i have just seen this images /bv5kcs0i8omhpic.html I am sure that not one of those women, no matter who they may be has consented to their face being posted here. I did attempt to report it but as that has not appeared maybe this is a paying member.
This to me is a red line - you don't post a woman's face without her consent.
Thank you, thank you. I knew I had seen that face before somewhere I have been racking my brain. I suppose the saving grace of this post is that at least they are not nude.
Andthisisme, #5 was a member until sometime earlier this year when the profile was referred to the evaluation panel by a longtime member for being being "fake". I don't recall her exact name but I believe it was something like Miriam22.
@ Andthisisme, it's difficult to follow the different posts but I believe that DeadEnd is asking whether he reported Miriam22 and the answer is yes. You're speaking about reporting nils1991 and the referral report did not come through for the evaluation panel.
If you see a profile with a lots of non-nude photos with face of the same girl you can be 95% sure that it was created by a male with a purpose of revenge/defamation. Me be ex or rejected admirer.
In this case, however, it seems to be just a kind of poll. He may not even know any of them and took photo from the net. So far there is no reason to suspect malice. But it's better to keep an eye for what that member can post in the future.
To admin, regardless of whether you feel that there was no malice intended, Andthisisme made a rerport based on his gut feelings on this matter. Shouldn't you have allowed the referral process to run the course of review since 1991nils is not a paid member?
There is a rare bug, sometimes reports come like they are for paid members when member is not actually premium and never was. And this was the case. I'm too lazy to sort it out, since it does not appear often.
[deleted image]
In this case, however, it seems to be just a kind of poll. He may not even know any of them and took photo from the net. So far there is no reason to suspect malice. But it's better to keep an eye for what that member can post in the future.
P.S. I think I just fixed it.