Recent Posts of member Ananas2xLekker

Topics:

Let's help Elon make twitter great 02,Nov,22 09:44

Posts:

By Ananas2xLekker at 27,Mar,24 08:46
I'm not naive about that at all, I would accept it with ease,
if they just had any convincing evidence.

But you're correct about 1 thing, rich people do have 1 goal, to get richer.
They don't care how they do it, what they destroy or who they step on.
They even sacrifice their own happiness for that money. Greed is an illness. Have you seen Trump being happy, like ever? Have you ever seen a millionaire or a billionaire, on your right-wing media, doing anything else but whining and complaining about something? I've only seen them complaining about how high their taxes are or how expensive and greedy workers are. They are sick from money and greed. If they were not so incredibly damaging to the rest of society, I would feel sorry for their misery.

Still, you think it's a good idea to cut their taxes and deregulate their businesses, because you think that will help the workers, by the trickle down fantasy that they sold you. It doesn't; those taxes are providing people with the basics for survival and those regulations are protecting the people from rich people sacrificing their health and safety, for any little bit more profit.

It's funny, how you always seem to understand things a lot better,
when we are talking about Democrats.



By Ananas2xLekker at 27,Mar,24 08:23
It's happening, whether you believe he did it or not.
They have evidence up the wazoo. His appeal will not save him.
He doesn't have any defense, he's just delaying and obstructing.

If he had a good lawyer, instead of numbskull Alina Habba, and hadn't threatened the judge, prosecutor, the staff and the jury, and hadn't violated the gag order against publicly commenting about court staff twice, he might had been let off a little easier.

Still, he wasn't punished to the maximum that the law allows; the corporate death penalty was on the table, but he's only "barred for three years from serving in top roles at any New York company, including portions of his own Trump Organization."

If you lie about the value of your assets or income, to evade your taxes or get benefits you are not entitled to, you would be going to jail.



By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Mar,24 15:29
Trump has been found liable for fraud.
If he wants to appeal his case, he has to put up the exact amount he owes,
including interest, to delay him having to pay up, or his assets getting seized,
if he can't pay.

A bond like that, has been the status quo in every big case against companies. In cases like that, bonds can go up to billions of dollars. The difference is that other companies don't cry about it, but just put up the bond that the usually have already reserved.
To those companies, it would be perceived as a big PR mistake to complain about the height of the bond. They just act like a few billion dollars is just a tiny fraction of their working cash flow. Apparently, Trump is not as wealthy as he's always bragging he is.

Trump was already trying to move his assets out of the state, so the law wouldn't be able to take them anymore. Engoron did exactly what he was supposed to do.



By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Mar,24 15:11
Who is talking about wanting to be a dictator?
Who is using literal Nazi rhetoric, calling people animals and vermin?
It's Trump.

Your argument is ridiculous. Everything that Obama did was democratic and everything he ever said was well-considered and decent. He was the hardest working president you ever had, tried to cooperate with the other side to the absurd and did everything to improve your country. Obama is a good man. Don't lower him to the level of your selfish piece of shit, treasonous, raping, racist, fascist, wannabe dictator.



By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Mar,24 14:59
So, that's you thinking that old Joe is a master white washer.
It's something you can keep telling yourself for ever, no matter the lack of evidence. It's a cop out from accepting facts.

Your not honestly following the evidence to a conclusion.
There is a conclusion that you want to believe and your
grasping at straws to find arguments to support your belief.

The evidence leads me to believe that Hunter did indeed get nice cushy jobs, that he wouldn't have gotten if he hadn't been the son of Joe Biden, even with his education and experience as a lawyer. I don't like that, because I'm a socialist. Meanwhile you have defended that system many times. When it's just another rich kid getting all the chances that normal people don't get, you just think that's how it should be, because wealth is in the DNA or something.
However, when it's the son of a Democratic president, it's the biggest sin in the world, all of a sudden. Be consistent!

The evidence that Joe Biden is somehow involved in what his son was doing is flimsy as fuck. There is also absolutely no motive for it. Joe has his own career and his own money. He doesn't need to get a cut from his son. The fact that you lot think like that makes me think: "Ill doers are ill deemers!". Look at your own side; with Trump and his family everything is transactional,
I don't see any love there. The only 'love' I see is from Trump, when he talks about Ivanka, but then it's clear that he just loves her body, that he wants to fuck. Joe Biden actually loves his son, even though he's not always doing well. He did however lose two brothers. Loss like that have turned many people to drug addiction. Still, Joe has stood by him and tried to help him anytime he could. A father like that wouldn't demand a cut from his son.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 18:36
That 10% is only mentioned in communication between Bobulinski and Gilliar. There is no communication from Hunter about this. If this actually happened, it would be easy to find financials on that. They have all Joe's financial records. However, you must think that Joe is both a demented as fuck and a master white washer. Everything you think contradicts itself.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 18:20
Sorry, CAT, but that comes a little too close to reality, to be funny.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 15:45
"A republican President freed the slaves for petes sake."
Sure, and that's why all you Republicans now love the Confederate flag.
You're re-writing history yourself. You know that's all bullshit.
Those were Republicans in name only, and I'm not talking about your RINO conservatives who like the policies of Trump but just not his chaos.
They were the liberals, doing liberal politics, writing the liberal Constitution and caring about liberty for all, including the slaves. The conservatives hated that idea and hated everything the liberals came up with. The Constitution is actually watered down for those Southern conservatives, giving them the electoral college which provided them with more electors per vote.
The liberals favored a majority representative system, like my country has.
You are indoctrinated with the idea that The Constitution is perfect.
First of all, you don't even know what it says and second; it's pretty good, but it was still a compromise, between the liberals who designed it and the conservatives who didn't like that whole democracy thing very much. And that has stayed mostly the same throughout time. Conservatives still don't like democracy, especially not for people who have different opinions. They prefer destroying democracy over losing to the other side. It's also an admission that your opinions are actually not popular. Without constant lying, almost no one would support your ideas.

The slaves didn't stay on the plantation because they were treated well, but because they needed to work for a living and often to pay off the debt to their former owners. Instead of the original slavery, many of them were put in wage slavery or debt slavery. Additionally, it was still a very unsafe time for them. The South was still racist as fuck and would kill lost of former slaves, for just walking around. When you still consider a black kid who rings a doorbell in the evening a mortal danger that you shoot just to be safe, what do you think people back then thought about black people.

Indeed slaves were an expensive investment, but those slaves needed to work very hard to regain that investment. They didn't get their slaves to work that hard for nothing, by just asking them nicely. They needed to be tortured into submission. If you don't understand that, imagine you were in their situation. It always seems like right-wingers are unable to do that. You lot would lay down your lives to protect your guns. Bunker out on your hill, like dgraff, but you don't understand that slaves had NO FREEDOM AT ALL. Many of those slaves were proud warriors, captured by rivaling tribes and sold to the white men. Do you think they would bend over that easy? How delusional are you? They were shown who's the boss in the cruelest ways you could imagine.

"How would they work starved" They got fed, but they were used to eating garbage. The culture called 'soul food' is based on the skill of slaves to make offal and other waste eatable. The black people in your country that are descendant of slaves have no other culture. Unlike Americans from Irish descend, who still celebrate St. Patrick's Day, those black people don't have African culture. That was all beaten out of them, they only have SLAVE CULTURE, with slave music, which is based on singing together in the fields to mike life bearable and slave food, which is based on cooking with garbage.

Your correct that immigrants are abused in almost the same way as slaves were back then. They can go, whenever they want, just like those freed slaves that stayed on the plantation, because they have nowhere to go. They didn't get a ticket back to Africa. Hell, lots of them were born into slavery and had never seen Africa. Where would you go, if you were born on a plantation, in a country where you are not safe anywhere else. Most immigrants are leaving poverty and violence. Do you think they wouldn't leave their exploiters, if they had a better place to go to or a better job to survive on? That exploitative system isn't 'woke', that's what right-wingers created for employers to exploit CHEAP LABOR. Republicans only cut and gut labor inspection.

It's the jobs that Americans don't want to do, because those jobs suck or pay even less than the jobs that lots of Americans still do. I told you many times that you should crack down on those employers. If there are still no Americans for those jobs, then you give those immigrant workers green cards and make sure they cannot be exploited anymore. Then the citizens who came to the US further in the past, have a chance to compete with them too. Then less of you won't have to work 12 hours per day, 7 days per week either. You're all getting exploited. You can change that by starting with the immigrants. Keeping the immigrants out won't work, mostly because your Republicans don't want to. They take orders from big corporations, who want their raw materials for cheap, to make more profit. That involves exploitation of the people who make those raw materials. It's either illegals or American citizens, but they will exploit who ever they can to make more money. Normally you support that. You would support exploitation of illegals too, if they hadn't sold you the story that they are to blame for your exploitation 24/7 on your right-wing 'news' channels that they bought and own.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 10:50
Being raised from birth to hate anything or anyone is wrong.
What you should do is judge anything or anyone on ethical principles.
If you do that, by any decent standard, what Putin did was wrong.
Then you consider 2 things:
1) Ukraine has the right to defend itself.
2) What happens if the modern Western world lets Ukraine lose?

This has no relationship whatsoever with Hunter Biden.
Not even if everything that was told about him was true.

I don't even like Ukraine. I vehemently opposed the EU-Ukraine trade agreement, because they do not share our production standards, but get to compete with companies who do on an unlevel playing field. We should have only allowed them access to our market, if they met our production standards.
I do not want them in the EU and I do not want them in NATO.
However, they were attacked by a dictator with big ambitions, to regain control of all the territories his country once lost. I care about peace and freedom and that's why Putin and Russia MUST LOSE, no matter the cost.

Meanwhile, you are talking about that this country made your cult-leader look stupid. Ukraine didn't do that, he did that himself. And you shouldn't care, because he does it all the time.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 10:42
Actually, he's not.
only registered users can see external links

It's still ridiculously close, but that's against Joe Biden.
Neither of these two old demented men should be the candidates.
I know Trump is 'the best' you have, but there are many better Democrats.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 10:18
As TS7 or as one of your previous iterations?

What the hell do I do with your definition of a country?
A country is one of the concepts that is defined BY LAW.
It is accurately defined by every dictionary, unlike other concepts.
We know what the word 'country' means. This is not debatable.
International law describes how countries are recognized.
I don't need your definition of a word that is already accurately defined.

If you are struggling with definitions of concepts that almost everyone agrees on what they mean, than you are the one needs to get an education first.
Everyone who had an education already understands what a country is.

Here is the applicable definition of 'definition':
"the action or process of stating the meaning of a word or word group"

Now, if you have opinions of what countries SHOULD BE, that's a discussion you can have, with anyone who's interested in it. That's not DEFINING a 'country'.
I'm not interested in that discussion. I'm fine with what countries are.
It has no strong relation with any of my convictions.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 10:11
You didn't say anything. You could have given examples of text on that laptop that you found incriminating, posting links to the full text of the transcripts.
That would support your claims, if it was actually incriminating.
But, you didn't. Why? Is that too difficult for you?
Or can you not find anything that IS actually incriminating?

Show that you have integrity and do some research.



By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 09:49
Me neither, but that's capitalism, so you should like it.
If there is a market for you speaking, then you can ask
whatever price the rules of supply and demand support.

Actually, as a socialist, I see no problem with getting rich that way.
No one is exploiting anyone else's labor that way.
If people feel they get their money's worth, that's an honest exchange.
Pay your taxes, and whatever wealth remains is yours.
It's honest money, so that shouldn't be taxed crazy high.
I want to tax the lazy fuckers who profit off other people's work.

Jamie Oliver's fee also ranged from $100,000 - $1,000,000.
I would pay good money to see him, just not what he is asking.
But, I'm paying good money to see several big performances this year.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 22:56
Of course not, I have the self control to behave myself.
You're a little snowflake, who thinks you can win an argument with vulgarism.
You're only dishonoring yourself and the side you represent.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 22:48
There was nothing on that laptop. I've checked everything that your side claimed and it's all taken out of context. Read the whole text in the full transcript and nothing of your story holds up.

Why don't you just check your own stories for once, instead of parroting those dumb lies. It's not so difficult. It's all out there for anyone to read. You just prefer to keep believing those lies.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 22:28
The president makes $400,000 a year, and has an expense allowance of $50,000.
Who told you the president makes only $42,000 per year?
That would be stupid. That's asking for corruption.

He gets a speaking fee of a million per gig.
Well, $400,000 now. The million was just after he was president.
only registered users can see external links

Then he has his book sales. And he was a millionaire before he was president.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 22:26
Obama has the money to waste. That property will last the remainder of his life.
In the meantime he can enjoy it.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 19:31
If you are boycotting every company that uses 'illegals', you will starve.
Instead of spending $25 billion to try to close 2067 miles of border, it would be much much cheaper to hire an army of labor inspectors, to crack down on the companies who use illegals as cheap labor.
That will also result in safer workplaces. It's much better for everyone.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 19:25
"Would you feel the same way if the thug they shot was white?"
White people don't get shot when they ring a doorbell.

"could it be because it is a bunch of lies and political correctness that doesn't tell the whole story?"
No, it's because you want to rewrite history, to say slavery was awesome.
In any case, ever heard of the first amendment?

There are no people with a victim complex as big as right-wingers.
You're all a bunch of fragile little crybabies and Trump is the worst one.



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 19:18
They don't care! Their sales are already up again.
Probably all the woke people who compensate for you.

If they are smart, they brand it as the wokest beer available.
You're not the target market for light beers. That's 'gay'!



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 19:12
What are you talking about?
Last time Hunter showed up, Comer didn't even have the balls to face him.

Hunter showed up when he needed to. And he crushed your guys!



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 19:05
Dem. rep. Jared Moskowitz literally motioned the House to impeach Biden, yesterday, asking Chairman Comer to second it. Why didn't he get any support from any Republican, while they have a majority in the House?
They don't even want to vote for it. They have 'studied' it since January 2023.
They have all Biden's financial records.

They found nothing. It's all based on lies!

The reason is that Republicans could not defend Trump's corruption.
So they accused Biden of corruption, to level the playing field.
There's just one difference; there's evidence for all Trump's crimes.
--------------------------------------- added after 63 hours

Here's the video of it:
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 18:49
You are trying to spin Trump being Putin's clown onto Biden.
And then you are referring to polls. What polls?

It's your brain malfunctioning. Whatever people dislike about Biden,
it's not that he's Putin's bitch. That's on Trump!

Biden is supporting Ukraine in defending their country from Putin.
Republicans are blocking the support of Ukraine, on Trump's orders.
That's Trump trying to give Putin what he wants, not Biden.

Republicans fear-mongered about Russians for 50 years. Now you have Tucker Carlson sucking off Putin and telling you how nice Russia is.
What happened to your side?

Putin is a horrible dictator and Russia is horrible for most Russians.

Do you see any Democrats praising Putin or Russia?
No, that's all your side. Your side has gone mad.
Maybe you just see a lot of Putin in Trump.
That's a BAD THING, you bunch of dumb-assess!



By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Mar,24 07:47
Do you poll your presidential candidates on how they like Putin?
If not, your comment makes no sense.



By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Mar,24 07:44
Maybe she makes a lot of money with that ass on Onlyfans.
Some women get tits like melons. There is always a willing doctor.



By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Mar,24 07:36
True, you are not guilty of anything, just because you're white.
But, you keep voting for a party that has restricting the voting rights of black people and other non-white people as a priority.
That party bans thousands of books from schools, for the only reason that there are black people in it as characters, that they were written by a black person or that it describes black history.
You react to every murder of a black person by police or some fearful grandpa, that they had it coming, because they are 'obviously criminals'.
That's you acquiring guilt for racism, that you haven't been born with.



By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Mar,24 18:49
I have explained this before, but I don't mind doing it again.

The weather is dependent on fluctuations in the atmosphere, which are very hard to predict, because they are mostly chaotic. It can be done, to some extend, by mathematically dividing the whole of the atmosphere in millions of virtual boxes, with interactive modeling between them, including the surface of the earth below, accounting for temperature, humidity, vectors of air movement from differences in atmospheric pressure, cloud cover, cloud height and energy gain or loss.

Predicting the climate is a whole different ballgame. All those fluctuations, that are so important for predicting the weather are averaged out. The only factors they use is the energy from the sun coming in, the ability of the atmosphere and the surface to absorb or reflect that energy, resulting in the average temperature of earth or more specifically a certain area of earth.

The ability of the atmosphere to absorb solar radiation is dependent on the concentration of gasses that are composed of more than two atoms, like CO2, methane and water vapor, because those molecules absorb infra red light, to create heat. Oxygen and nitrogen only have two atoms, and therefore do not absorb any light. The CO2 and methane concentrations have risen to concentrations never seen before in history. This can be measured from a.o. ice core gas composition measurements. The temperature of earth has not exceeded historical temperatures yet, because it takes much more time, than the few decades the green house gas concentrations have been at record highs, before such an incredibly large system as the whole earth can heat up and before all the icecaps have melted. When the icecaps melt, the surface of the earth becomes darker and less reflective, absorbing even more of the solar radiation (not just the infrared), exacerbating the increasing temperatures on earth.

Predicting the weather takes massive computer power, predicting the climate is pretty simple physics. It just has some variables and interactions that are not fully predictable yet, but the basic principles are discovered by science long ago.



By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Mar,24 12:12
In this case, it might be some creative medical effort.
But, I've seen proportions like this created by nature and food.
We had a female friend for a while, who had an ass almost as big.
I've even seen her naked several times. Another time, I had my hands all over that ass, while she gave me a lapdance. We had some wild parties, a long time ago.
I really cannot take much credit for those, I was just a happy participant.



By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Mar,24 09:37
Dave Chappelle | What Do You Want To Be When You Grow Up?
"Billy is A Big-Picture Guy"

only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 21:54
There is no evidence that Hunter ever did anything illegal too.
However, it's a useless discussion with you. The future will show who's right.

By the way, got you ass kicked out again and now trying #7?
It's getting a bit ridiculous, don't you think?



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 21:51
Maybe you should explain the true structure and definition of a country and democracy and what your desires are, before you say something so blatantly false. Goddamn you are a arrogant, ignorant buffoon.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 18:06
It they do, it's still democracy. What you call 'free money' is people's own tax dollars. The people should decide what they use it for.

Why do you think this is in any way related with RNC campaign donations?

When Republican voters donate to the RNC, they are not donating to Trump.
Lara Trump might be breaking the law there.

It's also very likely a campaign finance violation, if Trump uses that money
to pay for his personal indictments.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 17:54
Maybe, we will see when more evidence gets uncovered.

The Guardian say: "Alexander Smirnov was paid $600,000 by the Texas-based Economic Transformation Technologies. ETT’s chief executive is Christopher Condon, who is also one of three shareholders in the now-dissolved ETT Investment Holding Limited in London. The other two shareholders are Pakistani-American investor Shahal Khan and Dubai businessman Farooq Arjomand. Both Khan and Arjomand boast ties to Trump “through Trump associates,” according to The Guardian. Arjomand, who was also listed as an adviser on ETT’s American website, is also a board member of Damac Properties, a Dubai developer that has “partnered with Trump for a decade,” The Guardian reported. The former chairman of Damac, billionaire Hussain Sajwani, is close with the former president, attending his 2016 inauguration. “Hussein, Damac, a friend of mine, a great guy,” Trump reportedly said in 2017."
It will take some time to get all those ties investigated, in so far as they can link the money to the lying and it being a criminal offense.

So, what's your source for claiming that the US paid that money?

In any case, the whole Hunter Biden case is now flat on its ass
and Republicans don't even want to be reminded about it any more.
Too bad, if they find out that Comer and his friends knew about it being
nothing but lies, they are complicit and should face indictments too.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 13:31
It's very sad that you think only meat tastes fit to eat.
I do admit it requires some more skill to make veggies taste nice.

I just want to have the real cost of food represented in the price.
And I don't want factories to turn literal garbage into food.

I'm not saying I want to criminalize eating meat, I'm saying that the damage to nature should be included in the price. That will result in you having financial incentives to eat more healthy, because locally grown plant based food would then be cheaper than meat, especially beef.

Where we are heading, at this pace, you won't be able to afford beef anyway, in a couple of years. The price of all food will go up, whether we do something about climate change or not. Many farms in your southern states are already not able to afford the costs of water and food for their livestock. Clean water sources are drying up, pastures require more water each year and grain goes up in prices because of dwindling water sources too. Cows drink and eat a lot for your piece of beef. The calculations for the amount of beef produced vary from 4,000 to 15,0000 l water/kg of beef, probably based on the areas where they raise the livestock and grow their food. When water sources become scarce, the price goes up, affecting the prices of all products requiring water for their production. Eventually, we will be forces to just consume food that is produced with the least amount of water, which will eliminate beef the first. Pork is a little bit less wasteful with water and chicken is the most water efficient piece of meat. But chickens still eat more grain, than when we feed people on just grain. The longer you lot delay the inevitable sacrifices humanity has to make, the tougher the sacrifices will need to become.

It is freedom to be allowed to do things up to some level of harm you are causing with it. At the moment, eating beef causes a lot of harm to civilization. That should be reduced, because the level of harm is unsustainable.

I'm not talking about achieving Utopia, I'm talking about the continued existence of humanity.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 13:18
Which in your opinion is imprisoning everyone involved in alcohol and g@mbling? Well, at least it would be consistent.

Just look at countries where drugs, alcohol and g@mbling are criminalized and tell me if you want to live there. If you do, maybe convert to Islam beforehand, because I cannot think of any countries besides those. It's not a good sign if your ideas about freedom have so much similarities with Islamism.

People not being able to cope with lives little issues (or big issues) is indeed often the cause for them using alcohol or drugs. That's the wrong reason, but you can't solve that by giving them more issues to cope with. The better solution is to reduce the amount of huge fucking problems that people face every goddamn day of their lives, if they didn't win the birth lottery. Some countries successfully do that and achieve a better quality of life for most of their citizens. Some countries don't and turn the lives of their citizens into a living hell. I know in which country I want to live and that's what I support politically.
The end goal might be socialism, but even if that never amounts to it, in the meantime they are working hard to achieve more justice, freedom and quality of life for the citizens. I cannot say the same for the politicians that you support.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 12:58
You're not even capable of writing something legible anymore.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 12:56
If it was all so obvious, you wouldn't need to say so, you could just show it.

I have an open mind to arguments, based on evidence and logic, not to a bunch of inconsistent claims, that you don't even provide the sources for, or any other reason to accept the truth of them.

Just like pure socialism, pure capitalism also has never worked in history before. There are still many socialist policies that HAVE WORKED to pull many people out of poverty and is still working in many countries, to provide their citizens with a much higher quality of life than the US, that doesn't have much of those policies.
But, you do you, and support politicians who want to destroy social security and medicare. Maybe old people will stop voting for Republicans, when they see their life made impossible. Or they'll just die and then they cannot vote for Republicans.
You can of course take care of your parents, like people did before 1935.
Then you can hope your son will do the same for you, when you are old.
But, if he doesn't believe that 2 oranges + 2 oranges are 4 oranges, I don't think he will be ABLE to take care of you in the future. Did he get one of your chromosomes in duplicate?

In any case, what type of economy I support has no relation to anything else we are discussing. Any subject requires it's own arguments, based on evidence and logic.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 12:35
When Trump refused to give back the collection of classified documents that he had, he wasn't president (anymore) EITHER. Trump is not indicted for HAVING those documents, he's indicted for refusing to give them back, lying about having them, lying to his lawyers about it, having his lawyers lie about it, moving those boxes of classified documents and trying to destroy evidence of him moving those boxes of classified documents. Also, Trump had the type of classified documents that he wasn't even allowed to take anywhere outside of the White House as president.

All these charges do not apply to Biden. Biden returned the documents he had, as soon as he found out he had them and fully cooperated in the investigation.
Biden didn't have any documents that he wasn't supposed to have in his personal possession as vice-president.

That's why Biden has not been indicted and that's why Trump still faces 37 felony counts related to the mishandling of classified documents, obstructing justice and making false statements.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 12:16
The American voter never surprises me anymore, but I can give you some reason to be worried. The GOP has lost all control to Trump. With Lara Trump now in control of the party's campaign funding, every cent now goes to Trump's defense in all those court cases. All those Republican congress people, who also want to be re-elected, won't have a cent for their campaigns coming from the RNC.
The RNC was already struggling with declining donations, but now Trump is cleaning out the cash register even more.

Lots of retiring Republicans need to be replaced with new idiots, who depend on the media posting lying ads for them. The media won't do that for free.

Democrats don't have those financial troubles. They are not controlled by someone who's only qualification is being married to Eric Trump.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 11:55
If you cannot find ANY argument against it, then you are full of shit.

I'm objectively not lying, because I'm referring to real news from many credible sources. I'm reporting the fact, that Alexander Smirnov is in custody, awaiting trial:
only registered users can see external links

All the stories about Hunter and Joe Biden having received $ 5 million each from Burisma, were based on nothing else than Alexander Smirnov's 'testimony'.
Everything he has said turns out to be false, it turns out he had been caught lying
in two another cases in 2015 and 2017 and the FBI had considered Smirnov a liar
and a fraudster for years.

Now you better provide any evidence that the story about the $ 5 million from Burisma
is based on anything real. Maybe you can help Alexander Smirnov to get off from being indicted and facing a maximum of 25 years for 'lying' about Biden bribes.
If you can't, you're the liar and you're full of shit.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 09:50
There are lots of conservative Christians working in Hollywood. There are also lots of actors who at some point don't get asked for new roles at a point in there career and even more (millions) who try to make a career over there and fail. They are just not good enough at their job or their appearance doesn't match their role type or they just don't get the good graces of the public anymore.

Kevin Sorbo was a mediocre actor, but he was muscular enough to be Hercules. When he aged, his acting didn't save him. It happens to almost every actor and
even more actresses. Only a rare talent or being associated with roles that are
less dependent on looks saves some of them.

But, right-wingers and Christians have all been talked into a massive victim complex, which is easy to abuse as justification, when you lot get washed up. When they stir up that indignation strong enough, they will get asked for really bad conservative propaganda flicks, out of pure sympathy, for their fake battle against woke.

So, don't be sad, just like there is a good market for 'woke' movies, there is also a good market for right-wing propaganda movies and failed or washed up actors to appear in them. The market is way smaller, but in contrast to the movies you call 'woke', those right-wing propaganda movies are funded massively by wealthy conservative Christian fundamentalists. Not because they want to see that filth themselves, but because they want YOU to see it.



By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Mar,24 09:21
You are unwilling to even try to come up with any arguments, other than
personal attacks, but you say I'm the con man and refuse to show transparency.
Irony is lost on people like you.



By Ananas2xLekker at 16,Mar,24 20:31
"US firm that paid indicted FBI informant tied to Trump associates, records reveal"
only registered users can see external links

"Alexander Smirnov was paid $600,000 in 2020 – the same year he allegedly began lying to FBI about Bidens’ role in Ukraine business."
"An American company that paid the now indicted FBI informant Alexander Smirnov in 2020 is connected to a UK company owned by Trump business associates in Dubai, according to business filings and court documents."

So literally a paid disinformation/smear campaign, organized by Trump.
You can only wait until he faces consequences for that; indictment #4328.



By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Mar,24 11:24



By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Mar,24 11:11
That's true and now fossil fuels are destroying humanity and that prosperity.
We either find a solution to prevent the worst of it or die off.

I have told you about technologies before that can power large cargo ships
on solar, hydro, bio or wind power. Understand that about 40% of the mass transported with those ships consists of fossil fuels. And maybe we could ship
a bit less shit from China?

If combustion engines are indispensable for a certain task, then they can run on hydrogen, alcohol or bio-fuel. The problem is however never the combustion engine itself, because electric motors are much stronger for their size. It's indeed the energy storage that is the problem. However, energy storage is not limited to batteries. There are several chemical solutions to efficiently store energy in a liquid or solid, with high density, which can easily be refilled in a short time, just like tanking fossil fuels. Electric energy storage also gets better by the day. High capacity capacitors can be recharged with many times the speed of batteries. At the moment they can hold a bit less energy than batteries, but it's the time unit of charging per time unit of operation that counts. A minute of charging for an hour of operation is acceptable. We do not have to kill humanity to avoid that minor inconvenience.



By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Mar,24 10:31
In history, changes like that took thousands to hundreds of thousands of years,
now those changes take decades.

Those trees under the ice of of greenland are about 400,000 years old.
The CO2 concentration then was 280 ppm. During the last 400,000 years,
the CO2 concentration didn't rise above 300 ppm once. We are at 421.83 ppm today.
In 1970, the CO2 concentration still was at 325 ppm.

The global average temperature was 53.6°F/12°C 400,000 years ago
and didn't rise above that for 400,000 years. The global average temperature
right now is at 57.99°F/14.44°C. It just takes a while for all the ice to melt away.

Yonaguni Jima is NOT under water because of the sea level rising,
but because of tectonic activity causing it to sink below the sea level.

Find some arguments that cannot be debunked in 5 minutes of Googling.

If you don't think: "OMG, I was wrong!" from those arguments, then you are either
not smart enough to understand them or you are gaslighting yourself.



By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Mar,24 10:20
Wow, that's dismissive of 99% of women who want to be independent human beings.
Even in 1950's red rural Christian areas, some women didn't want to be men's pets.



By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Mar,24 10:16
"a drunk in a penal colony listening to barney the dinosaur playing a digeridoo"
I must say, that's highly creative insulting



By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Mar,24 18:56
Bullshit, Trump got hundreds of millions from his father to have him fail business after business.
Then when old Trump died, Donald took the whole inheritance for himself.

When you have that kind of money, you don't have to do anything. You just buy your way into several businesses and live the good life from the dividend. If Trump had done just that, he would have been more wealthy than he is now.

You think living like that is the maximum? OMG, it's so sad what they have made you think.

Even a burger flipper creates enough added value to live that life, if they got a fair piece of the cake. But, I told you before that flipping burgers is only a thing of capitalism, where wealthy people get their money by exploiting nature, workers and your health. It doesn't help society and it doesn't create much pleasure for people. It's bland food that only gives you a buzz, because it's full of fat and sugar and your body is programmed to like it. It's sort of an addiction. It's only capitalism that makes you think that giving people obesity and diabetes is good, because of the jobs. It's not good, it only serves the wealthy and harms society. Socialism would provide restaurants where you could eat a burger, but it would be more expensive than eating healthy, way more tasty, less harmful to nature and pay the workers a wage to do all the things I described.
Why? Because that's the smart choice, that serves everyone.



By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Mar,24 18:38
"As for putting drug addicts in jail,that should greatly reduce or eliminate the chance of getting drugs, which would allow them to sober up."
And then they come out with a criminal record and no future.
They will be addicts 10 minutes later again.

You have tried this for decades and decades. It doesn't work.
The US has the worst drug problem in the world. Try something else.

It's only your feelings of 'let them suffer', why you say that.
You don't say it for alcoholics or g@mbling addicts.

Ending the alcohol prohibition did do lots of things. It took away the revenue model from the mafia. The fact that they turned to drugs after exactly proves my point.

It is impossible to keep people away from drugs or alcohol, unless you create a repressive police state which is worse than the drugs and alcohol problem. Duterte tried it in the Philippines and murdered thousands of people, way more than ever died of overdoses. I thought you liked 'small government'? Do you think that a repressive police state like that would respect the freedoms that you like? They will search your house every time they find anything suspicious in your area, because that the only way to keep all drugs of the streets.

People who don't have hope for a better future will always find something to destroy themselves. Actively worsening their future, by jailing them for their mistakes, assures they will never recover. Only the hope for a better future and some help, can be successful in turning these people into contributing members of society.

And again, most people who use drugs don't get addicted. I know a lot of people who used a plethora of drugs and they are all doing perfectly fine right now. Your preferred system would have destroyed them.

People who get into drug addiction have character flaws that would get them in any other trouble too. Those people either need constant mental healthcare, or we accept they are unable to be contributing members of society and minimize their damage.
You might want to put them in jail forever, but that's more expensive than trying to help them. Sometimes it works,
sometimes it doesn't. I want to give them a chance.