Started by PITBULL at 04,Aug,24 14:54 other posts of PITBULL
 | The latest Court cases. The Court where all defendants are guilty until proven innocent. The Court Judges are; Chief Justice; RuFino 85 yrs old, Judge Clarisbinda 60 yrs old and Judge Florisbinda 76, yrs old.
 |
Similar topics: 1.who likes sex outdoors 2.who likes sex outdoors 3.What's the dirtiest thing you've done? 4.Cock Site Court of Law in Session 5.Supreme Court horror stories
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
v.
MiniD, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all statements on this complain are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.
1. The defendant MiniD has violated rule 102 which Members must maintain their page free of negative gifts at all times. Under the Clean Page Act, more than 3 negative the page is dirty and in violation of the rule.
2. The defendant has received notices to clean his page but he refused.
3. The defendant' page is dirty and in Violation of the Clean Page Act Rule for the past 2 weeks.
Judge RuFino; Mr. MiniD your are disgusting and a pig. Look at your page. You must clean you page withing the next 2 weeks or be in Contempt of Court.
4/24/25
A total loser with a 3 inch cock. Def wears cuck panties and sits to pee!
miniD Fuck you cunt!
And Yes my dick is small haha really funny, tell me something I dident now already!
How should I clean my page?? You are sending the most expensive gifts!!
And if I clean you just send me new one.. I will need to sell my ass to the hole site too afford that!
Hearing on the Violation of Probation
Defendant; GingerDaddy
This Court has decided to charge the defendant, GingerDaddy with Violation of Probation on his previous case. I will give this defendant an explanation on why he violated hi probation.
Judge Tomasina
4/26/25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!@
a/k/a Saggy Granny, defendant.
_________________________________/
........................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I VIOLATION PAGE ACT
1. The defendant's profile is showing negative gifts.
2. The defendant is violating the following Clean PAGE ACT RULE, which states that each member must maintain their profile page clean of any negative gifts. A member receives a warning to clean up his/her page.
3. The defendant's page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.
COUNT II CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant in a previous Court order has been ordered to stop banned members from commenting on her page.
2. Defendant's actions are considered refusal to obey and follow the Court orders.
COUNT III SOLICITING TO CLEAN PROFILE PAGE
1. The defendant is soliciting for cleaning her page.
2. The defendant asked member, PITBULL to clean her dirty page. Member PITBULL refused her request.
3. No member shall order another member to clean a page unless they do so voluntarily.
COUNT IV ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant has violated the rule of the Immunity Member Act. Under this Act no member is allow to; defame, attack, send negative gifts or be blacklisted.
2. The defendant CAT52! violated this ACT several times when she attacked the following Immunity Memge Sir-Skittles.
Judge; RuFino; You are GUILTY of the above charges and you should refrain from making comments on blogs and forums on this site.
3/7/25
She is putting Charlie at risk- he can't be on or exposed to sex sites!
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
States Can't Ban Sex Offenders from All Social Media
States cannot ban sex offenders from using all social media or internet sites. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law in North Carolina that banned convicted sex offenders from Facebook and other social medial websites.Feb 21, 2024
The democrap party will be destroyed
Maybe someone will send the screenshots from his profile to the sex crimes unit in Florida
You seem to be worried that someone may do that... Oh my! I would probably just delete your scummy profile. It appears you are not happy here and with your life choices. Looks like they continue to haunt you!
Petition to request CAT52! new name.
It has come to the attention to the Court that member CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny be known now as THE MULE.
The Court granted the Petition/Motion
24 April, 2025
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
....................COMPLAINT.......................
This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION CHAT RULES
1. The defendant Ginger Daddy has violated the rules of chat with; chat room abandonment.
2. The defendant has opened chat rooms as a host.
3. Defendant has abandoned his chat room leaving several members without a host. This is clear violation of the chat rules.
4. Under the rules of Chat Rooms the host must inform his members in the chat room he is leaving or closing the chat room.
JUDGE; Claribilda; Mr. GingerDaddy you opened room on this site and you leave your room without telling others you leaving . This is outrageous and unacceptable. You must follow the rules of Chat Room or don't open one. You are not above the law here. You now are in probation for 30 days. During this period you are forbidden from opening chat rooms.
You are guilty of the above charges.
4/25/25
4/23/25
....................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
This Court charged the defendant CAT52! with the following;
1. The defendant has attacked the judicial system including judges.
2. After her previous case decision the defendant told judge RuFino to 'kiss her ass" . This is a defiance to the Court judicial system.
3. No members are allowed to disobey, or attacked the judicial system, as member CAT52! did.
JUDGE Fredesbinda; Ms. CAT52! you are outregeous and you shown no respect for the judicial system. I will not tolerate you child behavior. You must accept this Court decisions an refrain from using vulgar language. This Court will monitor your behaviour for the next 20 days.
1. Violations of site rules and laws
2. Contempt
3. Failure to pay her bills- She could not pay a $300 debt! What a loser!
SITO members, plaintiffs,
vs.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court shows that all evidence on this case to be true.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH
1. The defendant CAT52! in several times has violated the free speech on this site.
2. The Defendant has prevented members from making comments on her page.
3. The defendant willfully has prevented the following member from making comments on her page; PITBULL. This is a clear violation of free speech.
COUNT II. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. Under the rules of Immunity no other member is allowed to attack an immunity member.
2. The defendant has violated this rule when she blacklisted, defame member, Sir-Skittles.
JUDGE RuFino; I found you guilty of the above charges. You must unbanned member Sir-Skittles immediately.
Are you going to allow the retard veggie to your Easter spam dinner?
From this day forward, the Saggy Granny can also be addressed as The Mule!
A filthy rented animal!
SITO Court Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDAddy. defendant
_______________________________/
This Court declares all the evidence in this case to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CHAT RULES
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Rules of Chat Room 3 times.
2. Under the chat room rules, all chat room hosts must announce when they leave their room, including break times.
3. The defendant violated the above 3 times while on this site.
4. Leaving the chat room without an announcement is considered chat room abandonment.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have violated the chat room rules 3 times. This is outrageous. If you continue with this type of behaviour, the Court will order a Gag Order. You are guilty of the above charges.
The Site Court is coming after you and your fat lump coolie wife! ICE will send her back to Manila to work the rice fields!
Fat fucking ginger retard!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares all the following statements to be true based on the case's evidence.
COUNT I. Chat Room Violation
1. The defendant, on March 28, 2025, opened a chat room on the site.
2. The defendant, GingerDaddy used foul language while hosting his room. The defendant use the words "fuck" while chatting with members.
3. The defendant violated Rule 301 Sec. C, which states no member is allowed to use foul language of any type. The defendant has violated this rule on March 28, 2025.
Judge Tomasina; Mr. GingerDaddy, you have a filthy mouth. Control yourself in chat rooms. I found you guilty of the above charges and you will on probation for 30 days.
4/1/25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! defendant.
__________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. GAG ORDER VIOLATION
1. The defendant was placed on a Gag Order on March 14, 2025.
2. Under that Gag Order, the defendant was ordered to refrain from making comments or opinions attacking other site members.
3. Defendant refused to follow this Order by this Court.
COUNT II. INTIMIDATING A JUDGE
1. The defendant has defamed the integrity of this Court.
2. Defendant told the judges to "you lick ass". This is a clear violation of intimidation and disrespect of the Court system.
COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant has violated all previous orders by this Court, and now she is in Contempt of Court.
2. The defendant CAT52! is a hostile member of the site.
Judge Tomasina; Ms. CAT52! You has shown no respect to this Court and refused to obey this Court orders. You are now reached the limit of this Court decisions with respect to your cases here. The Holly Counsel may take action against you.
3/28/25
ON THIS day Thursday the 20th of March, 2025 this Court will charge the following defendant @CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny with CONTEMPT OF COURT for failure to remove video/picture that this order her to delete from her profile/picture/video #2 from her page.
Judge Tomasina-SITO COurt
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
____________________________/
................CONTEMPT OF COURT.......................
This Court certified the defendant CAT52! has violated an order from this Court;
REF....The Court found the defendant guilty of violating the free speech.
REF....The defendant continues to ban members from making comments on her page.
This Court imposes a Gag Order on defendant
Judge Fredesbinda
3/14/25
SITO Members, Plaintiffs,
v.
xxx25, Defendant.
___________________________/
....................COMPLAINT.............................
This Court declares all statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING COURT PEACE
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the rules of the Court when disturbing all Court proceedings during Court hours.
2. The defendant xxx25 has engaged in personal attacks with member PITBULL during the Court hours of 9 AM-8 PM.
3. No member is allowed to engage in any arguments related to the Court proceedings outside the Court room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. xxx25 you have a foul mouth. You must respect the Court Hearings. You are an idiot. Now you are in a gag order. The Court will seek a Graded Offense.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
xxx25, defendant.
____________________________/
..................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant xxx25 has violated the site's CLEAN PAGE ACT. Under this Act, members must maintain and keep their pages free from negative gifts.
2. The defendant's page is filthy. His page has been filthy for the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has shown disregard for keeping his page clean.
JUDGE: Clarisbinda; Mr. xxx25 your page is filthy. This is not good. It's time for you to clean your messy page. It is disgusting and ugly. I order you to clean your page within 20 days or be in Contempt of Court.
3/10/25
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
v.
XXX25, defendant.
_____________________________/
....................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. DISTURBING OF A COURT HEARING
1. The defendant xxx25 has been charged with a Court hearing, under the rules of the Court.
2. Defendant, during a hearing of the Court, makes
arguments and attacks against member Sir-Skittles.
3. This Court will not tolerate attacks outside the Court during a case hearing.
Judge Fredesbinda; This Court will order you to cease making comments, soliciting, and other illegal activities during a Court session. You are GUILTY of the above charges
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
midwestmilf, defendant.
____________________________/
..........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all the statements on this Complaint to be true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. Clean Page Act Violation
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act Rule. Under this rule members with 3 or more negative gifts have been defined by this Court as trash.
2. The defendant has violated this rule as her page received 3 negative gifts. The defendant refused to clean her page.
Judge Clarisbinda Sentence. Ms. Midwestmilf. you must clean your page within 30 days. Failure to clean your page will result on Contempt of Court. Jan. 28, 2025
Nasty!
This is your ONLY warning.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT.......................
COUNT I. Violation of Free Speech
1. The defendant has banned members from making comments on her page. This is a clear violation of free speech.
2. The defendant has banned members; PITBULL and Sir-Skittles from making comments on her page. This is a violation of free speech.
COUNT II. Stealing member's Video
1. The defendant has stolen a video from another member and using it on her page.
2. The defendant claims the member on the video is making a tribute to her. This is completely false.
COUNT III. Violation of Forum Rules.
1. The defendant has used foul language when chatting on forums.
2. Defendant violated the following rule; No member is allowed to use foul language that is offensive to others.
3. The defendant has used 'fuck' during statements she made.
COUNT IV. Violation Clean Page Act
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts for the past 2 weeks.
2. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act which states; Each member must maintain their page clean at all times. It is the responsibility of every member to keep in the page clean.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. I order you to clean your page. You have 20 days to clean your filthy page. A gag order will be imposed to prevent you from making statements using foul language. You must remove the video of the member you are using on your page. Stop banning members from making comments on your page.
SITO Members, plaintiff,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
______________________________/
..................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on all the evidence.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant opened a chat room on February 20, 2025.
2. The Defendant left his room by 5:30 PM without any departure announcement. The defendant never came back.
3. Under the Rules of Chat Rooms the host must notify all members he is leaving or taking a break. The defendant failed to follow the rules.
JUDGE Clarisbinda; Mr. GingerDaddy it looks like you want to be above the law. You must follow the rules if you want to open chat rooms. It is plain rude to leave a chat room without notifying all room members. I will place you in a 2-week suspension of opening rooms.
...............NOTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT...............
Defendant GingerDaddy has ignored a previous order from this Court from open Chat Rooms with the intent to abandon leaving guests without a chat room host. You are now in a Gag order by this Court.
Judge Tomasina
2.23.25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny, defendant.
______________________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true based on the evidence;
.....................COMPLAINT.............................
COUNT I. POSTING PICTURES OF CONVICTED CRIMINAL
1. The defendant has posted a picture of the following member woody on her page. Woody was convicted of a felony in Florida.
2. This Court will no allow pictures of convicted criminals on this site.
3. The defendant is on violation of the rules of posting pictures of criminals with the intent to defend that said criminal.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.
1. The defendant page is dirty with negative gifts
2. The defendant has expressed no intention of cleaning her page.
3. The defendant is violating the Clean Page Act rule.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! You are a hostile member of this site. You continue to violate the rules of this site. You think you are better than the rest of the members of this site. I ordered you to clean your page within 30 days. You are guilty of the above charges.
A total loser.
May get deported
--------------------------------------- added after 395 hours
Cat going crazy with my latest blog and pic
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
cdwank, defendant.
___________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT...................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT VIOLATION
1. The defendant cwank has violated the rule of Chat Room abandonment.
2. Under this rule a chat room host must announce to his member guests that he is leaving the room. This room includes the host; leaving for the bathroom or any other activities that are not longer than 10 minutes.
3. On January 18, 2025, the defendant, cdwank had a room called; Naked Chat Room Here. The defendant left his room without announcing he was not returning.
Judge RuFino's decision; Mr.cdwank you are a rude host. You left your room without telling your guest you weren't coming back. You are now on probation for 30 days and are not to open chat rooms during the probation period.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
..........................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy, has violated the Chat Room rules when he abandoned his chat room.
2. Under the rules and law a a chat room host is said to abandon his room when he doesn't tell members about his departure.
3. The defendant has done this kind of action several times, disregarding members in his room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you are rude and you don't care about members in your room. This kind of conduct is not acceptable. While most chat room hosts decide to follow the rules you decided to make your own rules here. You are not above the law. You are now prohibited from open chat rooms for the next 30 days.
is now a defendant under the rules and laws of this Court. She has been charged with the following;
VIOLATION FREE SPEECH
ATTACKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Judge Clarisbinda will be presiding over this hearing.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! defendant.
_____________________________/
..............COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This Court declares all the following statements to be true.
COUNT I. VIOLATION FREE SPEECH
1. The defendant has violated free speech when she blocks others from making comments on her page.
2. The site's free speech is fundamental under the free expression of every member of this site. It is the right of every member.
3. The defendant's actions on free speech are outrageous.
4. No member of this site should not block others from making comments. The defendant has done that.
COUNT II. ATTACKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
1. The defendant attacked the Chief Justice of the Court, Justice Rufino.
2. The defendant has mocked and attacked the entire judicial system.
3. The defendant CAT52! has shown no respect for our judges of this Court.
Judge Clarisbinda; I ordered you to stop blocking others for making comments on your page. Ms. CAT52! You have a filthy mouth that should be sealed with glue. You now will be on probation for 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
Celestial, defendant.
___________________________/
......................COMPLAINT.........................
This court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE
1. The evidence shows the defendant, Celestial tampering with evidence in the case of CAT52!.
2. Member CAT52!'s page is filthy with negative gifts.
3. The defendant sends her gifts to cover her page from any negative gifts. Under the rules of this Court, the defendant maliciously tampered with evidence.
JUDGE RuFino's Sentence: Mr. Celestial, it is unlawful to help others tamper with evidence. Stay from other member's business and don't help others with their crimes. You will be on probation for 30 days.
BRIBERY
VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52! defendant.
__________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant solicits members to verify her in exchange for gifts.
2. The defendant has solicited about 10 members of this site, but most refuse to verify the defendant. CAT52!
3. The defendant requested that member, Celestial, clean her page for the exchange of gifts.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act rule. Under this Act, all members must maintain at all times a profile page free of negative gifts.
2. The defendant refused to clean her page by accepting member Celestial clean her page.
Judge Sentence;
Ms. CAT52! You are becoming a nuisance on this website. You can't keep your page clean, but you want others to clean your page. You are outrageous. I ordered you to clean your page within 20 days. You are also guilty of bribery. This type of conduct must be stopped now!
Chief Justice; RuFino
cat52!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
_________________________/
.......................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant CAT52! has been soliciting other members for verification.
2. In exchange for verification the defendant has accepted gifts from other members.
3. She also wants other members to donate points to her. This is a clear violation of bribery.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. The defendant immediately received notice about cleaning her page, but she refused.
JUDGE CLARISBINDA'S Sentence; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. Your filthy page is a big violation of the rules of this site. You don't care about the welfare of new members when they look at your page. Regarding the charges of bribery, you have acted with malice and is outrageous. You are now in probation for 30 days on the above charges.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
......................COMPLAINT...........................
The Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Chat Room rule of abandonment.
2. Under the rules and laws the defendant has violated this rule several times when he left his room without any announcement to the chat room guest.
3. Any member who leaves his chat room without any official farewell violates this law. The law also says any member under this violation shall not open a room for a period of 30 days.
4. Defendant GingerDaddy has violated this rule 3 times during the past 6 days.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you have shown disregard for the members of this site. Every time you leave your room without any anouncement it shows disrespect for all the memebrs in your chat room. A chat room is a very important institution of this site. You have abuse the previliges of having a free chat room but you have missused. You don't care about the well-being of your fellow members. I ordered you from refraining any chat room for the next 30 days.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
reaper2402, defendant.
______________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT..............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant reaper2404 is on violation of the Site Clean Page Act rule.
2. Under the Act, all members must maintain at all times their page clean of any negative gifts. The Defendant has violated this rule more than 3 times.
3. This Court has contacted the defendant about his page status.
COUNT II. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant, reaper2402 has violated the Immunity Member Act rule. Under this rule, any SITE member is found being attacked such as blacklisting, atc has violated this rule.
2. The defendant has attacked the following Immunity member; Sir-skittles.
JUDGE Decision; Mr. reaper2404 you are a filthy person. Have you looked at your page lately.? You should be ashamed of yourself. Does this is the way you are at your home? living like a pig. Not in this site. here you must follow the rules and laws. I ordered you within the next 30 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court. Stop blacklisting and face the enemies that you have made on this site.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
4438cr, defendant.
____________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT RUlE
1. The defendant was ordered to clean his page 30 days ago.
2. The defendant refused to clean his page as ordered by this Court and is now in Contempt of Court.
3. Defendant 4438cr page is filthy in defiance of this Court order.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. The Court ordered this defendant to stay silent in chat rooms but he refused therefore he is now in Contempt of the Court.
2. The defendant violated the Gag Order when he left comments on blogs.
3. Defendant refused to stay silent in chat rooms and blogs
4. The defendant violated the Gag Order when verbally attacking members Sir-Skittles and Pitbull.
Judge Fredesbinda; Mr. 4438cr you are a nasty person. It is not only nasty but also hostile to our judicial system. I found you guilty of the above charges.
Another old rat
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES
1. The defendant has posted pictures of herself for over 10 years. This action is deceiving members of this site.
2. The defendant knew her pictures were more than 10 years old. She will not post photos of her as she looks today.
3. The pictures in question;
showitoff.org//showitoff.org/mhOea3vbmt5epic.html
showitoff.org//showitoff.org//ngapry3qmw25pic.html
4. The defendant refused to delete the above pictures from her profile page.
Judge Fredesbinda's decision; Ms. CAT52! I don't understand why you post pictures that don't look like you anymore. Why you are deceiving members of this site with your obsolete photos? This Court condemns your activities here when it comes to updating your profile with pictures of you now. This Court ordered you to delete those pictures.
Saggy's fraud! A disgusting display indeed!
It would take an crate of Viagra for anyone to get hard with her current pictures!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true:
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. This Court placed The defendant in a GAG ORDER to remain silent in the chat rooms.
2. The defendant, bjuk has made rude and obscene conversation while in the chat rooms.
3. While in a chat room, the defendant has been involved with verbal fights with other members, violating a GAG ORDER.
JUDGE Rufino's decision: Mr. Bjuk you can keep your mouth shut. Attacking verbally other members in a chat room is not acceptable. This Court will be monitoring your behavior when you are in a chat room.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
.......................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
1. This Court charges the defendant GingerDaddy with contempt of Court.
2. The defendant violated an order from this Court on CHAT ROOM ABANDOMENT.
3. This Court orders this defendant from opening chat rooms for 30 days.
Judge Rufino's decision; Mr. GingerDaddy you are a hostile member of this site who shows disregard of this Court order. You now will be on probation for the next 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
____________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares all statements on this case to be true.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM CONDUCT VIOLATION
1. The defendant bjuk has violated the rules of the Chat Room.
2. On one occasion the defendant insulted members of the chat room using his middle finger.
3. Sometimes the defendant uses indecent words when referring to other members of the chat rooms such as; fuck you",
gift
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant bjuk's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. His page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks and the defendant refused to clean it.
JUDGE Rufino's decision of the case: Mr bjuk you are a hostile member of this site. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Just because you have been on this site for a long time doesn't mean you are above the law. I will give you 30 days to clean your page. And for your obnoxious conduct in the chat room, you have 20 days of probation. This Court will monitor your conduct in the chat rooms.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF PROBATION
1. The defendant has violated Article 3 of this Court which states that the court has the right to charge a member with violation of probation when he/she violates a Court order.
2. The defendant's case and actions of November 11, 2024, put him in Contempt of Court. On that day the Court ordered him not to open any chat rooms.
3. The defendant ignored the Court order when he opened a chat room in recent days; in November 14, and 15. This is a clear violation of probation. His probation was for 30 days on the charge of Chat Room Abandonment.
CHief Justice RuFinos' Verdict; Well Mr. GingerDaddy I see you don't care about the judicial system. Willfully disobeying a Court order. You think you are above the law, but you are not. You have opened chat rooms day and night and always left the chat rooms without informing your guests. That's rude, Mr. GingerDaddy.I will place you now on 45 days probation, starting today. I don't want to see you on this Court again. You are guilty of the above charges.
This is yer ONLY warning!
Fuck you Saggy Granny!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
tj8077, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant tj8077 has attacked the following Immunity Member, Sir-Skittles several occasions.
2. The defendant blacklisted him without a valid reason.
3. Under the law, any Immunity member who harasses, bans, attacks, or blacklists the defendant violates this law.
Judge Fredesbindan's verdict; Mr tj8077 I order you to remove member tj8007 from your blacklist immediately.
Failure to do so will result in Contempt of Court. You are guilty of the above charge.
Date; November 16, 2024
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant Gingerdaddy on November 11, 2024 opened a chat room with the name; 'daddy loves cock'.
2. In the room were about 8 members according to the evidence.
3. The defendant abandoned his chat room by 7:42 p.m. He didn't even tell the members of his room that he was leaving.
COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant ignored this Court's previous order regarding abandoning a chat room.
2. The defendant has become hostile and mocking this Court.
Justice RuFino's case decision; Mr. GingerDaddy here we go again. You were in this Court about 22 hours ago for the same thing. You also decided to ignore this Court, when we told you to stop leaving the chat room. There is something wrong with you or you just want to mock this Court. Now you will be on probation for 30 days. During those 30 days, you are not allowed to open Chat Rooms with the intent to leave the room any time you want. As a chat room host is your duty to keep your guests when would you leave and closed your room.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares all the statements are true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant, GingerDaddy on November 9, 2024 opened a chat room called; Where are the wild things are.
2. The chat room has more than 10 members at the time.
3. The defendant left the room without a valid reason. This constitutes Chat Room Abandonment.
4. Under the rules of this Court, no chat room host should leave the room without announcing it to the guests.
5. The defendant closed his chat room by 9:30PM without being present.
JUDGE RuFino's decision. Mr. GingerDaddy you are now officially charged by this Court for Chat Room Abandonment. Your actions are outrageous. You don't have any courtesy to the members in your chat room on November 9. This Court orders you to avoid opening chat rooms. If you do open chat rooms will be empty with a lack of members in your room.
His room was abandoned again this morning!
I heard you are on suicide watch after Trump CRUSHED that cunt stain Kamala! She was a total loser with no plan and no skills. Outmatched at every level!
I am glad you are getting state funded help!
You are the typical DNC voter- racist, anti-gay, hates Jews. But pretends to be so tolerant and outraged! Do NOT attempt to grow a brain you fucking hillbilly muppet cunt rag!
We all know you cannot afford private treatment!
--------------------------------------- added after 45 hours
Will the court compel Saggy Granny to get some help?
Will seh be remanded into a special center>?
SITO MEMBERS, Plaintiffs
vs.
CAT, defendant
The Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. USING 2 FAKE PROFILES
1. The defendant CAT has been using 2 fake profiles; #610414 opened on July 6, 2024, with 176 points.
2. Later in the month, the defendant opened a new profile using the following phone number: (786)530-8870.
3. She opened the above profile after her first profile lacked new visitors to her page.
4. The defendant has violated the rules of the profile
site guidelines. Under the rules of this Court, each member must maintain one profile name without excessive numbers.
JUDGE RuFino; Miss CAT you are an unstable member of this site. I ordered you to delete one of your profiles within one week. Failure to do so you will result in Contempt of Court.
Mentally ill, mentally unstable, old, and riddled with at least three diseases. Dealing with an amputee and auto-immnune disease husband, a cerebral palsy drooler, and poverty!
What a winner! #610414 You old slag!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
Mobynine, defendant.
__________________________/
The Court states that the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT.
1. The defendant opened a chat room on November 7, 2024, and violated the rules of chat rooms.
2. The defendant hosted a room on the above date but abandoned his room on the above date.
3. Under the rules of this Court chat room host must notify members of the room when the host is taking a break or leaving. The defendant Mobynine failed to announce members on the chat room he was leaving.
Judge Clarisbinda's decision on the case;
I declare this defendant rude and incompetent to have a chat room. This Court restrained the defendant from opening chat rooms.
The defendant will be on probation for 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
Celestial, Defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
Count I. Tampering with Case Evidence
1. The Court on October 15, 2024 charged Member CAT a/k/a (786)530-8870 with the Clean Page Act. The Defendant on this case Celestial send CAT gifts.
2. Under the rules of this Court, the defendant in this case tampered with the evidence of CAT by sending gifts to block the evidence of the case member CAT.
3. Member CAT knew about the tampering of member Celestial and didn't do anything about it.
4. This Court will not allow a defendant to receive gifts to cover her nasty page.
5. This Court orders CAT to clean her page immediately.
Judge; Florisbinda; Mr. Celestial you are guilty of the above charge of Tempering of Evidence in a current Court case. The Court will give you probation for 2 months.
Member Sir-Sittles, plaintiff
Site Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT a/k/a 786-530-8870, defendant
___________________________________/
This Court declares all the evidence of this case is true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant CAT has violated the Clean Page Act rule.
Her page is dirty with negative gifts.
2. Under the Clean Page Act all members must keep clean their pages at all times.
3. The Court will introduce the following evidence by member; Sir-Skittles; /blogs/58549.html
COUNT II. WITNESS TAMPERING
1. The defendant has covered all the evidence with the help of member Celestial. This constitutes Witness Tampering.
2. She contacted the above member because she has no points to clean her page.
3. This Court doesn't care about the points to clean the page.
COUNT III. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant CAT has violated the immunity member rule. Under this rule, no member under this rule/Act cannot be attacked or defamed.
2. The defendant attacked the following member under this Act/rule; Sir-Skittles.
COUNT III. MENTALLY UNSTABLE
1. Member CAT appears unstable, based on the evidence of member; Sir-Skittles.
2. The evidence shows this member is using a phone number as her profile name on this site.
3. Member CAT has shown her unstable behavior from a normal member of this site.
4. She posted old pictures of herself making this type of behavior unstable.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT you are more lunatic now than last time you were in my Courtroom. I found you guilty of all the above charges. You have 30 days to clean your nasty page.
Saggy playing the victim yet again! Stupid bitch. (786)530-8870
Like your daughter was contacted. If she was as you say, and you are still on this scummy site after she saw you sucking dick, that is a new low even for you. A normal person would be ashamed and would delete.
Please get the Saggy Granny some site assistance! She is completely senile and defenseless!
Posting her drivers license and now her mobile number. Things may go horribly wrong for her now!
Can we get her to delete or into a sanitarium?
(786)530-8870
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
Phillyphuncouple, defendant.
_______________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN ACT
1. Defendant has violated the site CLEAN PAGE ACT rule. Under this Act, every page must be clean and free of trash gifts.
2. The defendant phillyphuncouple violated this rule several times during the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has been advised to clean up his page.
COUNT II. ATTACKING PREMIUM MEMBERS
1. The defendant has attacked several premium members of this site.
2. The defendant has shown no respect for premium members of this site.
COUNT III. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant phillyphuncouple violated the rule of Attacking immunity members. Under this rule any immunity member of this site shall not; be attacked in chat rooms, emails, blogs, or forums. Also, no immunity member shall not receive trash gifts.
2. The defendant attacked the following immunity member; Sir-Skittles
JUDGE Tomasina: This defendant has some serious charges. Their behavior on this site is outrageous. I will order a Gag Order for 30 days. In addition a letter of apology to member Sir-Skittles. The Court and his allies will be watching this defendant on this site .
violation of the clean page act, attacking premium members, and for being cunts
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs,
Ginger Daddy, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declared the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant Ginger Daddy has violated the rule of chat room hosting.
2. Under the rules of Chat room hosting, the defendant must always remain in his room; Or advise members he is leaving.
3. The evidence shows the defendant opened 2 chat rooms this month and abandoned his room.
4. The defendant does not care for other members in his chat room.
JUDGE FREDESBINDA; Mr. GingerDaddy you have proved you don't have any manners when opening chat room(s). Abandoning your room is not acceptable and is rude. This Court is ordering you to avoid opening chat rooms.