Started by phart at 19,May,22 22:33 other posts of phart
 | Hello World.
HERE will be the NEW HOME of all the strange and odd things I have feelings about. You could consider this, Phart's Brain Farts regarding world or local news. There will be freedom of speech here.Just don't violate someone elses. For starters, only registered users can see external links Really now? Well what is really despicable is the mess at the border with folks coming in willy nilly bringing their dope and their virus's and diseases we have eradicated decades ago. Instead of putting all your air into denying it, PROVE THE THEORY WRONG. There is overwhelming evidence of a problem brewing,and unless democrats can gain from it,they would be otherwise trying to stop it. |
Similar topics: 1.Feelings 2.Under Pressure Horniness 3.All Trump and only Trump 4.HUGE DICKS 5.Arthur Labinjo-Hughes
only registered users can see external links
It is past time to clean up the mess,
Wow, amazing what gas can do
A good friend of mine is 89 years old. Has had serious medical issues since having the wuhan virus in december of 2020. He has been dealing with cancer since a couple months after taking the covid shot.
He has been taking some treatments and is feeling ok considering he can't eat much .Still drives, has a sharp mind.Just can't swallow much food.
He couldn't swallow some liquid last week for a scan, and since the scan turned out bad, the dr wants to cut off all further treatment and put him in hospice care. No way the scan could be accurate because he could not swallow the liquids necessary for the machine to pick it up.
So no way that dr knows what is going on.He is going monday to talk to the dr and has the backing of 2 other drs suggjesting treatment continue because it is helping him to live a good life as best he can.
It bugs me to no end that this so called health care system wants to just "pull the plug" on a retired airforce veteran and family man.His health care is covered both by the m,ilitary coverage and other insurance. and there is well over a quarter of a million dollars left in his yearly budget.
Why is this acceptable? Or is it? I don't feel like it is acceptable.
But there is so much whining about free health care and etc, and then this? what the fuck kinda health care is it to just tell a man to go home and die? hell he is still chasing women! He actually got some viagra 2 months ago. he aint dead,and simply wants to live ,why is it so acceptable to tell him to go home and die?
Hospice, will not allow the person to eat,drink or anything,OTHER than take something for pain. no driving,nothing. and he is very active, it would be living hell for this man. it just boggles my mind.
I don’t know how far your friend’s illness has progressed so I can’t say it’s a good idea or not, but, I can assure you, from my experience working in two major hospitals, hospice care DOES provide sustenance unless the patient is unable to process solid or liquid foods. Until then extra-ordinary means may be used like a feeding tube through the abdomen.
Hospice-like care can be provided at home, too. However, I believe your friend is still far from reaching this point. At the very least redo the tests.
I think a feeding tube reinstalled would be a blessing for him.
His cancer dr told him frankly he had never saw anyone else survive everything Bill had been thru and he was a walking mystery and miracle.
Before covid and the covid shot existed, hundreds of millions of people were dealing with cancer too. He is 89 years old. The risk of not surviving the 'wuhan virus' is very high at that age. So he was wise to get vaccinated. Cancer has no relation to it and he probably already had it before 2020, because most of the time cancer takes years to develop into symptoms.
As you know healthcare costs money. In your system, health insurances decide if the patient is allowed to get treatment, based on money. How about a system that lets doctors decide what's best for patients? That doesn't mean doctors shouldn't think about money, because there are other patients to consider. As long as there are shortages of doctors and pharmaceuticals, it's the job of doctors to decide which patients are benefiting the most which treatment, not for profit health insurance companies.
"Hospice, will not allow the person to eat,drink or anything" Who told you that?
only registered users can see external links
"Hospice care does not deny a patient food or drink. If someone has the desire to eat or drink, there are no restrictions on doing so. However, for most patients, there comes a point where they simply do not want nor need food or liquids."
I had family in hospice care and when someone tried to give them water,the hospic nurse there about body slammed them and told them "NO,they are not to be given anything". family member still crys to this day remembering not being able to simply give water to them.
Edit, I did find this, which makes perfect sense
only registered users can see external links
Can COVID increase cancer risk?
People hospitalized with severe COVID-19 are at increased risk of being diagnosed with cancer in the following months, according to new research. While it's well established that cancer patients are at a higher risk of getting severe COVID-19, researchers have found a potential new link between the two conditions.Jun 5, 2023
'Liberal free speech' does not protect unambiguous misinformation. If there was some German article claiming that vaccines affect the body's defenses against cancer, based on medical reports, which describe just a correlation in time, that article is misinforming people, who do not understand that correlation does not imply causation.
Everyone was able to report suspected side effects, however people were fearful and politically influenced. The FDA and other government medical authorities will check all those claims. If they find no CAUSATION, then those reports are rejected. For instance, if someone is diagnosed with a large slow growing tumor, a month after vaccination, that is no causation, because that tumor must have been developing for years.
only registered users can see external links
I would NOT want to be 1 of those that failed to do my job!.
only registered users can see external links
And men won't be able to compete with women in chess either!
Things will be fair hopefully for girls trying to get college scholarships and such. And PLEASE, be sure to to listen to the poor gal that was hit in a soccer game by a male and suffered brain damage from the hit.
Sad,poor gal will suffer the effects of that accident the rest of her life.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
You need some evidence to cook Biden's goose.
Looks like Republicans still got absolutely nothing,
so they should think about the alternatives.
Maybe become a party that people actually have reason to vote for?
I still can’t believe they are doing cocaine in the White House what a bunch of losers
The reason Trump has been accused of about 100 crimes, is not because he was a horrible president, but because he really has a problem with respecting THE LAW.
And for the thousandth time; if it was Biden's fault,
then why does the whole world have the exact same problem?
You just like to swallow those stupid cocaine stories, to make yourself believe
that the other side is really really bad, because you don't have much else to show for.
The biggest 'achievement' of Trump is tax-cuts for the wealthy, which increased the deficit, and requires average Americans to pay more taxes or get even less back from the government. An other 'achievement' is banning abortion, which does nothing for you, but only makes the lives of lots of women harder. That's a good part of the reason for why most people are not voting for Republicans (again). Your side can only win
by lying and cheating, and you support that wholeheartedly.
We need boots on the ground actually making life livable and affordable again ,not leadership trying to cram chemical castration of teens and ukraine aid in our faces and telling us it is great.
than you have no idea how inflation works. Inflation will keep happening,
because it's necessary to compensate for all the rising national debts.
As long as people's income rise at a similar pace, that's no problem.
You are absolutely NOT basing your opinions on just what you see around you,
you are basing your opinions on what you hear from the most dishonest media.
I don't care how much pussy presidents grab or how many cigars they put in there, as long as it's consensual. That's between them and their wives, if they have them. What Trump did, was very much NOT consensual, Clinton's cigar story was.
Trump lost in court over sexual abuse and defamation of E Jean Carroll.
Clinton was never found guilty, even though he settled for $850,000 once.
The rest is just accusations, and Trump has way more of them then Clinton.
That your mind is making this worse for Clinton somehow, shows your bias.
That Trump got in trouble with the law for his prostitutes, is because he used campaign funds for hiding it. That's breaking the law. Clinton just lied about it.
Trump has lied 30,573 times over 4 years. Did anyone impeach him for that?
Or maybe a bit, if the Ukraine war ends and they can export grain again
for human and livestock consumption.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
If you think food is expensive now, just wait until climate change destroys
even more harvests and turns even more areas unfit for agriculture.
then there's your problem.
One easy solution would be to increase the wages to a level that Americans could live on it, but that seams to be out of the question. The alternative is to have legal migrant workers do it. Easy fix; just give all the illegals green cards.
Legal worker import is available, but, the State Department limits these temporary work visas and there's not enough workers, hence, illegals are the answer only because they are forced into this unsupervised type of work.
Not so in the State of Florida now. Now, the brunt of staying legal falls on the farmer. He risks heavy fines and/or imprisonment.
If you give all illegals a green card they would be tickled pink. As soon as they get it they would be looking for jobs in other places than agriculture.
because capitalism allows the food corporations and supermarkets to control the prices and make all the profits.
That will not change if the government makes illegal employment on farms impossible. The prices of raw produce and raw animal products will go up a bit, because the costs will rise a bit, for the food corporations and supermarkets, but the profits of the farmers will be the exact same; just enough to survive and not decide to stop. That's just basic economy. My country is the #2 agricultural products exporter in the world. We cannot produce cheaper than you, because we don't have illegal employment on farms, we just have a lot of legal exploitation of migrants from Eastern Europe. They have all the freedom to find better jobs, but those better jobs are taken by our own people, who speak the language and are better educated.
Transportation of food is very expensive, so our products cannot compete with your products on price of raw goods. They might compete on profit margins of the end products or quality though, but that's up to you.
In the EU, every citizen of the EU is allowed to work everywhere in the EU.
So they're all working legally in that way, but there are many of them who are exploited in other ways, like not getting payed the hours they are actually working or getting deducted very high prices for a dirty bed in a shed. At least they have no reason to fear getting arrested and deported.
If you look at russia and ukraine with a open mind, same thing there. Putin is trying to reunite the countrys and rebuild the "Union". and we are fighting with the confederates on this 1. why 1 war was so wrong to so many and this war is so right makes little sense.
Yea,on JOE BIDENS HEAD
only registered users can see external links
Millions of dollars paid to the biden family while joe was vice. I wonder what obama will think about all this when he finally wakes up to the fact his vice was actually worse than himself?
So, where is it already?
The prosecutor fired in ukraine? Um, I am willing to bet he would be glad to testify if allowed to
His emails might be evidence of Hunter doing something illegal, but they
fully exonerate Joe.
Maybe they will find something, but at this moment you have diddly-squat.
If you had something, you could present it, instead of your conjectures.
Phart can you find ANY evidence of this? Not conjecture, real facts.
If you mean literally; I didn't know you're into that fetish. I'm not, sorry.
to their claims.
And it uses statements like 'might have included'; conjecture.
However, the article says: "Schwerin ... testified last week before a House committee".
I haven't seen that one and cannot find it on YouTube. Did you see it and know where I can find it?
I found this and it looks like (if you can believe FOX NEWS) nothing happened.
passing the deadline set by a JUDGE, to provide their OWN documents,
which are more SPECIFICALLY described, or whatever.
This is called a 'false equivalence fallacy' and they do it all the time.
Like Trump vs Biden or Obama possessing government archive records.
Or all the emails incriminating their side vs Hunter's emails (not doing so).
But because she was a candidate before Trump, they just point out the things that she did, while she was not even the president, without a word about things that Trump did, who was president, related to similar subjects.
What Trump did was all much worse, but they don't want him investigated
for those things, while Hillary was. That's just 'hypocrisy'.
You know, artificial intelligence?
Who would be receptive of it,and who would not want to be a part of it?
He says he is the AI, when he has no REAL intelligence.
only registered users can see external links
any evidence of it. Smarter than Trump, with his 78 criminal charges and counting.
Smarter than Trump's lawyers, who are incriminating their client on live TV.
They are basically saying: "Yeah, he did all of that, but he had a good reason..."
and "Yeah, he did all of that, but that's free speech!"
Even pretty good lawyers turn into morons, the minute they start working for Trump.
Trump must spread some Artificial Unintelligence virus or something.
I thought you would see the open goal for a joke here;
Biden is Artificially Intelligent, without those meds he's a vegetable.
Right?
only registered users can see external links
The article above is no longer available. However, the theory is and has been since the early 1900’s. We don’t have to prove something that has already been proven false as you can find that proof too.
The problem with our border to the south, though, doesn’t quite line up with this theory. First, they are a mixed group of people representing all races and nationalities. Their religious beliefs are varied too, although I suspect, most are Catholics or, at the very least, Christians.
They are coming over unvaccinated maybe. Other countries do vaccinate their citizens, but, it should not be very hard to do so once they are here. Nor is it that hard to check for “virous’s or diseases” and quarantine those affected. That is something I’m sure they do already.
Bringing their dope is a different problem, but, one way or the other, the drug cartels will get them in. There’s too big a market in the US not to.
So, I’m 71, all my life I’ve heard how drugs are imported illegally into this country. It didn’t matter if the administration was Republican or Democrat. What possible magic wand do you expect President Biden to wave and resolve the crisis? If you do your research instead of getting your info from crazy-assed ultra-right fake news media folks, you might get to the truth.
I can’t say we should not try to find a solution. I just say that it takes ALL OF US to try to do so instead of blaming one or another national leader.
Dope heads, the scrouge of the earth.
Colorado no less, land of legal pot,that only leads to worse.
only registered users can see external links
That's absolute bullshit. Illegal pot only leads to worse. Legal pot saves lives.
To stop pot, you need to do far worse to people than drugs and crime are causing now.
Look at the Philippines. A horrible drugs war and it doesn't help at all.
only registered users can see external links
Republicans used to stand for freedom, now just for tyranny and servitude.
This is the list of freedoms you stand for:
- Working
- Mindless consumerism
- Saying racist bullshit online
- Having guns to kill people who look like a criminal (black)
That's it, nothing more.
Work 40 hours a week, then enjoy the fruits of your labors
Speaking my mind ,
being able to defend myself against the racist ,thieving thugs that libturds leave out on the streets to harass every day people.
You must live under a rock.
I have watched several people start out with that simple "harmless "joint once in awhile and then go to worse because the joint is just not giving them the HIGH they are after.
If you can't understand that people smoke dope to get high, then get acclimated to it and it is not enough, they do more, read this, maybe it will help you understand.see link below
I am familar with this 1 as they helped a freind get cleaned up so he could get back into the work force and take care of his family. But 2 others I know, didn't work out and have become zombies. 1 gal I went to school with that later became a topless dancer, died from a od.
since the wuhan virus thing started, just in our fire district alone that I help manage, we have had at least 8 deaths from Overdoes.
Most of them, started out with pot.
only registered users can see external links
You just re-interpreted the ones that I ridiculed.
Freedom comes with responsibilities. Just because some people
cannot handle freedom, is no reason to keep it from everyone,
unless that freedom itself really hurts others.
I support the maximum possible freedom, shared equally to the maximum.
That doesn't just mean passive freedom, like you support, but proactive freedom distribution. That means providing the basic rights to a good life, because without it, people don't have any freedom or just very little.
And it means only prohibiting actions that directly harm other self-conscious people.
How am I twisting it?
This, I think is a good definition: the quality or state of being free: such as.
a.: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action.
b.: liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another
c.: independence.
Something has to be done to acquire it ,you may have some choices as to HOW you acquire it ,but it would be steal ,borrow, barter, or work and use wages.
b, slavery is illegal, so that is not a current issue.
c, independence. hum, sure ,but that requires you to violate a, independence requires effort. which translates loosely to necessity.
b) It's still happening in many parts of the world and it doesn't stop at just abolishing slavery. It also says 'liberation from the power of another'. There is too much power concentrated in the hands of too few people. Power => Freedom. That reduces freedom for too many people.
c) 'independence requires effort' sure. But at the moment we are all stuck in a power/dependence system that I don't like, because it maximizes freedom for some at the cost of freedom for many others.
I fully recognize that one freedom can affect an other freedom in a negative way, and that freedom of one person can affect the freedom of another.
I say it's a balance, you just say it's 'not possible'.
My 'liberal agenda' is a result of my idea of freedom, not the other way around.
The Socialist Party that I am a member of summarized the basic principle as "human dignity, equality and solidarity", where the starting point is 'human dignity', which results in a demand for 'equality', which results in a demand for 'solidarity'.
The idea is supporting more than to be 'free as a bird', because that's not freedom, that's being left to fate. It's the same as being worthless, because no one cares about your fate. By evolving away from animals, we acquired 'human dignity'. That means everyone has value. The idea that all people have the same value, results in the demand for equality. To achieve equality, requires (at least some sort of) solidarity. Without solidarity, everyone is 'free as a bird', i.e. worthless.
Just falling out from between your mothers legs does not mean you have a silver spoon up your ass and can sit around and do nothing for the entirety of your life.
There is work to be done,someone has to do it, health care to provide for example. That takes education. That also takes commitment from the person . A criminal ,on the other hand,makes no commitment, needs no education. They have both taken actions to NOT be equal but 1 has taken action to be BETTER and a asset to society, unlike the criminal.
That is a brief explanation as to why people like me consider your idea's highly flawed.
You want the criminal ,the nurse, the dr, the garbage man, the politician, all to eat from the same buffet provided by WHO? Live in equal house's provided by WHO?
There is only 1 way for that to happen ,and that is the 1's that work are giving up what they work for to provide for those that do nothing.
If all are equal,what is the incentive for 1 person to do any more than another? As in for example, 1 person going to college and the other watching tv all day?
Do you consider yourself to be equal to other people?
Is what you think of yourself in any way consistent with what you think of others?
I know you contribute to society, but if you were unable to do so,
is society right, to just kill you off? Is your value only dependent
on how much you are able to contribute?
Is the value of fully able people only dependent on what they contribute?
Is a person who starts with nothing and tries to be valuable, worth less,
than a rich kid who only lives of their parent's money?
If not, then why are they deserving so much more in life?
Why do they get from birth the benefits of a healthy and safe place to live,
good education, good healthcare, access to healthy food and a shoo-in
for a nice cushy job or a political position (if they even want to work at all)?
Why should people be so dependent on where they are born?
We are all human and therefore start out with equal human value.
I agree that people's actions can make themselves more or less valuable,
but everyone starts out with the exact same human value, no matter
where they are born or who their parents are.
You must think everyone starts with no value, because you think no one deserves anything, besides what they earn or get from their parents.
If that isn't true, explain why not, and how I can conclude otherwise
from what you are saying.
Never have been.
Do I attempt to be? Of course, I run into blocks ,such as income level, and ability's, talents .People are not equal, they can't be ,it is impossible.
Just because I fell out of my mother just like Bill gates, do I deserve to get handed a check each month so I can eat snails and drink wine like him? No.Not hardly
If you can't contribute something back,why are you deserving of equal status to those that can?
We would literally have to go back to cave man times to establish the equality you seek.As long as Elon Musk has his millions he made taking risk and inventing things,and I don' t because I can't do as much as he can, I am not equal.
Why does he have the millions? Because he can invent, he can invest, he is willing and able to take risk.
That is what makes him more of a person than I am.
And to top it all off, if you took all the money and assets of the world and put them in a jar and then distributed them evenly across the land, there would be haves and have nots again in 6 months because of the fact some humans always strive to have more,do more,and some don't and are foolish with their assets,be it good health, money,talent,etc
As for life it's self,for all lives to be equal,we would all have to live under the bridge or in a sky scraper. you can't be equal and not be exactly the same
only registered users can see external links
Brokering his dad's vice presidential power. what a concept.Making money hand over fist.
OF course joe is going to lie.
Of course hunter had a long standing agreement not to talk about his father.
Apples don't fall far from the tree.
only registered users can see external links
"The issue, known as “transableism,” belongs to “Body Integrity Identity Disorder” and represents people who identify as handicapped."
I am willing to bet if they had to live on disability income for a couple years that "condition" would suddenly heal. There are no Starbucks coffees and shit.
You can't make this stuff up.
1, we have a President being arrested for keeping document folders and such in his home under secret service protection, 2,we have someone hacking into goverment computers.
So which data is really at risk here? Anything Trump mighta had that is 2+ years out of date? Or what is on bidens computers??
It takes a damn long time before corporate media accepts reality.
only registered users can see external links
What would stop them from deciding later on that if you have 40 dollars left at the end of the month you need to hand it over?
Slipper slope when you start dictating what is to much when it comes to company's that invest millions to design ,manufacture, distribute and maintain a product and fulfill the wages and retirements and etc for the people that make it possible.
Most of the liberals that claim greed on the part of a company have never invested the money and time into 1 to understand the risk taken.
even before anyone had ever heard of Covid.
Remember the damage of Trump's stupid trade war?
Trump is not the only one. Every Republican President Over The Last 100 Years Has Had A Recession.
only registered users can see external links
The article doesn't say, but the Democratic presidents often inherit their crisis from the Republican president before them and than has to fix it. Just like Obama had to fix the crisis that Bush's deregulation of the banks created.
Right-wing media just doesn't talk about the economy being bad, whenever a Republican is in office, even if there's a economic sinkhole developing under their own office chair. And no matter how good the economy is going under a Democrat, or how much a Democratic president is lowering the deficit, right-wing media will fearmonger constantly over the economy and the debt. And you will parrot their lies, no matter how transparent.
People were working,living well. REAL WORLD, right out my front door that i saw with my own eyes, living much better than under obama. quit looking at charts that are skewed to prove the writers point of view and start looking at the real world.
That was not by his actions, that was the economy.
When the Covid restrictions were relieved in the US and Europe, that was not the end of the crisis. As you know, China, the factory of the world, was struggling much longer. That had an effect globally. It resulted in inflation, because of shortages, not because of devaluation of money. But that inflation was worsened by companies raising their prices much more than their cost increased, because of greed and because Republicans protect them and blame Democrats for it.
Then Russia decided to attack Ukraine, resulting in sanctions affecting energy prices globally. Also not the fault of either Trump or Biden.
What is caused by Trump was trillions in extra debt and a huge deficit from giving tax-cuts to the wealthy. Democrats could fix that, but Republicans are preventing any fixes, because they like to destroy the economy when a Democrat is in office.
At least I'm referring to actual data, you are referring to partisan lies.
It was even so low, for so long that economists were worried about it.
only registered users can see external links
Your brain is creating alternative facts, just to be able to think whatever you want.
How about actually looking at trends? They exist in the real world as data and as history. Then you can use it to be correct about reality, instead of creating your own reality.
No you didn't, your ears heard lies about 'the numbers' and you believed them.
No, it's not worse in your country. In my country, the prices of gas have gone down a bit, because of lower taxes on it, but the prices of food keep going up.
If you want to see our food prices, look here:
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
In march 2022, we paid Ђ2.30/l Euro95, that's $9.38 per gallon. You paid $4.173 per gallon then. What we pay for gas and food is outrageous, I agree.
Is that Biden's fault? No it isn't. It's the global economy and it's companies screwing us for more profits.
What makes high prices less of a problem? People who can pay them.
Biden has lowered unemployment to a record low. Trump didn't.
1 major employer told 1 of my neighbors if Trump did not win 2016 that the company would be shutting down as they would not be able to afford to continue under democrat rule. Most of their contracts were military.
Biden increased your defense budget by $ 80 billion. Lots of military contracts going round. Who do you think makes all those weapons for Ukraine?
Those numbers and surveys are done in different areas of the country.
For example, you would not go to a small town in Kansas and ask about the effects of coastal oil drilling, those people would not know much about it unless you wanted numbers to say, people had nothing against it. You would go to somewhere on the texas coast to a democrat led town and ask , then you would get numbers to say it has a negative effect.
So some new contracts went around , hum, didn't do the company much good that had been in business over a 100 years and went bank rupt in 2014.
But when Trump was in office he was of course not responsible for the biggest job loss in decades. Then every state failing is their own fault.
What did Obama do? What was the cause? When I tell you things, I explain what the Republican president did. You can check that in the news history and in government archives. Then I tell you what result came from it and why.
You just tell me your gut feelings. They are wrong, because they are based on decades of misinformation and bias. There's no logic behind any of it.
Because, if you just tried to find logic for your ideas, they would unravel.
only registered users can see external links
WASHINGTON (AP) — In claiming that he scored “a massive landslide victory” in last month’s presidential election, Donald Trump turned history upside down.
In fact, his winning margin in the Electoral College is on the other end of the historical spectrum, far closer to the narrowest win in history than to the widest.
Speaking on “Fox News Sunday,” Trump claimed that “We had a massive landslide victory, as you know, in the Electoral College.” Hillary Clinton, he said, is “down to a very low number.” He added that Democrats “suffered one of the greatest defeats in the history of politics in this country.”
The final Electoral College margin was Trump 306, Clinton 232, for a winning percentage of just under 57 percent. That ranks this year’s outcome as the 13th-closest of the 58 presidential elections in U.S. history, according to a tally by Claremont McKenna College political scientist John Pitney.
Barack Obama won both of his presidential elections with bigger Electoral College margins: 61 percent in 2008 and 62 percent in 2012. Trump’s margin was narrower than all but two of the last 10 presidential elections — those of George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004.
--------------------------------------- added after 64 seconds
And I don’t give a damn about your graph’s and google look ups
And the results would also be altered by the beliefs of the person paying for all this to be done.
“ For every look up you do there is a counter look up out there ”
The question is, “Why do I look stuff up on the internet”? I’ll explain, but, before I do, let me explain some truths. I know that Trump won the 2016 election. I know that Biden won the 2020 election. These are undeniable by me or by anyone. These are not opinions. These facts are as true as an apple is a tree grown fruit and that a man .is born with a penis, and so on and so forth. An opinion is a statement made by someone that needs to be proved before it can be a fact. Dgraff made a statement in the above post. I didn’t think that was right, but, before I, call someone out, I want to be absolutely sure that what I’m saying is true. Trump won the 2014 election. That will not change. It’s history. Now, if I believe Dgraff is wrong, how do I prove it? You geniuses, that see only what’s in front of your face, how would you prove and convince me that what you are saying is the truth, a real fact? I go to the online encyclopedia, Google. What I ask, and in order to not be biased, I pose this question, “By what margin did Trump win the 2014 election?” What ever I find I EVALUATE. If every source says one thing and just one says another, I’ll go by the majority.
You two, and many more, have your views. I don’t know for sure where you acquired these views, but, not once, when I refute your views do you come up with unimpeachable sources to support your views. Mainly, it’s what, you Dgraff, said, “I don’t give a damn about your graph’s and google look ups”
I’m not as you seem to be. If I’m wrong, I’ll say so. I also don’t open my mouth until I put my brain in gear. Want to see how that works? Biden won the election by very little, so I won’t open my mouth and say he had a landslide. I will say that he was declared the winner of the 2020 election and now he’s serving as our current president. See what I did? Now, if you say the election was stolen, I can say, “ But, he is serving now.” That’s how it works.
You have an opinion? Fine, but, if you want me to believe it, provide facts that I can see. And you don’t care to, then I can have my opinion. You LIED.🤣🤣😈
I’m going to step back and let the young folks figure it out
It is possible for THC trapped in your body fat to get released again and cause a secondary high later on when you are working.
So you dope up on friday night,and go back to work and get high just riding down the road off your body fat and wreck and kill somebody.How nice
You don't get a high, from such a low amount. That wouldn't even be sleep inducing.
But, if you care about chemicals being trapped in your body (fat), why don't you speak out against PFAS and mercury pollution? Those are actually harmful substances.
Using cannabis is a choice, having to use polluted tap-water is not.
I don't use teflon cookware. It is bad for you right out of the box.over heat it like my mother did and kill all your pet birds.
Just because you don't use Teflon, doesn't mean it's not in your body.
PFAS waste is everywhere, because it doesn't break down, just like plastic.
It's found in water, air, soil and food, across the globe, even in Antarctica.
only registered users can see external links
SureHire is proud to offer testing services in the US.
Nowhere did they say THC trapped in the body would cause another high at work or driving. What they said was:
Cannabis can remain in your system for anywhere from one to thirty days, and is detectable even longer in your hair follicles — here are some factors that play a role.
And then they said:
While recreational cannabis is legal in Canada and many U.S. states, being high at work is not, particularly if you are working in a safety-sensitive position.
Those are two separate statements meant to influence employers that, perhaps, they should DRUG TEST EMPLOYEES, using this company. You are the one that came up with this wild idea. Yes, we know about your cousin, twice removed, who smokes weed and is a bum, but, the reality is that smoking a joint is much safer than drinking two shots of scotch. Maybe, in your circle of friends, pot is not well known, but, many of my friends and/or acquaintances use pot. Their high seldom stays longer than a couple of hours and none have problems doing their work.
left in someone's blood, doesn't mean it's still having an effect.
It's like a positive test, after drinking two beers, three days ago.
No effect left whatsoever, but people still lose their jobs over it.
How would you like it, if you lost your drivers license over eating one bonbon?
only registered users can see external links
I am in constant pain,most of the time I just cope but I use over the counter stuff when it gets bad. I have often been ask if I tried CBD oil for it. NO, because it could impair me. IF I was a cancer victim, and had no need to drive, perhaps so, but on the road, hell no. My pain at it's worst, is far less painful for me to live with than taking a life while impaired ,knowing it was preventable. I guess that is 1 of the times having a conscience is costly.
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
In general, though, alcohol can be detected:
In the blood for up to 12 hours
On the breath for 12 to 24 hours
In the urine for 12 to 72 hours
In saliva for 12 to 48 hours, and
In hair for up to 90 days
Yet we drive, go to work the next day, stop for a beer during lunch. No one really cares.
And besides, a pee test, positive, fired, is alot faster way to achieving a safe work environment than going thru a bunch of steps to prove 100% sober.
Safety is much more important than someone being able to get high on the weekends.
But, I would with you, Mountain Man. 🥰😈
Well, if russia was not able to buy it from afganistan,they were able to get it in ukraine. Smooth move folks, giving putin and our enemys all our tech. Our military is now a moot point if we are attacked. The enemys know our every detail and methods now.
Where is the outrage over this issue?
I don't see anything but the call sheets of my local ems with ever increasing over dose's and drug related deaths.
Do any liberal dumbass's ever get the point?
Drugs are a bad thing and lead to most if not all the problems this country is facing.Poverty,violence,homelessness.
But yet more dumbass's want dope legal.
Well here is what 1 of the side effects of pot is, schizophrenia
I have good reason to agree as pot is what began my former girlfreinds decline.A student,honor roll,great singer,good looking, then the pot came into the picture. She is now totally disabled, fat as a pig and has the mind of a 9 year old. And schizophrenia is 1 of her issues.
Like I say,long story, but it all started when that asshole handed her a joint at age 15 after choir practice.
If I was the killer you folks like yourself and leo think I am,that son of a bitch would in the dirt, and no one would care,they would appreciate it. He was such a son of a bitch that he held a knife to his mothers neck and made her give him her wedding band so he could sell it for dope money.
Why should a option like that be available?
Was her first joint a LEGAL joint?
Was she a responsible individual before her first joint?
If I said I’ve had three car accidents. I totaled the cars. What impression would I make with you?
Same question if I told you I had three failed marriages?
Same question if I tried suicide twice?
The most important and telling question so all. What made a drug dependent, suicidal whore so attractive to you?
it was pushed on to her on a church bus headed to a picnic.
I knew her from age 5 to 16 ,at 16 she ran away from home
All those bad things happened when she was away.
She had no where else to go in 2011, made all kinds of promises to recover and this and that, and when she came home, she found out I was single. She explained a few scant details and said she needed to spend time with someone that did not do dope drugs and so forth. Naive as I was at the time, I still remembered the honor student, with a nice figure, a voice that we could have easily been hearing on the radio nowadays .just a great, attractive intelligent person, BEFORE the fucking dope.
Alcoholism, which she suffers as well, runs in my family. THat is why I have never taken a drink, I don't want to flip that switch.
My dad, a terrible drinker for over 30 years. quit liquor cold turkey, then shortly after the night of my accident, as he thought based on what the dr's said,I would be a vegitable the rest of my life and would need care.
he quit beer .Cold turkey .has not drank a drop since. So this mess with the ex started about 7 years after he quit. I saw this and know other quit cold turkey. I knew she would have a issue or 2 but with 2 doctors working to help her, I thought it would work.
WRONG.
Constant issues, they call it falling off the wagon,. Bullshit ,they jump on the damn thing and beat the horses towing it to death .They love being out of wack.
anyway, after years of lies and relapses, her second suicide attempt put her in a coma. LIke a dumbass, I tried to be there for her. you can read my old blogs about that.
All of it started from a joint, from a horny fellow a year older than her,trying to get some pussy.I don't know what being legal or illegal as far as the joint is concerned has to do with it. Surely they don't sell joints to teens where it is legal.
Cat, getting involved with her was the worst mistake I ever made in my life. BUT being naive,trustworthy,and remembering who she was,and thinking she could be that person again, only smarter and more mature, was stupid on my part. drug addicts seldom are ever worth a damn again.
As far as education, she was a nurse and had just got a degree in human resources. She was about to hired to supervise a new Alzheimer's wing at the nursing home she did a quarters internship or whatever at during the college attendance .I can't remember the word for it. Anyway, she had a high 5 figure salary waiting to be earned the following week of her suicide attempt.
Get rid of the drugs,and alot the issues will settle down to negligable.
Recently, while I was working in the flower beds in the front yard, my neighbors stopped to chat as they returned home from walking their dog. During our friendly conversation, I asked their little girl what she wanted to be when she grew up.
She said she wanted to be President someday. Both of her parents, Democratic Party members, were standing there so I asked her, "If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?"
She replied . . . "I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people."
Her parents beamed with pride!
"Wow . . . what a worthy goal!" I said . . . "But you don't have to wait until you're President to do that!"
"What do you mean?" she replied.
So I told her, "You can come over to my house now, and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and trim my hedge, and I'll pay you $50.
Then you can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house."
She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?"
I said, "Welcome to the Republican Party."
Her parents aren't speaking to me anymore.
If you know any Republicans that would get a chuckle out of this, share it with them.
Most Democrats will just delete it, I guess the logic escapes them.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
I admire your energy & the time you take trying to get through to these dems that don't even have simple reading comprehension skills.
Text books are great in teaching theory, but real life is much different.Money does not grow on trees.it is earned.
This country is a cracked, empty shell of what it was back in the good times, the 50's and 60's, when people knew their places in life, knew their responsibilities and accepted them.
WTF, you weren’t even born.
Everyone does not need a college education to contribute good to the world.
only registered users can see external links
hell working people don't make what he is while on sick leave. He should feel blessed he hasn't been fired
"The Left has made clear that it wants the public unemployed, unmotivated, and totally dependent on government handouts."
I recommend NO network.
Get up from the recliner and venture out into the real world. See the suffering,see the problems with YOUR OWN EYES and not thru the biased lens of overpaid talking heads trying to sell 60 second commercial breaks.
Totally agree. So never again refer to anything Fox 'News' has said.
They only exist to do right-wing propaganda and know they are doing it.
But you probably do not want to hear about all the evidence that supports that.
And you certainly do not hear it from right-wing sources.
--------------------------------------- added after 18 seconds
Bill O'reilly
But, I think at least Bill believes most things he's saying. Tucker doesn't.
That doesn't mean that he's objective. That's a rare thing on the 'news'.
Here is a pro trump youtube and I believe this is down to the point in truth.. only registered users can see external links The central banks rule the world. the columm here is called DAVERadioX #3047A
No, I don't think he's quite intelligent. Tucker is way smarter.
But the smarter they are, the better they lie. Because that's their job.
MSNBC is also not trustworthy. But Fox'News' lies 90% of the time and you think they are more trustworthy, because they 'dare to say things'. They sound anti-establishment a lot don't they? And MSNBC doesn't. However, MSNBC only lies about 30% of the time, but doesn't 'dare to say things'. That's true! They are corporatist, bought and owned by corporations, so they don't anger their money providers. But they are more trustworthy on lots of other subjects. They are not trustworthy enough for me to listen to them, so I have better sources.
Fox'News' is ALSO bought and owned by corporations. And you think they are anti-establishment, because they sound like it, but IT'S A TRICK!!! They sound like that to gain your trust and then have a wealthy guy crying about estate-taxes five minutes later. Have you never noticed that?
Tucker is their grand master. He really is fantastic at fake-populism. His only job is creating fear and anger about culture and the 'deep state', but then FULLY SERVING THAT DEEP STATE, because the 'deep state' are THE WEALTHY! Tucker himself is fucking wealthy and you believe he's anti-establishment?
Tucker understands very well what idea's are popular, but hue uses it all to gain your trust and then make you believe ideas that are very favorable to the establishment. Do you think the establishment wants higher taxes and regulations? Tell me what they want and why and how Tucker fights against it. Or at least think about it.
I think you are smart. It gives me hope that I can make you see how they trick you.
When I listen to your channel, I hear just one claim after another, like fire, fire, fire, without any justification. I don't hear them explain how, why, who. It's all conspiracies, to make you afraid and distrust everything, without giving you a real reason. Do they hit on some truth? Sure! But they just pass along some of the truth, mix it with bullshit and I'VE LEARNED NOTHING!!! They start out, with 'the deep state', 'the corrupt politicians', 'the world central bank', 'the world economic forum'... And nothing gets explained. I HAVE HEARD NO ARGUMENTS! NONE!
Lets get into your claim; 'The central banks rule the world'.
- Who controls the central bank? Some very wealthy people.
- How do they control the world? Money? Who pays the corrupt politicians? The central bank? No! A lot of corporations and super-PAC's funded by more corporations, private interests, foreign interests and wealthy people. Then the politicians have meetings with all those donors asking them what they want to have done. They all meet at Davos (the WEF) too. That's true. The donors of the politicians are there too. Is that the central bank controlling the world? Or is it the wealthy controlling the central bank and the politicians?
- Why would the politicians listen to the central bank? Because it's the system, set up to protect the money of the wealthy, doing the bidding of the wealthy.
And that's something that your right-wing talk radio doesn't say. Because they are owned by corporations and get donations from the wealthy too. Follow the money!
Their only job is telling you that you cannot trust anyone but them, because they are the 'truth tellers'. Sure, they speak some truth, to get you hooked, but they leave out so much information. They do that intentionally, so you cannot verify what they say. You will find your own information and justify their message for them. And every right-winger does that, with their own ideas. And then the right-wing media fill in what THEY WANT YOU TO THINK.
Do you really listen to lefty YouTubers? Do you notice a difference between them and your radio channel? Who only makes claims, without substantiating their claims? Who uses arguments more?
If you say right-wingers, you don't understand what arguments are.
O'reilly says things I agree with and don't agree with but he says hard truth such as "out of all due respect" You're wrong.
You know about the fake electors that were standing by to vote for trump and turn over the election, right?
"out of all due respect" is a hard truth? What?
What are you talking about?
--------------------------------------- added after 47 hours
Oh, the things that Bill O'Reilly says are hard truth.
No, they are not, they are just fear-mongering for gullible people.
You privately say that media lies 100% of the time, except O'Reilly?
You are picking the wrong media to trust. Fox'News' is one of the worst.
They just admitted they were lying and settled for $787.5 million with Dominion!
Sure, some, most about the Roman empire.
"what's the difference between the 3? How is this different from the central banks? Nothing.. Its the same agenda"
What? I assume you are referring to all three being empires?
The central banks are not in power. They are ruled by the wealthy.
Does your understanding stop at the central banks?
Why would anyone listen to some bankers?
Who controls those bankers and how? Think further!
You are cutting through to some good ideas further on, but there is no consistency to it all. Sure, religion is used to keep people submissive to power and the powerful do fucked up things, because the people let them.
Yes, educate yourself, reason and start understanding the world as it is.
But, I see you put pieces together like a rambling mad man. Start understanding that the biggest evil is just plain selfishness. People want power and money for themselves and nothing for anyone else. It takes a lot of lying ans dogmas for the other people to give it to them. I see no sign that you understand that part of it. Pe.do.phe.lia is just a symptom of letting fucked-up religious morality rule the world unchecked. Only people who's thinking is messed-up with dogmas can allow that to happen. I think that your 'hard truths' are based mostly on some very crazy conspiracy theories. Those are also dogmas and when you don't shed them, you are no risk to the real powers who control the world. In fact your ideas only serve them, because they can be directed to any enemy they want you to attack.
I can't dismiss it entirely as there is as much evidence of it being real as there is of it being fake.
The Masonic Lodge is probably the closest thing to it that is real and trust me, years ago that was a powerful group of people but the younger generations have not took up to it and they are getting a bit relaxed and showing themselves a bit to draw new members.
George soros has made up a system that will allow him to run things long after his death. He bankrupted 2 countries and works hard to ruin others.He is a pinocle of the enemy from behind
only registered users can see external links
Not an organization that was operating in the shadows, going back to Babylonia, the Roman empire or the Ottoman empire.
There are lots of powerful people influencing politics. The 'deep state' is a good name for them. Most of them are incredibly conservative though. You keep pointing to George Soros, because liberals are really hard to find in that club.
There are at least 100 billionaires donating to Republicans, controlling politics. Here are some of the more known donors, who are the most active: The Koch brother(s), Sheldon Adelson, Richard Uihlein, Harlan Crow, Peter Thiel, Leonard Leo, Barre Seid, David Horowitz, Farris Wilks, Robert Mercer, Andy Beal and Phil Ruffin.
It's true that George Soros is the biggest donor in name, but the next 3 are conservatives, donating to Republicans and give more combined than Soros. But, that's IN NAME! Way more is given to Republicans through 'dark money' organizations, which means they are not transparent about their donors. At least Soros funds Democrats by a transparent methods.
And here are some organisations that some of the founded, to 'make up a system that will allow him to run things long after their death':
only registered users can see external links
Soros bankrupted 2 countries? Are you referring to the Bank of Thailand and the Bank of England?
"According to sources who had knowledge of the Quantum Fund’s positioning at the time, Soros bet just under $1 billion of his total war chest of $12 billion against the baht. By selling the Thai baht short in January 1997, the Quantum Fund managed by my investment company sent a market signal that the baht may be overvalued. The bank eventually broke, the baht devalued and Soros profited."
"In 1992, Soros shorted the British pound and reportedly made a profit of $1 billion. He sold billions of pounds during the days preceding the British government devaluing the pound sterling in September that year. Much of it was on borrowed money. Afterward Soros bought back pounds, repaid the money he had borrowed, and made a killing"
Didn't you say that Soros was some kind of socialist or communist? I told you that Soros is a capitalist, remember? This is how capitalists make their money. Especially hedge funds make profits over the demise of others. Soros funds the corporate Democrats, who deregulate Wall Street, so he can keep raking in the billions. Not a cent of his money goes to progressives. Sometimes Democrats even donate to Republicans, to stop a real progressive from winning.
Again you resort to bullshit no good hollywood fake fake news. Stop using bullshit links because it is NOT proof,, Stick with factsl... you are a admitted socialist which means you seek to control.. You think a one party state has no politics? Think again
Alex baldwin is a hypocrite if there ever was 1.Claims to be antigun, but was working on a movie that uses guns,and literally, physically pulls the trigger and kills 1 person dead and injurs another,but yet,the antigun people don't seem to hate him for it.Why? Double standard.
I'd suggest you study the congressional and senate judicial hearings
I asked you on numerous occasions who those bad people are, but I see a few answers now. Lets get into it:
The Biden Administration, for 'sex slavery and forced labor'.
And that is happening mostly in Republican controlled states, where Republicans are relaxing laws against child labor. It's Republicans who work against the legalization of illegal immigrants who have nowhere to go and it's Republicans who don't want to inspect employers who exploit illegals and punish them. So why are you blaming Democrats, while this was already going on under Trump and while Republicans don't support any laws that could improve the situation?
European Union terror groups? What the fuck are you talking about?
"European Union a branch of the swamp" The US government is way more corrupt than the European Central government. They caught a Greek female politician (Eva Kaili) for illicit lobbying in favor of Qatar. She's awaiting her trail in jail now. In the US that's LEGAL (if you register as a foreign agent). However, Trump did not register as a foreign agent to Saudi Arabia, but as President, his illicit lobbying broke records. He was getting paid by Saudi Arabia through his hotels and business deals, for selling them weapons which they used doing a genocide in Jemen and for being silent about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Clear 'quid pro quo', but it's not even one of his many indictments.
"destroying private business" is just another claim without any substance.
What are you talking about?
At least I provide links and provide substance with my claims.
You just spout absolute bullshit, without any justification.
The one who should stick to the facts is you!
A socialist seeks control for all the people. That's not a one party state.
How many times do I need to tell you that socialism is not communism.
Damn, I thought you had some brains, but you're just another stupid
right-winger, who only consumes propaganda of the dumbest type.
What are you talking about"
I have no idea what the other fellow is referring to,but regulations the government passes,such as tighter emissions on trucks that just went thru ,small trucking companies that run 2 trucks, are put at risk of being to far in debt for a new truck they don't really need.
Regulations similar to this are hitting my home town as we are staring at a million dollar debt for a new fire truck,we don't need. But regulations have not been modified since they were written for gas trucks that were in place 40 years ago. a deisel fire truck built in the last 20 years, for our rural application is still in good shape and could last another 20 easy.
But no, we have to damn near give 1 away and go 1 million in debt for a new 1 we don't need. Thanks to uncle sam.
regulations are what cost alot of money to comply with,that is how they distroy small bussiness. keeping them in debt they can't afford, and then the ecomony goes flat,and they loose it all or sell out for fractions of their original value.
Remember Palestine Ohio?
There have been regulations on car manufacturers for 55 years.
Are there now no more car manufacturers?
Regulations don't destroy businesses at all, they help them evolve.
Tighter emission standards only resulted in more jobs for engineers.
Small businesses have way better innovation potential than big ones, in my experience.
I know you don't believe it, but climate change will be devastating.
It already is affecting people in hotter areas, giving them drought as early as april now. Your farms are also feeling the effects and it will only get worse. A hurricane or wildfire affects small business more than large ones. They often have more locations compensating for one that is lost by a 'natural' disaster and they have better insurance.
The rest of the world has a responsibility to act, before ostriches like you finally recognize the problem, and it will be too late.
It's true that the energy transition will take a lot of effort. Maybe some companies will not be able to adjust, but that's their fault for not being able to compete when every company is facing the same regulation.
Many more companies will be started because of all the chances that the innovation creates, like solar panel installers, heat pump engineers, energy transition specialists and consultants. It does cost a lot of money, but that will only create more jobs and grow the economy and the demand.
And even if it costs a lot of money, I care more about surviving.
Corporations were created to destroy small business.. Survival of the fittest.. Taxcodes,, who puts them in place? Certainly not the people..
Who might I be?
It you cannot show any substance or consistency to your claims,
I have no REASON to even consider them.
“That which can be asserted without evidence,
can be dismissed without evidence.”
(Hitchens's razor)
Just because some bullshit website contains the same bullshit claims,
doesn't confirm your bullshit claims.
I can find thousands of websites with all different claims about some sort of 'deep state', some that I might agree with, some that are the psychotic ramblings of mentally ill people. Unless you clarify which 'deep state' description you support, you cannot use it as an argument for anything.
I am not saying that the only thing that exists are what I can hear, taste, touch, smell or see, I say that for me to BELIEVE those things, I need good evidence. There are lots of things that I see as a possibility, but UNTIL there is EVIDENCE or LOGIC to accepting those possibilities, I DON'T.
Accepting what's true, based on evidence, that's called logical reasoning.
Accepting what's true, based on beliefs and revelation, that's called religion.
If you think adding 'extreme' to 'leftist' makes some sort of point, you're again not providing any SUBSTANCE.
I'm a member of a legal political party and everything the party does is permitted by the law and fully transparent. The SP is the most democratic party in our country, while the 3 'parties' on the far right (FvD, PVV en JA21) are the least democratic. They do not even qualify as a political party and are breaking laws consistently. That is 'extreme'!
Every system can not work for everyone.
A herd of sheep would be happy in a socialist state.There is no need to think,no need to worry ,no need for self improvement,no need to work,no need to -----fill in the blank.The government provides. They somehow pull it out of their ass's I guess.
That's true, but it can respect the rights of everyone
and it can at least work for the large majority of the people.
Your country only works for a small minority; the wealthy.
And you are blinded by propaganda from those wealthy people
telling you that giving them everything they want is good for you.
You cannot win an argument, so you show your colors.
What you are doing is called 'false dichotomy'. That's a type of fallacy.
Someone who has critical thinking skills would know that.
Would they make small tribes, like thousands of years ago?
Or would they form a 'government', because that's more efficient?
The constitutions also says 'government of the people, by the people, for the people'. Sure sounds a lot like socialism to me. The founders were wise people.
That's not even democracy, that's socialism.
Are you really talking about your nation? Where 88% of people support background checks on all gun sales, Medicare for All, earns 70% support, even 91% of Republican voters want to empower Medicare to negotiate drug prices and a strong majority of Americans favor doubling the minimum wage to a living wage of $15 an hour?
If the US is ruled by the people, why aren't those policies implemented today?
The US doesn't even have a real democracy and you think it's ruled by the people!
You're ruled by corporate interests, bribing your politicians.
That's not a nation ruled by THE people. That's a nation ruled by a representative government.
You don't rule your country, you just get to vote every few years.
The political system which is the most ruled by the people is socialism.
In socialism, power is distributed over as many people as possible. It means bottom-up influence constantly and people are encouraged to participate as much as they want.
And not just power, but also ownership is distributed over as many people as possible. But of course, that's only possible if the current capitalist system is replaced. As you might understand, ownership means power too.
If you knew what you were talking about, you would be able to correct me if I was wrong. You're not doing that. You just say that I don't know the meaning of terms for political systems and don't know what I'm talking about, without any further explanation. And you do that a lot.
No wonder it is a system that fails anywhere it is used. The least productive people are ruling the 1's that do produce.
That removes ALL incentive to be productive and to improve 1's self.
But, it's amazing how you think of 'homeless dopeheads', when I'm just talking about normal citizens. You're listening to elitist pricks, who shit on the common people, too much. Understand that your life means nothing to them.
The most effective system is the one that produces the least 'homeless dopeheads'. A system that makes the best use of those 'least productive people', needs to spend the least of hard working peoples money.
Would you not have any incentive to improve yourself, as soon as your basic living standards are met? It's sad how low you value other people.
Race is not relevant.
If you are sleeping on the ground and hungry, if you gave a damn,you would not need any more incentive to do something. take a bath in a creek, and make a sign, "Will mow grass for food" or something
And in Iceland there are the least people who don't value themselves?
As you know Iceland has the least people sleeping on the ground and hungry. They must be the hardest working people on earth.
It seems they are not: only registered users can see external links
Strange how people in all those poor countries are working their asses off.
How about those incentives? Has Iceland provided the most incentives to work, by taking away social security, making people pay for their own private system of education and healthcare, stripping all food programs, not providing public housing, privatizing all government jobs and public benefits and public infrastructure and minimizing government spending and taxes?
No, in fact, Iceland is one of the strongest social democracies in the world.
How can you be so wrong consistently and never change your mind?
"Demokratia (Greek: δημοκρατία dēmokratнa) is a direct democracy, as opposed to the modern representative democracy."
"Greek democracy created at Athens was direct, rather than representative: any adult male citizen over the age of 20 could take part, and it was a duty to do so.", "In a participant government, citizens who wish to have a say in government can participate in it."
But take note that it was only intended for 'adult male citizens'.
So, they excluded women, people younger than 20 y.o. and everyone who was not a 'citizen' (born in Athens and owning property). That means, even that original Demokratia was 'representative' for everyone else.
only registered users can see external links
When societies grew bigger than just Athens, even that became impractical.
It is not possible to have a direct power system for millions of people.
That's why the term 'democracy' stands for a representative government.
There are lots of representative governments around the world.
If none of them comply with you idea of 'democracy', than it's on you to explain what characteristics you are missing. The large majority of the people defines 'democracy' as to include the USA, which is only the 36th on the list of Countries Ranked by Quality of Democracy.
only registered users can see external links
instead of being massive hypocrites 100% of the time, like Fox'News'.
There is no corporate 'news' channel who is consistent like that.
There are only some independent YouTubers who are consistent.
That doesn't mean they are NEUTRAL, they are OBJECTIVE. That is different.
It means that they are transparent about their principles and judge everything
and everyone by those principles, no matter if they are talking about Democrats
or Republicans.
I have only seen them on the left though, never on the right.
Find me one right-winger on YouTube who is consistent and objective and not a hypocrite or an outright grifter, and I am sure to watch that person or channel.
- Muddying the waters makes lefties less of a threat to the wealthy.
- Voting for Democrats, because they still need votes from their base, even though they hardly deliver on their promises.
- Culture-shit doesn't cost anything for the wealthy. And it's a good way to make lefties lose in the general debate. It's a good way to trick them into the bullshit culture-war.
(When I say culture shit, I mean extreme-'woke'. Human rights are not culture-shit!)
So sharpen your critical thinking skills, teach yourself how to recognize false arguments and lies and don't believe anything, until you can follow along the logic from data, to arguments, to claims and ideas. Not even accept arguments and data on face value, check for yourself and know where to find trustworthy sources.
It's all 100% twisted propaganda.
CNN is mostly trash too and only rarely will you see anything useful on MSNBC.
Then there are about a million grifters on YouTube, a billion fake news posters on Facebook and a zillion trolls on Twitter, including Elon Musk himself.
So basically, there is not much that you can trust. Sorry!
I would say 'do your own research', but most who think they do that find even worse garbage. That's the people who buy dried scrotum powder.
To anyone who used Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine to prevent Covid;
you're a dumb-ass who is incapable of discerning facts from lies. Better stop trying to inform yourself about anything ever again, smash your TV and cancel your internet subscription. First read some schoolbooks on logical reasoning and fallacies (I can also recommend the book 'Intuition Pumps And Other Tools for Thinking' by Daniel C. Dennett), learn the scientific method and maybe then you will be responsible enough to use the internet and watch the news again.
“You don't know me I don't know you. Do you know anything about history going back to Babylonia? Roman Empire? Ottoman Empire? what's the difference between the 3? How is this different from the central banks? Nothing.. Its the same agenda,, just like using religion for power such as christianity and islam.. What if I were to tell you all of these groups going from 1700 BC until now were the same? Exactly.. What does this group crave? Power and domination. What kept them in power all these years is propaganda. Do you really think the news is journalism? If you do then you're dumb. You say the roman empire fell.. I say it changed its name to the vatican.. The vatican still exists today thriving on ****phiia.. So whats the same for the last 4000 years? suppression of the average joe through propaganda. Lies.. Even in history class. The only way you can find the truth is educating yourself and reasoning by putting the pieces together. If the news put out the hard truth you would mnever see these people again.”
CAT
And I find it too simplistic. The Roman Empire stopped being around the 5th century. The Holy See started around that time even though Catholicism existed from before. The Ottoman Empire came a few hundred years later. Anyway you look at these entities, they are NOT like the Central Bank. You belong to a worldwide group of conspiracy theorists. They and you, because you can’t accept that life evolves as it does, seek to blame institutions as wanting to dominate the masses. I say, “Bullshit”.
What a concept,give a teenage some room and they can self motivate and then get family support!
Watch as much as you can stand,but the first part just shows how it is made to look fake.
Then from there,it starts showing up as undeniable. Sickening.
Well, these professors don't even want to TEACH the founding of America.
only registered users can see external links
How can anyone object to this?
just 3 credit hours, that is not much to ask of anyone.
And look at this?
only registered users can see external links
What job do you get in the real world that allows this type of thinking?School is supposed to help kids be ready for the real world.
we are already having issues,
only registered users can see external links
This is scary when they finally admit they think all children are the governments.
The answer can be found by posing the following question:
You're walking down a deserted street with your wife, and two small children.
Suddenly, a Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities,
raises the knife, and charges at you...
You are carrying a Kimber 1911 cal. 45 ACP, and you are an expert shot.
You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.
What do you do?
Democrat's Answer:
What is a Kimber 1911 cal. 45 ACP?
Does the man look poor or oppressed?
Is he really a terrorist?
Am I guilty of profiling?
Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack
Could we run away?
What about the kids?
Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?
What does the law say about this situation?
Does the pistol have appropriate safety built into it?
Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?
Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?
Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me?
If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me?
Should I call 9-1-1?
Why is this street so deserted?
We need to raise taxes.
Can we make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior?
I need to debate this with some friends for a few days and try to come to a consensus.
This is all so confusing, and maybe we need to just start defunding all police departments!!
Republican's Answer:
BANG!
Southerner's Answer:
BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG ! BANG! BANG! BANG!
Click..... (Sounds of reloading)
BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
Click
Daughter: 'Nice grouping, Daddy!' 'Were those the WinchesterSilver Tips or Hollow Points?!
Son: 'Can I shoot the next one?!'
Wife: 'You are NOT taking that to a Taxidermist'
They are unfortunately not in these statistics:
only registered users can see external links
If a terrorist wants me dead, then I either run or die.
That is the risk I take, for living in a free and safe country.
I'm just as dead when some stupid right-winger shoots me.
One like you, who has wet dreams about shooting someone who looks 'suspicious'.
That's why I support our law, keeping guns away from people like you.
THEY’RE AFTER YOU
…I’M JUST STANDING
IN THE WAY!”
DONALD J. TRUMP, 45th President of the United States
only registered users can see external links
Fix the crime issue,then the gun issues will dwindle as people will feel safer.
I had no idea transparent totes would let alge grow in rain water,so off to paint my water catch barrel.
Besides the black barrels will be serving the house for showers and etc later on from what he said. saving money and being less dependent on the system.
I have a few catch barrels myself and 1 that is laying on it's side with a direct tv dish acting as a collector.Works well in a remote area of the property so I can have water for the raised beds, no plumbing! Sits on a converted heating oil tank rack.
I was eating breakfast with my 10-year-old Granddaughter and I asked her, "What day is tomorrow?".
Without skipping a beat, she said, "It's President's Day”!
She's smart, so I asked her "What does President's Day mean”?
I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln, etc.
She replied, "President's Day is when President Biden steps out of the White House, and if he sees his shadow, we have 3 more years of Bull Shit."
You know, it really does hurt when hot coffee spurts out your nose!
Your family making her a Republican voter makes her screw her own future.
Heaven help us if the Repukers remain in our politics.
Are there any countries that tax their citizens and send some of it to Americans?
Women are just as capable as men of evil, just not as common for them to commit it.
Can you imagine what kind of woman would pitch a baby into the air and shoot it with her pistol in front of it's mother?
This 1 photo put into perspective how many people died during the holocaust.Nothing but wedding rings in that box.
only registered users can see external links
Some really neat photos showing the reality of the mid to late 30's for ALL races of people. I guess I can say I have inherited some of the "white privilege" shown here as my mother hoed cotton as a little girl until she got married at 16. She still had her hoe when she died ,it was out in the shed but it got stolen before I was able to save much of her stuff. It was worn down to about half it's size from new.
16 minute video about the vaccine bullys during the wuhan virus.
Turbo cancer, first time i had saw that in writing. Although 3 of my friends experienced it shortly after the shots,2 died.
German scientist found the "vaccine" damaged the bodys cancer fighting ablity.
This is what gives environmentalist a bad name. The man was trying to save peoples homes.
only registered users can see external links
Did you get yours?
CDC ye later!
It bothers me that a 12 year old girl could be trying to use the restroom and some pervert in a skirt just walk in and be standing there peeing or something. I guess the womens bathrooms have urinals now since the mens rooms have menstrual pad machines? As in a male suddenly forming a place to put 1?
By the way, if men could aim, there would be no need for separate toilets.
There are millions of unisex public toilets everywhere in Europe.
You're fixation with toilets is really ridiculous.
As for the missing the toilet,
there is a sign on the bathroom door at the local grill I just got a hamburger at about 2 hours ago.
it says, "how can a man hit a deer at 200 yards and miss the toilet".
Well,I have been wanting to write down the reasons for that and tape it to the bathroom wall but have not yet.
Reasons,
Barrel to short,
Barrel bent,
not enough powder in the shell,
sights out of adjustment,
And some others I cant think of at the moment.
And besides, as for tinkling on the seaty,
Remember what Walter,Jeff Dunhams little friend says,"Learn to Hover">
Maybe because the whole idea of toilets being specifically for men or women have been used for stupid propaganda for years now?
"how can a man hit a deer at 200 yards and miss the toilet".
That's a good one! It uses men's pride to make them pee right.
So why do you act like you care about separate toilets then?
Is it fun to make life a misery for trans people, just to 'own the libs'?
You can teach people the most stupid ideas, if you just keep repeating them.
If you tell people long enough that left-handed people are demons,
you can create a holocaust to wipe out the left-handed people.
only registered users can see external links
Phart do you recommend all of Miami/Dade County and Broward County (Ft Lauderdale) population move to the mountains of the Carolinas?
As for the NC mountains, eh, bad choice, they had some flooding up there years back that made 1 hell of a mess. it was a hurricane that did some of it
only registered users can see external links
Drug Offenses. Although drug problems are common throughout the United States, it is the most common offense in the state of Texas. ...
Property Crime. Property crime is another leading crime in the state of Texas. ...
Aggravated Assault. ...
Texas has 46% of it's population living in a house with at least one gun.
They need those guns for protection
🤣🤣🤣😈
only registered users can see external links
O