Started by #14563 at 20,Jun,09 06:38
 | I'm cut but would rather be uncut. Love the look of uncut. Especially when the hood can cover an erect cock. You guys are lucky!! Wish I still had my manhood!! |
Similar topics: 1.How and by who u Cut? UnCut can comment too 2.Who love Uncut Cock?..........Who has Uncut Cock? 3.do u prefer cut or uncut? 4.Uncut Dicks 5.Any uncut guys near Jackonville, Florida?
Here's my uncut 17cm cock
cut.
I like both
And yes I am exited.
I was "loosely cut" and I had all my boys done the same way. When completely flaccid, only 1/3 of the head is visible. When erect, the foreskin completely slides down like it's supposed to, but since it's loose, I can still masturbate dry if I choose. In my opinion, some are cut waaay to tightly.
Anyway, looking forward to seeing him afterwards, hope you share with us and good luck!
Definitely cut. My dad is cut also
🇺🇸 TRUMP 2020 🇺🇲
Uncut here.So nice to masturbate with so much extra foreskin
Circumcision isn't that common in UK, so I like being a little different
Cut. I like the look - on myself and others - better than a dick with cover-up foreskin.
When it has been erect, the foreskin stays back after orgasm unless I pull it over. I like to wank with the foreskin pulled right back and use lube on the glans.
All of this cam be seen in my gallery.
Until recently i didn't really give much thought to it
But Ive since discovered a passion for orgasm denial and chastity cages, and im seriously saving up for a circumcision so that I may stay locked for much longer of periods of time (without hygene issues). It will also allow me to wear much more secure and restrictive cages too!
I love both!
I am happy being uncut.
But have often wondered what it would be like to be circumcised. My father was cut and I felt like mine should have been like his growing up.
I like how it looks though, I'm in a minority in UK so it kind of stands out, and I'm a low maintenance kind of person!
please take a look
/yo0dqvoqz8c4pic.html
http://showitoff.org/49n3axtprsi0pic.html
They always wanted to wank my cock because of the experience of doing it with a foreskin; but my efforts with theirs lack finesse.
read what the man says!
"the feeling when his or her tongue tickle my foreskin is awesome ..so much happiness and fun i get when someone's mouth covers and uncovers my dick head with my foreskin....its really very great....."
that seems to be the experience(s) this statement is based up on.
what you are going at, justwill, in all your statements in this forum, is like saying:
"all this fuzz about music, good music, bad music, i'm deaf and happy, so music is of no matter!"
we uncut guys CAN hear the music, and we enjoy our foreskin, you better believe it!
and it would be best to let a boy decide for himself, at the time the law says he is wise and old enough (18 y/o) to take that decision, if he wants to be cut, or STAY UNCUT, the way he came at birth..!
Your music analogy is not a good one because it also plays into the whole "cut guys have insensitive dicks" propaganda by likening a circumcised penis to deafness. Being unable to hear and not having a foreskin are very different things, and they are not comparable.
Once again, you speak from emotion and not logic.
because i don't miss something, i cannot promote stopping having someone else from missing something, beacause i wouldn't know how it feels to miss something...
so:
because i'm rich, i cannot say i want to stop poverty, because i don't know how it feels to be poor;
because i'm white, i cannot say that i want to end racism because i'm not black (or anything other than white);
because i'm male, i cannot say i'm against sexism because i'm not a woman;
because i'm uncut, i cannot say that i am against cutting up a c h i l d, b o y or g i r l, because i didn't meet the knife myself...
please will, explain!
You have no empirical evidence to back your claim.
The examples you list are not relevant to the discussion.
Poverty, racism and sexism all suck. There is quantifiable evidence to prove the truth of that. None of them are based on physical sensation. Feel free to speak out against them as much as you like, and I will back you on it.
The original poster said that he felt more pleasure (than an implied cut guy) because he has a foreskin.
I said that he can't back that claim because he doesn't know how a cut dick feels.
It's like me claiming that pain hurts me more than it does you, or that I can taste chocolate better than you do.
"Because you don't know what it feels like to be circumcised, you can not say that it feels better to have a CLITORIS."
so, there it is...
and again you will say that it is completely irrelevant and different and god knows what..!
but you seem to think that it is a good thing to slice up boys genitalia, someone else might think it is a good thing to slice up girls genitalia, and i just think it is a good thing NOT to slice up ANY kids genitalia.
and THAT is my point!
Also (and we have had this discussion many times before), slicing up a girl's genitalia and male circumcision are radically different things (and you KNOW this!). Slicing up a girl's clitoris often results in life-long pain and total loss of sexual stimulation. Circumcision of the penis does neither.
quote:
"slicing up a girl's genitalia and male circumcision are radically different things (and you KNOW this!)."
NO, i do NOT know this!
(by virtue of not ever having had a circumcision, male and female!)
"In keeping with the point I have been making all along, you actually CAN'T say it's better to have a clitoris because--by virtue of your not ever having a clitoris--you have no idea what being equipped with one feels like."
quote:
"Slicing up a girl's clitoris often results in life-long pain and total loss of sexual stimulation."
SO? if slicing up a girl's clitoris would NOT OFTEN (but ONLY SOMETIMES) result in life-long pain and total loss of sexual stimulation, you would be OK with it?????????????
man, man, man..!
There is no scientific evidence that circumcision makes a guy's penis less sensitive.
Circumcision of the penis rarely results in life-long pain. (On the other hand, non-circumcision frequently produces problems which cause pain for the foreskin owner.)
Also, I am beginning to detect an anti-clitoris leaning in your commentary. Shame on you!
Myth – Routine circumcision of baby boys cannot be compared to Female Genital Mutilation.
Fact – Rationales offered in cultures that promote female genital cutting – hygiene, disease prevention, improved appearance of the genitalia, and social acceptance – are similar to those offered in cultures that promote male circumcision. Whatever the rationale, forced removal of healthy genital tissue from any **** – male or female – is unethical. Boys have the same right as girls to an intact body, and to be spared this inhumane, unnecessary surgery.
--------------------------------------- added after 71 seconds
And THAT is what it's all about!
--------------------------------------- added after 2 hours
Also from intactamericaDOTorg:
QUESTIONING CIRCUMCISION?
If you are expecting a son, it's likely that people will ask you, "Are you going to have him circumcised?" Circumcision continues to fall out of favor among Americans today, and with good reason. We think that the fact that you've come to Intact America means you're considering keeping him natural — intact or "uncircumcised." We hope the information provided here will make it easier for you to feel comfortable with your decision.
Here's 7 Things New Parents Should Know About Circumcision...
There is no medical reason for "routine" circumcision of baby boys. No professional medical association in the United States or the rest of the world recommends routine circumcision. People in Europe, Asia and Latin America — where 90% of men are intact ("uncircumcised") and suffer no negative consequences — are often shocked to hear that American doctors and hospitals remove part of a boy's penis shortly after birth.
Times and attitudes have changed. The circumcision rate in the United States is down from 81% in 1981 to about 55% today (and much lower in some regions). This means that nearly half of all baby boys leave the hospital intact as more and more parents realize that circumcision is unnecessary. Many say it's not a choice they should be making for their son.
The foreskin provides protection and sexual pleasure. The foreskin is a natural, functional part of the body. In baby boys, it's attached to the head of the penis (glans), protects it from urine, feces, and irritation, and keeps contaminants from entering the urinary tract. The foreskin also plays an important role in sexual pleasure, due to its specialized, erogenous nerve endings and its natural gliding and lubricating functions.
Caring for and cleaning the foreskin is easy. A natural, intact penis requires no special care beyond gentle washing. In babies, the foreskin should never be forcibly retracted — just "clean what's seen." Once natural retraction has occurred (sometimes not until late adolescence), a male simply needs to pull back his foreskin to wash his penis. (Most boys and men thoroughly enjoy this process!) Read our Foreskin Care flyer for more information.
Circumcision is permanent, and your son might not appreciate it. Circumcision permanently alters a boy's genitals, removing healthy, protective, functional tissue from the penis and exposing him to unnecessary pain and medical risks. More and more men are voicing their displeasure over having lost a natural part of their sexual anatomy.
Circumcision is painful, and there are risks to the surgery. Both common sense and medical research confirm that babies are sensitive to pain. Even when analgesia is used, circumcision pain is not eliminated and the effects can be long-lasting. Also, complications can and do occur with this surgery. These include infection, abnormal bleeding, removal of too much skin, loss of part or all of the glans, urinary problems, and even death. All circumcisions result in the loss of the foreskin and its functions, and leave a scar on the penis.
Circumcision does not prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) or other diseases. Over the years, the claims that circumcision prevents various diseases have repeatedly been proven to be exaggerated or outright false. UTIs occur more frequently in girls than in boys, and are treated with antibiotics. While most adult men in the United States are circumcised, our rates of sexually transmitted diseases (including HIV) are as high — or higher — than those in countries where circumcision is rare.
You copied that from an anti-circ propaganda site.
Hardly a credible source.
Like going to a vegan site to get recipes for cooking a cheese burger.
Still, your new post doesn't address the whole "my penis feels better than yours" nonsense...
I, like I said, copied that from intactamericaDOTorg.
Why wouldn't that be a credible source? I don't know..! Because you say so..? The argumentation seems fairly solid to me, makes perfect sense!
What seems to be your problem Will, is that I claim, among other things BUT I never stated it in THIS discussion, that a circumcised penis looses sensitivity. And that, if you will or not Will, makes perfect sense! You cannot feel anything in a bodypart you don't have, and you are the first one to aknowledge that! (In your statement 03,Oct,16 22:5
So apart from that, do you think it's a good thing, and do you have a valid argument, to cut up any new-born boy?
As we have engaged in debate over this topic many times in the past, I draw on memory of comments you have made elsewhere. (I have, you will note, not brought the "rusty knife" argument back into this one.)
I would like to point out that several guys posting here have mentioned that they were cut later in life--and that they like it much better. One even states that his penis is MORE sensitive now than it was with a foreskin.
Again--my argument here has been about guys with a foreskin who claim that their dick experiences more pleasure than the dick of a guy who has none. As I have said--they can't prove that and it is an invalid assumption on their part.
you say: there is no proof that a clipped penis is less sensitive than an uncut penis;
i say: i think you cannot have feeling in parts you lost.
bottomline in the discussion is: is it a good thing to cut up all new-born boys? you don't want to answer that question, and i say: NO!
Circumcised is definitely cleaner than foreskin
8
When uncut the Glans is generally more sensitive as is the foreskin. But after Circumcision, you loose some sensitivity from the Glans but seem to gain sensitivity over more of the shaft. But the sexual stimulation of the cut cock, seems to actually improve ! So I am very happy to be cut and believe me, it is best to be cut
I'm cut and proud of it. I think a cut cock looks better, feels better & is a healthier option.
Here in the U.K. it is quite rare to find a cut cock, as Circumcision has gone out of fashion in recent years.
I am very much 'Pro-Circumcision' and would recommend it
another circumscised photo...
im cut but like uncut
In my country cuting a boys foreskin is unlawful and will put you in jail so only uncut is for me!
I mean, with a glans like that why would i hide it in a foreskin? Lol
Uncut
I am circumcised.... hated it all my life and then in my 30's discovered foreskin restoration. I am in the process of restoring my foreskin, and have never felt better now that I have a foreskin...more sensitivity and pleasure
Its interesting to me that not many people give "religious reasons", as the reason they got circumscised?
Most have mentioned appearance and medical/hygenic reasons.
She loves it.
I love playing and sucking uncut! Uncut cocks are supersexy to me.
I'm uncut and very happy to be so. I would say I prefer other guys' dicks to be uncut but I'm not averse to cut ones neither. ALL dicks are unique to their owners and ALL are the proudest parts of our bodies - that's why we like showing them - be they cut or uncut
Most of my buddies I play around with are uncut. I'd be uncut myself if I had the choice.
love the way it is
All this is just my opinion,no offense meant to anyone.
maybe it is "you want what you have not got"
But I wouldn't turn down a cock just because it was cut. Some beautiful specimens in both camps.
--------------------------------------- added after 24 hours
for guys like yourself, that applaude their loss and argument they are happy about it because it's much more hygienic to have NO foreskin, looks better, foreskin is rubish with no function, and all that jazz, i don't feel sorry for of course!
and EVERY man, jewish, islamic, US and australian can have a moment of thought before he gets his son clipped!
if religion or just a practice is leading in your decision, you might wonder if you have a working brain!
/forum/thread.php?id=20748
Foreskins are amazing, so hot pulling it back to reveal a lovely knob. I prefer guys with foreskins.
Uncut & horny!!!
[URL=/xa70d7ei12kepic
or like this
One can always opt to get cut as an adult, but it's most probably never the same :restored:--even at its best, from what I've been told.
What do you think of my uncut cock?