Started by PITBULL at 04,Aug,24 14:54 other posts of PITBULL
 | The latest Court cases. The Court where all defendants are guilty until proven innocent. The Court Judges are; Chief Justice; RuFino 85 yrs old, Judge Clarisbinda 60 yrs old and Judge Florisbinda 76, yrs old.
 |
Similar topics: 1.who likes sex outdoors 2.who likes sex outdoors 3.What's the dirtiest thing you've done? 4.Cock Site Court of Law in Session 5.Supreme Court horror stories
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT>......................
This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The evidence shows the defendant, GingerDaddy abandoned his chat room on Tuesday the 27th of May 2025.
2. The Defendant opened a chat room the previous day in the evening and maintained it for almost 2 hours.
3. On the second hour, the defendant did not announce that he was leaving, which is a violation and is considered Chat Room Abandonment.
Judge Rufinos' Decision; Mr. GingerDaddy why is so hard for you to tell all the guests in your room that you are
leaving your room? I will not tolerate the disrespect that you have shown your room guests. You are outrageous. If you continue with this type of action I will put a Gag Order on you.
May 29, 2025
v.
Ananas2xlekker, defendant.
___________________________/
....................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. VIOLATION RULE 139
1. The defendant has violated rule 139, which is Attacking an Immunity member.
2. The above rules state no other member is allowed to attack, degrade, and make false accusations to a member under rule 139.
3. The defendant Ananas2xlekker attacked member Sir-Skittles on a forum. This is a violation of Rule 139.
Judge RuFino's decision; Mr. Ananas2xlekker you have a foul mouth. This Court will not tolerate you attacking other members under the Immunity rule. You must control yourself and use your language carefully. I found you guilty of the above charge. You are now on probation for 30 days.
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
___________________________/
This Court declares the statements on this document to be true based on the case's evidence.
COUNT I VIOLATION OF RULE 151
1. The defendant CAT52! violated rule 151 which is posting obsolete pictures on this site.
2. Under rule 151 no member shall post profile pictures of more than 20 years old. The evidence shows the defendant posted a picture in the Best Image/Member section that is 30 years old.
3. The defendant CAT52! knows that the picture in question is not the way she actually looks today which constitutes a violation of Rule 151.
JUDGE Tomasina; Ms.CAT52! I found you guilty of the above charge. I order you to delete that picture within 20 days or you will be in contempt of Court.
May 25, 2025
v.
50YOBaldDick, defendant.
__________________________/
......................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on the evidence of this case.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant 50YOBaldDick is violating the Clean Page Act rule. His page is full of dirty gifts.
2. The defendant received several warnings to clean his page but he refused to clean it.
3. This Court will not tolerate this kind of filthyness on a member's page.
Judge Florisbinda; Mr. 50YOBaldDick your page is a big mess. I found you guilty of the above charge. You have 20 days to clean your page or you will be in Contempt of Court.
May 24, 2025
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
....................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares that all the statements on this complaint are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING
1. The defendant CAT52! destroyed evidence in the case of Novice.
2. Defendant Novice's page was dirty with negative gifts and CAT52! use other gifts to destroy the evidence. This constitutes a violation of the rules and laws.
JUDGE: RuFino: Ms. CAT52, what you did is not acceptable. You have committed a serious violation. No one is allowed to destroy evidence in a case. You are outrageous. You are guilty of the above charge.
May 21, 2025
v.
bella!, defendant.
__________________________/
....................COMPLAINT.............................
This Court declares all the evidence of this case to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. USING FAKE PROFILE
1. Under the rules of this Court members shall not have fake profiles.
2. The evidence shows the defendant has about 7 fake profiles on this site. See the attachment Exhibit 1; /blogs/59782.html
3. The defendant used those profiles to attack other members she dislikes.
COUNT II. MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS
1. The defendant bella! has made some accusations against member PITBULL.
2. Defendant claims member PITBULL has other profiles on this site.
3. The member above doesn't have other profiles. Her claims are baseless and this Court will not allow a member to make false accusations with tangible evidence.
Judge Fredesbinda, Ms. Bella, you have a big mouth, and I found you guilty of the above charges. On Count I, you must delete all those fake profiles immediately.
v.
Novice, defendant.
__________________________/
...................COMPLAINT.............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant Novice has violated the Clean Page Act rule. His page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. The defendant refused to clean his page and continued violating the rule.
3. The defendant has enough points to clean his page.
Judge RuFino; Mr. Novive is time to clean your disgusting page. You are guilty of the above charge. You have 20 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.
May 19, 2025
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
////////////////////COMPLAINT///////////////////////
This Cout declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on all evidence.
COUNT I. POSTING A FAKE LINK IN THE CHAT ROOM
1. On May 12 , the defendant posted a fake link in the chat room.
2. It is prohibited to post fake links in chat rooms with the intent to defraud members. The link was not clear, appearing blurry or did not exist.
3. Members asked the defendant what type of link was but he refused to say.
4. The link damages the configuration of the chat room.
Judge RuFino: Mjr. GingerDaddy if you continue posting fake links, this Court will suspend all your chat room privileges immediately. Stop acting like a child.
May 13, 2025
vs.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT.....................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I . POSTING A FAKE PICTURE(S)
1. The defendant CAT52! has violated rule 113, which states, "No Member shall post fake pictures as part of their profile."
2. The defendant posted a fake picture in the; Best Image/Top Member section. The picture got low ratings after member PITBULL mentioned in the blog section.
3. The defendant posted the fake picture to get more members to her profile page.
May 10, 2025
Judge; Claribilda; Ms. CAT52! you are outrageous in posting fake pics on this site to get more members to your page. You want members to believe the picture you posted is yours. The evidence shows it is not. You are a complete fraud.
YOU ARE GUILTY for Violating rule 113 of this Court.
Her income, her education, her credit score, her fake ass heart surgery!
And she cucks her husband Charlie
vs.
MiniD, defendant.
___________________________/
........................COMPLAINT...........................
The Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on all evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant MiniD has violated the Clean Page Act. His page is full of negative gifts.
2. Under the Clean Page Act every member must maintain their page clean at all times. The Defendant has refused to clean his page.
3. This defendant has shown disrespect for the rules and laws of this Court.
Judge Florisbinda; Mr. MiniD you're guilty of the above charges. I will give you 20 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.
Fuck you MiniD
Mini Dick
You bucket of shaved ass hairs- Your page will not be safe!
Banning rat cunt!
Private Chat Log with SYSTEM. Page 1
Apr 27, 03:24 system: You were blacklisted by MiniD
And Cat is too poor to buy site points or her own membership! Her hand has a beggar's cup perm attached to her hand!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING
1. The defendant CAT52! tampering with evidence on the case minid.
2. The evidence shows the defendant used or sent members MiniD gifts to cover the page of MiniD gifts with her gifts.
3. The defendant violated the rules of tampering with evidence.
Judge; Fredesbinda, Ms.CAT52 you're outrageous with you use your points to tamper with evidence on the case of MiniD. You are guilty of the above charges.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
v.
MiniD, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all statements on this complain are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.
1. The defendant MiniD has violated rule 102 which Members must maintain their page free of negative gifts at all times. Under the Clean Page Act, more than 3 negative the page is dirty and in violation of the rule.
2. The defendant has received notices to clean his page but he refused.
3. The defendant' page is dirty and in Violation of the Clean Page Act Rule for the past 2 weeks.
Judge RuFino; Mr. MiniD your are disgusting and a pig. Look at your page. You must clean you page withing the next 2 weeks or be in Contempt of Court.
4/24/25
A total loser with a 3 inch cock. Def wears cuck panties and sits to pee!
miniD Fuck you cunt!
And Yes my dick is small haha really funny, tell me something I dident now already!
How should I clean my page?? You are sending the most expensive gifts!!
And if I clean you just send me new one.. I will need to sell my ass to the hole site too afford that!
Hearing on the Violation of Probation
Defendant; GingerDaddy
This Court has decided to charge the defendant, GingerDaddy with Violation of Probation on his previous case. I will give this defendant an explanation on why he violated hi probation.
Judge Tomasina
4/26/25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!@
a/k/a Saggy Granny, defendant.
_________________________________/
........................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I VIOLATION PAGE ACT
1. The defendant's profile is showing negative gifts.
2. The defendant is violating the following Clean PAGE ACT RULE, which states that each member must maintain their profile page clean of any negative gifts. A member receives a warning to clean up his/her page.
3. The defendant's page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.
COUNT II CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant in a previous Court order has been ordered to stop banned members from commenting on her page.
2. Defendant's actions are considered refusal to obey and follow the Court orders.
COUNT III SOLICITING TO CLEAN PROFILE PAGE
1. The defendant is soliciting for cleaning her page.
2. The defendant asked member, PITBULL to clean her dirty page. Member PITBULL refused her request.
3. No member shall order another member to clean a page unless they do so voluntarily.
COUNT IV ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant has violated the rule of the Immunity Member Act. Under this Act no member is allow to; defame, attack, send negative gifts or be blacklisted.
2. The defendant CAT52! violated this ACT several times when she attacked the following Immunity Memge Sir-Skittles.
Judge; RuFino; You are GUILTY of the above charges and you should refrain from making comments on blogs and forums on this site.
3/7/25
She is putting Charlie at risk- he can't be on or exposed to sex sites!
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
States Can't Ban Sex Offenders from All Social Media
States cannot ban sex offenders from using all social media or internet sites. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law in North Carolina that banned convicted sex offenders from Facebook and other social medial websites.Feb 21, 2024
The democrap party will be destroyed
Maybe someone will send the screenshots from his profile to the sex crimes unit in Florida
You seem to be worried that someone may do that... Oh my! I would probably just delete your scummy profile. It appears you are not happy here and with your life choices. Looks like they continue to haunt you!
Petition to request CAT52! new name.
It has come to the attention to the Court that member CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny be known now as THE MULE.
The Court granted the Petition/Motion
24 April, 2025
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
....................COMPLAINT.......................
This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION CHAT RULES
1. The defendant Ginger Daddy has violated the rules of chat with; chat room abandonment.
2. The defendant has opened chat rooms as a host.
3. Defendant has abandoned his chat room leaving several members without a host. This is clear violation of the chat rules.
4. Under the rules of Chat Rooms the host must inform his members in the chat room he is leaving or closing the chat room.
JUDGE; Claribilda; Mr. GingerDaddy you opened room on this site and you leave your room without telling others you leaving . This is outrageous and unacceptable. You must follow the rules of Chat Room or don't open one. You are not above the law here. You now are in probation for 30 days. During this period you are forbidden from opening chat rooms.
You are guilty of the above charges.
4/25/25
4/23/25
....................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
This Court charged the defendant CAT52! with the following;
1. The defendant has attacked the judicial system including judges.
2. After her previous case decision the defendant told judge RuFino to 'kiss her ass" . This is a defiance to the Court judicial system.
3. No members are allowed to disobey, or attacked the judicial system, as member CAT52! did.
JUDGE Fredesbinda; Ms. CAT52! you are outregeous and you shown no respect for the judicial system. I will not tolerate you child behavior. You must accept this Court decisions an refrain from using vulgar language. This Court will monitor your behaviour for the next 20 days.
1. Violations of site rules and laws
2. Contempt
3. Failure to pay her bills- She could not pay a $300 debt! What a loser!
SITO members, plaintiffs,
vs.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court shows that all evidence on this case to be true.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH
1. The defendant CAT52! in several times has violated the free speech on this site.
2. The Defendant has prevented members from making comments on her page.
3. The defendant willfully has prevented the following member from making comments on her page; PITBULL. This is a clear violation of free speech.
COUNT II. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. Under the rules of Immunity no other member is allowed to attack an immunity member.
2. The defendant has violated this rule when she blacklisted, defame member, Sir-Skittles.
JUDGE RuFino; I found you guilty of the above charges. You must unbanned member Sir-Skittles immediately.
Are you going to allow the retard veggie to your Easter spam dinner?
From this day forward, the Saggy Granny can also be addressed as The Mule!
A filthy rented animal!
SITO Court Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDAddy. defendant
_______________________________/
This Court declares all the evidence in this case to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CHAT RULES
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Rules of Chat Room 3 times.
2. Under the chat room rules, all chat room hosts must announce when they leave their room, including break times.
3. The defendant violated the above 3 times while on this site.
4. Leaving the chat room without an announcement is considered chat room abandonment.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have violated the chat room rules 3 times. This is outrageous. If you continue with this type of behaviour, the Court will order a Gag Order. You are guilty of the above charges.
The Site Court is coming after you and your fat lump coolie wife! ICE will send her back to Manila to work the rice fields!
Fat fucking ginger retard!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares all the following statements to be true based on the case's evidence.
COUNT I. Chat Room Violation
1. The defendant, on March 28, 2025, opened a chat room on the site.
2. The defendant, GingerDaddy used foul language while hosting his room. The defendant use the words "fuck" while chatting with members.
3. The defendant violated Rule 301 Sec. C, which states no member is allowed to use foul language of any type. The defendant has violated this rule on March 28, 2025.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have a filthy mouth. Control yourself in chat rooms. I found you guilty of the above charges and you will on probation for 30 days.
4/1/25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! defendant.
__________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. GAG ORDER VIOLATION
1. The defendant was placed on a Gag Order on March 14, 2025.
2. Under that Gag Order, the defendant was ordered to refrain from making comments or opinions attacking other site members.
3. Defendant refused to follow this Order by this Court.
COUNT II. INTIMIDATING A JUDGE
1. The defendant has defamed the integrity of this Court.
2. Defendant told the judges to "you lick ass". This is a clear violation of intimidation and disrespect of the Court system.
COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant has violated all previous orders by this Court, and now she is in Contempt of Court.
2. The defendant CAT52! is a hostile member of the site.
Judge Tomasina; Ms. CAT52! You has shown no respect to this Court and refused to obey this Court orders. You are now reached the limit of this Court decisions with respect to your cases here. The Holly Counsel may take action against you.
3/28/25
ON THIS day Thursday the 20th of March, 2025 this Court will charge the following defendant @CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny with CONTEMPT OF COURT for failure to remove video/picture that this order her to delete from her profile/picture/video #2 from her page.
Judge Tomasina-SITO COurt
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
____________________________/
................CONTEMPT OF COURT.......................
This Court certified the defendant CAT52! has violated an order from this Court;
REF....The Court found the defendant guilty of violating the free speech.
REF....The defendant continues to ban members from making comments on her page.
This Court imposes a Gag Order on defendant
Judge Fredesbinda
3/14/25
SITO Members, Plaintiffs,
v.
xxx25, Defendant.
___________________________/
....................COMPLAINT.............................
This Court declares all statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING COURT PEACE
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the rules of the Court when disturbing all Court proceedings during Court hours.
2. The defendant xxx25 has engaged in personal attacks with member PITBULL during the Court hours of 9 AM-8 PM.
3. No member is allowed to engage in any arguments related to the Court proceedings outside the Court room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. xxx25 you have a foul mouth. You must respect the Court Hearings. You are an idiot. Now you are in a gag order. The Court will seek a Graded Offense.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
xxx25, defendant.
____________________________/
..................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the site's CLEAN PAGE ACT. Under this Act, members must maintain and keep their pages free from negative gifts.
2. The defendant's page is filthy. His page has been filthy for the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has shown disregard for keeping his page clean.
JUDGE: Clarisbinda; Mr. xxx25 your page is filthy. This is not good. It's time for you to clean your messy page. It is disgusting and ugly. I order you to clean your page within 20 days or be in Contempt of Court.
3/10/25
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
v.
XXX25, defendant.
_____________________________/
....................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING OF A COURT HEARING
1. The defendant xxx25 has been charged with a Court hearing, under the rules of the Court.
2. Defendant, during a hearing of the Court, makes
arguments and attacks against member Sir-Skittles.
3. This Court will not tolerate attacks outside the Court during a case hearing.
Judge Fredesbinda; This Court will order you to cease making comments, soliciting, and other illegal activities during a Court session. You are GUILTY of the above charges
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
midwestmilf, defendant.
____________________________/
..........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all the statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. Clean Page Act Violation
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act Rule. Under this rule members with 3 or more negative gifts have been defined by this Court as trash.
2. The defendant has violated this rule as her page received 3 negative gifts. The defendant refused to clean her page.
Judge Clarisbinda Sentence. Ms. Midwestmilf. you must clean your page within 30 days. Failure to clean your page will result on Contempt of Court. Jan. 28, 2025
Nasty!
This is your ONLY warning.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT.......................
COUNT I. Violation of Free Speech
1. The defendant has banned members from making comments on her page. This is a clear violation of free speech.
2. The defendant has banned members; PITBULL and Sir-Skittles from making comments on her page. This is a violation of free speech.
COUNT II. Stealing member's Video
1. The defendant has stolen a video from another member and using it on her page.
2. The defendant claims the member on the video is making a tribute to her. This is completely false.
COUNT III. Violation of Forum Rules.
1. The defendant has used foul language when chatting on forums.
2. Defendant violated the following rule; No member is allowed to use foul language that is offensive to others.
3. The defendant has used 'fuck' during statements she made.
COUNT IV. Violation Clean Page Act
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts for the past 2 weeks.
2. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act which states; Each member must maintain their page clean at all times. It is the responsibility of every member to keep in the page clean.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. I order you to clean your page. You have 20 days to clean your filthy page. A gag order will be imposed to prevent you from making statements using foul language. You must remove the video of the member you are using on your page. Stop banning members from making comments on your page.
SITO Members, plaintiff,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
______________________________/
..................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on all the evidence.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant opened a chat room on February 20, 2025.
2. The Defendant left his room by 5:30 PM without any departure announcement. The defendant never came back.
3. Under the Rules of Chat Rooms the host must notify all members he is leaving or taking a break. The defendant failed to follow the rules.
JUDGE Clarisbinda; Mr. GingerDaddy it looks like you want to be above the law. You must follow the rules if you want to open chat rooms. It is plain rude to leave a chat room without notifying all room members. I will place you in a 2-week suspension of opening rooms.
...............NOTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT...............
Defendant GingerDaddy has ignored a previous order from this Court from open Chat Rooms with the intent to abandon leaving guests without a chat room host. You are now in a Gag order by this Court.
Judge Tomasina
2.23.25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny, defendant.
______________________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true based on the evidence;
.....................COMPLAINT.............................
COUNT I. POSTING PICTURES OF CONVICTED CRIMINAL
1. The defendant has posted a picture of the following member woody on her page. Woody was convicted of a felony in Florida.
2. This Court will no allow pictures of convicted criminals on this site.
3. The defendant is on violation of the rules of posting pictures of criminals with the intent to defend that said criminal.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.
1. The defendant page is dirty with negative gifts
2. The defendant has expressed no intention of cleaning her page.
3. The defendant is violating the Clean Page Act rule.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! You are a hostile member of this site. You continue to violate the rules of this site. You think you are better than the rest of the members of this site. I ordered you to clean your page within 30 days. You are guilty of the above charges.
A total loser.
May get deported
--------------------------------------- added after 395 hours
Cat going crazy with my latest blog and pic
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
cdwank, defendant.
___________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT...................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT VIOLATION
1. The defendant cwank has violated the rule of Chat Room abandonment.
2. Under this rule a chat room host must announce to his member guests that he is leaving the room. This room includes the host; leaving for the bathroom or any other activities that are not longer than 10 minutes.
3. On January 18, 2025, the defendant, cdwank had a room called; Naked Chat Room Here. The defendant left his room without announcing he was not returning.
Judge RuFino's decision; Mr.cdwank you are a rude host. You left your room without telling your guest you weren't coming back. You are now on probation for 30 days and are not to open chat rooms during the probation period.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
..........................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy, has violated the Chat Room rules when he abandoned his chat room.
2. Under the rules and law a a chat room host is said to abandon his room when he doesn't tell members about his departure.
3. The defendant has done this kind of action several times, disregarding members in his room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you are rude and you don't care about members in your room. This kind of conduct is not acceptable. While most chat room hosts decide to follow the rules you decided to make your own rules here. You are not above the law. You are now prohibited from open chat rooms for the next 30 days.
is now a defendant under the rules and laws of this Court. She has been charged with the following;
VIOLATION FREE SPEECH
ATTACKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Judge Clarisbinda will be presiding over this hearing.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! defendant.
_____________________________/
..............COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This Court declares all the following statements to be true.
COUNT I. VIOLATION FREE SPEECH
1. The defendant has violated free speech when she blocks others from making comments on her page.
2. The site's free speech is fundamental under the free expression of every member of this site. It is the right of every member.
3. The defendant's actions on free speech are outrageous.
4. No member of this site should not block others from making comments. The defendant has done that.
COUNT II. ATTACKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
1. The defendant attacked the Chief Justice of the Court, Justice Rufino.
2. The defendant has mocked and attacked the entire judicial system.
3. The defendant CAT52! has shown no respect for our judges of this Court.
Judge Clarisbinda; I ordered you to stop blocking others for making comments on your page. Ms. CAT52! You have a filthy mouth that should be sealed with glue. You now will be on probation for 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
Celestial, defendant.
___________________________/
......................COMPLAINT.........................
This court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE
1. The evidence shows the defendant, Celestial tampering with evidence in the case of CAT52!.
2. Member CAT52!'s page is filthy with negative gifts.
3. The defendant sends her gifts to cover her page from any negative gifts. Under the rules of this Court, the defendant maliciously tampered with evidence.
JUDGE RuFino's Sentence: Mr. Celestial, it is unlawful to help others tamper with evidence. Stay from other member's business and don't help others with their crimes. You will be on probation for 30 days.
BRIBERY
VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52! defendant.
__________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant solicits members to verify her in exchange for gifts.
2. The defendant has solicited about 10 members of this site, but most refuse to verify the defendant. CAT52!
3. The defendant requested that member, Celestial, clean her page for the exchange of gifts.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act rule. Under this Act, all members must maintain at all times a profile page free of negative gifts.
2. The defendant refused to clean her page by accepting member Celestial clean her page.
Judge Sentence;
Ms. CAT52! You are becoming a nuisance on this website. You can't keep your page clean, but you want others to clean your page. You are outrageous. I ordered you to clean your page within 20 days. You are also guilty of bribery. This type of conduct must be stopped now!
Chief Justice; RuFino
cat52!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
_________________________/
.......................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant CAT52! has been soliciting other members for verification.
2. In exchange for verification the defendant has accepted gifts from other members.
3. She also wants other members to donate points to her. This is a clear violation of bribery.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. The defendant immediately received notice about cleaning her page, but she refused.
JUDGE CLARISBINDA'S Sentence; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. Your filthy page is a big violation of the rules of this site. You don't care about the welfare of new members when they look at your page. Regarding the charges of bribery, you have acted with malice and is outrageous. You are now in probation for 30 days on the above charges.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
......................COMPLAINT...........................
The Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Chat Room rule of abandonment.
2. Under the rules and laws the defendant has violated this rule several times when he left his room without any announcement to the chat room guest.
3. Any member who leaves his chat room without any official farewell violates this law. The law also says any member under this violation shall not open a room for a period of 30 days.
4. Defendant GingerDaddy has violated this rule 3 times during the past 6 days.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you have shown disregard for the members of this site. Every time you leave your room without any anouncement it shows disrespect for all the memebrs in your chat room. A chat room is a very important institution of this site. You have abuse the previliges of having a free chat room but you have missused. You don't care about the well-being of your fellow members. I ordered you from refraining any chat room for the next 30 days.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
reaper2402, defendant.
______________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT..............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant reaper2404 is on violation of the Site Clean Page Act rule.
2. Under the Act, all members must maintain at all times their page clean of any negative gifts. The Defendant has violated this rule more than 3 times.
3. This Court has contacted the defendant about his page status.
COUNT II. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant, reaper2402 has violated the Immunity Member Act rule. Under this rule, any SITE member is found being attacked such as blacklisting, atc has violated this rule.
2. The defendant has attacked the following Immunity member; Sir-skittles.
JUDGE Decision; Mr. reaper2404 you are a filthy person. Have you looked at your page lately.? You should be ashamed of yourself. Does this is the way you are at your home? living like a pig. Not in this site. here you must follow the rules and laws. I ordered you within the next 30 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court. Stop blacklisting and face the enemies that you have made on this site.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
4438cr, defendant.
____________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT RUlE
1. The defendant was ordered to clean his page 30 days ago.
2. The defendant refused to clean his page as ordered by this Court and is now in Contempt of Court.
3. Defendant 4438cr page is filthy in defiance of this Court order.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. The Court ordered this defendant to stay silent in chat rooms but he refused therefore he is now in Contempt of the Court.
2. The defendant violated the Gag Order when he left comments on blogs.
3. Defendant refused to stay silent in chat rooms and blogs
4. The defendant violated the Gag Order when verbally attacking members Sir-Skittles and Pitbull.
Judge Fredesbinda; Mr. 4438cr you are a nasty person. It is not only nasty but also hostile to our judicial system. I found you guilty of the above charges.
Another old rat
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES
1. The defendant has posted pictures of herself for over 10 years. This action is deceiving members of this site.
2. The defendant knew her pictures were more than 10 years old. She will not post photos of her as she looks today.
3. The pictures in question;
showitoff.org//showitoff.org/mhOea3vbmt5epic.html
showitoff.org//showitoff.org//ngapry3qmw25pic.html
4. The defendant refused to delete the above pictures from her profile page.
Judge Fredesbinda's decision; Ms. CAT52! I don't understand why you post pictures that don't look like you anymore. Why you are deceiving members of this site with your obsolete photos? This Court condemns your activities here when it comes to updating your profile with pictures of you now. This Court ordered you to delete those pictures.
Saggy's fraud! A disgusting display indeed!
It would take an crate of Viagra for anyone to get hard with her current pictures!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true:
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. This Court placed The defendant in a GAG ORDER to remain silent in the chat rooms.
2. The defendant, bjuk has made rude and obscene conversation while in the chat rooms.
3. While in a chat room, the defendant has been involved with verbal fights with other members, violating a GAG ORDER.
JUDGE Rufino's decision: Mr. Bjuk you can keep your mouth shut. Attacking verbally other members in a chat room is not acceptable. This Court will be monitoring your behavior when you are in a chat room.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
.......................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
1. This Court charges the defendant GingerDaddy with contempt of Court.
2. The defendant violated an order from this Court on CHAT ROOM ABANDOMENT.
3. This Court orders this defendant from opening chat rooms for 30 days.
Judge Rufino's decision; Mr. GingerDaddy you are a hostile member of this site who shows disregard of this Court order. You now will be on probation for the next 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
____________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares all statements on this case to be true.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM CONDUCT VIOLATION
1. The defendant bjuk has violated the rules of the Chat Room.
2. On one occasion the defendant insulted members of the chat room using his middle finger.
3. Sometimes the defendant uses indecent words when referring to other members of the chat rooms such as; fuck you",
gift
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant bjuk's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. His page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks and the defendant refused to clean it.
JUDGE Rufino's decision of the case: Mr bjuk you are a hostile member of this site. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Just because you have been on this site for a long time doesn't mean you are above the law. I will give you 30 days to clean your page. And for your obnoxious conduct in the chat room, you have 20 days of probation. This Court will monitor your conduct in the chat rooms.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF PROBATION
1. The defendant has violated Article 3 of this Court which states that the court has the right to charge a member with violation of probation when he/she violates a Court order.
2. The defendant's case and actions of November 11, 2024, put him in Contempt of Court. On that day the Court ordered him not to open any chat rooms.
3. The defendant ignored the Court order when he opened a chat room in recent days; in November 14, and 15. This is a clear violation of probation. His probation was for 30 days on the charge of Chat Room Abandonment.
CHief Justice RuFinos' Verdict; Well Mr. GingerDaddy I see you don't care about the judicial system. Willfully disobeying a Court order. You think you are above the law, but you are not. You have opened chat rooms day and night and always left the chat rooms without informing your guests. That's rude, Mr. GingerDaddy.I will place you now on 45 days probation, starting today. I don't want to see you on this Court again. You are guilty of the above charges.
This is yer ONLY warning!
Fuck you Saggy Granny!