![]() Become an expert in pussy licking! She'll Beg You For More! | ![]() Male Multiple Orgasm Discover your full Abilities! | ![]() Stay Hard as Steel!!! | ![]() Find local men to exchange blowjobs |
Similar topics: 1.20 -> 40M movie limit 2.Friendship with opposing lifestyles 3.About friends lists 4.Friends list 5.Apology from cum4me for deleting friends New CommentComments: |
I would not pay attention to this, but since normal server operation was affected I looked into it and found out that many members put thousands of other members in their friends. I don't know why they do this, but I can't imagine someone who can remember over 50 friends. And if you don't remember who the person is, how the hell can you put them into your friends? So I put a limit of 100 members which is more than enough for any reasonable application. And if you have some other non-reasonable purposes, you have to pay for it.
Premium members have limit of 500 and diamond - 5000.
therefor: only to find a hot, sexy members page again, to see good pics again or to look if there are some new pics there.
- only to notice the name,(Maybe one photo to choose) for finding it again, shortly, and not seen for everyone, like the "favourites" now,
so everyone, who visited a hot members page and he wants to remember or to visit later again can put the name of this list to click it on again
Why cant it just consentrate on pics uploaded during the past week only (irrespected if its "friend" of mine or not???
In general the site has improved a lot over the past few years with good features being introduced! Unfortunately it seems to be going backwards now! I am watching these developments closely and will decide soon if I delete all my "friends" from the list and start new, or if I delete my entire profile and go to another site!
Paying for this or facebook or any other social network site is not an option for me - out of principal!
It's really not so bad. An administrator can do whatever he pleases really. He already provides a great service, a little belt tightening is expected.
This reminds me of when people start complaining that their favorite band releases an album that they don't like. Oh the horror!
Anyway, I feel like a fully engaged member of the site - my wife and I have a great time - and it's totally free. I accept the ads and the bandwidth limits, and all other rules, because.... Wait for it.... It's free!
You see, I get constant complaints about so-called bullies. Sometimes it's about Monted, sometimes it's about Ererready sometimes it's about someone else. But it's always about one member. Something like "He spoils the site for everyone being rude in public chat / burning my points". And this site is organized so that one person cannot stand an organized group. Even a small group can ban anyone from public chat or burn points of 1 member. Yet here they are, "bullies", who can spoil the site for a person who have 1000 of friends in their list. What those 1000 friends are worth then???
My points is - friends lists with hundreds of members are not for friends at all. I don't know what they serve for, but definitely not for friends.
May be those friendslist are used to see full size pics or view vids free of charge or to in other ways increase viewing convenience, but those are premium features and should be paid for.
Now I was thinking: isn't it possible to put a field in everybody's profile that keeps track what the last time was that that button was used and then check on 'real' recent uploads? By this a friend that hasn't logged in in the meantime, can be skipped all the way.
And perhaps you could just go for the pics that had been uploaded after the last check? The server still needs to check everyone's friends but after hitting an old pic it can move on to the next friend.
I had no idea about this new 100 friends thing. I don't have a problem with it actually, I just wish I knew why I logged on and found I had about 30 PMs of people deleting me from their friends list. I thought I'd done something to offend a lot of people and didn't get to see any notification of your decision.
Why don't you consider deleting the accounts of all the users who join, post NO pics yet think it's ok to visit our page and simply add us to their friends without asking, saying anything to us or even commenting at all? If you looked into this and deleted them I reckon it would free up a large amount of the headroom the site needs.
Thereby, I can understand your point of view, Admin, in reducing serverload. But as stated so often here, perhaps giving a little notice in advance would have been nice. Like you did with the multiple accounts recently.
If I offended any one by deleting them, I'm sorry, I never meant to do so.
As for me, I can live with a friends limit although, I'd prefer not to have one. I typically use the friends feature to track people I'm interested in as they put up new pix. When I go into my webpage and open the Social/Your Friends Recent Uploads it prompts me to check out what else they're up to.
Either way. Can we somehow select which Friends to keep or will they be cropped in some particular fashion such as date etc?
Or perhaps just a bad case of inter-cranial rectal inversion?
Means that you do not necessarily have to delete grayed ones.
why this limit?
is this site going to be paysite very soon?
Hello "Someone" May I be the one to tell you that it already is a pay site. The free part is just to get you into it and the features are all paid for. WHY? The owner doesn't want to work for a living so he/she is taking advantage of the people through sex. Basically he/she is pimping you out everytime you make a payment.
Since I usually don't add guys, the number of users that have befriendied me are 10 times higher than the number I have in my own friends list. Still harder than I thought though to trim my friends list down to under 100 users
fuck u then bitch
Send Private Reply (start chat if the member is on-line) [blacklist this member] [report spam]
Uhhh....since you banned me now, I can't tell you that I didn't want to do it.
100 is kind of low if you've been here awhile.
you could even let people have 3,000 friends if the problem is really those few with 10,000.
Well this sucks !!! Only because your forcing All the members here to become paying members ! I have been here since July 2009 and have made alot friends along the way , and I actually do know most by first name and have become close to most of them ! This new system really sucks , because now my good friends are being deleted from my friends list and I am sad to hear this site is going to force all there members to become a pay site !
ARE THERE OTHER SITES LIKE THIS THAT AREN"T PAY SITES ????
I guess nothing lasts forever , and I always thought of everyone here like family , one big happy family that has to all be weeded out because of this site going to become a Pay Site
Rob , the "CreativeOne" @}-;-'--- Now , "1XSpurt"
^..^_____!
I think everyone here is going to move on to other sites !
Maybe we can just unlock the full resolution photos to all logged in members of the site, then there wouldn't really be a huge *need* for "friends". All good whatever happens, still
Now I hope that the limitation will return the initial meaning of "friends".
The only thing that will satisfy some is anarchy and chaos!!
Quit whining! Friends should be counted by quality not quantity.
If you think you can run the site better.....get with admin and invest!!!!
Those who can, do. Those who can't, whine.
....care fore some cheese to go with that whine?
"someone" spoke about Facebook above, but does he know that Facebook uses over 60'000 servers as by now? Running costs for those are tens if not hundreds millions of dollars per month.
thanks for your time
Shortly speaking - problem is not the friend table itself, problem begins when someone adds hundreds of friends and then refreshes "friends recent uploads" every 20 seconds, because then the server has to go through 500'000 of images and see which of them belong to the friends of this member, then sort them in order where last goes first and in all existing SQL implementation it takes A LOT of time contrary to the natural first to last order.
It's not about disc space or memory, it's about calculations and they increase drastically as count of friends and images grow. I could implement some bypasses by now, and I did something to the "friends recent uploads" page but soon enough I would run into the same problem.
Actually at first I was not going to put any limitations just made some changes to the "friends recent uploads" page, but then I saw that some members added over 10'000 of members to their friends, one even added all 42'000 (probably with some kind of script) and decided that it had to be limited. As someone here wrote - friends are not about quantity, they are about quality.
I understand your need to make this decision, and also that some people are disproportionate users of resources and bandwidth on this site. (10,000 friends is ridiculous!!!!) But I recommend that you rethink your decision to make the cutoff at only 100 friends. That's simply too low and will drive many to other sites, such as xhamster.
My advice would be to raise the cutoff to several hundred. That's all. Thanks for listening.
I wondered about all the members in gray. I hope they aren't just going to drop off my list(?!)