I am not American or live in the US. Take for example, a Kyrgyzhian citizen. They would not necessarily know the American rescue phone numbers.
Let me reverse the question and you'll understand. Do you know the emergency phone number in Macao?
Started by TWOWARMTTS3 [Ignore] 11mo ago other posts
NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.
New Comment [I do not like this topic] Rating: -1 [+] [-]
Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.STUFF, JUST STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 4.A Forum Topic 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II
By TWOWARMTTS3 [Ignore] 6hr ago other posts
Posted by LittlePeanutPeePee Dgraff in that thread by that person I’m not allowed to mention
Boo hoo I’m a bitter old woman and phart disagrees with me so I hate him and will attack @Bella@ thinks I’m mean and ANNOYING so I hate her so I will attack Dgraff skittles and Freddy are bullies and I hate them so I will attack I also hate my mother my father my husband my children and my grandkids are the worst someone please just lock me up in a nursing home because I’m not fit to be in this world"
Who wrote that? I can't even parse it.
It doesn't make sense.
Maybe whoever wrote it has poor command of English.
Let's give a brief explanation like this:
People, especially men, need to have sex throughout their lives in various ways, with various people. That's human nature. Stone like men, some women, some both, some none, some want to have sex with multiple partners. Marriage is a convention that is not necessarily part of human biology. So, in a free and ideal society, we wouldn't even have to ask such questions. It's like asking "why do fishermen like to eat beef?"
If people, especially men, had sex whenever they needed to, if sex wasn't that a big deal, if they could communicate their needs and desires, if, if, if... then the world would have been a better place. Fewer wars, less attraction to positions of power, fewer health problems, etc. Instead, we've been living in societies that have adopted religions that preach that sex is a sin. It goes against any kind of logic. It's like adopting a religion preaching that using your right hand is a sin. Imagine what problems that would create.
Also, take, for example, how much is sex related to power. Many people want to rise in hierarchy for prestige, for money, but also for sex. They'll never say so but we know so. How big is the sex factor in one's decision to become, say, top administrator, chairperson, head of a company, etc. I daresay that it is nonnegligible.
Very true. In fact, a lot of men have gone to war hoping that they'll fuck in the distant lands they go to. Perhaps, not fully consciously, but it would be interesting to know how big is the sex factor for someone risking their life. I daresay it's a nontrivial factor.
He was honest for not siding with a deranged president. Being honest is not what a politician should do if he/she cares about their career. Romney preferred honesty to the career. That is very good, I'm sure you'll agree.
I saw this vid
only registered users can see external links
of a Chinese guy fucking a Chinese prostitute in a filthy room, without condom, in disgusting conditions. She just lowered her knickers, he shoved his bare dick inside for a few minutes and when he was done, he has his dick sprinkled with water, she pulled up her pants again, done. Meanwhile you could hear a rooster shouting and some trucks or trains. It must have been a room under a bridge. The dirt there is incredible. They never wash the walls or floor, the bed is filthy, they girl fucks everyone in the same dirty conditions. How is that possible?
And they booed Mitt Romney, a conservative, right-wing guy, a mormon even, who just criticised the ex president's character. For that he's put aside by the members of his own party. Dishonesty seems to be more valuable for these party than truth.
The problem is that he/she may become governor not based on abilities but based on sexual preferences. THIS is the problem. It's fucked up. --------------------------------------- added after 88 seconds
The world is in crisis.
Being recognised as, say, transvestite has become synonymous as being progressive ir democratic or smart.
Yes, it's stupid to call Floyd a martyr. He was not planning to be. He was an unlucky guy who died because Chauvin killed him on purpose.
Somehow, the police in the US should be told not to kill whenever they feel like it. But it's a complex problem. In a society where guns are everywhere, how do you deal with that?