Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Find local men
to exchange blowjobs

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

PHART'S FEELINGS ON NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

This is an Adult Discussion Forum of Show It Off Site
If you wish to participate you should register on that site and write there

Started by phart at 19,May,22 22:33  other posts of phart
Hello World.
HERE will be the NEW HOME of all the strange and odd things I have feelings about. You could consider this, Phart's Brain Farts regarding world or local news.
There will be freedom of speech here.Just don't violate someone elses.

For starters,
only registered users can see external links

Really now? Well what is really despicable is the mess at the border with folks coming in willy nilly bringing their dope and their virus's and diseases we have eradicated decades ago. Instead of putting all your air into denying it, PROVE THE THEORY WRONG.
There is overwhelming evidence of a problem brewing,and unless democrats can gain from it,they would be otherwise trying to stop it.



Similar topics: 1.Feelings   2.Under Pressure Horniness   3.All Trump and only Trump   4.HUGE DICKS   5.Arthur Labinjo-Hughes  

New Comment

Comments:
By phart at 29,Aug,23 23:44 other posts of phart 
I wish them well, and support their endeavors.
only registered users can see external links

It is past time to clean up the mess,
By dgraff at 30,Aug,23 00:01 other posts of dgraff 
Yeah 3 years passed time



By phart at 23,Aug,23 14:26 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Wow, amazing what gas can do
By dgraff at 24,Aug,23 00:24 other posts of dgraff 
Yeah it went BOOM



By phart at 13,Aug,23 00:23 other posts of phart 
I have to vent a bit.
A good friend of mine is 89 years old. Has had serious medical issues since having the wuhan virus in december of 2020. He has been dealing with cancer since a couple months after taking the covid shot.
He has been taking some treatments and is feeling ok considering he can't eat much .Still drives, has a sharp mind.Just can't swallow much food.
He couldn't swallow some liquid last week for a scan, and since the scan turned out bad, the dr wants to cut off all further treatment and put him in hospice care. No way the scan could be accurate because he could not swallow the liquids necessary for the machine to pick it up.
So no way that dr knows what is going on.He is going monday to talk to the dr and has the backing of 2 other drs suggjesting treatment continue because it is helping him to live a good life as best he can.
It bugs me to no end that this so called health care system wants to just "pull the plug" on a retired airforce veteran and family man.His health care is covered both by the m,ilitary coverage and other insurance. and there is well over a quarter of a million dollars left in his yearly budget.
Why is this acceptable? Or is it? I don't feel like it is acceptable.
But there is so much whining about free health care and etc, and then this? what the fuck kinda health care is it to just tell a man to go home and die? hell he is still chasing women! He actually got some viagra 2 months ago. he aint dead,and simply wants to live ,why is it so acceptable to tell him to go home and die?
Hospice, will not allow the person to eat,drink or anything,OTHER than take something for pain. no driving,nothing. and he is very active, it would be living hell for this man. it just boggles my mind.
By #610414 at 14,Aug,23 17:39
I’m sorry for your friend. What do you mean by: “since the scan turned out bad, the dr wants to cut off all further treatment and put him in hospice care”? The Dr. calls the shots? He’s not able to get a second or third opinion? And, why would an active man like your friend accept the diagnosis?
I don’t know how far your friend’s illness has progressed so I can’t say it’s a good idea or not, but, I can assure you, from my experience working in two major hospitals, hospice care DOES provide sustenance unless the patient is unable to process solid or liquid foods. Until then extra-ordinary means may be used like a feeding tube through the abdomen.
Hospice-like care can be provided at home, too. However, I believe your friend is still far from reaching this point. At the very least redo the tests.
By phart at 14,Aug,23 20:03 other posts of phart 
I hope to hear from him tonight as to what will be done to redo the test.
I think a feeding tube reinstalled would be a blessing for him.
By #610414 at 14,Aug,23 20:52
Probably would be. My granddaughter is 25 and she’s survived for all 25 yrs on a feeding tube. It’s not easy or cheap, but, it’s life. Good luck to him.
By phart at 15,Aug,23 00:09 other posts of phart 
can't get up with him this evening,will try again in the morning.

By phart at 16,Aug,23 15:36 other posts of phart 
Well his talking to his family doctor got the results he wanted, 6 months more of infusions and 2 scans will be done with stuff put in his arm instead of being drank.
His cancer dr told him frankly he had never saw anyone else survive everything Bill had been thru and he was a walking mystery and miracle.
By #610414 at 17,Aug,23 00:21
There's always hope. Second opinions are important





By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Aug,23 10:58 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Hundreds of millions of people will be dealing with cancer after taking the covid shot.
Before covid and the covid shot existed, hundreds of millions of people were dealing with cancer too. He is 89 years old. The risk of not surviving the 'wuhan virus' is very high at that age. So he was wise to get vaccinated. Cancer has no relation to it and he probably already had it before 2020, because most of the time cancer takes years to develop into symptoms.

As you know healthcare costs money. In your system, health insurances decide if the patient is allowed to get treatment, based on money. How about a system that lets doctors decide what's best for patients? That doesn't mean doctors shouldn't think about money, because there are other patients to consider. As long as there are shortages of doctors and pharmaceuticals, it's the job of doctors to decide which patients are benefiting the most which treatment, not for profit health insurance companies.

"Hospice, will not allow the person to eat,drink or anything" Who told you that?
only registered users can see external links
"Hospice care does not deny a patient food or drink. If someone has the desire to eat or drink, there are no restrictions on doing so. However, for most patients, there comes a point where they simply do not want nor need food or liquids."
By phart at 21,Aug,23 16:31 other posts of phart 
having trouble finding it but the germans determined early on that the vaccine affected the bodys defenses against cancer. Strangly, that info is is not showing up now on a search, some of that liberal free speech at work I guess,Hide what we disagree with.
I had family in hospice care and when someone tried to give them water,the hospic nurse there about body slammed them and told them "NO,they are not to be given anything". family member still crys to this day remembering not being able to simply give water to them.
Edit, I did find this, which makes perfect sense
only registered users can see external links
Can COVID increase cancer risk?
People hospitalized with severe COVID-19 are at increased risk of being diagnosed with cancer in the following months, according to new research. While it's well established that cancer patients are at a higher risk of getting severe COVID-19, researchers have found a potential new link between the two conditions.Jun 5, 2023
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Aug,23 17:12 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I wouldn't be surprised if severe cases of COVID-19 could increase the risk of cancer, but I do not find this study convincing. The study compares people hospitalized with severe COVID-19 against people hospitalized for other reasons and people with COVID-19 that did not require hospitalization. Those are dissimilar groups, where differences in the effectiveness of the immune system can both account for the severity of the COVID-19 case and the increased risk of cancer. If 31% of the people hospitalized for other reasons had no illness related to a weakened immune system, that could completely account for the observed increased likelihood of being diagnosed with cancer in the months afterwards, in the other group.

'Liberal free speech' does not protect unambiguous misinformation. If there was some German article claiming that vaccines affect the body's defenses against cancer, based on medical reports, which describe just a correlation in time, that article is misinforming people, who do not understand that correlation does not imply causation.

Everyone was able to report suspected side effects, however people were fearful and politically influenced. The FDA and other government medical authorities will check all those claims. If they find no CAUSATION, then those reports are rejected. For instance, if someone is diagnosed with a large slow growing tumor, a month after vaccination, that is no causation, because that tumor must have been developing for years.

only registered users can see external links





By phart at 22,Aug,23 13:31 other posts of phart 
I think little Rocket man is pissed!
I would NOT want to be 1 of those that failed to do my job!.
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 18,Aug,23 01:34 other posts of phart 
Great news for women and girls in North carolina.A BIPARTISAN bill banning men from womens sports was made legal by a veto override.
And men won't be able to compete with women in chess either!
Things will be fair hopefully for girls trying to get college scholarships and such. And PLEASE, be sure to to listen to the poor gal that was hit in a soccer game by a male and suffered brain damage from the hit.
Sad,poor gal will suffer the effects of that accident the rest of her life.
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 15,Aug,23 23:13 other posts of phart 
Just what we need,our government officals eating mushrooms that make you see crazy shit , IN CHINA no less, the home of wuhan!
only registered users can see external links


By tecsan at 01,Aug,23 05:08 other posts of tecsan 
I believe the dems know that Biden's goose is cooked. But, really what alternative do they have?
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Aug,23 09:01 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Another investigation fell completely flat.
You need some evidence to cook Biden's goose.
Looks like Republicans still got absolutely nothing,
so they should think about the alternatives.
Maybe become a party that people actually have reason to vote for?
By dgraff at 01,Aug,23 10:23 other posts of dgraff 
Just the fact that we are paying triple the price for everything should be reason enough if people would wake the fuck up and throw the democrats out on their ass
I still can’t believe they are doing cocaine in the White House what a bunch of losers
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Aug,23 14:43 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's got absolutely nothing to do with accusing a president of crimes.
The reason Trump has been accused of about 100 crimes, is not because he was a horrible president, but because he really has a problem with respecting THE LAW.

And for the thousandth time; if it was Biden's fault,
then why does the whole world have the exact same problem?

You just like to swallow those stupid cocaine stories, to make yourself believe
that the other side is really really bad, because you don't have much else to show for.
The biggest 'achievement' of Trump is tax-cuts for the wealthy, which increased the deficit, and requires average Americans to pay more taxes or get even less back from the government. An other 'achievement' is banning abortion, which does nothing for you, but only makes the lives of lots of women harder. That's a good part of the reason for why most people are not voting for Republicans (again). Your side can only win
by lying and cheating, and you support that wholeheartedly.
By dgraff at 01,Aug,23 15:11 other posts of dgraff 
Hey what can I say the only democrat that did us any good was bill Clinton he left office with a surplus not a deficit and he invented the pussy dipped cigar all the rest left us with staggering inflation and very high prices so you can see why im skeptical if I see prices go down to were they were three years ago then I will quit bitching and say I guess I was wrong the democrats must know what they are doing now I don’t want to see a bunch of computer graphs because we both know the information on the computer is only as good as the person that printed it there but when I go to the store and see that i can buy chicken for 49 cents a pound again then I will know we are on the right track
By phart at 01,Aug,23 16:42 other posts of phart 
Exactly, these theory's and concerns about who grabbed a pussy are ridicules.
We need boots on the ground actually making life livable and affordable again ,not leadership trying to cram chemical castration of teens and ukraine aid in our faces and telling us it is great.

By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 07:33 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
If you think, you'll ever be able to buy chicken for 49 cents a pound again,
than you have no idea how inflation works. Inflation will keep happening,
because it's necessary to compensate for all the rising national debts.
As long as people's income rise at a similar pace, that's no problem.

You are absolutely NOT basing your opinions on just what you see around you,
you are basing your opinions on what you hear from the most dishonest media.

I don't care how much pussy presidents grab or how many cigars they put in there, as long as it's consensual. That's between them and their wives, if they have them. What Trump did, was very much NOT consensual, Clinton's cigar story was.
Trump lost in court over sexual abuse and defamation of E Jean Carroll.
Clinton was never found guilty, even though he settled for $850,000 once.
The rest is just accusations, and Trump has way more of them then Clinton.
That your mind is making this worse for Clinton somehow, shows your bias.

That Trump got in trouble with the law for his prostitutes, is because he used campaign funds for hiding it. That's breaking the law. Clinton just lied about it.
Trump has lied 30,573 times over 4 years. Did anyone impeach him for that?
By dgraff at 02,Aug,23 08:29 other posts of dgraff 
Well let me tell you this the price of things better come back down mainly food or some of the democrats in my area will start coming up missing and my skin will start turning yellow from eating them
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 15:38 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Prices won't come down. Not under a Republican president either.
Or maybe a bit, if the Ukraine war ends and they can export grain again
for human and livestock consumption.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links

If you think food is expensive now, just wait until climate change destroys
even more harvests and turns even more areas unfit for agriculture.
By #610414 at 12,Aug,23 20:22
Or, like Florida, the crops don’t get picked because of DeSantis
By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Aug,23 07:56 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
If the only people who are willing to pick crops are illegals,
then there's your problem.

One easy solution would be to increase the wages to a level that Americans could live on it, but that seams to be out of the question. The alternative is to have legal migrant workers do it. Easy fix; just give all the illegals green cards.
By #610414 at 14,Aug,23 13:50
An explanation to the agricultural situation in this nation. The profit margin for a farmer is very little. The bigger the farm or conglomerate, the more room there is for higher wages, but, that can't be too high. If they go too high, they would have to raise prices. That won't do. The public would prostitute themselves for a few pennies. Foreign agricultural products would flood the country much more than it is now. That means a farmer can't pay a wage more than what a fast food restaurant pays. No one will show up for work under those wages when they can work in a nicer job with benefits. This is not a theory. Many agricultural entities try it every year and fail to meet their work force requirements.
Legal worker import is available, but, the State Department limits these temporary work visas and there's not enough workers, hence, illegals are the answer only because they are forced into this unsupervised type of work.
Not so in the State of Florida now. Now, the brunt of staying legal falls on the farmer. He risks heavy fines and/or imprisonment.
If you give all illegals a green card they would be tickled pink. As soon as they get it they would be looking for jobs in other places than agriculture.
By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Aug,23 17:16 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No matter how high or low the wages are, farmers will not make much money,
because capitalism allows the food corporations and supermarkets to control the prices and make all the profits.
That will not change if the government makes illegal employment on farms impossible. The prices of raw produce and raw animal products will go up a bit, because the costs will rise a bit, for the food corporations and supermarkets, but the profits of the farmers will be the exact same; just enough to survive and not decide to stop. That's just basic economy. My country is the #2 agricultural products exporter in the world. We cannot produce cheaper than you, because we don't have illegal employment on farms, we just have a lot of legal exploitation of migrants from Eastern Europe. They have all the freedom to find better jobs, but those better jobs are taken by our own people, who speak the language and are better educated.
Transportation of food is very expensive, so our products cannot compete with your products on price of raw goods. They might compete on profit margins of the end products or quality though, but that's up to you.
By #610414 at 14,Aug,23 17:20
Whatever the reason, special labor groups (one step away from indentured servitude) are needed, and not just in the USA.
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Aug,23 08:17 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
'special labor groups'? Are you referring to unions?
By #610414 at 15,Aug,23 10:43
No. I mean more alliens with legal temporary visas. Visas that are good to work in a particular industry.
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Aug,23 12:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
OK, I never heard that term.
In the EU, every citizen of the EU is allowed to work everywhere in the EU.
So they're all working legally in that way, but there are many of them who are exploited in other ways, like not getting payed the hours they are actually working or getting deducted very high prices for a dirty bed in a shed. At least they have no reason to fear getting arrested and deported.
By #610414 at 15,Aug,23 13:36
The EU and the US are very similar. We are a collection of 50 small countries with a central government. Unlike the EU, we are not able to leave the Union
By phart at 15,Aug,23 14:03 other posts of phart 
Sadly you are right cat,13 states tried to break free from the oppression of washington and 1000's died as they tried to "reunite" the country.
If you look at russia and ukraine with a open mind, same thing there. Putin is trying to reunite the countrys and rebuild the "Union". and we are fighting with the confederates on this 1. why 1 war was so wrong to so many and this war is so right makes little sense.
By #610414 at 15,Aug,23 14:15
The Ukraine was a separate republic in Easter Europe until the Russian Bolsheviks invaded and took over the running of the country after the Russian/Ukrainian war. When the USSR was dissolved, it, again, became a sovereign country. Russia has no legitimate claim on the Ukraine.

















By phart at 01,Aug,23 21:11 other posts of phart 
Completely flat?
Yea,on JOE BIDENS HEAD
only registered users can see external links

Millions of dollars paid to the biden family while joe was vice. I wonder what obama will think about all this when he finally wakes up to the fact his vice was actually worse than himself?
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 07:19 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Then they should have no problem to find the evidence, right?
So, where is it already?
By phart at 02,Aug,23 16:44 other posts of phart 
Emails, the laptop the fbi tryed to downplay and so on. Also I feel sure that the foreign country's that find out biden did things for money against them will help find evidence.
The prosecutor fired in ukraine? Um, I am willing to bet he would be glad to testify if allowed to
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,23 10:16 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
In those emails, Hunter literally says that he cannot involve his father.
His emails might be evidence of Hunter doing something illegal, but they
fully exonerate Joe.

Maybe they will find something, but at this moment you have diddly-squat.
If you had something, you could present it, instead of your conjectures.



By #610414 at 12,Aug,23 20:24
Putting aside Biden, for the moment, what was bad about Obama, besides the color of his skin?

By #610414 at 14,Aug,23 13:53
Why do you put Old Joe in that group? And, since when is Joe Comer, the biggest fool in Congress to be believed? He can’t even make a case to use toilet paper when he takes a dump?
Phart can you find ANY evidence of this? Not conjecture, real facts.


By tecsan at 02,Aug,23 07:22 other posts of tecsan 
If you are a moron Ananas2xLekker then I suppose you need the shit just thrown in your face.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 07:47 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Proverbial shit, I assume? You are certainly trying, but I can duck pretty well.
If you mean literally; I didn't know you're into that fetish. I'm not, sorry.
By tecsan at 03,Aug,23 09:15 other posts of tecsan 
All can see the evidence Ananas2xLekker . Only the morons deny it.
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,23 10:20 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Only morons keep repeating the same thing, without demonstrating any truth
to their claims.

By #610414 at 12,Aug,23 20:25
Tecsan, don’t throw stones inside a glass house.




By phart at 08,Aug,23 02:38 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,23 10:24 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That article doesn't present any evidence either.
And it uses statements like 'might have included'; conjecture.

However, the article says: "Schwerin ... testified last week before a House committee".
I haven't seen that one and cannot find it on YouTube. Did you see it and know where I can find it?
By #610414 at 12,Aug,23 20:29
only registered users can see external links


I found this and it looks like (if you can believe FOX NEWS) nothing happened.
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Aug,23 08:20 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"As your Letter is a sweeping attempt to collect an expansive array of documents and communications from President Biden and his family, I write to explain that the Committee on Oversight and Accountability lacks a legitimate legislative purpose and oversight basis for requesting such records from Mr. Biden, who is a private citizen," Lowell wrote.
By #610414 at 15,Aug,23 10:56
That probably went way over their heads.
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Aug,23 13:08 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
And then they compare this to Trump or some other Republican politician
passing the deadline set by a JUDGE, to provide their OWN documents,
which are more SPECIFICALLY described, or whatever.

This is called a 'false equivalence fallacy' and they do it all the time.

Like Trump vs Biden or Obama possessing government archive records.
Or all the emails incriminating their side vs Hunter's emails (not doing so).
By #610414 at 15,Aug,23 13:42
And Hilary Clinton's
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Aug,23 15:14 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Oh, so many false equivalence fallacies between her and Trump.
But because she was a candidate before Trump, they just point out the things that she did, while she was not even the president, without a word about things that Trump did, who was president, related to similar subjects.
What Trump did was all much worse, but they don't want him investigated
for those things, while Hillary was. That's just 'hypocrisy'.
By #610414 at 15,Aug,23 17:07
No, well, yes, but, we call it Trumpism












By phart at 18,Jul,23 00:09 other posts of phart 
Just curious, how will this forum react when AI starts interacting with us here?
You know, artificial intelligence?

Who would be receptive of it,and who would not want to be a part of it?
By tecsan at 03,Aug,23 09:12 other posts of tecsan 
Thanks mrs. VP for clearing up what AI means.
By phart at 08,Aug,23 02:39 other posts of phart 
You can't make this stuff up,
He says he is the AI, when he has no REAL intelligence.
only registered users can see external links
By tecsan at 11,Aug,23 06:22 other posts of tecsan 
You know the media is always trying to say gaffes but you go back and explain. What we see is just trying to find the way off the stage. No explanation until days later from speech writers that suck at their job.

By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,23 08:53 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
He's still outsmarting all Republicans, if he did all that crime and they cannot find
any evidence of it. Smarter than Trump, with his 78 criminal charges and counting.

Smarter than Trump's lawyers, who are incriminating their client on live TV.
They are basically saying: "Yeah, he did all of that, but he had a good reason..."
and "Yeah, he did all of that, but that's free speech!"
Even pretty good lawyers turn into morons, the minute they start working for Trump.
Trump must spread some Artificial Unintelligence virus or something.

I thought you would see the open goal for a joke here;
Biden is Artificially Intelligent, without those meds he's a vegetable.
Right?
By #610414 at 14,Aug,23 17:41
🤣🤣🤣👍😈

By phart at 15,Aug,23 00:10 other posts of phart 
asparagus maybe.






By #610414 at 11,Aug,23 14:43
Commenting on your original premise, ie:
only registered users can see external links

The article above is no longer available. However, the theory is and has been since the early 1900’s. We don’t have to prove something that has already been proven false as you can find that proof too.
The problem with our border to the south, though, doesn’t quite line up with this theory. First, they are a mixed group of people representing all races and nationalities. Their religious beliefs are varied too, although I suspect, most are Catholics or, at the very least, Christians.
They are coming over unvaccinated maybe. Other countries do vaccinate their citizens, but, it should not be very hard to do so once they are here. Nor is it that hard to check for “virous’s or diseases” and quarantine those affected. That is something I’m sure they do already.
Bringing their dope is a different problem, but, one way or the other, the drug cartels will get them in. There’s too big a market in the US not to.
So, I’m 71, all my life I’ve heard how drugs are imported illegally into this country. It didn’t matter if the administration was Republican or Democrat. What possible magic wand do you expect President Biden to wave and resolve the crisis? If you do your research instead of getting your info from crazy-assed ultra-right fake news media folks, you might get to the truth.
I can’t say we should not try to find a solution. I just say that it takes ALL OF US to try to do so instead of blaming one or another national leader.


By phart at 02,Aug,23 11:27 other posts of phart 
In the liberal utopia sometimes there is still a small amount of justice. Frankly the death penalty would be better but at least she can cope with withdrawal for a while.
Dope heads, the scrouge of the earth.
Colorado no less, land of legal pot,that only leads to worse.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 15:13 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"legal pot,that only leads to worse."
That's absolute bullshit. Illegal pot only leads to worse. Legal pot saves lives.
To stop pot, you need to do far worse to people than drugs and crime are causing now.
Look at the Philippines. A horrible drugs war and it doesn't help at all.
only registered users can see external links

Republicans used to stand for freedom, now just for tyranny and servitude.

This is the list of freedoms you stand for:
- Working
- Mindless consumerism
- Saying racist bullshit online
- Having guns to kill people who look like a criminal (black)
That's it, nothing more.
By phart at 02,Aug,23 16:00 other posts of phart 
You are the 1 full of it.
Work 40 hours a week, then enjoy the fruits of your labors
Speaking my mind ,
being able to defend myself against the racist ,thieving thugs that libturds leave out on the streets to harass every day people.
You must live under a rock.
I have watched several people start out with that simple "harmless "joint once in awhile and then go to worse because the joint is just not giving them the HIGH they are after.
If you can't understand that people smoke dope to get high, then get acclimated to it and it is not enough, they do more, read this, maybe it will help you understand.see link below
I am familar with this 1 as they helped a freind get cleaned up so he could get back into the work force and take care of his family. But 2 others I know, didn't work out and have become zombies. 1 gal I went to school with that later became a topless dancer, died from a od.
since the wuhan virus thing started, just in our fire district alone that I help manage, we have had at least 8 deaths from Overdoes.
Most of them, started out with pot.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 16:30 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I might be 'full of it', but you mentioned no other freedoms that you care about.
You just re-interpreted the ones that I ridiculed.

Freedom comes with responsibilities. Just because some people
cannot handle freedom, is no reason to keep it from everyone,
unless that freedom itself really hurts others.

I support the maximum possible freedom, shared equally to the maximum.
That doesn't just mean passive freedom, like you support, but proactive freedom distribution. That means providing the basic rights to a good life, because without it, people don't have any freedom or just very little.
And it means only prohibiting actions that directly harm other self-conscious people.
By phart at 02,Aug,23 16:42 other posts of phart 
You twist freedoms to fit your liberal agenda.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 16:55 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Then what does freedom mean, in your opinion?
How am I twisting it?

This, I think is a good definition: the quality or state of being free: such as.
a.: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action.
b.: liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another
c.: independence.
By phart at 02,Aug,23 17:16 other posts of phart 
a is not possible because you require food, shelter and etc. there for, there can be no absence of necessity.
Something has to be done to acquire it ,you may have some choices as to HOW you acquire it ,but it would be steal ,borrow, barter, or work and use wages.

b, slavery is illegal, so that is not a current issue.
c, independence. hum, sure ,but that requires you to violate a, independence requires effort. which translates loosely to necessity.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Aug,23 18:52 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
a) Yes it is, just have rich parents. But, you cannot chose your parents. That's the reason for why I say freedom should be more equally shared.
b) It's still happening in many parts of the world and it doesn't stop at just abolishing slavery. It also says 'liberation from the power of another'. There is too much power concentrated in the hands of too few people. Power => Freedom. That reduces freedom for too many people.
c) 'independence requires effort' sure. But at the moment we are all stuck in a power/dependence system that I don't like, because it maximizes freedom for some at the cost of freedom for many others.

I fully recognize that one freedom can affect an other freedom in a negative way, and that freedom of one person can affect the freedom of another.
I say it's a balance, you just say it's 'not possible'.

My 'liberal agenda' is a result of my idea of freedom, not the other way around.

The Socialist Party that I am a member of summarized the basic principle as "human dignity, equality and solidarity", where the starting point is 'human dignity', which results in a demand for 'equality', which results in a demand for 'solidarity'.

The idea is supporting more than to be 'free as a bird', because that's not freedom, that's being left to fate. It's the same as being worthless, because no one cares about your fate. By evolving away from animals, we acquired 'human dignity'. That means everyone has value. The idea that all people have the same value, results in the demand for equality. To achieve equality, requires (at least some sort of) solidarity. Without solidarity, everyone is 'free as a bird', i.e. worthless.
By phart at 02,Aug,23 23:00 other posts of phart 
I am confused on how a criminal, a homeless person ,a vet, a scientist, a garbage collector, a politician, and etc can all be considered equals?
Just falling out from between your mothers legs does not mean you have a silver spoon up your ass and can sit around and do nothing for the entirety of your life.
There is work to be done,someone has to do it, health care to provide for example. That takes education. That also takes commitment from the person . A criminal ,on the other hand,makes no commitment, needs no education. They have both taken actions to NOT be equal but 1 has taken action to be BETTER and a asset to society, unlike the criminal.
That is a brief explanation as to why people like me consider your idea's highly flawed.
You want the criminal ,the nurse, the dr, the garbage man, the politician, all to eat from the same buffet provided by WHO? Live in equal house's provided by WHO?
There is only 1 way for that to happen ,and that is the 1's that work are giving up what they work for to provide for those that do nothing.

If all are equal,what is the incentive for 1 person to do any more than another? As in for example, 1 person going to college and the other watching tv all day?
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,Aug,23 08:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The fact that you are confused about that is your core problem.
Do you consider yourself to be equal to other people?

Is what you think of yourself in any way consistent with what you think of others?

I know you contribute to society, but if you were unable to do so,
is society right, to just kill you off? Is your value only dependent
on how much you are able to contribute?

Is the value of fully able people only dependent on what they contribute?

Is a person who starts with nothing and tries to be valuable, worth less,
than a rich kid who only lives of their parent's money?
If not, then why are they deserving so much more in life?
Why do they get from birth the benefits of a healthy and safe place to live,
good education, good healthcare, access to healthy food and a shoo-in
for a nice cushy job or a political position (if they even want to work at all)?
Why should people be so dependent on where they are born?

We are all human and therefore start out with equal human value.
I agree that people's actions can make themselves more or less valuable,
but everyone starts out with the exact same human value, no matter
where they are born or who their parents are.

You must think everyone starts with no value, because you think no one deserves anything, besides what they earn or get from their parents.
If that isn't true, explain why not, and how I can conclude otherwise
from what you are saying.
By phart at 03,Aug,23 13:20 other posts of phart 
No I am not equal to every one else.
Never have been.
Do I attempt to be? Of course, I run into blocks ,such as income level, and ability's, talents .People are not equal, they can't be ,it is impossible.

Just because I fell out of my mother just like Bill gates, do I deserve to get handed a check each month so I can eat snails and drink wine like him? No.Not hardly

If you can't contribute something back,why are you deserving of equal status to those that can?

We would literally have to go back to cave man times to establish the equality you seek.As long as Elon Musk has his millions he made taking risk and inventing things,and I don' t because I can't do as much as he can, I am not equal.
Why does he have the millions? Because he can invent, he can invest, he is willing and able to take risk.
That is what makes him more of a person than I am.

And to top it all off, if you took all the money and assets of the world and put them in a jar and then distributed them evenly across the land, there would be haves and have nots again in 6 months because of the fact some humans always strive to have more,do more,and some don't and are foolish with their assets,be it good health, money,talent,etc

As for life it's self,for all lives to be equal,we would all have to live under the bridge or in a sky scraper. you can't be equal and not be exactly the same





By tecsan at 05,Aug,23 06:49 other posts of tecsan 
He loves to spin the truth, phart.








By phart at 01,Aug,23 01:29 other posts of phart 
The clock is ticking on the bidens.
only registered users can see external links

Brokering his dad's vice presidential power. what a concept.Making money hand over fist.
OF course joe is going to lie.
Of course hunter had a long standing agreement not to talk about his father.
Apples don't fall far from the tree.
By tecsan at 02,Aug,23 07:24 other posts of tecsan 
Well put, but some just walk around with closed eyes and minds and think biden is a Angel. I think the bubble is about to burst.



By phart at 21,Jul,23 00:50 other posts of phart 
This is how california treats business owners, liberal logic,fuck up everything and leave.
only registered users can see external links


By tecsan at 12,Jul,23 08:43 other posts of tecsan 
You do find some interesting stuff.


By phart at 04,Jul,23 22:13 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

"The issue, known as “transableism,” belongs to “Body Integrity Identity Disorder” and represents people who identify as handicapped."
By dgraff at 05,Jul,23 11:11 other posts of dgraff 
Anything for a free ride from our government
By phart at 05,Jul,23 13:58 other posts of phart 
Just makes it harder for people like myself with REAL issues, that are NOT of our own fault or making , to get help.
I am willing to bet if they had to live on disability income for a couple years that "condition" would suddenly heal. There are no Starbucks coffees and shit.
By dgraff at 05,Jul,23 15:23 other posts of dgraff 
I agree





By phart at 16,Jun,23 23:45 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

You can't make this stuff up.
1, we have a President being arrested for keeping document folders and such in his home under secret service protection, 2,we have someone hacking into goverment computers.
So which data is really at risk here? Anything Trump mighta had that is 2+ years out of date? Or what is on bidens computers??
By dgraff at 05,Jul,23 11:16 other posts of dgraff 
Oh no they will find Biden’s file on scented women’s shampoo gee you’re hair smells terrific the creepy old fuck



By Ananas2xLekker at 26,May,23 11:06 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The concept of 'greedflation' finally gets generally recognized.
It takes a damn long time before corporate media accepts reality.
only registered users can see external links
By #681164 at 26,May,23 11:57
Big oil refineries come to mind
By #610414 at 26,May,23 13:08
Big oil is one reason, but not the only one. The auto industry, housing, and food are too
By phart at 26,May,23 14:57 other posts of phart 
So who is qualified to decide how much profit is to much profit? AND how would that be held at the same amount?
What would stop them from deciding later on that if you have 40 dollars left at the end of the month you need to hand it over?
Slipper slope when you start dictating what is to much when it comes to company's that invest millions to design ,manufacture, distribute and maintain a product and fulfill the wages and retirements and etc for the people that make it possible.
Most of the liberals that claim greed on the part of a company have never invested the money and time into 1 to understand the risk taken.
By #610414 at 26,May,23 15:49
You don't control profits. You control the percentage of TAXES levied on them. Your Boy the MAGA king, LOWERED the taxes to large corporate entities. Guess what? Inflation.
By phart at 13,Jun,23 12:54 other posts of phart 
The economy was fine when Trump was president.it was only after biden came in that things went to shit.not Trumps fault.
By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Jun,23 15:16 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's not true at all. The economy was heading into a crisis during Trump,
even before anyone had ever heard of Covid.
Remember the damage of Trump's stupid trade war?

Trump is not the only one. Every Republican President Over The Last 100 Years Has Had A Recession.
only registered users can see external links
The article doesn't say, but the Democratic presidents often inherit their crisis from the Republican president before them and than has to fix it. Just like Obama had to fix the crisis that Bush's deregulation of the banks created.

Right-wing media just doesn't talk about the economy being bad, whenever a Republican is in office, even if there's a economic sinkhole developing under their own office chair. And no matter how good the economy is going under a Democrat, or how much a Democratic president is lowering the deficit, right-wing media will fearmonger constantly over the economy and the debt. And you will parrot their lies, no matter how transparent.
By phart at 13,Jun,23 15:25 other posts of phart 
gas and food were affordable while Trump was in office.
People were working,living well. REAL WORLD, right out my front door that i saw with my own eyes, living much better than under obama. quit looking at charts that are skewed to prove the writers point of view and start looking at the real world.
By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Jun,23 15:36 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Oil was at a negative price for a while under Trump.
That was not by his actions, that was the economy.
When the Covid restrictions were relieved in the US and Europe, that was not the end of the crisis. As you know, China, the factory of the world, was struggling much longer. That had an effect globally. It resulted in inflation, because of shortages, not because of devaluation of money. But that inflation was worsened by companies raising their prices much more than their cost increased, because of greed and because Republicans protect them and blame Democrats for it.

Then Russia decided to attack Ukraine, resulting in sanctions affecting energy prices globally. Also not the fault of either Trump or Biden.
What is caused by Trump was trillions in extra debt and a huge deficit from giving tax-cuts to the wealthy. Democrats could fix that, but Republicans are preventing any fixes, because they like to destroy the economy when a Democrat is in office.

At least I'm referring to actual data, you are referring to partisan lies.

By #610414 at 13,Jun,23 16:24
Except you couldn't get stuff to buy



By dgraff at 13,Jun,23 15:27 other posts of dgraff 
I agree Obama high inflation trump much better than comes Biden and bingo high inflation again I’m no rocket scientist but I see a trend here
By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Jun,23 15:43 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's not even a coherent sentence, but inflation under Obama was very low.
It was even so low, for so long that economists were worried about it.
only registered users can see external links

Your brain is creating alternative facts, just to be able to think whatever you want.
How about actually looking at trends? They exist in the real world as data and as history. Then you can use it to be correct about reality, instead of creating your own reality.
By #610414 at 13,Jun,23 16:25
What brain? They use teleprompters.🤣🤣
By phart at 13,Jun,23 17:33 other posts of phart 
Telephone,telegraph,teledemocrat!


By dgraff at 13,Jun,23 21:59 other posts of dgraff 
Were pray tell do you dig this happy horse shit up i see with my eyes not a computer screen everything was sky high in our 8 years of the negro era and now it’s even worse much like the high inflation in your country what do you pay for gas and food it’s outrageous
By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Jun,23 08:13 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
So your eyes saw high inflation during Obama, that 'the numbers' didn't see?
No you didn't, your ears heard lies about 'the numbers' and you believed them.

No, it's not worse in your country. In my country, the prices of gas have gone down a bit, because of lower taxes on it, but the prices of food keep going up.
If you want to see our food prices, look here:
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links

In march 2022, we paid Ђ2.30/l Euro95, that's $9.38 per gallon. You paid $4.173 per gallon then. What we pay for gas and food is outrageous, I agree.
Is that Biden's fault? No it isn't. It's the global economy and it's companies screwing us for more profits.

What makes high prices less of a problem? People who can pay them.
Biden has lowered unemployment to a record low. Trump didn't.
By dgraff at 14,Jun,23 09:44 other posts of dgraff 
No what my eyes saw was the money flying out of my wallet every time I bought something anything and every one bitching about the prices what he was is a black pawn that the higher ups wanted in office to show the world that we were not racist but yet he was nothing more than a money grabbing gutter rat why do you think trump won by a landslide the first time it’s because even the Democrats were sick of the high prices and you can take that statement to the first national
By phart at 14,Jun,23 13:37 other posts of phart 
My eyes saw my neighbors out of work because home building had slowed down to a crawl,
1 major employer told 1 of my neighbors if Trump did not win 2016 that the company would be shutting down as they would not be able to afford to continue under democrat rule. Most of their contracts were military.
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Jun,23 07:05 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Someone lost their job, while Obama was president, so of course it was Obama's fault. Do you understand how much confirmation bias is in that kind of thinking? If someone close to you lost their job while Trump was president, you wouldn't blame Trump for that.

Biden increased your defense budget by $ 80 billion. Lots of military contracts going round. Who do you think makes all those weapons for Ukraine?
By phart at 15,Jun,23 14:23 other posts of phart 
Not just someone, alot of people.
Those numbers and surveys are done in different areas of the country.
For example, you would not go to a small town in Kansas and ask about the effects of coastal oil drilling, those people would not know much about it unless you wanted numbers to say, people had nothing against it. You would go to somewhere on the texas coast to a democrat led town and ask , then you would get numbers to say it has a negative effect.
So some new contracts went around , hum, didn't do the company much good that had been in business over a 100 years and went bank rupt in 2014.
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Jun,23 15:18 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The jobless rate under Obama started out at 10% in 2010, caused by Bush's financial crash and declined to 4.7%, when Obama left office in January 2017. But of course you make him responsible for the failures of every stupid Republican led state too.
But when Trump was in office he was of course not responsible for the biggest job loss in decades. Then every state failing is their own fault.




By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Jun,23 06:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
If that was true, it would show up in inflation data. It's impossible that so many prices are going up, without it showing in inflation data. It's confirmation bias. Your media tells you that Obama is making prices higher, you see something that is expensive and that confirms their story for you. But your media tells you everything sucks when a Democrat is president and praises everything to high heaven, when a Republican is president. They are lying to you. Unless you belong to the 1%, it's the exact opposite. Republicans blow up the deficit, by giving tax-cuts to the wealthy and make the other 90% of people pay for it. Then they deregulate banks, so they can gamble away your money, scam you with interest rates and sell you bad investments. All of Wall Street then gets rich as fuck, until the whole system crashes. Then the tax-payer has to step in to save the economy again, with of course more presents to the rich, with the FED buying stocks and bonds. Bush created the problem, and Obama had to clean it up. He did, and the economy recovered on every metric, clearly visible. So you have to come up with a better story than 'everything was expensive'. That's just your bias speaking.

What did Obama do? What was the cause? When I tell you things, I explain what the Republican president did. You can check that in the news history and in government archives. Then I tell you what result came from it and why.
You just tell me your gut feelings. They are wrong, because they are based on decades of misinformation and bias. There's no logic behind any of it.
By dgraff at 15,Jun,23 08:41 other posts of dgraff 
Back at ya babe you’re not converting me
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Jun,23 15:25 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Just trying to make you think. That's what I want to convert you to.
Because, if you just tried to find logic for your ideas, they would unravel.
By dgraff at 15,Jun,23 15:57 other posts of dgraff 
Wouldn’t the world be a funny place if we all liked the same thing drove the same car and lived in the same type house you liberals want to save the world and I would like it to stay the way it was 3 years ago
By phart at 15,Jun,23 16:25 other posts of phart 
Shit,I would take the clinton years back before I would obama or biden.
By dgraff at 15,Jun,23 21:27 other posts of dgraff 
Absolutely i 100 percent agree






By #610414 at 15,Jun,23 21:47
You lie Dgraff

only registered users can see external links

WASHINGTON (AP) — In claiming that he scored “a massive landslide victory” in last month’s presidential election, Donald Trump turned history upside down.

In fact, his winning margin in the Electoral College is on the other end of the historical spectrum, far closer to the narrowest win in history than to the widest.

Speaking on “Fox News Sunday,” Trump claimed that “We had a massive landslide victory, as you know, in the Electoral College.” Hillary Clinton, he said, is “down to a very low number.” He added that Democrats “suffered one of the greatest defeats in the history of politics in this country.”

The final Electoral College margin was Trump 306, Clinton 232, for a winning percentage of just under 57 percent. That ranks this year’s outcome as the 13th-closest of the 58 presidential elections in U.S. history, according to a tally by Claremont McKenna College political scientist John Pitney.

Barack Obama won both of his presidential elections with bigger Electoral College margins: 61 percent in 2008 and 62 percent in 2012. Trump’s margin was narrower than all but two of the last 10 presidential elections — those of George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004.
By dgraff at 15,Jun,23 22:29 other posts of dgraff 
Stick to the program hunny the point i was making was that people were that sick of that nigga after 8 years and his inflation that they would vote for any one just to get rid of the democrats
--------------------------------------- added after 64 seconds

And I don’t give a damn about your graph’s and google look ups
By #610414 at 16,Jun,23 00:20
Of course not. You rather have your head up your ass than face the truth.
By dgraff at 16,Jun,23 08:36 other posts of dgraff 
For every look up you do there is a counter look up out there so that gets us nowhere
By phart at 16,Jun,23 11:14 other posts of phart 
If a person wanted to disprove the sky is blue, a few days research and compiling data could be done to confirm it. If a person wanted to fight that, some research could be done to prove it was blue.
And the results would also be altered by the beliefs of the person paying for all this to be done.
By dgraff at 16,Jun,23 11:25 other posts of dgraff 
With out google or look ups seeing with my own eyes the sky is multi colored blue with white clouds and sometimes it has red and orange color sometimes gray and black and chicken little says the sky is falling but yet I bet google would say it’s blue


By #610414 at 16,Jun,23 13:56
Dgraff, Phart this is true
“ For every look up you do there is a counter look up out there ”
The question is, “Why do I look stuff up on the internet”? I’ll explain, but, before I do, let me explain some truths. I know that Trump won the 2016 election. I know that Biden won the 2020 election. These are undeniable by me or by anyone. These are not opinions. These facts are as true as an apple is a tree grown fruit and that a man .is born with a penis, and so on and so forth. An opinion is a statement made by someone that needs to be proved before it can be a fact. Dgraff made a statement in the above post. I didn’t think that was right, but, before I, call someone out, I want to be absolutely sure that what I’m saying is true. Trump won the 2014 election. That will not change. It’s history. Now, if I believe Dgraff is wrong, how do I prove it? You geniuses, that see only what’s in front of your face, how would you prove and convince me that what you are saying is the truth, a real fact? I go to the online encyclopedia, Google. What I ask, and in order to not be biased, I pose this question, “By what margin did Trump win the 2014 election?” What ever I find I EVALUATE. If every source says one thing and just one says another, I’ll go by the majority.
You two, and many more, have your views. I don’t know for sure where you acquired these views, but, not once, when I refute your views do you come up with unimpeachable sources to support your views. Mainly, it’s what, you Dgraff, said, “I don’t give a damn about your graph’s and google look ups”
I’m not as you seem to be. If I’m wrong, I’ll say so. I also don’t open my mouth until I put my brain in gear. Want to see how that works? Biden won the election by very little, so I won’t open my mouth and say he had a landslide. I will say that he was declared the winner of the 2020 election and now he’s serving as our current president. See what I did? Now, if you say the election was stolen, I can say, “ But, he is serving now.” That’s how it works.
You have an opinion? Fine, but, if you want me to believe it, provide facts that I can see. And you don’t care to, then I can have my opinion. You LIED.🤣🤣😈
By dgraff at 16,Jun,23 18:42 other posts of dgraff 
Good lord are you writing a book
By #610414 at 16,Jun,23 20:00
Honey child, you don't have to read it. Don't misunderstand my intentions. I didn't write it for you or Phart. I wrote it for me.
By dgraff at 16,Jun,23 21:36 other posts of dgraff 
I understand I have it all figured out now
I’m going to step back and let the young folks figure it out
By phart at 16,Jun,23 22:31 other posts of phart 
In other words, we're fucked. Because they can't figure out what gender they are when they wake up in the morning,and you think they can figure out something useful???
By dgraff at 16,Jun,23 22:49 other posts of dgraff 
Yeah I do believe you’re right






















By phart at 12,Jun,23 17:46 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
It is possible for THC trapped in your body fat to get released again and cause a secondary high later on when you are working.

So you dope up on friday night,and go back to work and get high just riding down the road off your body fat and wreck and kill somebody.How nice
By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Jun,23 11:38 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
So what? THC is not a harmful chemical. In fact, THC and other cannabinoids such as CBD slow growth and/or cause death in certain types of cancer cells.
You don't get a high, from such a low amount. That wouldn't even be sleep inducing.

But, if you care about chemicals being trapped in your body (fat), why don't you speak out against PFAS and mercury pollution? Those are actually harmful substances.
Using cannabis is a choice, having to use polluted tap-water is not.
By phart at 13,Jun,23 12:52 other posts of phart 
Because the chemicals you mention don't endanger me on the hwy like pot does.It doesn't endanger people directly in the work place either.
I don't use teflon cookware. It is bad for you right out of the box.over heat it like my mother did and kill all your pet birds.
By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Jun,23 14:56 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Just like alcohol, it's not allowed to be under the influence of pot, when driving or working. However, soon after the use of pot, someone is normally capable of driving, while after the consumption of alcohol, it takes hours to get sober.

Just because you don't use Teflon, doesn't mean it's not in your body.
PFAS waste is everywhere, because it doesn't break down, just like plastic.
It's found in water, air, soil and food, across the globe, even in Antarctica.
only registered users can see external links



By #610414 at 13,Jun,23 12:52
Phart, this is an add for drug testing in the work place by a company.

SureHire is proud to offer testing services in the US.

Nowhere did they say THC trapped in the body would cause another high at work or driving. What they said was:

Cannabis can remain in your system for anywhere from one to thirty days, and is detectable even longer in your hair follicles — here are some factors that play a role.

And then they said:

While recreational cannabis is legal in Canada and many U.S. states, being high at work is not, particularly if you are working in a safety-sensitive position.

Those are two separate statements meant to influence employers that, perhaps, they should DRUG TEST EMPLOYEES, using this company. You are the one that came up with this wild idea. Yes, we know about your cousin, twice removed, who smokes weed and is a bum, but, the reality is that smoking a joint is much safer than drinking two shots of scotch. Maybe, in your circle of friends, pot is not well known, but, many of my friends and/or acquaintances use pot. Their high seldom stays longer than a couple of hours and none have problems doing their work.
By phart at 13,Jun,23 13:01 other posts of phart 
I disagree, it last alot longer. My coworker that got fired for it claimed he had not smoked for 3 days but when I hauled him to be tested he failed miserably.
By Ananas2xLekker at 13,Jun,23 15:00 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Those tests are ridiculously accurate. Just because there is still a trace amount
left in someone's blood, doesn't mean it's still having an effect.
It's like a positive test, after drinking two beers, three days ago.
No effect left whatsoever, but people still lose their jobs over it.

How would you like it, if you lost your drivers license over eating one bonbon?
By phart at 13,Jun,23 15:39 other posts of phart 
well, if a bon bon contained something that could impair my driving ability, I would not have ate 1 ,much less enough for the sugar crash. I have the class A license, that means I can drive the 80,000 pound trucks at 70 on the interstate. Do you REALLY want me or anyone else for that matter,driving something that heavy at 70 mph if i have been smoking dope?
only registered users can see external links

I am in constant pain,most of the time I just cope but I use over the counter stuff when it gets bad. I have often been ask if I tried CBD oil for it. NO, because it could impair me. IF I was a cancer victim, and had no need to drive, perhaps so, but on the road, hell no. My pain at it's worst, is far less painful for me to live with than taking a life while impaired ,knowing it was preventable. I guess that is 1 of the times having a conscience is costly.


By #610414 at 13,Jun,23 16:50
There's a difference between the high and testing for THC. The "high" doesn't last very long. The chemical trace can be detected up to six months. The problem with work drug testing is that it doesn't test you for sobriety, the part that allows you to do your work. It tests for the USE of pot and other drugs. It should be illegal to test unless you show you are high.
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes

In general, though, alcohol can be detected:
In the blood for up to 12 hours
On the breath for 12 to 24 hours
In the urine for 12 to 72 hours
In saliva for 12 to 48 hours, and
In hair for up to 90 days

Yet we drive, go to work the next day, stop for a beer during lunch. No one really cares.
By phart at 13,Jun,23 17:36 other posts of phart 
Well the use of it is the real problem. If someone is using it sparingly, what is stopping them from getting worse?
And besides, a pee test, positive, fired, is alot faster way to achieving a safe work environment than going thru a bunch of steps to prove 100% sober.
Safety is much more important than someone being able to get high on the weekends.

By dgraff at 14,Jun,23 22:07 other posts of dgraff 
Let’s all sit back roll a fatty and get mellow
By #610414 at 14,Jun,23 22:56
only registered users can see external links

But, I would with you, Mountain Man. 🥰😈







By phart at 13,Jun,23 15:24 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Well, if russia was not able to buy it from afganistan,they were able to get it in ukraine. Smooth move folks, giving putin and our enemys all our tech. Our military is now a moot point if we are attacked. The enemys know our every detail and methods now.


By phart at 10,May,23 01:46 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Where is the outrage over this issue?
By #610414 at 15,May,23 22:14
Everywhere. You just conveniently overlook it
By phart at 16,May,23 02:08 other posts of phart 
Really? Why hasn't there been congressional hearings about it? Why hasn't biden and his cronys shut the border DOWN so it can't get here so easy??
I don't see anything but the call sheets of my local ems with ever increasing over dose's and drug related deaths.
By #610414 at 18,May,23 14:38
I guess Congress is more interested in the X Rated pics on Hunter Biden’s laptop.
By phart at 18,May,23 14:50 other posts of phart 
No more interested in the money he got for his dad being vice president.1 million for lobbying for a crooked Romanian politician.
By #610414 at 18,May,23 15:09
You mean Hunter? The mature, adult, son of a vice president? 🤣🤣🤣😈







By phart at 17,May,23 17:31 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Do any liberal dumbass's ever get the point?
Drugs are a bad thing and lead to most if not all the problems this country is facing.Poverty,violence,homelessness.
But yet more dumbass's want dope legal.
Well here is what 1 of the side effects of pot is, schizophrenia
I have good reason to agree as pot is what began my former girlfreinds decline.A student,honor roll,great singer,good looking, then the pot came into the picture. She is now totally disabled, fat as a pig and has the mind of a 9 year old. And schizophrenia is 1 of her issues.
By #610414 at 17,May,23 22:03
I'm sorry about your girlfriend. Who did this to her? Did she get the cops involved? Was it a one time thing or did the perpetrator forced her multiple times?
By phart at 17,May,23 22:16 other posts of phart 
Long story but it all started many moons ago, a fellow in my high school class got her started on pot, 3 car wrecks later in her 20's she became addicted to pain killers,antipsychotics and 3 marriages later and her claiming to want to recover got me involved because I do not do drugs or drink. 2 suicide attempts during the time we were together, the second while we were on a trip celebrating her graduation from getting a second college degree in her 40's after suffering a stroke.
Like I say,long story, but it all started when that asshole handed her a joint at age 15 after choir practice.
If I was the killer you folks like yourself and leo think I am,that son of a bitch would in the dirt, and no one would care,they would appreciate it. He was such a son of a bitch that he held a knife to his mothers neck and made her give him her wedding band so he could sell it for dope money.
By #610414 at 17,May,23 22:51
But, it was her choice, wasn't it?
By phart at 17,May,23 23:11 other posts of phart 
Well I don't consider it a "choice" this guy motivated her to try it,like all guys try to do at that age to get a gal drunk,high,whatever to get some pussy.
By #610414 at 18,May,23 00:44
But she accepted and continued.
By phart at 18,May,23 01:29 other posts of phart 
yea,and look where it put her.
Why should a option like that be available?
By #610414 at 18,May,23 13:45
Some questions to get a better picture.
Was her first joint a LEGAL joint?
Was she a responsible individual before her first joint?
If I said I’ve had three car accidents. I totaled the cars. What impression would I make with you?
Same question if I told you I had three failed marriages?
Same question if I tried suicide twice?
The most important and telling question so all. What made a drug dependent, suicidal whore so attractive to you?
By phart at 18,May,23 14:37 other posts of phart 
Well, first of all 15 and no it was not legal.
it was pushed on to her on a church bus headed to a picnic.
I knew her from age 5 to 16 ,at 16 she ran away from home
All those bad things happened when she was away.
She had no where else to go in 2011, made all kinds of promises to recover and this and that, and when she came home, she found out I was single. She explained a few scant details and said she needed to spend time with someone that did not do dope drugs and so forth. Naive as I was at the time, I still remembered the honor student, with a nice figure, a voice that we could have easily been hearing on the radio nowadays .just a great, attractive intelligent person, BEFORE the fucking dope.
Alcoholism, which she suffers as well, runs in my family. THat is why I have never taken a drink, I don't want to flip that switch.
My dad, a terrible drinker for over 30 years. quit liquor cold turkey, then shortly after the night of my accident, as he thought based on what the dr's said,I would be a vegitable the rest of my life and would need care.
he quit beer .Cold turkey .has not drank a drop since. So this mess with the ex started about 7 years after he quit. I saw this and know other quit cold turkey. I knew she would have a issue or 2 but with 2 doctors working to help her, I thought it would work.
WRONG.
Constant issues, they call it falling off the wagon,. Bullshit ,they jump on the damn thing and beat the horses towing it to death .They love being out of wack.
anyway, after years of lies and relapses, her second suicide attempt put her in a coma. LIke a dumbass, I tried to be there for her. you can read my old blogs about that.
All of it started from a joint, from a horny fellow a year older than her,trying to get some pussy.I don't know what being legal or illegal as far as the joint is concerned has to do with it. Surely they don't sell joints to teens where it is legal.
Cat, getting involved with her was the worst mistake I ever made in my life. BUT being naive,trustworthy,and remembering who she was,and thinking she could be that person again, only smarter and more mature, was stupid on my part. drug addicts seldom are ever worth a damn again.
As far as education, she was a nurse and had just got a degree in human resources. She was about to hired to supervise a new Alzheimer's wing at the nursing home she did a quarters internship or whatever at during the college attendance .I can't remember the word for it. Anyway, she had a high 5 figure salary waiting to be earned the following week of her suicide attempt.
By #610414 at 18,May,23 14:47
Your post did not mention illegal.** pot use. You say pot leads to worse drugs. I’m not arguing that point. What I’m saying is that drugs are a personal choice. Right or wrong, it’s undeniable. I also know that the money spent on “fighting” drugs can substain a small country. This , when we know how many homeless or poor people could use that help, makes it obscene.
By phart at 18,May,23 14:49 other posts of phart 
The drugs are part of the reason for the issues you speak of. Kill the roots ,the plant dies
Get rid of the drugs,and alot the issues will settle down to negligable.
By #610414 at 18,May,23 15:06
The drugs don't make the customers. The users make it necessary.













By phart at 06,May,23 01:10 other posts of phart 
THE NEIGHBORS,



Recently, while I was working in the flower beds in the front yard, my neighbors stopped to chat as they returned home from walking their dog. During our friendly conversation, I asked their little girl what she wanted to be when she grew up.

She said she wanted to be President someday. Both of her parents, Democratic Party members, were standing there so I asked her, "If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?"

She replied . . . "I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people."

Her parents beamed with pride!

"Wow . . . what a worthy goal!" I said . . . "But you don't have to wait until you're President to do that!"

"What do you mean?" she replied.

So I told her, "You can come over to my house now, and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and trim my hedge, and I'll pay you $50.

Then you can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house."

She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?"

I said, "Welcome to the Republican Party."

Her parents aren't speaking to me anymore.



If you know any Republicans that would get a chuckle out of this, share it with them.

Most Democrats will just delete it, I guess the logic escapes them.
By sherryann at 06,May,23 01:15 other posts of sherryann 
By phart at 06,May,23 01:16 other posts of phart 
Simple logic!
By sherryann at 06,May,23 01:17 other posts of sherryann 

--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes

I admire your energy & the time you take trying to get through to these dems that don't even have simple reading comprehension skills.
By phart at 06,May,23 01:55 other posts of phart 
Well, the thing is, at some point I will get old and weary, and I will have to live in the crumbled remains of what was once a beautiful country sitting in a squeaky rocking chair all alone .My mind will be peeping out of my skull thru failing eyes as the world goes by and I will have to watch young people struggle and strive trying to do what was once normal life things. All because of stupid democrats. The only consolation will be that during my younger years i TRYED to explain to people the error in their ways.
Text books are great in teaching theory, but real life is much different.Money does not grow on trees.it is earned.
By sherryann at 06,May,23 02:05 other posts of sherryann 
I already feel like I'm there or close to that point, and we are actually, as time moves quickly and before you know it we will all be gone. I shudder to think what it will be like after that.
By phart at 06,May,23 17:08 other posts of phart 
This country already reminds me of those Cicadas you find in the woods. A big bug "shell" with it's guts and eyes gone.
This country is a cracked, empty shell of what it was back in the good times, the 50's and 60's, when people knew their places in life, knew their responsibilities and accepted them.
By #610414 at 16,May,23 00:56
Yeah, a Ni….r and a Cu,,t new not to make trouble.
WTF, you weren’t even born.
By phart at 16,May,23 02:02 other posts of phart 
What are you addressing here? Oh I see , I was born in the late 60's and was aware of things by 1970 or so as a kid, I know what I saw ,how things were. life was good once I was gotten out of that horrible city and there was no bullets recaching off the house. People had nice ,comfortable cars, the mother could stay at home and take care of the kids and home. life was better then.Much better. Musta been, the suicide rate was much lower.The divorce rate was much lower.
By #610414 at 16,May,23 11:23
Horrible city then? Surely that wasn’t true. Not in the 70’s. I guess my Mom and other ladies in my family and friends didn’t get the word they didn’t need to work. I remember, and I'm a lot older than you, that many of my friends were from divorced parents. I guess I grew up in a different America. You were lucky.
By phart at 16,May,23 12:56 other posts of phart 
Charlotte was going down hill fast. I think it was 1969 when there was some riots about 2 street over as the bird flys, a bunch of shooting, injurys, and then when 1 of the shot people was loaded into the ambulance, the rioters shot it full of holes as it was leaving the area and that is when several bullets hit the house. I only venture the 40+ miles to that shit hole about twice a year and I go early in the morning around 9 to 10 am when the hoodlums are asleep.










By #610414 at 15,May,23 22:17
Sure, Phart, do you also sell bridges?
By phart at 16,May,23 02:07 other posts of phart 
-No but I have worked on them? How about you?
By #610414 at 18,May,23 13:53
No, not me. I just worked in shit jobs. You know, as a nurse and a hospital Hurricane emergency staff. Things like that. I did have a lot of contact with poor people that usually lived UNDER a bridge and had the bad luck of needing medical services. Minor needs like gun shot wounds, knifing, beatings. Things like that. Sometimes, helping poor people die from horrible deceases. No, never worked on or under a bridge.
By phart at 18,May,23 14:26 other posts of phart 
Gee,now do you see? Your college education came into play when you helped those people. The folks without college education related to bridge design, that built and maintained the bridges, were important as well. You drove over them to get to work and you helped the people under them.
Everyone does not need a college education to contribute good to the world.
By #610414 at 18,May,23 14:36
I suppose those bridges were not designed by civil enginees and architects. It's amazing how a local government will give millions of dollars to a high school graduate and ask him to build a bridge. Using LEGOS maybe?







By phart at 16,May,23 13:37 other posts of phart 
The jack ass has not worked in 15 years but is bitching because he didn't get a raise????
only registered users can see external links

hell working people don't make what he is while on sick leave. He should feel blessed he hasn't been fired
By #610414 at 17,May,23 22:04



By phart at 17,May,23 21:57 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 15,May,23 10:42 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

"The Left has made clear that it wants the public unemployed, unmotivated, and totally dependent on government handouts."
By #610414 at 15,May,23 22:14
BS. What government wants to collect gobs of taxes? It ain’t cheap



By #679615 at 04,Apr,23 17:56
Msn is as fake as cnn,,, so is msnbc, abc, nbc, pbs, nyt and BBC.. did I leave any asshole network out? Oh yes,, Foxnews,, another joke but Tucker has been censored to an extent.
By #681164 at 12,Apr,23 20:53
Hmm. What news network do you recommend?
By phart at 12,Apr,23 23:59 other posts of phart 
Not to butt in but i could add something.
I recommend NO network.
Get up from the recliner and venture out into the real world. See the suffering,see the problems with YOUR OWN EYES and not thru the biased lens of overpaid talking heads trying to sell 60 second commercial breaks.
By #681164 at 13,Apr,23 13:21
That's too small a sampling.
By phart at 13,Apr,23 13:39 other posts of phart 
Not really.Your local elections affect that sampling.
By #681164 at 18,Apr,23 02:54
Only if you watch the local news.



By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Apr,23 10:16 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"the biased lens of overpaid talking heads trying to sell 60 second commercial breaks."
Totally agree. So never again refer to anything Fox 'News' has said.
They only exist to do right-wing propaganda and know they are doing it.
But you probably do not want to hear about all the evidence that supports that.
And you certainly do not hear it from right-wing sources.


By #679615 at 13,Apr,23 21:18
Bill reilly no spin,,,, youtube
--------------------------------------- added after 18 seconds

Bill O'reilly
By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Apr,23 10:12 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Bill is also a massive hypocrite, but less so than Tucker Carlson.
But, I think at least Bill believes most things he's saying. Tucker doesn't.
That doesn't mean that he's objective. That's a rare thing on the 'news'.
By #679615 at 18,Apr,23 05:59
He's hard truth but I didn't agree with his assessment on Jan. 6th.. He's quite intelligent. Now compare him with MSNBC,, who is more trustworthy?
Here is a pro trump youtube and I believe this is down to the point in truth.. only registered users can see external links The central banks rule the world. the columm here is called DAVERadioX #3047A
By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Apr,23 08:37 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Explain the difference between the truth and the 'hard truth'.
No, I don't think he's quite intelligent. Tucker is way smarter.
But the smarter they are, the better they lie. Because that's their job.
MSNBC is also not trustworthy. But Fox'News' lies 90% of the time and you think they are more trustworthy, because they 'dare to say things'. They sound anti-establishment a lot don't they? And MSNBC doesn't. However, MSNBC only lies about 30% of the time, but doesn't 'dare to say things'. That's true! They are corporatist, bought and owned by corporations, so they don't anger their money providers. But they are more trustworthy on lots of other subjects. They are not trustworthy enough for me to listen to them, so I have better sources.

Fox'News' is ALSO bought and owned by corporations. And you think they are anti-establishment, because they sound like it, but IT'S A TRICK!!! They sound like that to gain your trust and then have a wealthy guy crying about estate-taxes five minutes later. Have you never noticed that?

Tucker is their grand master. He really is fantastic at fake-populism. His only job is creating fear and anger about culture and the 'deep state', but then FULLY SERVING THAT DEEP STATE, because the 'deep state' are THE WEALTHY! Tucker himself is fucking wealthy and you believe he's anti-establishment?
Tucker understands very well what idea's are popular, but hue uses it all to gain your trust and then make you believe ideas that are very favorable to the establishment. Do you think the establishment wants higher taxes and regulations? Tell me what they want and why and how Tucker fights against it. Or at least think about it.
I think you are smart. It gives me hope that I can make you see how they trick you.

When I listen to your channel, I hear just one claim after another, like fire, fire, fire, without any justification. I don't hear them explain how, why, who. It's all conspiracies, to make you afraid and distrust everything, without giving you a real reason. Do they hit on some truth? Sure! But they just pass along some of the truth, mix it with bullshit and I'VE LEARNED NOTHING!!! They start out, with 'the deep state', 'the corrupt politicians', 'the world central bank', 'the world economic forum'... And nothing gets explained. I HAVE HEARD NO ARGUMENTS! NONE!

Lets get into your claim; 'The central banks rule the world'.
- Who controls the central bank? Some very wealthy people.
- How do they control the world? Money? Who pays the corrupt politicians? The central bank? No! A lot of corporations and super-PAC's funded by more corporations, private interests, foreign interests and wealthy people. Then the politicians have meetings with all those donors asking them what they want to have done. They all meet at Davos (the WEF) too. That's true. The donors of the politicians are there too. Is that the central bank controlling the world? Or is it the wealthy controlling the central bank and the politicians?
- Why would the politicians listen to the central bank? Because it's the system, set up to protect the money of the wealthy, doing the bidding of the wealthy.

And that's something that your right-wing talk radio doesn't say. Because they are owned by corporations and get donations from the wealthy too. Follow the money!
Their only job is telling you that you cannot trust anyone but them, because they are the 'truth tellers'. Sure, they speak some truth, to get you hooked, but they leave out so much information. They do that intentionally, so you cannot verify what they say. You will find your own information and justify their message for them. And every right-winger does that, with their own ideas. And then the right-wing media fill in what THEY WANT YOU TO THINK.

Do you really listen to lefty YouTubers? Do you notice a difference between them and your radio channel? Who only makes claims, without substantiating their claims? Who uses arguments more?
If you say right-wingers, you don't understand what arguments are.
By #679615 at 19,Apr,23 04:43
The hard truth is what it is and it can be the painful truth,, Like say you say it out of all due respect but you suck in baseball.. for example. A new yorker tells it like it is whether it breaks your heart or not.. Tucker Carlson is a fuck off because when Trumps lawyer says they cheated in the election , everyone knows they cheated and carlson trashed the lawyer calling her a liar.. From that point on carlson was a fuckoff....
O'reilly says things I agree with and don't agree with but he says hard truth such as "out of all due respect" You're wrong.
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Apr,23 10:49 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
What are you actually saying? Who cheated and how?

You know about the fake electors that were standing by to vote for trump and turn over the election, right?

"out of all due respect" is a hard truth? What?
What are you talking about?
--------------------------------------- added after 47 hours

Oh, the things that Bill O'Reilly says are hard truth.
No, they are not, they are just fear-mongering for gullible people.
You privately say that media lies 100% of the time, except O'Reilly?
You are picking the wrong media to trust. Fox'News' is one of the worst.
They just admitted they were lying and settled for $787.5 million with Dominion!


By #679615 at 19,Apr,23 06:39
You don't know me I don't know you. Do you know anything about history going back to Babylonia? Roman Empire? Ottoman Empire? what's the difference between the 3? How is this different from the central banks? Nothing.. Its the same agenda,, just like using religion for power such as christianity and islam.. What if I were to tell you all of these groups going from 1700 BC until now were the same? Exactly.. What does this group crave? Power and domination. What kept them in power all these years is propaganda. Do you really think the news is journalism? If you do then you're dumb. You say the roman empire fell.. I say it changed its name to the vatican.. The vatican still exists today thriving on ****phiia.. So whats the same for the last 4000 years? suppression of the average joe through propaganda. Lies.. Even in history class. The only way you can find the truth is educating yourself and reasoning by putting the pieces together. If the news put out the hard truth you would mnever see these people again.
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Apr,23 11:10 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"Do you know anything about history going back to Babylonia? Roman Empire? Ottoman Empire?"
Sure, some, most about the Roman empire.

"what's the difference between the 3? How is this different from the central banks? Nothing.. Its the same agenda"
What? I assume you are referring to all three being empires?
The central banks are not in power. They are ruled by the wealthy.
Does your understanding stop at the central banks?
Why would anyone listen to some bankers?
Who controls those bankers and how? Think further!

You are cutting through to some good ideas further on, but there is no consistency to it all. Sure, religion is used to keep people submissive to power and the powerful do fucked up things, because the people let them.

Yes, educate yourself, reason and start understanding the world as it is.
But, I see you put pieces together like a rambling mad man. Start understanding that the biggest evil is just plain selfishness. People want power and money for themselves and nothing for anyone else. It takes a lot of lying ans dogmas for the other people to give it to them. I see no sign that you understand that part of it. Pe.do.phe.lia is just a symptom of letting fucked-up religious morality rule the world unchecked. Only people who's thinking is messed-up with dogmas can allow that to happen. I think that your 'hard truths' are based mostly on some very crazy conspiracy theories. Those are also dogmas and when you don't shed them, you are no risk to the real powers who control the world. In fact your ideas only serve them, because they can be directed to any enemy they want you to attack.
By #679615 at 20,Apr,23 03:18
there is no difference,, same goal. same group.
By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Apr,23 10:46 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
So you believe in the same organization of people, working on the background in human society, affecting the leaders of empires, democratically elected governments and central banks, for thousands of years now?
By phart at 21,Apr,23 14:26 other posts of phart 
The Luminati I think they call it? Alot of people believe it is there somewhere.
I can't dismiss it entirely as there is as much evidence of it being real as there is of it being fake.
The Masonic Lodge is probably the closest thing to it that is real and trust me, years ago that was a powerful group of people but the younger generations have not took up to it and they are getting a bit relaxed and showing themselves a bit to draw new members.
George soros has made up a system that will allow him to run things long after his death. He bankrupted 2 countries and works hard to ruin others.He is a pinocle of the enemy from behind
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Apr,23 14:43 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Google 'Illuminati' and see that they exist. Founded on 1 May 1776 in Bavaria, by Adam Weishaupt (1748–1830), a professor of Canon Law and practical philosophy at the University of Ingolstadt.
only registered users can see external links
Not an organization that was operating in the shadows, going back to Babylonia, the Roman empire or the Ottoman empire.

There are lots of powerful people influencing politics. The 'deep state' is a good name for them. Most of them are incredibly conservative though. You keep pointing to George Soros, because liberals are really hard to find in that club.
There are at least 100 billionaires donating to Republicans, controlling politics. Here are some of the more known donors, who are the most active: The Koch brother(s), Sheldon Adelson, Richard Uihlein, Harlan Crow, Peter Thiel, Leonard Leo, Barre Seid, David Horowitz, Farris Wilks, Robert Mercer, Andy Beal and Phil Ruffin.

It's true that George Soros is the biggest donor in name, but the next 3 are conservatives, donating to Republicans and give more combined than Soros. But, that's IN NAME! Way more is given to Republicans through 'dark money' organizations, which means they are not transparent about their donors. At least Soros funds Democrats by a transparent methods.

And here are some organisations that some of the founded, to 'make up a system that will allow him to run things long after their death':
only registered users can see external links

Soros bankrupted 2 countries? Are you referring to the Bank of Thailand and the Bank of England?

"According to sources who had knowledge of the Quantum Fund’s positioning at the time, Soros bet just under $1 billion of his total war chest of $12 billion against the baht. By selling the Thai baht short in January 1997, the Quantum Fund managed by my investment company sent a market signal that the baht may be overvalued. The bank eventually broke, the baht devalued and Soros profited."

"In 1992, Soros shorted the British pound and reportedly made a profit of $1 billion. He sold billions of pounds during the days preceding the British government devaluing the pound sterling in September that year. Much of it was on borrowed money. Afterward Soros bought back pounds, repaid the money he had borrowed, and made a killing"

Didn't you say that Soros was some kind of socialist or communist? I told you that Soros is a capitalist, remember? This is how capitalists make their money. Especially hedge funds make profits over the demise of others. Soros funds the corporate Democrats, who deregulate Wall Street, so he can keep raking in the billions. Not a cent of his money goes to progressives. Sometimes Democrats even donate to Republicans, to stop a real progressive from winning.
By #679615 at 22,Apr,23 19:38
Of course, there are good people and bad. Bad meaning sociopathologista so that they can achieve slavery and control. Here right now there are children being led into the country from the Biden Administration for sex slavery, forced labor resulting in many deaths. European Union a branch of the swamp formulating terror groups and destroying private business..
Again you resort to bullshit no good hollywood fake fake news. Stop using bullshit links because it is NOT proof,, Stick with factsl... you are a admitted socialist which means you seek to control.. You think a one party state has no politics? Think again
By phart at 22,Apr,23 19:49 other posts of phart 
I don't know much about all this trafficking thing .But looking at it logically ,what other reason would all those migrant kids be allowed in without parents?
Alex baldwin is a hypocrite if there ever was 1.Claims to be antigun, but was working on a movie that uses guns,and literally, physically pulls the trigger and kills 1 person dead and injurs another,but yet,the antigun people don't seem to hate him for it.Why? Double standard.
By #679615 at 23,Apr,23 01:42
Good question. Poverty in countries are so bad that mothers are forced to sell their children because they can't afford. Sadly The drug cartels which have free reign across the border bring these children to internal brothel rings.. So far to this date from Biden taking office people along the border are going into their backyard and finding dead people of which 839 children included. Child prostitution for the global elite are in high demand.
I'd suggest you study the congressional and senate judicial hearings


By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 08:57 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"Of course, there are good people and bad. Bad meaning sociopathologista so that they can achieve slavery and control."
I asked you on numerous occasions who those bad people are, but I see a few answers now. Lets get into it:

The Biden Administration, for 'sex slavery and forced labor'.
And that is happening mostly in Republican controlled states, where Republicans are relaxing laws against child labor. It's Republicans who work against the legalization of illegal immigrants who have nowhere to go and it's Republicans who don't want to inspect employers who exploit illegals and punish them. So why are you blaming Democrats, while this was already going on under Trump and while Republicans don't support any laws that could improve the situation?

European Union terror groups? What the fuck are you talking about?

"European Union a branch of the swamp" The US government is way more corrupt than the European Central government. They caught a Greek female politician (Eva Kaili) for illicit lobbying in favor of Qatar. She's awaiting her trail in jail now. In the US that's LEGAL (if you register as a foreign agent). However, Trump did not register as a foreign agent to Saudi Arabia, but as President, his illicit lobbying broke records. He was getting paid by Saudi Arabia through his hotels and business deals, for selling them weapons which they used doing a genocide in Jemen and for being silent about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Clear 'quid pro quo', but it's not even one of his many indictments.

"destroying private business" is just another claim without any substance.
What are you talking about?

At least I provide links and provide substance with my claims.
You just spout absolute bullshit, without any justification.
The one who should stick to the facts is you!

A socialist seeks control for all the people. That's not a one party state.
How many times do I need to tell you that socialism is not communism.
Damn, I thought you had some brains, but you're just another stupid
right-winger, who only consumes propaganda of the dumbest type.
By phart at 24,Apr,23 15:43 other posts of phart 
"destroying private business" is just another claim without any substance.
What are you talking about"

I have no idea what the other fellow is referring to,but regulations the government passes,such as tighter emissions on trucks that just went thru ,small trucking companies that run 2 trucks, are put at risk of being to far in debt for a new truck they don't really need.
Regulations similar to this are hitting my home town as we are staring at a million dollar debt for a new fire truck,we don't need. But regulations have not been modified since they were written for gas trucks that were in place 40 years ago. a deisel fire truck built in the last 20 years, for our rural application is still in good shape and could last another 20 easy.
But no, we have to damn near give 1 away and go 1 million in debt for a new 1 we don't need. Thanks to uncle sam.
regulations are what cost alot of money to comply with,that is how they distroy small bussiness. keeping them in debt they can't afford, and then the ecomony goes flat,and they loose it all or sell out for fractions of their original value.
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Apr,23 14:03 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Your standard regulations are bad perspective again?
Remember Palestine Ohio?

There have been regulations on car manufacturers for 55 years.
Are there now no more car manufacturers?

Regulations don't destroy businesses at all, they help them evolve.
Tighter emission standards only resulted in more jobs for engineers.
Small businesses have way better innovation potential than big ones, in my experience.

I know you don't believe it, but climate change will be devastating.
It already is affecting people in hotter areas, giving them drought as early as april now. Your farms are also feeling the effects and it will only get worse. A hurricane or wildfire affects small business more than large ones. They often have more locations compensating for one that is lost by a 'natural' disaster and they have better insurance.
The rest of the world has a responsibility to act, before ostriches like you finally recognize the problem, and it will be too late.

It's true that the energy transition will take a lot of effort. Maybe some companies will not be able to adjust, but that's their fault for not being able to compete when every company is facing the same regulation.
Many more companies will be started because of all the chances that the innovation creates, like solar panel installers, heat pump engineers, energy transition specialists and consultants. It does cost a lot of money, but that will only create more jobs and grow the economy and the demand.
And even if it costs a lot of money, I care more about surviving.

By #679615 at 25,Apr,23 14:04
phart, look at the tax codes.. Who gets fucked and who gets rich? Like a succubus that sucks your cock for the moment is pleasing but she keeps going making you cum over and over again,, soon she sucks your life and soul out of you.. nothing left.. This is what happens for the voters getting free money including illegal aliens and poor minorities..
Corporations were created to destroy small business.. Survival of the fittest.. Taxcodes,, who puts them in place? Certainly not the people..


By #679615 at 25,Apr,23 13:56
No it is not in red states.. It's occurring because of absolute power corrupting absolutely.. Refer to a song,, Ozzie Osbourne "war pigs" This is their goal.. only registered users can see external links ... This idea has been going on since the start of the industrial revolution.. Their goal is for this.. Poisening their brainwashed minds while satan laughing spreads his wings. Egoism using brainwashing children. You corrupt all children you destroy humanity,



By #679615 at 23,Apr,23 02:34
There is evidence that suggests you are someone that catches my eye. You write the same way.
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 10:30 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Someone who catches your eye? Well, let's hear that hypothesis.
Who might I be?
By #679615 at 25,Apr,23 14:06
I'll keep this in disgression for now.. just as long as we continue morally





By #679615 at 22,Apr,23 06:02
You've read my statement. I will not retract what I said.
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Apr,23 11:13 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I'm not asking you retract your statement, I'm asking you to SUPPORT IT.
It you cannot show any substance or consistency to your claims,
I have no REASON to even consider them.

“That which can be asserted without evidence,
can be dismissed without evidence.”
(Hitchens's razor)
By #679615 at 23,Apr,23 01:45
that's up to you. The sad thing is that you refuse to look this up yourself. To your perception since you are a politial leftist atheist the only thing that exists to you is what you can hear, taste, touch, smell or see.. What you don't see to you does not exist. BUT to the leftist extreme when they tell you to jump--you jump.
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 09:26 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
It's not up to me. In what discussion do people with differences in opinion provide the arguments for the other side? How can you convince anyone of your positions, when you don't or cannot provide any arguments for your positions?

Just because some bullshit website contains the same bullshit claims,
doesn't confirm your bullshit claims.
I can find thousands of websites with all different claims about some sort of 'deep state', some that I might agree with, some that are the psychotic ramblings of mentally ill people. Unless you clarify which 'deep state' description you support, you cannot use it as an argument for anything.

I am not saying that the only thing that exists are what I can hear, taste, touch, smell or see, I say that for me to BELIEVE those things, I need good evidence. There are lots of things that I see as a possibility, but UNTIL there is EVIDENCE or LOGIC to accepting those possibilities, I DON'T.
Accepting what's true, based on evidence, that's called logical reasoning.
Accepting what's true, based on beliefs and revelation, that's called religion.

If you think adding 'extreme' to 'leftist' makes some sort of point, you're again not providing any SUBSTANCE.
I'm a member of a legal political party and everything the party does is permitted by the law and fully transparent. The SP is the most democratic party in our country, while the 3 'parties' on the far right (FvD, PVV en JA21) are the least democratic. They do not even qualify as a political party and are breaking laws consistently. That is 'extreme'!
By phart at 24,Apr,23 18:48 other posts of phart 
You are a socialist and are BLINDED by it's ideals.
Every system can not work for everyone.
A herd of sheep would be happy in a socialist state.There is no need to think,no need to worry ,no need for self improvement,no need to work,no need to -----fill in the blank.The government provides. They somehow pull it out of their ass's I guess.
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,May,23 20:24 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"Every system can not work for everyone."
That's true, but it can respect the rights of everyone
and it can at least work for the large majority of the people.

Your country only works for a small minority; the wealthy.
And you are blinded by propaganda from those wealthy people
telling you that giving them everything they want is good for you.










By #679615 at 23,Apr,23 02:53
Ananas2xLekker's dominant is CAT
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 09:32 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Wow, you're now even going into dumb name calling.
You cannot win an argument, so you show your colors.
By #679615 at 08,May,23 15:58
why so huffy huffy.. Your actions and behavior mirror her. You like to write, ok. But writing books that won't be Worth a penny .. Your frustrations are starting to show too. Whether you are CAT Hotpussy(who supports the nazi party) or any other alias you represent on a jerk your dick off site, it doesn't matter.. Here's the deal---I took history in high school---we studied capitolism, socialism, democracy, fashism, elections and all the anatomy of government back in the 11th grade. So far up to this point you are only writing in here to promote prapaganda for the deep state.. Either you are in the deep state or you have been had by them..





By #679615 at 20,Apr,23 03:17
Its either all or nothing.
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 09:38 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No it's not. There are nuances to almost everything.
What you are doing is called 'false dichotomy'. That's a type of fallacy.
Someone who has critical thinking skills would know that.


By #679615 at 20,Apr,23 04:54
Please don't take my few choice of words as personal or hostile.. This forum is based on opinions, not to measure who is the smartest or dumbest. I can see you are very compassionate about this subject. If it were up to me I would abolish governments and rule given to the people.. The one provision is that they are educated and trained to reason justly. Thats how I believe is the best way. Not power or who's in charge. Our constitution says "We the people", not "We the rulers"
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 09:45 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
If you would abolish governments and give rule to the people, how would they 'rule'?

Would they make small tribes, like thousands of years ago?
Or would they form a 'government', because that's more efficient?

The constitutions also says 'government of the people, by the people, for the people'. Sure sounds a lot like socialism to me. The founders were wise people.
By #679615 at 26,Apr,23 04:04
Nations are ruled by the people, not pushed by government that words for them. They are the boss,, not government. Last democracy was ancient greece.
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,May,23 20:19 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"Nations are ruled by the people"
That's not even democracy, that's socialism.

Are you really talking about your nation? Where 88% of people support background checks on all gun sales, Medicare for All, earns 70% support, even 91% of Republican voters want to empower Medicare to negotiate drug prices and a strong majority of Americans favor doubling the minimum wage to a living wage of $15 an hour?
If the US is ruled by the people, why aren't those policies implemented today?

The US doesn't even have a real democracy and you think it's ruled by the people!
You're ruled by corporate interests, bribing your politicians.
By #679615 at 05,May,23 20:18
Before you make demeaning arguments you should make sure you know the meaning of democracy and socialism. You have no idea what you are talking about.
By Ananas2xLekker at 05,May,23 21:40 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Democracy is a political system of representation elected by voting.
That's not a nation ruled by THE people. That's a nation ruled by a representative government.
You don't rule your country, you just get to vote every few years.

The political system which is the most ruled by the people is socialism.
In socialism, power is distributed over as many people as possible. It means bottom-up influence constantly and people are encouraged to participate as much as they want.
And not just power, but also ownership is distributed over as many people as possible. But of course, that's only possible if the current capitalist system is replaced. As you might understand, ownership means power too.

If you knew what you were talking about, you would be able to correct me if I was wrong. You're not doing that. You just say that I don't know the meaning of terms for political systems and don't know what I'm talking about, without any further explanation. And you do that a lot.
By phart at 06,May,23 00:19 other posts of phart 
Bottom up influence .So that means the homeless dopeheads are deciding how to spend the hard working peoples money and that of the wealthy that took chances and invested?
No wonder it is a system that fails anywhere it is used. The least productive people are ruling the 1's that do produce.
That removes ALL incentive to be productive and to improve 1's self.
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,May,23 11:15 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
'Bottom up', instead of 'top down'. Another term for it is 'grassroots'.
But, it's amazing how you think of 'homeless dopeheads', when I'm just talking about normal citizens. You're listening to elitist pricks, who shit on the common people, too much. Understand that your life means nothing to them.

The most effective system is the one that produces the least 'homeless dopeheads'. A system that makes the best use of those 'least productive people', needs to spend the least of hard working peoples money.

Would you not have any incentive to improve yourself, as soon as your basic living standards are met? It's sad how low you value other people.
By phart at 09,May,23 11:50 other posts of phart 
I value people,the thing you are not seeing is alot of these people don't value THEMSELVES.
Race is not relevant.
If you are sleeping on the ground and hungry, if you gave a damn,you would not need any more incentive to do something. take a bath in a creek, and make a sign, "Will mow grass for food" or something
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,May,23 12:21 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
So, according to you there are mostly people who don't value themselves in a country like Albania, which is the poorest European country?
And in Iceland there are the least people who don't value themselves?

As you know Iceland has the least people sleeping on the ground and hungry. They must be the hardest working people on earth.
It seems they are not: only registered users can see external links
Strange how people in all those poor countries are working their asses off.

How about those incentives? Has Iceland provided the most incentives to work, by taking away social security, making people pay for their own private system of education and healthcare, stripping all food programs, not providing public housing, privatizing all government jobs and public benefits and public infrastructure and minimizing government spending and taxes?
No, in fact, Iceland is one of the strongest social democracies in the world.

How can you be so wrong consistently and never change your mind?




By #679615 at 08,May,23 15:50
democracy is ruled by people. Your "democracy" does not exist.
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,May,23 11:53 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The word 'democracy' has its origins in the Greek language. It combines two shorter words: 'demos' meaning whole citizen living within a particular city-state and 'kratos' meaning power or rule.
"Demokratia (Greek: δημοκρατία dēmokratнa) is a direct democracy, as opposed to the modern representative democracy."
"Greek democracy created at Athens was direct, rather than representative: any adult male citizen over the age of 20 could take part, and it was a duty to do so.", "In a participant government, citizens who wish to have a say in government can participate in it."
But take note that it was only intended for 'adult male citizens'.
So, they excluded women, people younger than 20 y.o. and everyone who was not a 'citizen' (born in Athens and owning property). That means, even that original Demokratia was 'representative' for everyone else.
only registered users can see external links

When societies grew bigger than just Athens, even that became impractical.
It is not possible to have a direct power system for millions of people.
That's why the term 'democracy' stands for a representative government.

There are lots of representative governments around the world.
If none of them comply with you idea of 'democracy', than it's on you to explain what characteristics you are missing. The large majority of the people defines 'democracy' as to include the USA, which is only the 36th on the list of Countries Ranked by Quality of Democracy.
only registered users can see external links









By #681164 at 18,Apr,23 02:55
👍


By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Apr,23 10:08 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Just find a news source that is consistent in principles and values,
instead of being massive hypocrites 100% of the time, like Fox'News'.
There is no corporate 'news' channel who is consistent like that.
There are only some independent YouTubers who are consistent.
That doesn't mean they are NEUTRAL, they are OBJECTIVE. That is different.
It means that they are transparent about their principles and judge everything
and everyone by those principles, no matter if they are talking about Democrats
or Republicans.

I have only seen them on the left though, never on the right.
Find me one right-winger on YouTube who is consistent and objective and not a hypocrite or an outright grifter, and I am sure to watch that person or channel.
By #681164 at 18,Apr,23 02:59
You hit it on the head. I know who and what to watch. I also watch the other side's too to see how biased they are and also to check my impulse to believe everything said by the left.
By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Apr,23 09:07 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Any impulse to believe anything is a mistake. Only accept the truth of a claim, if it's accompanied by evidence. There are lefty grifters too. They cannot grift for money from corporations and the wealthy, because lefty ideas are not favorable to the corporations and the wealthy, but there are grifters posing as lefties, to muddy the waters or to just make them vote for the Democrats or to shift their ideas away from anti-establishment ideas to pure culture-shit, because:
- Muddying the waters makes lefties less of a threat to the wealthy.
- Voting for Democrats, because they still need votes from their base, even though they hardly deliver on their promises.
- Culture-shit doesn't cost anything for the wealthy. And it's a good way to make lefties lose in the general debate. It's a good way to trick them into the bullshit culture-war.
(When I say culture shit, I mean extreme-'woke'. Human rights are not culture-shit!)

So sharpen your critical thinking skills, teach yourself how to recognize false arguments and lies and don't believe anything, until you can follow along the logic from data, to arguments, to claims and ideas. Not even accept arguments and data on face value, check for yourself and know where to find trustworthy sources.
By #681164 at 18,Apr,23 21:26
You mean stop watching FOX?
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Apr,23 13:10 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
And OAN and NewsMax and never read anything from Breitbart.
It's all 100% twisted propaganda.
CNN is mostly trash too and only rarely will you see anything useful on MSNBC.
Then there are about a million grifters on YouTube, a billion fake news posters on Facebook and a zillion trolls on Twitter, including Elon Musk himself.

So basically, there is not much that you can trust. Sorry!

I would say 'do your own research', but most who think they do that find even worse garbage. That's the people who buy dried scrotum powder.

To anyone who used Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine to prevent Covid;
you're a dumb-ass who is incapable of discerning facts from lies. Better stop trying to inform yourself about anything ever again, smash your TV and cancel your internet subscription. First read some schoolbooks on logical reasoning and fallacies (I can also recommend the book 'Intuition Pumps And Other Tools for Thinking' by Daniel C. Dennett), learn the scientific method and maybe then you will be responsible enough to use the internet and watch the news again.




By phart at 28,Apr,23 14:18 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links





By #610414 at 05,May,23 20:57
Hooters I was reading your post:

“You don't know me I don't know you. Do you know anything about history going back to Babylonia? Roman Empire? Ottoman Empire? what's the difference between the 3? How is this different from the central banks? Nothing.. Its the same agenda,, just like using religion for power such as christianity and islam.. What if I were to tell you all of these groups going from 1700 BC until now were the same? Exactly.. What does this group crave? Power and domination. What kept them in power all these years is propaganda. Do you really think the news is journalism? If you do then you're dumb. You say the roman empire fell.. I say it changed its name to the vatican.. The vatican still exists today thriving on ****phiia.. So whats the same for the last 4000 years? suppression of the average joe through propaganda. Lies.. Even in history class. The only way you can find the truth is educating yourself and reasoning by putting the pieces together. If the news put out the hard truth you would mnever see these people again.”

CAT
And I find it too simplistic. The Roman Empire stopped being around the 5th century. The Holy See started around that time even though Catholicism existed from before. The Ottoman Empire came a few hundred years later. Anyway you look at these entities, they are NOT like the Central Bank. You belong to a worldwide group of conspiracy theorists. They and you, because you can’t accept that life evolves as it does, seek to blame institutions as wanting to dominate the masses. I say, “Bullshit”.
By phart at 05,May,23 21:05 other posts of phart 



By phart at 04,May,23 15:33 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

What a concept,give a teenage some room and they can self motivate and then get family support!


By phart at 03,May,23 20:07 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Watch as much as you can stand,but the first part just shows how it is made to look fake.
Then from there,it starts showing up as undeniable. Sickening.


By phart at 29,Apr,23 01:34 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 28,Apr,23 01:46 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 26,Apr,23 14:16 other posts of phart 
People say ignorance is part of the problem in the US.
Well, these professors don't even want to TEACH the founding of America.
only registered users can see external links

How can anyone object to this?
just 3 credit hours, that is not much to ask of anyone.
And look at this?
only registered users can see external links

What job do you get in the real world that allows this type of thinking?School is supposed to help kids be ready for the real world.
we are already having issues,
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 25,Apr,23 19:05 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
This is scary when they finally admit they think all children are the governments.


By phart at 23,Apr,23 01:37 other posts of phart 
Are you a Democrat, a Republican, or a Southerner?

The answer can be found by posing the following question:

You're walking down a deserted street with your wife, and two small children.

Suddenly, a Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities,

raises the knife, and charges at you...

You are carrying a Kimber 1911 cal. 45 ACP, and you are an expert shot.

You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.

What do you do?


Democrat's Answer:

What is a Kimber 1911 cal. 45 ACP?
Does the man look poor or oppressed?
Is he really a terrorist?
Am I guilty of profiling?

Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack

Could we run away?
What about the kids?
Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?

What does the law say about this situation?

Does the pistol have appropriate safety built into it?

Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?
Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?
Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me?

If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me?
Should I call 9-1-1?

Why is this street so deserted?
We need to raise taxes.

Can we make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior?

I need to debate this with some friends for a few days and try to come to a consensus.

This is all so confusing, and maybe we need to just start defunding all police departments!!

Republican's Answer:

BANG!

Southerner's Answer:

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG ! BANG! BANG! BANG!
Click..... (Sounds of reloading)
BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
Click



Daughter: 'Nice grouping, Daddy!' 'Were those the WinchesterSilver Tips or Hollow Points?!



Son: 'Can I shoot the next one?!'



Wife: 'You are NOT taking that to a Taxidermist'
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Apr,23 10:15 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
How many terrorists were shot by a good guy with a gun this year?
They are unfortunately not in these statistics:
only registered users can see external links

If a terrorist wants me dead, then I either run or die.
That is the risk I take, for living in a free and safe country.
I'm just as dead when some stupid right-winger shoots me.
One like you, who has wet dreams about shooting someone who looks 'suspicious'.
That's why I support our law, keeping guns away from people like you.



By phart at 22,Apr,23 17:38 other posts of phart 
"THEY’RE NOT AFTER ME,
THEY’RE AFTER YOU
…I’M JUST STANDING
IN THE WAY!”

DONALD J. TRUMP, 45th President of the United States
By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 22:43
Funny. That's what we said about him



By phart at 22,Apr,23 20:24 other posts of phart 
OLD link but so true still.
only registered users can see external links

Fix the crime issue,then the gun issues will dwindle as people will feel safer.
By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 22:43
Yes, because crime is so new and probably WOKE.



By phart at 22,Apr,23 20:53 other posts of phart 
INEPTOCRACY: (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a System Of Government where the Least Capable To Lead are elected by the Least Capable Of Producing, and where the members of society Least Likely To Sustain Themselves or Succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the Confiscated Wealth Of a Diminishing Number Of Producers ….
By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 22:42
Sure sound like the 2016 election



By phart at 22,Apr,23 14:22 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
I had no idea transparent totes would let alge grow in rain water,so off to paint my water catch barrel.
By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 16:05
Why the catch barrel? Short on water?
By phart at 22,Apr,23 17:09 other posts of phart 
Probably trying to avoid city utility water that has all kinds of things harmful to plants and people. To water that much stuff would be expensive.
Besides the black barrels will be serving the house for showers and etc later on from what he said. saving money and being less dependent on the system.
I have a few catch barrels myself and 1 that is laying on it's side with a direct tv dish acting as a collector.Works well in a remote area of the property so I can have water for the raised beds, no plumbing! Sits on a converted heating oil tank rack.
By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 20:32
Cool





By phart at 21,Apr,23 14:59 other posts of phart 
supposed to be funny but to true

I was eating breakfast with my 10-year-old Granddaughter and I asked her, "What day is tomorrow?".


Without skipping a beat, she said, "It's President's Day”!

She's smart, so I asked her "What does President's Day mean”?

I was waiting for something about Washington or Lincoln, etc.

She replied, "President's Day is when President Biden steps out of the White House, and if he sees his shadow, we have 3 more years of Bull Shit."

You know, it really does hurt when hot coffee spurts out your nose!
By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Apr,23 18:03 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Doing a good job at indoctrination, I see.
By phart at 21,Apr,23 18:44 other posts of phart 
Well in this case, i don't know, little gal has been right so far.
By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Apr,23 22:54 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No, she isn't, because she should have at least 70 years of future.
Your family making her a Republican voter makes her screw her own future.

By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 16:11
You voted for a Clown that was pure lies and bullshit. A man under several investigations for breaking the law. A man suspected of illegally overturning the legal results of a Federal election. You can seriously approve and champion what this little girl is spouting?
Heaven help us if the Repukers remain in our politics.





By phart at 22,Apr,23 01:21 other posts of phart 
"Payday" candy bar is changing its name because it's offensive to those who don't work.

Are there any countries that tax their citizens and send some of it to Americans?
By #610414 at 22,Apr,23 16:04
Yes! Red China and Russia sent money to their American citizen spies.



By phart at 22,Apr,23 01:48 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 21,Apr,23 22:51 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Women are just as capable as men of evil, just not as common for them to commit it.
Can you imagine what kind of woman would pitch a baby into the air and shoot it with her pistol in front of it's mother?

This 1 photo put into perspective how many people died during the holocaust.Nothing but wedding rings in that box.
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 21,Apr,23 22:20 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Some really neat photos showing the reality of the mid to late 30's for ALL races of people. I guess I can say I have inherited some of the "white privilege" shown here as my mother hoed cotton as a little girl until she got married at 16. She still had her hoe when she died ,it was out in the shed but it got stolen before I was able to save much of her stuff. It was worn down to about half it's size from new.


By phart at 21,Apr,23 18:44 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
16 minute video about the vaccine bullys during the wuhan virus.
Turbo cancer, first time i had saw that in writing. Although 3 of my friends experienced it shortly after the shots,2 died.
German scientist found the "vaccine" damaged the bodys cancer fighting ablity.


By phart at 20,Apr,23 22:34 other posts of phart 
European environmentalist logic. To hell with peoples homes flooding because of water backing up, the little crawl fish are more important.
This is what gives environmentalist a bad name. The man was trying to save peoples homes.
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 20,Apr,23 02:15 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
Did you get yours?
CDC ye later!


By phart at 18,Apr,23 23:15 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
By sherryann at 19,Apr,23 00:20 other posts of sherryann 
That bathroom cartoon reminds me of a recent Target bathroom experience. There were men in there semi dressed as women, and I hate these new bathrooms that allow that. I don't want to go to a public bathroom and see a man's penis while worrying about being in there with him alone. The hell with these days! Send me back in a time machine.
By phart at 19,Apr,23 01:57 other posts of phart 
Most places now have what we call a "1 holer". In other words, just 1 person in the room at the time, such as the Harbor Freight I went to today to get a couple paint brushes. there was no where for but 1 person.
It bothers me that a 12 year old girl could be trying to use the restroom and some pervert in a skirt just walk in and be standing there peeing or something. I guess the womens bathrooms have urinals now since the mens rooms have menstrual pad machines? As in a male suddenly forming a place to put 1?
By #610414 at 19,Apr,23 22:50
First, every women's toilet I've been to has STALLS WITH DOORS. A woman is hidden but, A TRANSGENDER would like to sit like a LADY. And he would be behind a door. BTW, why is it that it's always "a young girl might see a dick". Why don't they ever say "a man might see a pussy" if a tranny entered a MENs room?



By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Apr,23 13:48 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I know you only think of men transitioning to women, because that the thing that is hyped, but there are almost just as many women transitioning to men. So at least put the same sign on the men's room, because that might confirm your ignorance a bit less.

By the way, if men could aim, there would be no need for separate toilets.
There are millions of unisex public toilets everywhere in Europe.
You're fixation with toilets is really ridiculous.
By phart at 19,Apr,23 17:03 other posts of phart 
Well if it weren't for people getting crossed up as to which 1 to use, no one would be thinking much about it.
As for the missing the toilet,
there is a sign on the bathroom door at the local grill I just got a hamburger at about 2 hours ago.
it says, "how can a man hit a deer at 200 yards and miss the toilet".
Well,I have been wanting to write down the reasons for that and tape it to the bathroom wall but have not yet.
Reasons,
Barrel to short,
Barrel bent,
not enough powder in the shell,
sights out of adjustment,
And some others I cant think of at the moment.

And besides, as for tinkling on the seaty,
Remember what Walter,Jeff Dunhams little friend says,"Learn to Hover">
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Apr,23 21:38 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Why are people crossed when you use the 'wrong' toilet?
Maybe because the whole idea of toilets being specifically for men or women have been used for stupid propaganda for years now?

"how can a man hit a deer at 200 yards and miss the toilet".
That's a good one! It uses men's pride to make them pee right.
So why do you act like you care about separate toilets then?
Is it fun to make life a misery for trans people, just to 'own the libs'?

You can teach people the most stupid ideas, if you just keep repeating them.
If you tell people long enough that left-handed people are demons,
you can create a holocaust to wipe out the left-handed people.





By #610414 at 14,Apr,23 15:27
Photos show scenes of South Florida flooding after historic storm

only registered users can see external links

Phart do you recommend all of Miami/Dade County and Broward County (Ft Lauderdale) population move to the mountains of the Carolinas?
By phart at 15,Apr,23 23:03 other posts of phart 
Is flooding normal in this area?
As for the NC mountains, eh, bad choice, they had some flooding up there years back that made 1 hell of a mess. it was a hurricane that did some of it
By #610414 at 15,Apr,23 23:07
No, not normal




By phart at 12,Apr,23 20:17 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
By #610414 at 14,Apr,23 14:44
Wanna bet?



By #610414 at 14,Apr,23 14:43
TEXAS — Texas ranks as the 11th most dangerous state in the nation, according to a report from 24/7 Wall Street culled from FBI data.

Drug Offenses. Although drug problems are common throughout the United States, it is the most common offense in the state of Texas. ...
Property Crime. Property crime is another leading crime in the state of Texas. ...
Aggravated Assault. ...

Texas has 46% of it's population living in a house with at least one gun.
They need those guns for protection
🤣🤣🤣😈


By phart at 12,Apr,23 22:34 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 04,Apr,23 16:41 other posts of phart 
His music is not my cup of tea. BUT there should be no question as to how he feels about the beer company's actions.
only registered users can see external links

O
By #610414 at 04,Apr,23 21:43
And, of course, he used a semi-automatic gun to make his point. If he's so upset about a company's stance on trans, I'd hate see what he does in other situations






Adult Discussion Forum