59855 at 16,Nov,11 04:18
From Matt's Wife: On that I agree and i state that all of the time, hence my first post that I hate these threads. When someone calls a cut man mutilated then they are an asshat. I would love to see one of these cyber bullies look Matt in the eye and tell him he is mutilated and see how well that goes. I disagree that an uncut man is gross, personal preference but other than that, i agree with Bond, I will never mock someone because of their cock
By #6568 at 16,Nov,11 08:11
MW,....I have no wish to "mock" any mans penis whatever it looks like,...and my responses here were 'aimed' at JB, who I suspect was stupic enough to get cut and then realised his mistake and is now desperate to see it as a success.


The Concise Oxford Dict. shows 'mutilation' as 'to deprive and remove' so, routine circumcision clearly IS a 'mutilation' by any civilised standard with over thwo thirds of the most sensitive part of the penis 'removed' and the owner 'deprived' of a large part of his voluptus.


I am well aware that many men here were mutilated against their basic will and human rights and it would be wonderful if this could now stop so that men can make up their won minds once they are ADULTS ....As I have now posted several times; I have no problem with any mans decision to do whatever he wants with his own body.....

.......I see these arguments (on sites such as this) as very important because attitudes need to be changed and the normal condition of having ALL of ones body parts needs defending against the crass stupidity of people like JB.






By #202700 at 16,Nov,11 14:31
Hahahaha yes because they get paid a shit load for doing it
By #59855 at 16,Nov,11 18:41
From Matt's Wife: There is no reason to mock people because of their penis. This thread needs to be closed. I am getting tired of it already. I repeat myself. It is not mutilation and can't be compared to female circumcision. Way different
By #161491 at 16,Nov,11 21:32
It is not "way different" from female circumcision; there are unquestionable similarities. In both instances part of a person's sexual anatomy is removed without his or her consent. Many people consider such an act to be mutilation, whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.


I personally don't see most circumcisions as an act of mutilation, but I try to respect where other people are coming from who passionately feel that it is. Plus I also acknowledge the medical benefits that can come from circumcision. Both sides have very valid points. But ultimately, I believe it should be an adult male's choice to have it done.
By #59855 at 17,Nov,11 20:46
From Matt's Wife: WHAT?????? So you want to compare removal of the clit to foreskin???? You just lost all credibility
By #161491 at 17,Nov,11 23:34
That is not what I said; I said there are similarities in male and female circumcision. But it's pretty clear to me that you are seeing what you want to see and that you are just as nuts as James Bond, so I'm done trying to have any further conversation over this with you.
By #59855 at 18,Nov,11 04:05
From Matt's Wife: You obviously know nothing about female circumcision










By princea at 17,Nov,11 16:49 other posts of princea 
if you have a really nice cock,which not all men have,it really doesnt matter if yr cut or not,but just my opinion!


By #186672 at 16,Nov,11 14:18
All cocks cut uncut look great hear. But some do look fake


By #33070 at 16,Nov,11 03:04
All I can say a cock is a cock It doesn't matter if it's cut or not they can be hot lookin cocks or fugly ones My view is that most uncut look good if the forskin isn't to long. I've seen plenty cut cocks look ugly and hot looking Its all in the jeans So I say don't cut


By #151013 at 14,Nov,11 21:18
I find it difficult when somebody is so pro circumcision and then preaches his new found conversion in a way that every body should now do it and that anyone whom has opposing views is wrong.  As an adult you have the choice to do what you want with your body, you do not have the right to do this to a child.  I choose to pierce mine many times but just because my partner and I think its great I wouldn't do it to a child not tell adults they'll love it too.

There are some medical circumstances where circ. is deamed to necessary, but it is interesting that in the US where the medical industry is private that the pratice is prevalent.  another reason why the detal pratice of tooth whitening is now the accepted norm) Also a country where religion is still widely practiced thus a proportion of the population the Jewish community are routinely done. I also beleive religion should to be praticed until you are 18, tough but not brainwashed.

Circ. as mutilation I'm not sure, if done well it looks fine but there are many cases where the procedure goes wrong and the results can effect a man for life, apart from the pain to the child unless the op is done when a baby where crying babies don't seem to bother parents as they do that anyway?

If kept clean the uncut penis has little to worry most in the western world, in the third world it may and can be used stop the spread of some diseases (if some of the latest theories are correct) but in effect this is to combat a problem where better education over time will have the same effect; circ. at the moment seems to be a quicker option.

In the UK circ. is not common so a circ'd person is the odd one out.

Thats why I choose to start foreskin restoration with the support of my partner, she has no issues either way and I was the first guy she knew who was circ'd.

2.5 years in and I have more to play with and I like the look of the extra skin over my head.

The uncut penis it just the same with the skin retracted so I'm not sure lools are the issue.

When women say they find the natural penis ugly, I'm not so sure they'd feel the same if it was the 'fashion' for men to prefer women with no labia.

Freddy.

One I get my Hard Drive sorrted on my PC I'll post some pics, this postwas from a tablet.

Please excuse any spelling earrors?


By #205743 at 10,Nov,11 21:36
Like I suspect the OP only wanted to start a debate on the topic.

There is nothing wrong with male circumcision, and there is nothing wrong with being circumcised, and there is nothing wrong with parents choosing to have there kids circumcised.

The anti side will always try to create reasons as to why being uncircumcised is better than being circumcised, when in reality there aren't any.

I myself was circumcised as an adult, so I personaly know that there is no negative aspect to being circumcised. I know what it is like to be uncircumcised, and I know what it is like to be circumcised. Because of this I have first hand knowledge that 99% of all the theories they develop about being circumcised and how horrible it must be are just that....nothing more than fantastical theories created in order to create a sense of self justification for remaining uncircumcised, when there true desire is to actually be circumcied.

When I got circumcised I did NOT loose anything useful or anything pleasurable. My penis works sexualy just as well after being circumcised as it did before I was circumcised.

Not one single negative theory that the anti-circ side has ever stated about being circumcised has EVER happened to me as a result of getting circumcised.NOT A SINGLE ONE.

It's all made up folks, and I actually know because I have been both ways.
By #199710 at 10,Nov,11 21:45
I am uncircumcised and I don't feel the need to remove my foreskin. I think everyone should decide by themselves if they want to be circumcised or not. I am glad you also had that chance and that you are happy with the result. I wouldn't do it, I love my dick just the way it is and I am not the only one . I have nothing against people being circumcised but I would like for everyone to decide that by themselves as adults just like you.

By #202700 at 12,Nov,11 15:26
So has everyone who has not been circumcised! Simply pull your skin back!!! And ofcourse you lost something pleasurable! The fore skin is a very sensitive erogenous zone!!! Its more hygenic? Is that the best you can do? Do you not bath? It looks better? What? I have not heard one good arguement to get it cut off yet!
By #208355 at 13,Nov,11 18:59
I like how you are telling a man you have never met what his penis feels. Honestly, I've heard the same thing from numerous adult circumcision stories. There really is no difference. Being cut just means its a little cleaner, and it still does its job perfectly. Also, I think its better to do it as an infant so that the man doesn't have to go through unpleasant process of getting it done later.
By #6568 at 13,Nov,11 21:46
Well, the foreskin DOES have a rich collection of nerve ends,...it DOES have it's own blood supply,....It DOES have plentiful pleasure receptors,.....It DOES have it's own set of sensations distinct to those of the glans,...and It DOES feature on all natural penis specimens.......So are you still absolutely sure that there "really is no difference"...??
By #208355 at 14,Nov,11 07:19
Well considering we just heard from a man who has first hand experience being cut and uncut who straight up says there is no difference, then yes, yes I do think there really is no difference. For some strange reason I put more weight in his opinion than yours.
By #6568 at 14,Nov,11 09:52
Yes, but as 'LB' has very ably demonstrated he IS a moron....so, ask yourself; does he have the mental criteria to actually KNOW whether it was an improvement or not to lose two thirds of the most sensitive part of his penis?.....


....Are you really going to use his claims to sanction the routine mutilation of tiny infants against their will and without any anaesthetic....??

In fairness to 'JB' he claims to have been cut as an adult after making his own decision,...I have NO PROBLEM with that as it's entirely his own privalege pleasure and free will to do so.......Unlike the many tiny infants who DO NOT have that consideration shown to them.







By #59855 at 11,Nov,11 05:29
From Matt's Wife: I hate these threads, they piss me off. I hate when people say that a man that is cut is less of a man some how. I have a friend that has a father she is taking care of, he is old and he is un-cut. His foreskin is splitting and it is very painful, the docs have told her that it is very common for un-cut men. Yikes
By #21213 at 11,Nov,11 22:40
only if it is not taken care of do it become a problem unless it was too tight from birth Im 64 years old and have never had a problem and its as soft and ply able as when I was born ,oh and works very well and its up to the person to keep clean not just because they have foreskin . It was an old Jewish practice ,fact also I Muslim practice .
By #6568 at 13,Nov,11 21:51
I'm 64 too and VERY grateful not to have been mutilated at birth. As men age they need more penile stimulation to reach orgasm and this IS a problem to many older mutilated men because an important source of voluptus has been denied them.




By #94227 at 11,Nov,11 05:26
It honestly doesn't matter. But medically a circumsized penis is on average cleaner than an uncircumsized one. It's really just for cleanliness. Not saying all uncut penises are unclean but bacteria grows a lot faster under tge foreskin since it's warm and moist. Nothing wrong with being uncut though, as long as u stay clean
By #6568 at 13,Nov,11 21:48
So don't you think we should also cut off a babies ears too,...and why not remove all finger and toenails too that would be MUCH more hygenic.....

.....I thought that America was a very clean country where people are taught at an early age to wash themselves....??

.....Apparently not...(?)



By slipper at 13,Nov,11 02:26 other posts of slipper 
Circumcision fees and marketing!


By Ray10754 at 12,Nov,11 01:34 other posts of Ray10754 
LOL


By #201155 at 10,Nov,11 18:21
I was circumcised as a very young baby (so I'm told!) and I'm very happy about that
By Ray10754 at 10,Nov,11 18:58 other posts of Ray10754 
I might add that it was a very nice job you have a very good looking cock
By #201155 at 11,Nov,11 05:32
Thank you!







Adult Discussion Forum