Started by PITBULL at 04,Aug,24 14:54 other posts of PITBULL
 | The latest Court cases. The Court where all defendants are guilty until proven innocent. The Court Judges are; Chief Justice; RuFino 85 yrs old, Judge Clarisbinda 60 yrs old and Judge Florisbinda 76, yrs old.
 |
Similar topics: 1.who likes sex outdoors 2.who likes sex outdoors 3.What's the dirtiest thing you've done? 4.Cock Site Court of Law in Session 5.Supreme Court horror stories
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true:
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. This Court placed The defendant in a GAG ORDER to remain silent in the chat rooms.
2. The defendant, bjuk has made rude and obscene conversation while in the chat rooms.
3. While in a chat room, the defendant has been involved with verbal fights with other members, violating a GAG ORDER.
JUDGE Rufino's decision: Mr. Bjuk you can keep your mouth shut. Attacking verbally other members in a chat room is not acceptable. This Court will be monitoring your behavior when you are in a chat room.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
.......................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
1. This Court charges the defendant GingerDaddy with contempt of Court.
2. The defendant violated an order from this Court on CHAT ROOM ABANDOMENT.
3. This Court orders this defendant from opening chat rooms for 30 days.
Judge Rufino's decision; Mr. GingerDaddy you are a hostile member of this site who shows disregard of this Court order. You now will be on probation for the next 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
____________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares all statements on this case to be true.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM CONDUCT VIOLATION
1. The defendant bjuk has violated the rules of the Chat Room.
2. On one occasion the defendant insulted members of the chat room using his middle finger.
3. Sometimes the defendant uses indecent words when referring to other members of the chat rooms such as; fuck you",
gift
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant bjuk's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. His page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks and the defendant refused to clean it.
JUDGE Rufino's decision of the case: Mr bjuk you are a hostile member of this site. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Just because you have been on this site for a long time doesn't mean you are above the law. I will give you 30 days to clean your page. And for your obnoxious conduct in the chat room, you have 20 days of probation. This Court will monitor your conduct in the chat rooms.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF PROBATION
1. The defendant has violated Article 3 of this Court which states that the court has the right to charge a member with violation of probation when he/she violates a Court order.
2. The defendant's case and actions of November 11, 2024, put him in Contempt of Court. On that day the Court ordered him not to open any chat rooms.
3. The defendant ignored the Court order when he opened a chat room in recent days; in November 14, and 15. This is a clear violation of probation. His probation was for 30 days on the charge of Chat Room Abandonment.
CHief Justice RuFinos' Verdict; Well Mr. GingerDaddy I see you don't care about the judicial system. Willfully disobeying a Court order. You think you are above the law, but you are not. You have opened chat rooms day and night and always left the chat rooms without informing your guests. That's rude, Mr. GingerDaddy.I will place you now on 45 days probation, starting today. I don't want to see you on this Court again. You are guilty of the above charges.
This is yer ONLY warning!
Fuck you Saggy Granny!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
tj8077, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant tj8077 has attacked the following Immunity Member, Sir-Skittles several occasions.
2. The defendant blacklisted him without a valid reason.
3. Under the law, any Immunity member who harasses, bans, attacks, or blacklists the defendant violates this law.
Judge Fredesbindan's verdict; Mr tj8077 I order you to remove member tj8007 from your blacklist immediately.
Failure to do so will result in Contempt of Court. You are guilty of the above charge.
Date; November 16, 2024
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant Gingerdaddy on November 11, 2024 opened a chat room with the name; 'daddy loves cock'.
2. In the room were about 8 members according to the evidence.
3. The defendant abandoned his chat room by 7:42 p.m. He didn't even tell the members of his room that he was leaving.
COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant ignored this Court's previous order regarding abandoning a chat room.
2. The defendant has become hostile and mocking this Court.
Justice RuFino's case decision; Mr. GingerDaddy here we go again. You were in this Court about 22 hours ago for the same thing. You also decided to ignore this Court, when we told you to stop leaving the chat room. There is something wrong with you or you just want to mock this Court. Now you will be on probation for 30 days. During those 30 days, you are not allowed to open Chat Rooms with the intent to leave the room any time you want. As a chat room host is your duty to keep your guests when would you leave and closed your room.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares all the statements are true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant, GingerDaddy on November 9, 2024 opened a chat room called; Where are the wild things are.
2. The chat room has more than 10 members at the time.
3. The defendant left the room without a valid reason. This constitutes Chat Room Abandonment.
4. Under the rules of this Court, no chat room host should leave the room without announcing it to the guests.
5. The defendant closed his chat room by 9:30PM without being present.
JUDGE RuFino's decision. Mr. GingerDaddy you are now officially charged by this Court for Chat Room Abandonment. Your actions are outrageous. You don't have any courtesy to the members in your chat room on November 9. This Court orders you to avoid opening chat rooms. If you do open chat rooms will be empty with a lack of members in your room.
His room was abandoned again this morning!
I heard you are on suicide watch after Trump CRUSHED that cunt stain Kamala! She was a total loser with no plan and no skills. Outmatched at every level!
I am glad you are getting state funded help!
You are the typical DNC voter- racist, anti-gay, hates Jews. But pretends to be so tolerant and outraged! Do NOT attempt to grow a brain you fucking hillbilly muppet cunt rag!
We all know you cannot afford private treatment!
--------------------------------------- added after 45 hours
Will the court compel Saggy Granny to get some help?
Will seh be remanded into a special center>?
SITO MEMBERS, Plaintiffs
vs.
CAT, defendant
The Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. USING 2 FAKE PROFILES
1. The defendant CAT has been using 2 fake profiles; #610414 opened on July 6, 2024, with 176 points.
2. Later in the month, the defendant opened a new profile using the following phone number: (786)530-8870.
3. She opened the above profile after her first profile lacked new visitors to her page.
4. The defendant has violated the rules of the profile
site guidelines. Under the rules of this Court, each member must maintain one profile name without excessive numbers.
JUDGE RuFino; Miss CAT you are an unstable member of this site. I ordered you to delete one of your profiles within one week. Failure to do so you will result in Contempt of Court.
Mentally ill, mentally unstable, old, and riddled with at least three diseases. Dealing with an amputee and auto-immnune disease husband, a cerebral palsy drooler, and poverty!
What a winner! #610414 You old slag!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
Mobynine, defendant.
__________________________/
The Court states that the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT.
1. The defendant opened a chat room on November 7, 2024, and violated the rules of chat rooms.
2. The defendant hosted a room on the above date but abandoned his room on the above date.
3. Under the rules of this Court chat room host must notify members of the room when the host is taking a break or leaving. The defendant Mobynine failed to announce members on the chat room he was leaving.
Judge Clarisbinda's decision on the case;
I declare this defendant rude and incompetent to have a chat room. This Court restrained the defendant from opening chat rooms.
The defendant will be on probation for 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
Celestial, Defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
Count I. Tampering with Case Evidence
1. The Court on October 15, 2024 charged Member CAT a/k/a (786)530-8870 with the Clean Page Act. The Defendant on this case Celestial send CAT gifts.
2. Under the rules of this Court, the defendant in this case tampered with the evidence of CAT by sending gifts to block the evidence of the case member CAT.
3. Member CAT knew about the tampering of member Celestial and didn't do anything about it.
4. This Court will not allow a defendant to receive gifts to cover her nasty page.
5. This Court orders CAT to clean her page immediately.
Judge; Florisbinda; Mr. Celestial you are guilty of the above charge of Tempering of Evidence in a current Court case. The Court will give you probation for 2 months.
Member Sir-Sittles, plaintiff
Site Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT a/k/a 786-530-8870, defendant
___________________________________/
This Court declares all the evidence of this case is true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant CAT has violated the Clean Page Act rule.
Her page is dirty with negative gifts.
2. Under the Clean Page Act all members must keep clean their pages at all times.
3. The Court will introduce the following evidence by member; Sir-Skittles; /blogs/58549.html
COUNT II. WITNESS TAMPERING
1. The defendant has covered all the evidence with the help of member Celestial. This constitutes Witness Tampering.
2. She contacted the above member because she has no points to clean her page.
3. This Court doesn't care about the points to clean the page.
COUNT III. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant CAT has violated the immunity member rule. Under this rule, no member under this rule/Act cannot be attacked or defamed.
2. The defendant attacked the following member under this Act/rule; Sir-Skittles.
COUNT III. MENTALLY UNSTABLE
1. Member CAT appears unstable, based on the evidence of member; Sir-Skittles.
2. The evidence shows this member is using a phone number as her profile name on this site.
3. Member CAT has shown her unstable behavior from a normal member of this site.
4. She posted old pictures of herself making this type of behavior unstable.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT you are more lunatic now than last time you were in my Courtroom. I found you guilty of all the above charges. You have 30 days to clean your nasty page.
Saggy playing the victim yet again! Stupid bitch. (786)530-8870
Like your daughter was contacted. If she was as you say, and you are still on this scummy site after she saw you sucking dick, that is a new low even for you. A normal person would be ashamed and would delete.
Please get the Saggy Granny some site assistance! She is completely senile and defenseless!
Posting her drivers license and now her mobile number. Things may go horribly wrong for her now!
Can we get her to delete or into a sanitarium?
(786)530-8870
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
Phillyphuncouple, defendant.
_______________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN ACT
1. Defendant has violated the site CLEAN PAGE ACT rule. Under this Act, every page must be clean and free of trash gifts.
2. The defendant phillyphuncouple violated this rule several times during the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has been advised to clean up his page.
COUNT II. ATTACKING PREMIUM MEMBERS
1. The defendant has attacked several premium members of this site.
2. The defendant has shown no respect for premium members of this site.
COUNT III. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant phillyphuncouple violated the rule of Attacking immunity members. Under this rule any immunity member of this site shall not; be attacked in chat rooms, emails, blogs, or forums. Also, no immunity member shall not receive trash gifts.
2. The defendant attacked the following immunity member; Sir-Skittles
JUDGE Tomasina: This defendant has some serious charges. Their behavior on this site is outrageous. I will order a Gag Order for 30 days. In addition a letter of apology to member Sir-Skittles. The Court and his allies will be watching this defendant on this site .
violation of the clean page act, attacking premium members, and for being cunts
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs,
Ginger Daddy, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declared the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant Ginger Daddy has violated the rule of chat room hosting.
2. Under the rules of Chat room hosting, the defendant must always remain in his room; Or advise members he is leaving.
3. The evidence shows the defendant opened 2 chat rooms this month and abandoned his room.
4. The defendant does not care for other members in his chat room.
JUDGE FREDESBINDA; Mr. GingerDaddy you have proved you don't have any manners when opening chat room(s). Abandoning your room is not acceptable and is rude. This Court is ordering you to avoid opening chat rooms.
SITO Member, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
___________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. The defendant bjuk has violated a Gag Order from the month of August.
2. The Court gave him 30 days to stay silent bu the defendant violated the Gag Order.
3. The defendant's violations included; attacking members in chat rooms, using obscene language, and chatting to others without cause.
Judge RuFino; Mr. bjuk you don't know when you keep your mouth shut. You are guilty of the above charge and placed you now 40 days extended Gag Order.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
tecsan, defendant.
____________________________/
Thsis Courtt declares all the statements on this complaint are true;
COUNT I. ATTACKING A VERIFIED MEMBER
1. The defendant has attacked members AngelofDeath, several times.
2. The defendant has used verbal attacks and threats against member AngelofDeath.
3. The defendant has attacked all the blog member Angelof Death.
JUDGE Florisbinda; Mr tecsan this kind of attack must stop now. You are not allowed to attack a member that others have been verified. You have intimidated the victim, AngelofDeath with your attacks. You are guilty of the above charges. This kind of behavior must stop now. In addition, I will place a gag order for 30 days.
yer minge is reeking up the site
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs
tecsan, defendant.
____________________________/
...........................COMPLAINT.......................
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant has been violating the Clean Page Act rule for the past 3 weeks.
2. His page is filthy with negative gifts and refuses to clean his page.
3. This member, tecsan doesn't care for the cleanliness of this site. The defendant refuses to take responsibility for cleaning his page.
4. The defendant blames others for the filthyness of his page.
Judge Tomasina; Mr tecsan what are you waiting to clean your page a reward? It shows that you don't care about having your page clean. It's your page you clean it yourself.
Are you a democrat waiting for a handout?
The Honorable pro-temp Judge, Tomasina will be presiding over this hearing.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
v.
TECSAN, defendant.
___________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH
1. The defendant tecsan has a forum on this site, where members can comment.
2. The defendant has deleted some member's comments on his forum. This constitutes a violation of free speech
3. As a moderator the defendant has to allow all types of comments and not delete any.
4. Defendant only allowed comments that were favorable to him and deleted remarks he didn't like because of his political views.
JUDGE RuFino; Mr. tecsan, we have been checking your forum here and you have made your forum a political station of this site. Where is the democracy here when you don't allow others to comment because they don't favor your political views? Don't have forums if you disagree with others and then you delete their comments.
He has been charged with; VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH.
Chief Justice RuFino will be presiding over this hearing.
SITO Members,
vs.
4438, defendant.
.....................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION GAG ORDER
1. The defendant has violated his gag order several times.
2. While in chat rooms this defendant continues to speak and verbally attack other members.
COUNT II. VIOLATION CLEAN CHAT ROOM
1. The defendant's language during the chat room is extremely vulgar and violates the rules of a chat room.
2. The defendant has used word(s) such as "fuck" which is a clear violation of the chat room rules.
COUNT III. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. 4438, the defendant's page is filthy with trash.
2. The defendant has shown disregard to keep his page clean at all times.
Judge Fredesbinda; Mr 4438 you are a hostile member of this site. Your page is as filthy as your mouth. This Court orders you to clean your mouth and page.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs.
CAT, defendant.
_____________________________/
...................COMPLAINT......................
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. PROTECTING A CONVICTED FELON
1. The member/defendant #610414 has violated the rule 404 section 2B and states as follows; No members shall protect any convicted felons charged with a state felony.
2. The evidence shows the defendant is showing pictures of Woody58 a/k/a Charlie on her page. This is also a violation of rule 404. Section 2C states as follows; No convicted felons shall not display their pictures.
3. As per member Sir-Skittles shows evidence of convicted felon Woody58. See; /blogs/58010.html
4. This Court denounces any convicted felons being protected by another member.
Judge Pro-Temp Tomasina; CAT you are guilty of the above charge and you must remove any pictures from Woody58 from your page.
We are also hearing rumblings that she is being investigated for endangering other members of her family.
She has a cargo hauler attached to her piece of shit Nissan Rogue. This is being used to transport Charlie and Mongette in their wheelchairs. Not just the wheelchair, they are ridding on the cargo shelf! Barely strapped down!
Outrageous!
Also something that cannot be sealed or expunged!