Started by #303133 at 11,Dec,14 17:56
 | Darth_Syphilis was referred for deletion today by JohnS. He posted this reason: "The occultic nature of the images may not be appropriate for this group. Be that as it may all images generate multiple pages of matches, here are just three examples. The cat can be seen here (site), the tiger here (site), and the two men here (site) Consider this matter without opinion or prejudice and solely on the web derived aspect."
John obviously didn't bother to read the captions DS had put on the pictures, so he missed the reasoning behind said postings. The pictures are from a "religious" h*te group's facebook page, and DS was sharing them to remind us the sort of idiot's that folks like us have to deal with every day. Why include your pompous little preamble, John, if you only wanted members to vote on the "web-derived" nature of the pics? His loyal flunkies are falling in line to delete DS. No surprise there. When I voted NOT FOUNDED, he posted this on my page:“The complaint about your dopey mate has been resolved so your stupid comments about me are pointless. Go back to the dumpster and SAS group where you belong.” (The complaint has NOT been resolved!) Seems like John has some issues. Has he no shame? Is he trying to take editorial control of the site? (I realize that this thread will probably get booted straight to the dumpster, but I hope it lasts here long enough to let folks on the "intelligent" side of the forum see what sort of shenanigans Mr. S gets up to.) |
Similar topics: 1.The STAR CHAMBER 2.Sneaker Photo Update 3.The perverse joy of getting a member deleted 4.Here's a thought regarding the infamous Star Chamber "message"... 5.In Case You Want to See What's Happening in the Star Chamber:
They got rich by promoting hatred. And it's all tax-exempt!
Got to get a member deleted everyday,seems to be the mantra...
Seriously....it's Christmas ffs....forget the time zones....
What a joke.....
Teencock9898 was reported to the evaluation panel based on the 9898. The report began with IF that is the member's birth year, he would be under 18. Apparently, that report was dismissed however Teencock9898 was referred again to the evaluation panel for being under 18. Strange how a vote of +2 can get to +5 in 15 minutes or less and POOF!, the member is gone!
I'm also curious how the judicial system works in each voting member's country. Are those accused guilty until proven innocent? I'm thankful that I've never be in a closed room and go into deliberation with some of them!
Fortunately, it lasted on the "intelligent" side long enough to do what it needed to.
This topic IS RELEVANT and speaks LOUDLY of how well respected member(s) can abuse a privilege. Funny that the dick rating and cum shot rating topics, which DON'T attract many members or thought provoking posts are in the main forum? Oh yeah, those are the topics for the intelligent membership!
Your account is over 2 years old which means you have a vote on the abuse panel.
The sad thing is that when JohnS was referred to the evaluation panel ( several times ) because some members were offended by the pictures of him and the close proximity of his dogs, it was quickly dismissed as being a frivolous report. JohnS, this is not right, this has got to stop! Your referrals need to be fair across the board and within the guidelines.
Score one point for the side of reason and fair-play!
(Of course, you KNOW this means we will all be getting daily visits to our pages from John as he searches for reasons to have us all banned...)