No need to vote,does not good, but just so you know
Yes, posting a threat to the president is a federal crime under 18 U.S. Code § 871. This law makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully make any threat to take the life of, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, as well as the Vice President and presidential successors
And yes, phart, you should be a student of Sherlock Holmes detective agency to make a decision about what is right and wrong especially when it comes to booting out a member. Question; during election times whether they are local, state or national, do read qualifications and mull over their platform and believe everything that is said? Probably not!
Again, YOU AND I DO NOT KNOW what the dialogue was that led up to the posting of the picture and YOU AND I DO NOT KNOW what the dialogue was after the posting of the picture. Another question; do you trust admin to know what is tolerable for his website? If he thought that the referred member broke a law federal crime under 18 U.S. Code § 871, the guy would have been out of here in a heartbeat. Things aren’t always black and white, be open to gray.
Not really, no need, I just stopped voting because apparently I have to be a student of Sherlock Holmes detective agency to make a decision about what is right and wrong. I just saw the abuse report and the mention of a post wanting Trump Dead and it didn't seem to meet the "specs" for deletion. I was like, what the hell does if wishing our President dead doesn't rank up there for a reason to delete"?
In reference to your Forum topic, YOU and I and anyone else who votes (you didn’t vote but apparently have something to say) DO NOT HAVE THE FULL PICTURE OF WHAT WENT ON.
I am fully aware that there’s a law regarding making threats toward the President. There’s an actress currently in prison who was convicted of threatening President Obama.
Question for you, how do you feel about the blogs where the theme(s) show bitterness and desire something ill happens to the President?
not happy about it at all but they are not direct threats so freedom of speech sadly kicks in. Sad that people think that way. I never wished biden dead, I just wanted him to sit on his porch with his dog biting his ankles while sipping ice teat and watching the country and the world being rebuilt.
“Believe nothing you hear, and only one half that you see"
Just my opinion, you are someone who is black or white, there’s no gray in your world. I try to employ the above to my thought process when I evaluate any referral. Am I getting the full picture? I could tell by reviewing the reported member’s profile that we DID NOT and WERE NOT given the full picture and that’s why I reached out to admin. It was admin who gave me a copy of the picture. THINK ABOUT THIS, phart, after I contacted admin with my inquiry, if admin thought this picture was going to cause negative issues for his website, don’t you think he would have booted the referred member immediately? He’s not going to wait for a bunch of us to come to a 5+ general consensus, I assure you that if it was a problem, POOF!, the referred member would have been gone!
You’ve been here long enough to know that CHAT has been problematic with lots of fighting within. Heck, admin disbanded and did away with CHAT but he was persuaded to reinstate it. Regarding the current referral, WE do not know what the conversation was prior to the picture being uploaded nor do WE know what the conversation was after the photo was uploaded.
Regardless of what members think, I tend to lean toward giving someone the benefit of doubt. I will only vote to delete a member IF and WHEN adequate documentation is provided and when I have verified that the information submitted is accurate.
And shame on you for even posting that bullshit that your vote doesn’t matter. If your opinion doesn’t matter, shut your pie hole!!
Again, YOU AND I DO NOT KNOW what the dialogue was that led up to the posting of the picture and YOU AND I DO NOT KNOW what the dialogue was after the posting of the picture. Another question; do you trust admin to know what is tolerable for his website? If he thought that the referred member broke a law federal crime under 18 U.S. Code § 871, the guy would have been out of here in a heartbeat. Things aren’t always black and white, be open to gray.
Question for you, how do you feel about the blogs where the theme(s) show bitterness and desire something ill happens to the President?
“Believe nothing you hear, and only one half that you see"
Just my opinion, you are someone who is black or white, there’s no gray in your world. I try to employ the above to my thought process when I evaluate any referral. Am I getting the full picture? I could tell by reviewing the reported member’s profile that we DID NOT and WERE NOT given the full picture and that’s why I reached out to admin. It was admin who gave me a copy of the picture. THINK ABOUT THIS, phart, after I contacted admin with my inquiry, if admin thought this picture was going to cause negative issues for his website, don’t you think he would have booted the referred member immediately? He’s not going to wait for a bunch of us to come to a 5+ general consensus, I assure you that if it was a problem, POOF!, the referred member would have been gone!
You’ve been here long enough to know that CHAT has been problematic with lots of fighting within. Heck, admin disbanded and did away with CHAT but he was persuaded to reinstate it. Regarding the current referral, WE do not know what the conversation was prior to the picture being uploaded nor do WE know what the conversation was after the photo was uploaded.
Regardless of what members think, I tend to lean toward giving someone the benefit of doubt. I will only vote to delete a member IF and WHEN adequate documentation is provided and when I have verified that the information submitted is accurate.
And shame on you for even posting that bullshit that your vote doesn’t matter. If your opinion doesn’t matter, shut your pie hole!!