Recent Posts of member admin

Topics:

So, you can't live in peace 13,Dec,18 09:13
Good news on science front 27,Oct,18 08:24
New section - custom contests 08,May,18 08:52
Adblock 16,Feb,18 14:04
A new feature 08,Jan,18 17:25
Balls licked? 06,Oct,17 11:20
Tiny additions to the functionality 12,Aug,17 15:05
Public breastfeeding question 30,Jun,17 14:49
Let's stir the pot! 23,Jun,16 21:46
Small clarification about gift awards 29,May,16 10:59
Here are another reasons to leave the site 17,Apr,16 22:59
Small update for premium members 11,Apr,16 19:27
Mafia Game 21,Mar,16 16:36
Another small update 13,Mar,16 10:17
Small Update that may be very important for some 08,Mar,16 12:13
Hot sex could make you smarter 21,Feb,16 21:41
Something weird on youtube 01,Feb,16 19:34
Small Update 21,Jan,16 10:52
I'm doing some changes to the private chat 20,Dec,15 14:45
You can now change your account name 11,Dec,15 17:22

Posts:

By admin at 06,Apr,20 11:53
Because of many members voting erratically, per suggestion of Scorps (at least I think it was him) I recently limited panel participation to verified members only.



By admin at 06,Apr,20 09:33
Well, you can download the pics if you suspect they are stolen. If you think it's too much of a trouble - may be it's not so important for you then.

I have changed this to the way it is now because of genuine members who were upset that people they blacklisted kept visiting their pages. Indeed I understood it would make life easier for those who use stolen pics, but I thought that it was more important to please those few genuine women who are on this site than bother about fakes that are always in bigger numbers than genuine women no matter what.



By admin at 06,Apr,20 09:25
"Member posts stolen images from internet or that belong to other members" has been there for years.

Report pages are different for images and members because images can only have several specific problems and members can be abusive in more ways.

But as an active member of the panel you already know that in most cases reason is not selected properly anyway. People seem to think that if they select "illegal" it will give it more weight. Personally I just ignore most of abuse reports that do not have correctly selected reason. It tells me right away that reporter is either dumb and has no clue what he is reporting or he understands but is not acting in a good faith.



By admin at 05,Apr,20 23:34
You should see report abuse link on members page even if you are blacklisted. Also, I take it you send private messages to members with internet pics who blacklist you after that. So you can always open this page /recent_contacts.php (linked from private messages page), open chat page with that member - though you can not send messages to members who blacklisted you, you can still open chat page and see past messages, and there you have a report abuse link among other options.



By admin at 04,Apr,20 18:00
For quite some time you can see report abuse link even if you are banned from the member profile...



By admin at 03,Apr,20 09:45
From my observations yes, almost any "female" profile asking for tributes is a dude, but I can't stop keep wondering why...



By admin at 03,Apr,20 09:43
Well, some members can stay on top without 20 points votes and some can't.



By admin at 03,Apr,20 08:42
Someone probably voted for the top participant at the same time so that everyone else dropped down.



By admin at 03,Apr,20 08:41
Not true. Out of 1000 last votes 873 were free votes (that's 87.3%) that I gave out 3 points for and only 127 (12.7%) were votes that costed 20 points. The balance for these 1000 votes for me is -79. It may slightly differ, but most of the time it's close to 0.



By admin at 08,Mar,20 16:24
I grew up in a totalitarian country and I've seen a bunch of them after that. And from what I can see, it's democrats who's building new Orwellian anti-utopia in US. Not that republicans are much better, but at the moment they are more harmless. I too wonder, how people can't see this. I guess my experience gives different perspective. I grew up in a society with double-think where right and beautiful words were said all the time, but people thought and acted differently, so I never believe what politicians say, only what they do. And from what I can see, democrats mostly do not mean what they say, they only say it to manipulate their voters and their political opponents. Trump is not ideal, but he's neither self-obsessed nor a dictator. May be you use those words because you think they are curse words without meaning and you can apply them to people you do not like. But by definition of those words they are not applicable to Trump. Hillary, on the other hand was and is uncaring and self-obsessed. She's a psychopath (not an insult, just clinical definition) unable to feel empathy and lying and pretending without hesitation to get what she wants. Considering that Trump likes to troll his opponents I can understand why you could get this impression that he's self-obsessed. But from my experience, self-obsessed people can't be self-ironic. Trump can and does it all the time. Obama could not. I wonder how you can't see that people joke about Trump all the time and those jokes are not harmless at all, yet no one gets punished. During Obama comics who joked about him could get into real problems. And I can tell you - this is typical under dictatorships and totalitarian states, you can't joke about leaders in them without getting your life destroyed. So, only judging from this Obama was more of a self-obsessed dictator than Trump is. I could go on, but I know you do not want logic analysis, you just believe Trump is bad and any alternative is good. Corrupt Biden, crazy Bernie... duh... To be honest, I would not care what you believe, I'll let you elect those people and suffer the consequences, I would gladly laugh my ass off watching it, same as I laugh about Venezuelans, but regrettably US is a leading world power and if it succumbs to socialism all world will suffer and I will suffer too. Therefore I occasionally write posts like this one. Though I think it's mostly in vain anyway.



By admin at 26,Feb,20 20:15
It's quite obvious they are just for working people's money. All those project are nothing more than pipe dreams.



By admin at 09,Feb,20 08:29
It does not bring out anything that was not already there...



By admin at 01,Feb,20 11:49
Because it was not a private upload, just a link to a pic.



By admin at 13,Jan,20 10:37
I've considered it from the very beginning. And I might do this. But I'm not sure if I should.



By admin at 11,Jan,20 12:14
Good point. Most of people do not realize that most of technologies and drugs that are used today in government subsidized medicare systems all over the world were actually developed for profits in USA.



By admin at 29,Dec,19 07:21
We are talking about this page, right? /blogs/

May be it's too long for phones, though it really should not be the case, since many pages these days are 100 times larger than that page. But let me shorten it a bit may be it will help.



By admin at 28,Dec,19 21:55
40 seconds? For real? It takes 0.5 seconds for me and I have relatively slow internet at the moment. If it takes more than 5 seconds, something is not right. But I see nothing unusual.



By admin at 27,Dec,19 13:26
The code is very primitive on those pages I can't even imagine what may not work. I checked on my old android phone and it works for me without any problems.



By admin at 23,Dec,19 12:44
I forgot to renew ssl certificate for https. Nothing to worry about.



By admin at 17,Dec,19 10:30
This usually happens when a car runs rich on idle. If your car noticeably vibrates on idle - that's probably it and you should check your ignition system with a specialist.



By admin at 15,Dec,19 10:22
I don't care what paid members do as long as it is not a criminal offence. Occasional copyright violation is not a criminal offence and I can always throw them under the bus since I have their real data. I explained this multiple times, it will be their responsibility, not mine. Which is not the case with members who do not pay. You are either retarded and can't remember what I say or you just play your stupid games again.

I was always open that there are different standards. Some hide behind anonymity of internet and some pay and provide their real data. They are different and therefore different standards apply to them. I don't know why it's so hard to grasp. If you share an appartment with someone who pays a part of the rent and with someone who just lives there for free because you let them and you pay all the rent, you will treat them differently no matter what you may say about it. I'm not even pretending it is not so.

I can formulate it even clearly if it does not sink in - if you do not pay you have no solid rights at all on this site and everything depends on my mood of the moment. Despite that I try to be fair to everyone to the best of my human abilities this is true and I was always straight about it. You don't pay - you may be kicked out of here for whatever reason, for internet pics, for being stupid, for being annoying, for being rude to other members, etc.

You personally would be kicked out of this site hundreds of times already for stirring shit if you would not pay. And I can't stress it enough that a lot of people are also not content with this situation and think it's unfair double standard. But as I said - I never pretended that there are no different standards for paid and free members.



By admin at 14,Dec,19 22:29
We already established that you are horrible human being that does not deserve respect. I don't really care what you think. I answer you only because I want others to learn my position and understand that you are full of shit.



By admin at 14,Dec,19 09:51
The site is not supposed to have internet pics. And it's a violation of copyright laws to intentionally host copyrighted materials without their owners permissions. As long as they are occasional, within fair use, etc. - it's not a problem but for that they should not be a majority, just a minor portion. Also, I simply don't want this site to be something that it's not. It was made for people to share their photos. This site will be overwhelmed with internet pics if all members think they are ok.

If members want to share their favorite internet pics they can do it on their own page without placing them into categories. Or even for friends only.

There is an option in evaluation tab that says "internet pic". You know how many pics get evaluated as internet pics? After 10 years I'm yet to see one. May be someone occasionally presses it, but it requires several members to express the same consern to be flagged as "internet pic" and I have not seen a single one pic flagged like this in 10 years.



By admin at 12,Dec,19 10:25
There is no any special treatment in who moderates the groups. People who created them lost interest and moderatorial rights were passed to the most active member of each group accordingly. I rarely visit that section and if not for bella complains I would not even know who moderates them. And I must add that hers were only complains I received on this matter, i.e. everyone else just don't care. Not a single member wrote to me that they lost their group to lix and want it back. Bella seems to be having another episode of acute butthurt about lix, that's all.



By admin at 12,Dec,19 10:17
The only bullshit here is what you say, as usual.

I can't leave 500+ groups unattended, someone should supervise them and I can't monitor them myself. Would you prefer that instead of appointing a new moderator automatically I just delete the group ignored by it's current moderator completely? I can do this right away, but since lix watchers hers you will not get any satisfaction, instead a lot of groups of other members will vanish, so the only groups left will be the ones of lix and you will be even more butthurt. Which will be fun indeed but I can't throw other members under this bus just to have some fun on your account.

I have added this page though, but I'm quite sure it will not change anything. /group_reclaim.php



By admin at 22,Nov,19 12:32
* if the member who hits 1000 did not cast any excitement votes within past 2 days they do not receive the trophy, but instead the member who made them reach 1000 receives +20 points.

You got 20 points, I can see it - "+20 points for hitting other member's 1000 mark in the excitement game"



By admin at 15,Nov,19 07:53
This question is too vague. It depens on where exactly you posted it. Internet has become too huge. Some things stays almost forever, some get forgotten in several years and can't be found.



By admin at 05,Nov,19 14:40
My point exactly. You did not even know who she was and then your friends lost the game to her (which she won without using money I must add), and now you keep trying to kick her off the site because of that without any actual wrongdoing towards rest of the community, the site or me.

I don't have any "high regard" for her, she's just another member who tries to be popular exactly as a bunch of other members do. She only does it better because she has more time to dedicate to this site and that's, really, her only "sin". Yes, she may be not a model and of not refined behavior, but those things do not matter to me, because I'm not here to enjoy women or men, I just run things here. And from this point of view she is not worse than any other member who fight for popularity on this site (which by the way is basically nothing, puff of air). From this point of view she's better, because she manages not to annoy me during that quest for popularity, unlike those who oppose her.

You (I don't mean you personally, but a group of people you side with) can't beat her in the popularity on your own and try to use me so that I remove her as your competition. That's in the core how I see it. Let's even forget that this is not sportsmanlike behavior and I do not respect it, but this is quite annoying for me personally.



By admin at 04,Nov,19 18:43
Government takes care of itself. It's a pipe dream that government will take care of people. Usually it develops the same way - take from the rich and hard working, give 30% to poor, steal 20% and waste the rest 50% because of mismanagement. At first this creates an illusion that life of the poor improves, but then they run out of rich. It befuddles me, but a lot of people can't grasp the idea that the rich and hard working are not a renewable resource. No one is that stupid to keep working hard when the wealth you earn is taken away and wasted. And the rich can simply migrate. There is no country that could sustain this model for long unless it has wast natural resources and small population. Qatar is very fine for example despite that it's not a socialism and not even a democracy. But in Venezuela they fucked up so badly that not even their largest oil reserves can help. And in only 15 years. USA is much bigger and it will probably take longer, but have no illusion about it - if you go the way of socialism you will eventually end up like that. Or take Argentina for example. Before WW2 it was a 2nd largest economy in the world with only USA being bigger. But they played with socialism and now it's 30th by size and 76th by per capita and it seems there is no way up for them.



By admin at 03,Nov,19 12:50
Why should not I be? This is an adult site, you are all adults. If you can't behave like adults it's not really my problem. And everyone can see through your shit anyway. Everyone knows that you insult others without even noticing it, but you go whining to me when someone insults you.

You got my reply in private and came to make this comment at 10:39 after you read it at 10:34. I.e. you did not like my reply and decided to paint me black in forum. Ok, let's repeat it so that others can see it too:

I don't see your name there, and even if it was there - it's not against current site rules to insult other members and I must point out that YOU are the main reason of this situation, you always used euphemisms and hints to insult other members without violating rules regarding insulting other member so I had to remove them at all . At the moment you can't threaten someone's life and can't spread private info of other people as well as false accusations in serious crimes, but that's pretty much it. And I don't know why I have to repeat it again, I already told all this to you both in private and in forum several times.



By admin at 02,Nov,19 20:55
You can try and see how it works for you, but it's limited to 2 or 3 per day if I remember correctly.



By admin at 02,Nov,19 16:55
It's not like that. I never made it impossible to send links to pic of the month, I just limited how often it can be sent.

If you dumbasses don't want to block people who send you spam or vote [NOT], which I must point out is there mainly for exactly this reason - so that members can downvote spammed pics, than it's not really my problem.



By admin at 30,Oct,19 21:04
Stalin was actually preparing for the war and his goal was to take the whole Europe. He supported Hitler, tought his officers when Germany was prohibited to have a large army by the Treaty of Versailles, supplied a lot of food and raw materials when other countries were refusing to trade with Germany. He was counting for that Hitler weakens Europe and then he can invade it as a liberator. Hitler did not make a mistake, he actually did not have any choice. He stroke preemptively and obtained a lot of cannons and ammunition that Stalin was amassing along the borders. Hitler practically fought the whole first year of war in Russia with those weapons.

Also, Hitler knew Stalin was going to cut off his oil supply from Iran, his tanks would become useless without it. Not many remember it now, but there was a joint operation only registered users can see external links

So Hitler needed to take oil wells in Baku i.e. he needed to start a war with USSR anyway. As I said he did not have much choice on many accounts.



By admin at 29,Oct,19 19:39
I will not investigate every shitty abuse report 90% of which are submitted by brain dead morons and it's hard to even figure out what they mean. Like "illegal images". Illegal images are child porn, r@pe or bestia1ity yet every moron think he can use this reason for anything he does not like.

Also, you have no idea what you talking about. Out of 100 recently deleted members only 2 were deleted by the panel and 2 were deleted by me, the other 96 closed their accounts willingly. The site will probably die eventually, but it has nothing to do with the abuse panel.



By admin at 29,Oct,19 17:24
The system is a cancer and mostly serves it's own goals. And he is well aware how it works he was a big developer in NY and dealt with bureaucracy most of his life.



By admin at 29,Oct,19 17:21
What does it have to do with politicians? Shortly after losing his re-election bid, Carter told the White House press corps of his intent to emulate the retirement of Harry S. Truman and not use his subsequent public life to enrich himself. He basically quit being a politician in 1981. A move that deserves respect, despite him being the worst president of US before Obama topped him.



By admin at 29,Oct,19 11:47
Politicians accomplish increasing their wealth



By admin at 27,Oct,19 12:11
You have a point with the report button. I have added a link to abuse report there so that you can click it even if you are blacklisted.



By admin at 27,Oct,19 11:11
You are not making much sense. It was always possible to upload pics in "for members only" mode or "for friends only" mode. If someone wants to upload obvious internet pics for a very small bunch or morons who think they are real and he pays for it - I don't really see a problem.



By admin at 27,Oct,19 06:58
It was not meant for fakes, it was asked by real members who are afraid of being stalked and want to know who sees their profile. They actually asked to reveal invisible members who visit their profile but since it would defeat the purpose of invisibility I refused and then was asked for the block.

But it's a premium feature, fakes are mostly not paid accounts so they can't use it.



By admin at 22,Oct,19 12:20
No, not you. As far as I know you never created a single fake. But many others are like that. I mean only that you should not listen too much to wispers of others on this matter.



By admin at 22,Oct,19 09:23
It's Skittles obviously. And just FYI: those who talk the most about Monted's fakes are often the ones who like to create fakes. I don't think Monted appeared on this site ever after 2016.



By admin at 22,Oct,19 09:15
I don't understand this request. From what I can see in the code - it's impossible to freeze without casting a vote in the same time and it's impossible to freeze without leaving at least 15 characters comment. I can only change it so that it's impossible to freeze if you vote for deletion.



By admin at 21,Oct,19 15:48
I'm sure it was meant as a sarcasm.



By admin at 16,Oct,19 23:22
At least twice. And that's only what I know of. Not counting EvilFairy and Skittles (I'm not sure who it was, but they were friend in real life at the time) ordering pizza to real Monted's address which scared a shit out of him.



By admin at 15,Oct,19 18:39
Not exactly "keeps from", but rather allows to let off some steam. When people can channel their anger easily they usually lose motivation to do something more elaborately sinister.



By admin at 15,Oct,19 18:02
Because if I do not let people to channel their aggression on the site in some way, they start doing crazy shit outside this site which I can't control at all. Like finding members they don't like on facebook and embarrassing them in front of their friends and/or work colleagues.



By admin at 15,Oct,19 12:16
It's not correct though. I removed downvoting because it's barely used, it was like 5-10 negative votes per day, it's nothing. And there are only 3-5 trolls on the site now. 10 years ago there were at least 30 regular trolls. Also, I added way more positive gifts over years than negative ones. There were almost equal amount of positive and negative gifts at the beginning.



By admin at 11,Oct,19 14:22
I have already explained. There are circles of people who vote for each other just to push their pics onto main page or win top of the month. They are basically reutilizing the points they get from each other during such voting. This will make it slightly harder, that's all.

I don't really get why you use word "entitled". It's a balance thing. For example, out of 300 recent votes only 11 votes are 1 point votes, because average people don't do multiple votes on the same pic. And "the house" got 11 more points on it comparing to what it was before. 3.6% increase. Booyah, I'm gonna get rich...



By admin at 11,Oct,19 10:09
That's what I use. For a long time I did not use any blockers, but in past 3 years internet is so full of adds, that it becomes too difficult to read or watch anything.