Men's Underwear. Boxers vs. Briefs, which do you prefer?

By Bigdaddy402 at 26,Sep,19 18:16 other posts of Bigdaddy402

Ti wear bikini underwear thongs g string and jockstrap

By knewbi at 19,Aug,19 15:23 other posts of knewbi

Just give me something that shows a nice bulge and I am happy....

By #586354 at 19,Aug,19 06:00

Boxerbriefs give my boys more room and I like that.
[deleted image]

But also like how sexy briefs are they are good for tight pants.
[deleted image]

By #588327 at 19,Aug,19 10:45

Don't boxer briefs get hot
? They are nice at first but ballss sure get hot in them I find

By #588327 at 16,Aug,19 16:35

Maybe briefs are coming back in fashion vs boxers. I started to wear briefs again vs boxers or boxer briefs

By #595788 at 14,Aug,19 19:52

[deleted image]

Briefs anytime. They look sexy and show off a good bulge.

By #518391 at 16,Aug,19 07:51

Impressive bulge...you'd look even better in a jockstrap!

By #595788 at 16,Aug,19 08:47

The briefer the better. Best of all too brief to hold my cock, and see through!

By #518391 at 16,Aug,19 07:53

I prefer going commando if I can (I did so for a couple of years fulltime...now only evenings and weekends). If I wear underwear, tanga briefs are the most comfortable- max suppprt with min coverage and they don;'t ride up my backside; for gym and sports a jockstrap keeps everything snug...I don't like my tackle bouncing around then.

By #551147 at 25,Jan,19 08:48

I can't stand boxers!

I prefer colored briefs like these ➡️ [deleted image]

AND! I think chicks dig them more, as they show your bulge. 😉 I could be wrong too, though.

By #531909 at 22,Jan,19 10:37

I mostly wear briefs and some thongs here and there, never realy like boxers because of how loose they are and boxer-briefs don't realy feel as comfy.

By #545468 at 21,Jan,19 04:22

Why wear either? I prefer neither and wear nothing

By #177288 at 10,Jul,11 06:04

for me g string or thong

[deleted image]

By #165750 at 29,May,11 13:08

The PRAT that invented boxer shorts shud have been sufficated with a pair of them, they are the biggest turn off in the history of underwear! you only have to look at some porn sites to see a guy drop his jeans to reveal a pair of minging wrinkled up pair of old boxers, now you tell me! does that sight give you a hard on? I think not!

By spermkiss at 29,May,11 18:41 other posts of spermkiss

Well, I sorta agree with you, but it depends on the guy and the pants he's wearing. Some guys look really sexy in boxers. I agree that they should not be worn with jeans, but with a suit they are really fine, especially if they are silk. It's like going commando under your suit and that's exciting. See my comment from March 9, above.

By #143714 at 12,Mar,11 19:19

I find that I don't really need to wear anything - even with shorts. My equipment usually contracts to a small compact package which has no need for support. Even at school I did not wear a jockstrap. In fact it took me a while to realise why other boys wore them.

By spermkiss at 12,Mar,11 20:04 other posts of spermkiss

I'm with you all the way about not wearing underpants with shorts. Underpants should never be worn with shorts, especially gym shorts or short shorts. The excitement that one will sometimes "accidentially" expose himself thru a leg opening is really fine. Let's face it, exposing one's dick is fun. All SYD members know this.

By #143714 at 12,Mar,11 21:30

Never had problems with exposing. I see you have .not posted any picures so we can't verify. Any pants I have (see my site) are for wearing indoors and in bed.

By spermkiss at 12,Mar,11 22:21 other posts of spermkiss

Sure, I'd like to post photos, but I'm not going to. See my Blog for a discussion of this.

By #143150 at 14,Mar,11 03:56

Mine's way toooo noticeable if I free-ball, especially at the gym; briefs are an absolute must.

By spermkiss at 14,Mar,11 06:19 other posts of spermkiss

It's impossible for a dick and a pair of balls to be too noticeable. If you've got it, flaunt it. The other members of your gym will thank you for giving them a good show.

By #143150 at 15,Mar,11 03:56

I like wearing just briefs in the gym locker room. That's when I flaunt it.

By spermkiss at 15,Mar,11 05:47 other posts of spermkiss

In the locker room you should be nude. Or better yet nude and at least partially erect. Then you'd really be flaunting it.

By #143714 at 16,Mar,11 11:47

I am the opposite. I don't flaunt because I don't have anything to flaunt. I try to hide. If I was partially erect no one would notice! This is being honest.

By spermkiss at 16,Mar,11 17:19 other posts of spermkiss

You're being overly modest. While it's true that you don't have the largest dick in the world, you also don't have the smallest. It's big enough to get the job done and that's all that matters.

By #95006 at 11,Mar,11 01:29

I don't like to be constricted, but don't like boxers or most boxer briefs. The only underwear I have found that I really like are called obviously for men. They are a light weight very breathable fabric and are the only ones I've found so far with a pouch to support with out squishing or being uncomfortable.

Good luck

[deleted image]
[deleted image]
[deleted image]

By #33070 at 10,Mar,11 03:39

I like all kinds

Depends on the pants I wear

By notnow at 09,Mar,11 22:05 other posts of notnow

Jockey Y fronts for me , check it out

By #100011 at 09,Mar,11 16:30

I wore jockey style briefs most of my life; now prefer boxers for comfort letting things hang naturally. I have a problem recently with the new "no gap" boxers that must be designed by old maids that must think a man's penis sprouts out of his belly halfway between the crotch and belly button. Compared to some old boxers I am replacing because the elastic waistbands are all stretched out, I measured 9 inches from waistband to bottom of the fly on the old ones, 7 inches on the new; I have to push the fly down 2 inches to reach my cock and can only reach inside with 4 fingers because the fly is so short. The bottom of the fly is 2 inches above the crotch; I don't know about yours, but I'll bet your cock sprouts from the bottom of your crotch like mine. I left a complaint on the Hanes website and have found another brand of boxers that have a longer fly, but still sewn a couple inches above the crotch. These are fuller than Hanes or Fruit, and feel much like going commando in full shorts. I think the major underwear companies need to hire a well-hung man to design boxers.

By spermkiss at 09,Mar,11 17:21 other posts of spermkiss

Try the silk boxers from WinterSilks (WinterSilks.com). They cost a bit more than department store boxers but are definately worth it. They are cut more fully and have slightly longer legs that drape nicely inside the legs of suit pants or dress pants (I only wear them with a suit or dress pants). The silk fabric feels good on the skin so it feels like you're going commando under your suit. Plus they are a lot more durable than department store silk boxers and stand up to repeated laundering. So even though they cost more at the outset, they are more economical in the long run.

By #1047 at 09,Mar,11 15:01

depends on what i am doing and where i am going

By boc at 09,Mar,11 12:40 other posts of boc

Boxers or commando.

By #6568 at 09,Mar,11 10:34

I like some support so it's briefs for me always as they keep everything in place during movement and activity etc....

[deleted image]

[deleted image]

Men's Underwear. Boxers vs. Briefs, which do you prefer?

New Comment