Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Find local men
to exchange blowjobs

Global Warming... What do you Believe?

This is an Adult Discussion Forum of Show It Off Site
If you wish to participate you should register on that site and write there

Started by #485312 at 15,Dec,20 23:50
Fact or Fiction.... is it really happening???
what do you think contributes to it and what is
being done to stop it?



Similar topics: 1.WHY DO PEOPLE COME ON SYD WITHOUT VALID PROFILES????   2.MERRY CHRISTMAS.   3.What constitutes "World-Famous"?   4.Having Oral Sex Preformed on me by a Priest   5.YouTube can be educational too (let's share videos)  

New Comment

Comments:
By phart at 23,Nov,24 18:21 other posts of phart 
So now how do we get WATER if we can't pump it from wells?
only registered users can see external links

So now we are going to have "water nuts" trying to put water back in the ground to retilt the earth? Or do we just tax water? that's it,a tax will fix it, fixes everything else right?


By phart at 19,Oct,24 16:18 other posts of phart 
Well now, this might explain alot about how the temps are rising so fast!. Makes perfect sense that as a instrument ages, it's readings would be altered.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Oct,24 13:18 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
A measuring error? All over the world? Including satellites?
Do you think everyone is still using the same thermometers as 100 years ago?
We have seen the fastest temperature rise in the past few decades, when the technology of measuring basic shit like temperature has been the most accurate ever.
This is at a level of flat earth 'science' ridiculous. You're kidding right?

How about the measurements of the CO2 concentration rising?
How about all the glaciers disappearing?
How about just basic human observation, that it is getting fucking hot more often
in summer and way less cold in winter?



By phart at 11,Oct,24 19:42 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

now just who subsidized this project, and who will have to cough up repair cost?

Now tell me, how many coal plants were damaged in the hurricane?


By phart at 21,Sep,24 12:57 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

have a flood? Kill the officials in charge
By Ananas2xLekker at 30,Sep,24 15:56 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Who are the officials in Florida again?
Hurricane Helene is flooding many parts over there.

And how about South Carolina? Mass flooding over there too.
With at least 25 killed in South Carolina, Helene is the deadliest tropical cyclone
for the state since Hurricane Hugo killed 35 people, in 1989.
By phart at 30,Sep,24 23:01 other posts of phart 
I didn't post that saying I agreed with what was done,And yes, the west side of my state is fucked up BAD.
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Oct,24 13:56 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I guessed that since Trump likes how Kim Jong Un is "the boss" in his country,
you might like that way of Trump being "the boss" too. Trump Kim

Seeing the ocean was at record high temperatures, every meteorologist predicted
a heavy hurricane season. It's not good that it happened, but to be expected.
It's just going to get worse.





By phart at 26,Sep,24 01:45 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

I can't get it to open as i don't pay for the service but there is a new article out now about climate change.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 30,Sep,24 14:30 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Your first link is to an article from 1998. It picks and chooses some facts and ignores others. Even 26 years ago that was already bad statistics, but it's now completely debunked. It's now literally impossible to pick a temperature dataset that does not confirm climate change.

"why have average temperatures in the Arctic dropped by 0.88°C over the past 50 years?"
No idea how they claimed it then, but it's certainly wrong now:
only registered users can see external links

Your second link refers to Bjшrn Lomborg as a scientist, but he is not a CLIMATE scientist or PHYSICS scientist, he has a PhD in POLITICAL science. His environmental economics research is based around the claim that climate action will be more expensive than the effects of climate change. To support his claims, he has widely underestimating the effects. He wrote about the global warming "hiatus", in the 2010s, which were shown to be based on faulty statistics. He predicted that the earth would have stopped warming by now, but instead the earth is warming up faster now, than in the 2010s. He was wrong then and he is wrong now.

The guy comes from Denmark, a country which is running on 81.4% electricity from renewable sources. Their government debt accounts for 34.0% of the country's Nominal GDP. Their living standards are among the highest in the world. Obviously, their climate action has not damaged their country. His own country is proving him wrong.

That Newsmax article starts with "Polar bears are thriving.."
That's a lie, about 26,000 animals of one species is not "thriving",
that's at best a lower risk of them going extinct soon.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links



By kebmo at 21,Sep,24 03:36 other posts of kebmo 
Global warming doesn't care what you think.
By phart at 21,Sep,24 12:57 other posts of phart 
the earth hasn't cared ever. to many dead dino's prove that
By kebmo at 21,Sep,24 21:59 other posts of kebmo 
Dinos died because we had a meteor visit us, just a one time disaster.


By phart at 26,Sep,24 01:47 other posts of phart 
Plants grow humans for food.
so the globe doesn't care about US, it cares about the plants
By kebmo at 26,Sep,24 03:37 other posts of kebmo 
Water is lethal. It just takes 60 to 80 years to work.
By tecsan at 27,Sep,24 08:40 other posts of tecsan 
Climate change is BS like global warming and global cooling. Libtards keep thinking up new names for BS.


By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Sep,24 16:10 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Only humans care about humans, apart from some individuals.
Most humans at least care about themselves, but even that is not unanimous.
In any case, I think it's in my own best interest to care about humanity and the world.
I'd like humanity to be humane and the world to keep being hospitable.
By phart at 27,Sep,24 02:22 other posts of phart 
why is it in your best interest to give your self heartburn over other peoples problems? Have you ever thought about how much better your life would be if you concentrated on what would improve your own life instead of worrying about others all the time?
By Ananas2xLekker at 27,Sep,24 08:07 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Other peoples problems? Don't I live among humanity, on this world?

I can do two things at the same time; I concentrate on what improves my own life,
while also doing my part in improving humanity and the world, because they AFFECT my own life.

Focusing on making more money is futile, if the world around me turns to shit.
I cannot buy a ticket to a better world. Elon Musk seems to think he can (Mars),
but he is stupid that way. We would need to completely destroy Earth, for Mars
to suck less.

You don't practice what you preach. You are focusing on the world around you more than me. You are always talking about how you want to shape your country to make lazy people work and to keep out immigrants. The difference between you and me is that your priorities for the world are shaped by learned animosity towards other poor and powerless people, who are just trying to survive under difficult circumstances, while my priorities for the world are focusing on the wealthy and powerful people,
who actually have a choice in the circumstances they create, for themselves and EVERYONE ELSE.






By HornySyd at 06,Sep,24 15:40 other posts of HornySyd 
It's really not significant whether one believes it or not. It's a scientific fact that has been accepted by the vast majority of scientists and educated people. We can't just stop believing in gravity, or when the next predicted eclipse will occur. Because that belief or lack of it changes nothing.

It's just a fact, and the sooner people start accepting facts - or provide verifiable data that can be held to peer review to show they are not facts, the sooner we can get past this silly debate.

The amount of greenhouse gasses emitted today, and every day is extremely large. Meanwhile the atmosphere is not. Sure, it looks infinite on a clear day, but fully half of that air is packed within the first 18,000 feet - or 3 miles. That's a distance a reasonably healthy child could walk if it were not straight up.

The atmosphere we live in is a lot less than we perceive it to be with our eyes, and the number of tons of greenhouse gasses greatly affects the capture of heat. That's not subject to serious debate. It's simply a fact. And for one to deny it only demonstrates their lack of reason.
By CAT52! at 07,Sep,24 16:07 other posts of CAT52! 
How true, yet, millions of people decry it. At the bottom is greed and ignorance.
By phart at 08,Sep,24 23:28 other posts of phart 
Yea, look at who gets rich off the alternative energy stuff, the folks pushing it. kerry flys around in a big jet airplane telling everyone to walk and eat vegis basically while he lives like a king. Who makes the windmill parts, china, getting rich off our policy's while their pollution follows the jet stream and makes us sick.
Nothings perfect but this climate change thing is alot of bs.
It was global cooling then global warming and since that didn't fit, they call it climate change.
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,Sep,24 09:46 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's just your government trying to solve a problem with capitalism.
If your government invested public money into renewable energy and kept ownership of the production, you would have a massive return on investment for the public.
Now it's just wealthy renewable energy moguls competing with wealthy fossil fuel moguls. YOU PERSONALLY supported that system and now you argue against it?

Who gets rich of fossil fuels? In capitalism, there is always someone on the end
getting rich of EVERYTHING, no matter if it's good or bad.
That's why I support a specific version of socialism, that benefits the public
with everything good and eliminates as much as possible everything bad.
I call it social capitalism; democratic control over the capital, the means of production and labor. When you go to work, democracy stops and you are in a dictatorship.
I support democracy, not dictatorships. Stop supporting FEUDALISM!

You don't care about a million times worse pollution, when fossil fuels are causing it,
so stop using it as an argument to push those fossil fuels.

Global cooling was one article decades ago, before decades of reality statistically confirmed global warming. They changed the term to climate change, because it's just the GLOBAL AVERAGE temperature going up. That can cause fluctuations in weather patterns other than just warming. It can cause floods here, droughts there, and all sorts of other extreme weather including short local periods of extreme cold. Mostly those cold periods are getting rare, but there is a possibility of them returning.
The global saline gulfstream is being reduced by melting water from all the land-ice melting away. When that gulfstream stops, no more cold water is transported to the equator and no more warm water is transported to the arctic. That makes the warm areas warmer and the cold areas colder. It's possible that Scandinavian countries get colder and South American countries even warmer. That's why it's called 'climate change', because global warming IS JUST AN AVERAGE.

only registered users can see external links

By CAT52! at 09,Sep,24 12:34 other posts of CAT52! 
Too simple in a very short time period. Phart, think!

By HornySyd at 09,Sep,24 18:45 other posts of HornySyd 
call it bs or any pair of letters you want to, but it's still a fact.
You are the first person I ever heard from who ever mentioned global cooling in this current era. That must be a joke. If not, it removes your opinion from any serious conversation about the topic.
By phart at 10,Sep,24 00:54 other posts of phart 
no joke, when I was in elementary school it was talked about often, pages of our weekly reader newsletters talked about it. the same things were blamed for it, car exhaust and so on.

only registered users can see external links

they call it a conjecture but if you remember the dinosaurs were thought to be made extinct by volcano emissions not letting the sun in allowing the earth to cool

The funny thing is, the government thinks our memorys are to short. they try to put all knowledge online so it can be changed with a mouse clic and no one can verify something they saw days before.much less decades .
I had the foresite to save alot of books and such in my youth and I am so glad I did.

Almost no one remembers Y2K. A BIG bogus bunch of shit that cost the world millions of dollars to turn out to be a big nothing. global cooling, Y2K, now, climate change. which hoax will you fall for today?
By Ananas2xLekker at 10,Sep,24 15:06 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Of course global cooling is possible, it's just not an effect of carbon dioxide emissions, which as proposed in the 1970's. It was conjecture. The possibility
of anthropogenic WARMING dominated the peer-reviewed literature even then.
only registered users can see external links
It's just propaganda from big oil, to keep pointing to 'global cooling'.

We now have over 50 years of additional data, clearly showing a global average temperature INCREASE, that can only be explained by emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of fossil fuels, breeding of livestock and by the reduced capacity of nature to absorb greenhouse gases due to the destruction of forests.

Actually, there is lots of evidence for the extinction of the dinosaurs having been caused by a huge asteroid or comet slamming into the Yucatбn Peninsula 65 million years ago, blocking sunlight, changing the climate and setting off global wildfires.
It left the Chicxulub Crater, which is 125-mile-wide. Asteroids and comets have relatively large abundances of iridium. There is a layer of iridium-peppered rock,
65 million years old, all over the world, but with the highest concentrations of iridium, the closest to the impact site. Volcanoes don't contain high concentrations of iridium.

True, volcano eruptions can also affect the climate, which is why they need to be accounted for in climate change statistics. They can measure the effects that the Krakatoa eruption of 1883 had on the climate. It cooled the entire Earth by an average of 0.6°C for months.

Y2K wasn't bogus or a hoax, it was just fixed by IT specialists, by adding two digits
to the dates in all the important software. Easy, but damn important.

Before you mention it; the hole in the ozone layer is now slowly shrinking,
because the world heavily regulated chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

Any other misinformation? DAMN!
By phart at 10,Sep,24 15:54 other posts of phart 
my response was more so directed to the other person that said I was the first person to mention global cooling and it must be a joke.
And no one has ever responded to a basic question alot of folks have.
IF the global cooling and other stuff was misinformation, how do we know we are getting facts in regard to the latest rage of climate change? 20 years from now i could be vindicated as it could be discovered the Luminati was behind it all!

I know,i am being silly with the luminati thing but just used it for a example.
By Ananas2xLekker at 10,Sep,24 16:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You don't understand; global cooling itself wasn't misinformation, that was a hypothesis that some climate scientists were honestly researching, it was just not supported by most other climate scientists. It was researched and then rejected.
The misinformation is the claim that global cooling was just as widely accepted as global warming. It wasn't in the 1970's and it certainly isn't now.

If the Illuminati tried to meddle with temperature data, that would be identified by everyone and anyone involved. Temperature measurement data is recorded everywhere and can be checked against lots of other measurements, history and just the memory of people. They would have to break in to every public and private meteorology organization in the world, to fake the data, which would then not agree with books, newspapers, photographs, etc. The data is correct. Do you agree or not? Then it's just a matter of statistics. The trend is just apparent, any way you look at it. All the measurements go up, no matter if you look at the poles or the equator or you backyard. Sometimes you deny this fact itself, sometimes you acknowledge it, but claim it is a natural trend. Well, to justify a natural trend, you need to explain not just the temperature rising, but also the carbon dioxide concentration rising. Is the upwards trend in the carbon dioxide concentration also faked by the Illuminati? Every laboratory worth a dime can just measure it, whenever they feel like it and come to a very similar carbon dioxide concentration, of around 422.10 ppm today. Can that be faked? Or were all the lower measurements in history faked?
I'm curious how you explain that two sets of data, that can be verified in millions of ways, are faked.

Can they fake my decades old memories and photographs of my brother and me playing in the snow, making snow forts and snowmen, having snowball fights and skating, most winters? Just like me, many people have photos and memories of white Christmases and icy new-years. There are records and scars of broken bones due to winter weather. All of that history, slowly changing to the new normal today, where I hardly need a winter coat. People had snow-tires and snow-chains in my youth, while I recently considered if I still need all-weather tires or just rely on summer-tires. Can the Illuminati fake all of that?

Those are all things happening in one life-time. For everything else, I do have to rely on science. That doesn't mean you have to TRUST science. You don't, you VERIFY science, against all your data and all your knowledge. If their information or deduction is wrong, it wouldn't be difficult to see. I have enough scientific experience to identify it being wrong enough to fake a conclusion. There are tens of millions of people with more scientific experience than me to identify mistakes or meddling. Are all those people dumb or dishonest? Are they all bribed by the the Illuminati? Why would all those people want to believe or accept bribes to lie about a global problem of such impact to everyone's lives? Don't you think I have better things to do? There are enough problems to solve already. I wouldn't want to believe this, I just cannot help to accept it, because reality itself demonstrates
it's the truth.

Scientists are often wrong, that's why science is a process of checking each other. Here is an example of a science article being wrong and one scientist looking over it and seeing many mistakes in just minutes.
only registered users can see external links
She looks at climate science too. She considers most of it to be too careful.
There are millions like her. There are only a few that say climate change is wrong and the use your arguments; simplistic bullshit that only fools people like you.

By HornySyd at 14,Sep,24 22:42 other posts of HornySyd 
OK, I guess you want me to forget everything and believe and instead embrace what you *think* you remember from a child's weekly reader. (LOL)

The fact that you must cling to the idea that they once suspected it was caused by car exhaust, and can't seem to get past that it wasn't 100% accurate, and you can't seem to have a flexible mind to accommodate new information is why I have to completely dismiss your ideas. Nobody had the proof of a large meteorite that struck and so obviously they had other ideas about dinosaur extinction. Scientists adapt to new information. You should too.

But then you start adding that crap about how "the government...", as if there was a single entity that is out to get us all in some grand conspiracy.

Too bad you didn't use your "foresite" and reading to learn how the word foresight is constructed. Too bad you don't realize that the millions were spend prior to Y2000 to preemptively *correct* the problems that could occur if nothing was done. It was a "big nothing" because people addressed the problem. Unless of course you believe the weirdos that were saying that at midnight planes would fall out of the sky.

This all goes back to my initial remark. It doesn't matter what you believe or not. Science has established facts as well as human beings are able to establish. Anecdotes about them being wrong are laughable. If you want your ideas taken with any seriousness, provide verifiable data. A few little random "factiods" doesn't cut it.
By phart at 14,Sep,24 23:16 other posts of phart 
Yea, and some folks are hell bent that the earth is flat and consider it "fact".
You don't know a damn bit more than anyone else.you just know what you believe because someone with a degree and some funding tells you this and this and you eat it up.
Think vacuum cleaner salesman, same as a scientist ,trying sell a vacuum or trying to sell a idea, theory, for more research funding.

How many of these experts are working for free or expenses only?
By HornySyd at 15,Sep,24 06:01 other posts of HornySyd 
Yeah, think what you want. I'm an engineer that last worked in a electron microscope laboratory developing sample preparation equipment. I'm one of the muthafuckers making science and applying it, not watching videos on youtube about it. That's why I think you are full of it.
By phart at 17,Sep,24 22:20 other posts of phart 
well aint you just a smart 1 eh?
good for you.
so you hadn't been out of college long before i was in college learning how to write computer language and such
By HornySyd at 21,Sep,24 00:15 other posts of HornySyd 
Wrong again. I didn't get a degree from college. I'm just smart enough to learn electronics, computers, and engineering without spending a lot of money on an over-priced college.
By phart at 21,Sep,24 03:25 other posts of phart 
well you must be smart to be able to do that. i just got the 2 year degree, then never really used it for making a living. Use what I learned alot anyway but found another line of work I enjoyed.




By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Sep,24 17:17 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Flat earthers are science deniers, just like climate change deniers.
They refuse to believe facts that debunk their beliefs, they don't have any facts that support their believes.




By dgraff at 15,Sep,24 10:39 other posts of dgraff 
Why would I even care it’s not gonna happen in my lifetime that’s the problem in this world is trying to fix something that may or may not happen in hundreds of years and the fix only makes the people living now suffer
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Sep,24 17:25 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
It's already happening. You won't have much to worry from the sea level, that will take longer, but I hope you have two to four decades left to enjoy your retirement, and that's long enough to personally get harmed by climate change.

All over Eastern Europe are now huge areas flooded from ridiculous amounts of rain. That can happen in the US too.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
By dgraff at 15,Sep,24 20:38 other posts of dgraff 
Not much chance of flooding up here i live on top of a mountain ⛰️
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Sep,24 21:56 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
In that way, you live on a future proof location.
How about hurricanes, extreme heat, wildfires and drought?

It's not just your own damage that impacts you.
If your countrymen get flooded, that impacts you too.
It will impact your economy and how much taxes you pay.
Damage to infrastructure needs to be paid for, by you too.
It affects the political choices that affect you too.
It impacts the prices you pay for food, water and power.
And even the availability of food, water and power.

You're not alone. They faith of all people is connected.
By Cody8789 at 15,Sep,24 22:52 other posts of Cody8789 
I’ve lived in ft,lauderdale all my life and I’ve never experienced the heat that we’ve had in the last couple of years, down here the coral reefs that sustain the fish are dying off, there bleaching from hot 101 degrees water in the ocean, we are now experiencing major floods that flood into the cities of ft,lauderdale and Miami every full moon,,, we never had that flooding that bad before a couple of years ago either. It is so hot down here for 11 months of the year and in Jan- feb, it cools off to a nice cool 79 degrees. Something is definitely changing the weather. I went to the beach yesterday and I only seen a couple of people on the beach, because it is so unbearable hot, no one can take the heat, even going in the water at 102 degrees does not cool you off. I think I’m going to move to Lebanon Pennsylvania where the weather is still nice and no hurricanes can reach there, maybe even open up a garage (Cody’s garage) and work on cars😄
By Ananas2xLekker at 17,Sep,24 15:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You can see that something is happening, so don't believe people who tell you it's all in your imagination.

They keep flipping from point 1 to point 3:
1) Nothing is happening
2) OK, something is happening, but it's natural
3) OK, maybe humanity is causing it, but we cannot do anything about it

I say to that:
1) Really? Am I imagining things?
2) Oh? How then?
3) Why? Why can't we stop causing it? Are we lemmings?

When something is true, you shouldn't have to flip between arguments.
Which side is consistent and has the answers to the questions?
By Cody8789 at 17,Sep,24 21:41 other posts of Cody8789 
When my house gets flooded I’ll just have to move in with dgraff and marcy
By Ananas2xLekker at 18,Sep,24 07:17 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I'm sure they'll welcome you with open arms.

I guess you are at point 2) or 3)
I think in solutions, preferring to prevent the harm, instead of imagining
a place to hide, when the world turns against us for destroying it.

Humanity has survived by solving problems. Should we stop doing that
just because some wealthy assholes make a lot of money from fossil fuels?
Why? Wealthy assholes can make money from renewables too.















By Ananas2xLekker at 06,Sep,24 09:37 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Phoenix sets weather record with 100 degrees for 100 straight days
only registered users can see external links

Phoenix hits 100 degrees for the 100th day in a row
only registered users can see external links

"...there’s no end in sight to triple-digit days in the forecast."
By phart at 06,Sep,24 14:44 other posts of phart 
"But it's a dry heat!"
Arizona is hot,dry as a popcorn fart and does not even allow people to have anything on their property that holds water from rain.
been that way for a while.
By Ananas2xLekker at 06,Sep,24 15:17 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Put me in that heat and 'dry' is not what you can call me.
I'm very happy to live in a mild climate.

Strange how so many climate change deniers live in such hot states.
They literally feel the results every summer, but they chose not to believe it.
By phart at 10,Sep,24 19:59 other posts of phart 
This where I get the "dry heat" comment from.
I can't help but laugh when I see walter, kinda like looking in the mirror.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Sep,24 14:07 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I thought I heard it somewhere before, but I couldn't remember where.
Jeff Dunham is very funny. Nice that we both enjoy it.
Can you also enjoy Jim Jefferies, or is he too liberal?
How about Ricky Gervais? Is he anti-woke enough already?
By phart at 11,Sep,24 14:18 other posts of phart 
haven't saw those folks.
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Sep,24 14:43 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Really? You haven't heard of these bits?
Even penis sheath wearing Papuas have heard of these.

Jim Jefferies: only registered users can see external links

Ricky Gervais: only registered users can see external links








By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Aug,24 09:15 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I had another live discussion with a climate denier. Unfortunately, is was cut short
by my girlfriend, who didn't want it to ruin a nice day out.
I made a hint about something worsening from climate chance, to which he replied that all of climate chance was recently debunked, by the Technical University of Delft, something about soil composition not matching. So, later, I spend an hour searching the internet for any news or scientific article about that. I couldn't find anything even loosely related to that. So, it was just another 'trust me bro'.

If there is science debunking climate change, that will be all over the news 24 hours later.
It days later now, and I'm still waiting.

I'm not allowed to ask him for the article, because it's her side of the family.
Has anyone heard of such a topic not matching with climate change, recently?
By phart at 26,Aug,24 12:34 other posts of phart 
Must have been talking about this maybe?
only registered users can see external links

Soil can also influence climate on a smaller scale. Soils that are wetter or denser hold heat and stabilize the surroundings from temperature changes more so than drier, looser soils. The temperature in deserts may increase by more than 60°F during the course of a day.

Soils and Climate
Soil Science Society of America
only registered users can see external links › iys › november-soils-overview
By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Aug,24 21:45 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
There doesn't seem to be any critique of climate change in there. It's just some basic knowledge on the carbon cycle, without any introduction, method, results or conclusion.
The temperature of dry climates or above dry land definitely fluctuates more than wet climates or above wet lands.
If the soil composition changes over time, that can have an effect on the climate.
One example is when the Russian tundra isn't frozen as much anymore. That starts a rotting process that releases CO2 and CH4. It's one of the 'tipping points'.




By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Aug,24 16:18 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I just had the chance to drive a Tesla Y series, a few times.
It was fun. There was a learning curve though, because there is no real dashboard to speak of and except for the signals and drive selector, everything is on that center display.
Driving itself is a breeze. The acceleration is eye-watering. That was the fun part.
It's practical enough too. I could charge it 100 ft from my house, while I need to drive several miles for a gas-station with somewhat acceptable prices.
The Tesla Supercharger is also closer to my house than that gas-station.
It could charge the battery from 60% to 80% in 5 minutes. And it was cheap.

Of course, it's a very expensive car. I won't buy it, unless I become a lot richer.
Most people don't buy a Tesla, but have it leased with their job. Not my job though.
The car is 50% gimmick. Most of the price is related to all the sensors and the
eye-watering acceleration. If they dropped all the nonsense and just delivered the
sensible type of car, that I drive now, it could be very similar in price.
By phart at 21,Aug,24 16:37 other posts of phart 
very true, alot of "gimmicks" on the car that really do nothing but "wow" people
Did you try the self drive?
I have found a situation where the self drive or at least assisted driving is a good thing.
A friends daughter has Pots.
only registered users can see external links

So her husband chose to buy a Tesla for their new car and there is a way to program different "modes" for driving.
He programmed in a " Casey" mode,her name, when she drives, if she lets go of the wheel for more than like 2 seconds, the car starts talking" Casey,are you ok?" and then buzzers go off and the car slows down and the flasher turn on, if no response it pulls it's self over to the side of the road and stops.
By Ananas2xLekker at 21,Aug,24 17:23 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The self drive is a software option that the boss didn't pay for.
It has all the sensors though. It shows all cars, in a wide radius on screen.
It even distinguishes cars, trucks and motorbikes. It shows a light for them braking.
It does have adaptive cruise control, but I've had that before, in a rental.
It was set on one pedal regenerative braking. I have touched the actual braking pedal only a few times.
On a 60 mph straight highway, with trajectory control, it was practical, but very boring.

Yeah, it kept warning me, with 'bing bing bing' (lol) and no idea what for.
And it saw a 40 mph sign on the other lane and thought I was speeding.
No matter how rich I was, and how much luxury and service I could afford in a car,
they can keep that 'service' OUT! Show the speed limit, but shut the fuck up!
By phart at 21,Aug,24 23:20 other posts of phart 
oh my, I can tell you never were around the 80's Chrysler products, "Your door is a jar" "your door is a jar".
Really funny when the damn thing is UPSIDE DOWN in the middle of the road where it slid and flipped over on ice.
By pipcock at 22,Aug,24 00:04 other posts of pipcock 
😄 I've been upside down in a ditch. Car said nothing! I said plenty. 🫣
By phart at 22,Aug,24 02:10 other posts of phart 
thank goodness i haven't.But I am sure I would probably shit myself


By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Aug,24 06:42 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I found a video of that: only registered users can see external links
That's some creative design. I never saw anything like it.
Did they do that voice because of Knight Rider?

I'm used to navigation talking, but the car itself... No thank you.
My first navigation system was a PDA with external GPS.
You could install many different voices on it.
I installed our Dutch porn-star Kim Holland on it.
What she had recorded wasn't X-rated, but pretty erotic.
I also used voices from someone imitating our soccer coach
Johan Cruijff and the soccer brothers Frank and Ronald de Boer.




By #719542 at 22,Aug,24 07:16
I have a family member that has duel motored 3, the acceleration in blistering, I liken it to the pull back you get in a commercial air liner on take off & it just doesn't quit, no gear change, ya can here the motors winding up, its quite a different experience.

You can unlock more power but in AU its 10k same price as unlocking the auto drive, so that's all not unlocked in theirs's either.

Has some little nic nac features, well heaps of them, like you can make the horn many of the std sounds or you can upload one into the car. I tried to convince then to load in a machine gun mp3, they wouldn't be in it, but if it was mine it would be the first thing I would do 😁

A while back auto steer was unlocked for free, it works ok but you have to keep engaging with the steering wheel from time to time, its a bit annoying really I find holding onto the wheel a better option.

Auto pilot over here can only work on highways, I believe in America & Europe it works every where, I might not be correct on that.

One really cool feature of it, using your app in a shopping center, you can have the car come to you, that would be pretty cool
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Aug,24 08:00 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
This Model Y was just the one motor version and it was already impressive.
I've seen a Model 3 pull away once. That was not 'acceleration', that was instant speed.

It seems like the law gets an extra job, every time Tesla invents a new gimmick.
Or can it wait until someone is upside down in a ditch, for trying to avoid what they think is another mass shooter? It does open up traffic nicely though.

Maybe the 3 has free auto steer and it's an option on the Y.
It's only legal in The Netherlands if you're in it, and paying attention.
That would be even more boring on the freeway than just steering.
It's not allowed to have the car drive alone.
That would create insurance and legal liability issues.
It's also creating dilemmas like is the car supposed to protect the owner at all cost
or should it prioritize the lives of multiple pedestrians over the life of the owner.
That's not important at crawling speed, but it's an issue that they are already
struggling with.
By #719542 at 22,Aug,24 08:10
acceleration my have been the wrong term, instant power is more correct 😁 did you have much of a chance to look over build quality, they look flash as "Michael Jackson" at first, but the build quality on further inspection is a bit meh to be honest & how did you go with the central screen, does the Y have a heads up display for speed 🤷‍♀️, the 3 doesn't, you have to keep looking down at the screen, its a bit annoying
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Aug,24 08:23 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Head up display would be nice, but this Y didn't have it.
That screen asks for too much of the driver's attention.
They can compensate the design choice of leaving out a dashboard,
or they can do what car builders have optimized in the last 100 years.
I would not buy a Tesla, I would buy an electric car, which is 100% car.
I wouldn't want to daily drive something that's 50% gimmick.
By #719542 at 22,Aug,24 08:26
Some of their other models now they have returned a instrument cluster styled design, to be honest the looking down at the central screen is detracting a a safety issue 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Aug,24 13:24 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Apparently, the Tesla Model S Plaid has an instrument cluster.
That one is $121.397 in my country.
But, I've seen aftermarket instrument clusters, for all models.
That's a sign that people are getting annoyed with that design choice.






By phart at 25,Aug,24 01:09 other posts of phart 
I didn't get in it but I just got back from a family shindig and a couple had their new Y there, burgundy with the 1000 dollar optional white interior. Not leather or vinal, some other material he said has held up on their other tesla for 7 years just fine.
He told me about how it has seat and steering and mirror settings programmed for him and his wife. If they have the dog with them and need to go in a store,it has "pet mode" where the screen says "I am fine,it is xx degrees in here".
Also has a "keep" mode for keeping your grocerys from getting to hot as you run other errands. It still has it's temp tag and he has the self drive for 30 days free.8000 dollar option to leave it on. He turned it on, and a few miles down the road it made a panic stop for a car crossing a 1/4 mile ahead of him,so he turned it off.
said he would not buy it.
Alot of thought went into the design for sure.



By phart at 24,Aug,24 16:34 other posts of phart 
Ok, go plug this farting volcano! it is polluting the air!, make it buy carbon credits or at least go tax it and regulate it until it quits farting smoke!
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 20,Aug,24 02:09 other posts of phart 
I farted at least 15 times today. musta ate something that didn't set well.
I realize I need to get some charcoal filtered underpants to do my part for the environment but how do you dispose of them in a environmentally friendly way?
By CAT52! at 20,Aug,24 15:00 other posts of CAT52! 
Well, at least you would have done ONE thing to help the environment. But, we know you don't give a fart about the environment.

By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Aug,24 15:16 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Now you have to plant two trees, phart
By phart at 20,Aug,24 16:01 other posts of phart 
ok,
long as i can make me some lumber out of 2 others!




By phart at 07,Aug,24 20:53 other posts of phart 
So let's see here, liberals want electric cars, they want us to stop using coal ,natural gas and so on and depend on renewables and nuclear power .BUT the Australians took a uranium mine and made a park out of it.
Uh, so how can you have it both ways?

only registered users can see external links
Place is nothing but desert except for right around the edges, why bother with a park in the middle of nowwhere?
By Ananas2xLekker at 08,Aug,24 09:03 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Ameliorating climate change vs making parks from Uranium mines?
I don't understand what you're trying to argue.

Why bother? A 'national park' is not a park for people, but for nature.
Almost all wild animals are turning into 'endangered species'.

If the radiation is gone and there's no other pollution, it's a better solution to rewild it,
than to leave a fucking dead hole in the ground. It could be a lake with high biodiversity.
It might even be a start to turning that desert green. Weren't you supporting the Republican 'plan' to plant 1 trillion trees? Is it in Project 2025?

1 Trillion trees won't all fit in your backyard.
It entails at least turning all deserts into forests.

--------------------------------------------------------

Sure, many liberals think the world is saved with electric cars and nuclear power.
That's escapism too. Electric cars won't help much against climate change,
but it saves the car. It's a solution from Elon Musk... Take a hint!

Nuclear power is exchanging a current crisis for a future crisis.
Nuclear power isn't that 'green' and it is very expensive.
Solar, wind, water, geothermal and even bio-fuels are all better alternatives.
Those are all actually renewable. Uranium is still a fossil fuel. Gone is gone.
You cannot recycle uranium, but end up with highly radioactive waste for 100,000 years.
By phart at 08,Aug,24 17:19 other posts of phart 
i am just bringing out the irony of liberal thinking. They try to make out like there is a free ride to clean energy with nuclear and other sources and then,the very damn thing you need for nuclear power, a mine to get the minerals from,they shut down for a park in the middle of new where for critters.

I don't support nuclear.it is very dangerous.
Human error can happen with the best of tech.But I doubt 1000's of people would die because of a faulty solar panel.
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,Aug,24 07:21 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The support for nuclear energy is not (solely) from liberals. Maybe in the US it's mixed, but according Pew Research Center, Republicans have supported nuclear power in greater shares than Democrats each time this question has been asked since 2016.
only registered users can see external links

It's your bias to think everything you think is bad is supported by the others.
You never do any research to check your ideas.
Now you know Republicans mostly support nuclear power, you will either just accept that, maybe even switch your position, or you will keep denying it.

Trump is a big supporter of nuclear power and is planning to put the nuclear weapons programs on steroids. Remember that he wanted to nuke hurricanes?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links


In my country, nuclear power is much more a right-wing idea.

Our large corporate right-wing party, the VVD clearly states in it's program that new nuclear power plants should be build.
Our Christian right-wing party, the CDA clearly states in it's program that we need nuclear energy.
Our populist extreme right-wing 'party' (with just one member; Geert Wilders) even has a plan to have Henri Muntert's handyman company build four new nuclear power plants.
Our small right-wing Christian fundamentalist party, which just recently allowed women to participate, supports building new nuclear power plants.
Our totally corrupt right-wing populist party, FvD, strongly supports nuclear energy.

The 'liberals' are D66 and PvdA. D66 supports nuclear power, because they say we need it for a carbon neutral future, to combat climate change. The PvdA has always been against nuclear power, but switched their position about 20 years back, when they turned from left to centrist. Then they lost massive support. They went from 42 seats to 9 seats, in 14 years. They learned from that mistake and moved back to the left. In 2023, they joined with the Green Party (GroenLinks), creating GroenLinks-PvdA. Now their program states that there should be no new nuclear power plants, because nuclear power is neither safe nor cost effective.

Our Green Party (GroenLinks) clearly stated in their program:
- No new nuclear power plants
- A ban on subsidizing nuclear power plants in Europe

My Socialist Party even organized a national demonstration against nuclear power.
By phart at 10,Aug,24 22:50 other posts of phart 
I remember Trump wanting to kill the wuhan virus with UV light. Guess what I have brand new in the box to be installed on a central air unit? A UV virus killing light!
300 dollar item.
By #719542 at 10,Aug,24 23:18
Well that's a good idea, its well known that a lot of nasties are in AC units, UV should do the job, I know what I find in my split head units when I pull them apart to clean them out a couple of times a year, what's I find inside in nasty, especially mold, the UV should keep the mold at bay as well I would think

By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,24 13:07 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Yes, you can kill viruses with UV light, on a surface or in particles passing through, but the shorter the contact time, the higher the intensity that is needed. Killing viruses with UV takes a pretty strong UV light. I'm very sure that a UV light in your AC will not kill the viruses passing through, unless it's at least a 1000 Watt UV lamp.

Using a dose of UV light in lungs infected with Covid, strong enough to kill the virus, would kill the patient about 100 times faster. The worst sunburn ever, in the most delicate and vital tissue. Besides, you might kill the few viruses in the lungs, but they are everywhere in the body.

Actually, it's even wrong to say "killing viruses", because they are not really alive in the first place. They are just a capsule made of protein with genetic material inside. They don't multiply by themselves, like bacteria, fungi and other single celled organisms, they need a host. To 'kill' them, means destroying the capsule and/or the genetic material inside to such an extend that the virus is unable to infect the host or the genetic material doesn't work anymore.

A short burst of UV light can damage the genetic material slightly, while still allowing the virus to infect the host. You're actually creating mutants that way. It might be a mutant that can kill people more effectively. During my studies, we even used UV light to mutate bacteria. We wanted to create a mutant that would be able to break down poisonous hydrocarbons. We needed to be very careful with that UV light, because it could burn your eyes and skin in seconds, but we dosed the bacteria for minutes. That was not enough to kill them, just enough to damage their genetic material slightly. It didn't work, but we did find micro-organisms that were able to break down those poisonous hydrocarbons in soil that was contaminated with those poisonous hydrocarbons. Nature already provided the mutants that we needed.

You can also kill viruses with bleach or with ionizing radiation, on a surface or as air particles. You can even kill viruses with soap, in about 20 seconds. You can't do that in a human body, because the body is in the way. The virus is hiding in the cells and in the blood. If you replaced the blood with soap or bleach, the veins would be temporarily cleaned and the virus would be dead there. The patient would be also dead as a door-nail. If the patient miraculously survived, once you put in clean blood, viruses from other tissues would immediately reinfect the blood and veins.
If you tried to kill all the viruses in the cells of the patient, with a chemical or radiation, the patient would be long dead before the virus is even affected.

If you don't understand that, you're just as oblivious as Trump.
By phart at 11,Aug,24 14:08 other posts of phart 
you are working with information on todays tech. Not what may be discovered in the future.
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,24 14:28 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
True, but Trump was commenting on today's tech, with pure ignorance.
It is impossible to 'kill' a virus with radiation or chemicals, because a virus consists of protein and DNA or RNA, just like the person it has infected.
There is no type of radiation or chemical that can specifically destroy the protein
or DNA or RNA of the virus and not the protein or DNA of the patient.

What you can use to specifically attack the virus and leave the body intact are antibodies, either created in a bioreactor (biotechnology) or by inducing the body to make the antibodies; vaccination or immunotherapy.

They saved Trump from Covid with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies,
not with Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin, you can be sure of that.
By phart at 11,Aug,24 16:46 other posts of phart 
not really, we can't be sure of what they did.even the paper work for the shots is sealed for 75 years.
By Ananas2xLekker at 11,Aug,24 17:33 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Transparency? Why didn't he mind-declassify that information?

You can be sure, because that's what they use(d) for important people.
Even Joe Rogan got it, after saying he could trust his immunity, for weeks.
He would have probably been fine, so he took scarce life-saving medicine away from someone who needed it more than him, because he's rich.

Trump would have probably died. I don't fault any system that prioritizes their top government officials above some random people. I just observe that people who spread the anti-vaxxer or anti-science rhetoric will always listen to their doctor
or the actual science, as soon as they are at risk themselves.

Everyone at Fox'News' was forced to vaccinate. The channel was spreading
anti-vax propaganda, but did the opposite themselves. The anti-science ideas are just to distract and confuse the masses, but they don't believe a word
of anything they say themselves.











By phart at 08,Aug,24 17:17 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

Aint this nice? They take that government handout and then go tits up. Liberals constantly complain about Trump,Robison and others using bankruptcy and now this, I wonder what liberals will say to this?
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,Aug,24 07:43 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You're America! Any time someone wants to do something good,
there are lots of selfish assholes gearing up to scam them.

By the way, as of January 2024, there are 11,091 solar panel installation companies
in the US. There are 514 Solar Power businesses in the US as of 2023,
an increase of 22.8% from 2022. Those 'government handouts' are working.

How about those 'government handouts' from Trump?
Seen any money back from the PPP loans? Did they not fire people?
Did the 6 TRILLION DOLLARS he pumped into the stock market help you?

'Government handouts' are mostly a Republican thing, you just don't think so,
because the handouts go to wealthy people and never to the people who need it
or to goals that would actually Make America Great Again. They are LYING to you!

By #719542 at 09,Aug,24 10:44
Hey phart & Ananas2xLekker 🙋‍♀️

Trust me guys not having a go at either of you, I consider both of you to be my friends I just wanted to chuck my 2 cents worth in for the hell of it

Phart mate, caught my attention mentioning something of Australia, just to correct you on something, the "Kakadu National Park" up in the NT was a national park prior to the mine opening up, funnily enough about a year prior to the mine opening with a deal stuck with the "traditional landowners" to allow the mine to open up, it was all about money & very controversial, it was a common thing to hear about this mine through its operations in local (Australian) news broadcasts through the period of operation , local bands like "Midnight Oil" wrote songs about it in the past & so forth, it is unlikely if the traditional land owners were not involved & the park was owned by the state alone, chances are the mine would not have existed. The traditional landowners of this country take tittle to many lands within Australia causing trouble to obtain FREE money, from well, basically the white taxpayers of this country, sounds raciest, well maybe it is, even some local parks & councils, like council chambers & stuff they have taken claim to its all about getting money for FREE, so they can lease back, its a big problem.

Like I have said & mentioned many times, if the Dutch or Chinese colonized the country, there would be no traditional land owner problem, they all would have been shot on cocolonization bit over 200 years ago, its called genocide these days, but way back when I like to call it conquering nations, but we were colonized by the British, they liked to fuck little black girls 🤷‍♀️

Now for you my Dutch mate, as far as I understand, humans have 2 basic ways to generate power/energy

1. Turn a turbine:
Typically done with some type of boiler system, more or less heating water & harnessing its energy, there are other ways of course like wind farming that uses the power of wind to turn a turbine & Hydra also using the force of flow of water to turn a turbine, they would be the most common I would imagine, there would be others I am sure. Oh & nuclear to basically boil water, how could I forget that 🤭

2. Harnessing the suns solar energy:
So catching that energy via solar panels & chucking it into a grid or storing it in batteries for use later on, in Australia particularly in the state I live in ya can chuck some panels up on ya roof, heavily subsidized by the state government, typically these systems do not have the capability of storage, so the idea is, while your panels are being energized & you don't use all the power, the excess gets shoved into the grid, you get a subsidy for that, then once the sun goes down you have to pay to get the power back at a higher price then what you sold it for, but typically efficiently set up solar paneled household have a minimal bill at the end of the month, depending on how big your system is you may get a small refund although usually unlikely.

There are higher grades of this types of system, Tesla as one example, so you have a lithium storage bank set up beside your house, so you store your own power to use while the sun is not shinning, its my guess, I don't know the fundamentals of this type of system, but I would imagine once the storage bank is full, excess power would be bleed off & be shoved back into the grid which you would be paid for, however these types of systems are much more expensive & the government subsidy would fall well short of set up costs.

Also mate something I have picked up on. You have mentioned it a few times now that a EPV is not going to save the world it will save the automobile, your opinion on this matter I believe is 100% correct, in many countries like mine there is a target of 0 emissions & part of that is to can the internal combustion engine vehicle, sold new at some point/year, like phart I think evolving hybrid tec is a better option, perhaps using a hydrogen powered powered plant to produce power to energize the batteries carried on board & why not advance solar tec so your car look like a regular painted car so it is capturing the suns energy to change the power cells so the engine has less work to, I have a G Shock watch for example that uses solar energy to power the batteries, the solar panel is part of the glass watch face, not like solar powered watches from yesteryear, where a small solar panel was visible, why not use this technology in the windshield & rear shield of a modern modern Hybrid vehicle, most of which are driven during the daylight hours & cuck a few wind turbines in the front grill of that car to assist in power generation lessening the time the engine needs to be on to power the batteries, creatin les co2.

Australia has one of the lowest C02 emotions in the world, whey you might ask, we don't produce anything any more, well very little at all, we used to manufacture & build cars, the last of those were Holden(Chev), Ford & Toyota, no longer that's been gone for quite a few years now, we no longer produce a single car in this country, so the pollution created form this is somewhere else in the world. Our fords seem to be European, our holdens (Chev) appear to be American or maybe European as what is commonly known as the Commodore was originally formed from a European Opal.

Australia has many natural stocks & recourses, Uranium coal & iron (mostly), we export much Coal for example bringing the country billions of dollars, even though we not burning much of the stuff ourselves, converting for burning of natural gas to turn turbines, we send our coal to countries that do burn it to produce power, so although we have a low carbon footprint, we are allowing other countries to accelerate theirs's with our exports & the profit we make from it.

We have huge iron stocks, we used to produce our own steel, that ceased many years ago & our foundries shut down reducing our carbon footprint, instead we ship our ore to China, they send it back as steel & why because simply put its cheaper.

At the end of the day we have a low carbon foot print in this country, the main reason for that is we no longer manufacture fuck all, all our manufacturing is done in China, their caron foot print continues to climb, it is of no wonder why, we still produce a ugly carbon footprint, not seen here because we have moved it it China mostly 🤷‍♀️

The world at the end of the day needs less high level consumers, much like myself, Phart is a true environmentalist (even though he doesn't even know it), his actual carbon foot print on the world would be minimal, not even a drop in the ocean as far as I understand the way the guy lives 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 09,Aug,24 10:54 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 


Basically, every power generation technology uses the power of the sun or a star.
Directly, via solar PV panels or solar heat capture.
Indirectly, via the circulation of air or water, powered by the sun.
Delayed, by using fixed solar energy in the form of fossil fuels.
From a star that went supernova and provided Uranium or Thorium.
From the decay of radioactive elements in the earths core,
which were also created in a supernova, for geothermal.
Just being a nerd now. Sorry!
By #719542 at 09,Aug,24 11:12
You are a fucking nerd there is no doubt of that 🤭, but that's a interesting thing you have mentioned & again I would say you are correct, I never thought of it that way before but the creation of focal fuels, crude I guess, has been a process that has involved the solar energy produced by the sun, we need to blow up the sun
--------------------------------------- added after 59 seconds

No UV no more focal fuels
--------------------------------------- added after 98 seconds

Oh but then all the plants would die then we are fucked
--------------------------------------- added after 12 minutes

Its a funny world we live in, every action that's made there is a reaction to that action, like yin & yang I guess, to keep things equal, for something negative that's done a positive needs to be done to equalize the negative thing, to you know make it all equal again, the problem is that to many negative things are done & no positive things (well little at any rate) to equalize everything to bring things back to neutral again 🤷‍♀️





By phart at 28,Jul,24 12:29 other posts of phart 
1 lake in Africa can fart out 5% of the global greenhouse gases in 1 friggen day. And the left is worried about cow farts.
only registered users can see external links

but notice how the folks in Africa are going to extract the methane to make electricity! Instead of worrying about it, taxing the locals, etc, they are going to use it to their betterment.
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,Aug,24 09:19 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That lake can do that 1 time and add 5% that year, to the other 95%, which is emitted
by cows. So yes, we have to worry about cow farts.

It's not a bad idea to use the methane for electricity, but if that releases the CO2,
that's not a good idea. They could use that CO2 rich water to farm algae.
only registered users can see external links



By Gaydave at 25,Jul,24 09:27 other posts of Gaydave 
Have you ever seen day after tomorrow it is basically that extreme weather the scary thing is it could happen last weekend the weather was between 25-26 then down to 16-19
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Jul,24 09:52 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I have seen The Day After Tomorrow. I think the air coming down from space at those freezing temperatures is a bit far fetched, but the Thermohaline circulation (THC) is said to be affected by climate change. That makes certain place (nearer to the equators)
in the world heat up faster, while other places (nearer to the poles) are getting cooler.

I'm at the end of the Gulf Stream in Europe. If that Gulf Stream goes away, it will be significantly cooler in Europe than in South and North America, but we would still have
the same levels of CO2 and CH4, so I'm sure it wouldn't get to an Ice Age.
By Gaydave at 28,Jul,24 08:37 other posts of Gaydave 
There is already a reboot of H.H.G.T.T.G ( hitchhikers to the galaxy ) and the less said about the hollywood reboot of bewitbhed the better

By Gaydave at 28,Jul,24 08:39 other posts of Gaydave 
There is already a reboot of hitchhikers and the less said about bewitched the better

By Gaydave at 28,Jul,24 08:50 other posts of Gaydave 
Less said about bewitched hollywood movie the better


By phart at 28,Jul,24 12:31 other posts of phart 
Yea, I saw that movie in the theater
Notice mexico didn't like the US crossing the border either!
There has already been a ice age here. the movie was far fetched but entertaining to some degree.
The Village was another 1 I saw in the theater and that movie could have had a good plot, but they wasted it,
By Gaydave at 28,Jul,24 12:37 other posts of Gaydave 
That is M night movie for you. Movie with a twist best ones were the superhero alternative universe ( unbreakable, split and glass ) and this might sound bit detasteful and i do love glass i think its brilliant. But the end credits of glass. And this is why one side unbreakable the oher side split and in the middle shards of glass. Like an artist shown his art work.

By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 12:01 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
If I can recommend another movie, I would say; go see "Don't Look Up".

By Ananas2xLekker at 31,Jul,24 08:17 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You are forgetting the presidents speech, at the end of The Day After Tomorrow:

"Not only Americans, but people all around the globe are now guests in the nations we once called the third world. In our time of need they have taken us in and sheltered us, and I am deeply grateful for their hospitality."

only registered users can see external links




By phart at 20,Jul,24 23:55 other posts of phart 
Money talks, um, i wonder if any of the donations helped motivate politicians to pass stricter emissions laws to enlarge the market for the BYD cars?? And how much money is going straight to the politician and not their campaign?
this is a can of worms someone needs to fish with
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Jul,24 09:29 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No dumb-ass, they are trying to keep your car industry competitive with the Chinese.
By phart at 28,Jul,24 12:43 other posts of phart 
Well you can't have affordable electric cars and be competitive to.
with the high wages Americans think they deserve for simple button pushing ,the chinese can build the cars with the same quality far cheaper, which would meet the democrats goals much faster of having people driving electric carts around instead of comfortable safe cars.

I don't know what has happened to this country. We are supposed to be free,but if you want to buy a full size car, there aint 1. Want to buy a nice American made tractor,forget it,
By CAT52! at 28,Jul,24 12:47 other posts of CAT52! 
Sounds like a perfect business opportunity to me. Why don't YOU start making these types of cars? I bet there's lots of people that want to own a gas guzzler. 😈
By phart at 29,Jul,24 00:54 other posts of phart 
doesn't have to guzzle gas, we have fuel injection and cylinder control systems to get good mileage from large engines strong enough to pull a larger car.
the tech is just wasted.
Look at what comes from a 4 cylinder engine now.
Trouble is it is like giving a donkey steroids to pull a borax wagon, instead of using a team of draft horses fed good grain. the donkey will wear down and die because it is in a strain and running full bore all the time.
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 09:56 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The only reason for why the fuel consumption of American cars is following the rest of the world at all, is because of regulation in California. If your car manufacturers still want to sell some cars there, they have to keep up with the other car manufacturers.

Electric cars will become affordable. Electric motors are just far superior to the old carbon-burners. It's just the batteries or other ways of storing electric energy that have to be improved. That is happening as we speak.

The Chinese can make cars cheaper, but they have other disadvantages for why the free world would prefer to buy their cars from a European, Japanese or American company. China is an authoritarian regime that doesn't care about pollution much. That's why Europe limits the imports from cars from China. America had the lead in building electric cars with Tesla. They are now losing their lead, because they are losing the investment battle. Tesla is even using Chinese manufacturing. They can then benefit from the authoritarian regime's investments, the cheap labor and their government not caring about pollution, but they are simultaneously strengthening China's car industry and innovation over yours.
If you also become an authoritarian regime, who cares even less about pollution, then Europe will limit American car imports too. Just like your pickup trucks, the American electric cars will also only sell in America.



By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 04:54
Love your analogy phart why not develop know technology than trying to breed that out for new that is still not tested over time, a bit like smoking ciggys against vaping, they say vaping is better because it has killed less people than smoking, but records on vaping are limited cause it is new.

Personally battery power is not the ultimate answer, I do not believe at any rate, not that I have any facts of figures or any education for that matter.

Further development on the internal combustion engine (which is not dead yet) combined with storage of energy, you have brought this up a few times now Hybrid energy, I believe is the way to the future.

Changing the family automobile to be more efficient is not going to save this world, the biggest problem is consumerism & the disposable society & the emotions created to power this consumerism in modern society.

So take a bloke like you phart, if something you own breaks, you fix the fucking thing, whether you have to turn something down in your laith because you cant get a part, weld something up to fix a break, whatever it is you fix it instead of chucking it out & buying a new one, a bloke like you I would consider to be leaving a minimal carbon foot print on the world because you truly recycle, you might drive a car or truck that is fueled by focal fuels, it may well be old, pollute more than a modern vehicle, but never the less, with your true nature of recycling, lessening consumerism, guys like you are the true hero's of the planet, I am not being sarcastic I truly believe that, you might not think of yourself as such but you are a true environmentalist hero bloke, fucking tree hugger 🤭

I on the other hand are the complete opposite, I am a bad man, here is an example, we cook all our stuff either on the BBQ (LPG GAS low emissions) or in our air frier oven, its small & uses much less power than our conventional oven, saving my power bill & my ozone depleting footprint on the world, Ananas2xLekker would probs say good on ya bloke 👍.

However I am a bad consumer & unlike you phart & much like many other wasteful consumers in this world, I couldn't be bothered fixing something when it breaks. My airfrier had a really cool rotating basket in it to fry up chips & stuff that the lid was held together by a small metal clip poorly spot welded by it Chinese manufacturer. Within 12 months the clip came away & the basket, become useless. What do I do, pull my mig out of the shed, put a couple of tacs on it or chuck it in my bin, go down to the store buy another $80 fryer, that's what I did the fryer ended up as land fill, it was just easier.

You get a lot of flack about your ideas phart. I don't like it & if more followed the type of existence you live the human race would not be cooked like KFC on the face of the planet.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes

"You get a lot of flack about your ideas phart. I don't like it & if more followed the type of existence you live the human race would not be cooked like KFC on the face of the planet."

As soon anyway Earth needs less humans 🤷‍♀️
By phart at 29,Jul,24 06:10 other posts of phart 
Well, Economics is part of what fuels my lifestyle . I can't afford to buy new stuff.
And even if i could,i see no need to waste.
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 10:00
& without even your knowledge or care for that mater bloke you are a true environmentalist "i see no need to waste", these other a ledged environmentalists should take heed on the true environmentalists of this world like you phart that don't give a fuck & inadvertently are the best environmentalists out there, minimalizing waist & getting on with it instead of blubbering shit
By phart at 29,Jul,24 13:25 other posts of phart 
our county dump has a area set aside for old electronics.
For a short time a company came by and picked the stuff up for "recycling"
Well, that cost to much and there was about 2 acres of flat tv's shrink wrapped together on pallets. The lady that takes my money to dump said MOST worked, but the owners got 1 that had a little larger picture.
perhaps in sex 5 inches makes a big difference but does it on a tv enough to waste a good 1 and go in credit card debt for a new 1?
That is a example of WASTE that I am referring to.
A broke microwave, take it apart, replace the parts, continue to use and so on makes more long term sense.

Take any item, a microwave, a car, a house, and examine all the steps it takes to "recycle" it and you will find recycling it's self creates alot of emissions, not to mention loosing valuable landfill space.
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 16:22 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I do like that you are very much against the throw away culture.
Numb_Nuts might be totally correct that your carbon footprint is actually very low.

I very much support the right to repair legislation. It forces manufacturers to make their products with the possibility to repair and replace products in mind. That is regulation that even you might agree with.

Recycling is also very much dependent on regulation. It's cheaper to just dump stuff, so it requires enforcement from the government to get recycling in place. It can also help enforce manufacturers to think about how their products eventually are discarded, making the products easy to disassemble. I am bothered a lot by packaging that is made from paper and plastics or metal coated plastics, that cannot be recycled. It's all examples where right-wing policies are failing, because companies only think about their bottom line; money.









By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 05:29
Ananas2xLekker your existence on this site & every message you send within it has a carbon footprint attached to it, you claim to be a true environmentalist & that might be rightly so, are you willing to delete your account to reduce your carbon footprint on the world by doing so, if not you are in fact part of the problem 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 10:20 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Actually, this message is typed on a very efficient PC, I especially made myself for the purpose of saving electricity on low demanding tasks, like internet and Youtube.
As it's a sunny day in The Netherlands, I'm now producing more electricity than using, with my 10 high yield PV panels on my roof.

My house is also very efficient. We have the natural gas consumption of a small studio apartment. In a year, we only consume a tiny bit more electricity than our PV panels produce.

My girlfriend can walk to her job and I work from home for about 90% of the time, on a laptop from work. We own one car, which does about 50 mpg on average, on European E10. It's 10 years old now, and I'm hoping to use it for at least another 10 years. I'm betting electric cars will be good and affordable enough by then to go electric.

I don't claim to be a true environmentalist, I'm just not a science denier.
I want there to be a future, for my nephew. We didn't have kids ourselves,
because we are not that hopeful that humanity has the capacity to change.

Everyone is part of the problem, and no one can solve this alone. We are doing more than the average Dutch people to lower our carbon footprints.
The problem is political. The necessary steps to save humanity can only come from the modern world coming together to transition to a renewable economy. I am on the right side of this political struggle. It is hindered by climate deniers and people who believe the fearmongering of climate deniers. The impact of those people is the real problem.
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 10:23
Still has a carbon foot print though
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 10:31 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Yes, of course. Even killing myself today has a carbon foot print.
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 10:34
I know you strive for the ultimate answer, or hope their is one, humans though will be the end of their own demise, your notable attempts to educate change may help, but at the end of the day, ideas might delay the enviable, but the enviable is coming, sooner probs mor that latter 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:01 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
There is no "ultimate answer". I don't know if we are still able to save humanity, but the current direction is taking us to the end of the road very quickly. In any case, waiting longer won't help.

The only reason for why humanity is not doing what is needed to save itself, is because a few wealthy people do not want it. They will all be fine the longest, because they can go get anything the need and go anywhere to survive. You and I will feel the effects earlier, still within our lifetimes. It's poor people in countries around the equator, who are already suffering from it. They won't just die where they are, they will all move to milder climates. Your wall won't hold them back. They will come at you like the zombies from World War Z.

Whatever hard changes we will have to make, it will be better than the future that is coming. Waiting longer will only make the necessary changes worse. Don't think doing nothing and just letting it happen is an option. When your politicians start seeing their luxury and happiness is affected, they will do anything to keep it.
They will try to do what us lefties wanted to do decades earlier.
But, instead of them and their wealthy friends paying for it, you will.
It will just be too late then.


By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 10:46
yes it does, you know as well as I there is little time left, we keep going the way we are, humans may well be extinct on this planet within the next 100 years, surly less, you live your life fighting for change against that & I look up to you for your conviction to prevent that. Personally I think it is lost, changing all humans & what they do cant be changed & the human race will, well, cook them selves to death like KFC on the crust of the planet before to long 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:07 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
So, what are you actually promoting as an action?

1) Nothing, just keep going like we are, until the end?
2) Let everyone who thinks it's important do what's needed?
3) Just vote your conscience and our representatives will solve it?
4) Join the political fight against the powerful, who are killing us?
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 11:25
1 no
2 no
3 no
4 no

All humans need to unite as a whole to save our existence, all equal all facing the ultimate problem as a whole equally 🤷‍♀️
--------------------------------------- added after 18 seconds

As a single race
--------------------------------------- added after 39 seconds

For a single problem
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 12:18 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's option 0.5); Believe that it takes something impossible to achieve the goal, so you won't feel as bad when it doesn't happen.

It's just a step up from option 0); Believe that nothing is happening.






By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 10:29
We have spoken privately in one of my previous profiles, I get where you are at & unlike many here I see you as a smart educated man, I guess the point I was trying to make we are all part of the problem including yourself even though you are minimizing the problem in the way you are & conduct yourself in life & I give you tribute to that 👍
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 10:45 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You have bought in to the messaging of oil companies, saying that if we all turn off the light in a room we are not using, turn down the thermostat, everything will be alright.

We can do something, but the most important thing we can do is DEMAND politicians and big companies to do something. Unless we have a choice to buy products that have been made with a very low carbon footprint, it would be asking people to sacrifice their lives for everyone else. Only a tiny percentage of people is willing to do that, which makes it utterly useless.

It's selfish to deny climate change, but it's not selfLESS to accept it.
I want innovation, progress and solution to problems FOR ME! Not for you.
I don't want to live on a dying planet, with chaos and despair.
I don't want to be forced to give up all the luxuries that I enjoy, but I'm willing
to sacrifice some of them, to not be forced to sacrifice ALL in the future.

Denying climate change will not stop it.
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 10:54
Yes its money that its bringing the demise, you know I am not a educated man unlike yourself, but I do know the Earth has gone though periods of heating & cooling though, naturally, I don't know, billions of years, we are in a cycle of heating, natural I am sure, but human activity is accelerating a natural heating process that if left naturally we may be able to adapt over thousands of years, but we are accelerating that to hundreds & we wont be able to adapt but just cook into extinction is my thoughts anyway 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:15 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I'm educated in science, biotechnology to be exact, but it doesn't require much education to understand the science behind climate change.

The cycle of periods of heating & cooling have indeed been going on for millions of years. They do not change from taking millions of years or tens of thousands of years, to decades, all of a sudden.

When humanity is destroying most of the forest area, is burning carbon deposits
that have taken hundreds of millions of years to form, and has filled the earth with animals for food as much that 95% of land animals are for our consumption, then you cannot say that we are "accelerating a natural heating process", then it's clear that there is no natural climate process anymore. We have replaced the natural cycle with our human made climate change.
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 11:20
Hmmm interesting thank you for sharing your education on whats going on



By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 11:00
I see what you are saying in this statement but change takes fucking years, its also about bringing all the humans together as a whole, as a race, I cant see that ever happening, cunts are still at war even as we speak, humans will never be united as a whole & that will be the ultimate demise, once the human race realizes we all need to be equal outside of religion & war & all the other shit it will be to late, even if that's possible & I cant see it being possible to be honest 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:36 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Scientific, technological and cultural advances have never been achieved by bringing all the humans together as a whole. There is always a big contingency of conservatives, who don't want to follow the rest. Most of the time, it just requires a small, but dedicated minority, to achieve progress. The lazy majority will follow eventually.

Just look at the history of gay acceptance in the US. Only a tiny percentage supported gay marriage. It was 27% only in 1996, it's 67% now. Sure it dropped a bit, from the 71% it was a while back, but that took tremendous effort and funding for anti-LGTBQ propaganda. It's a small minority that paved the way and it's now a small minority who is fighting against progress. And it's very similar in the tactics they are using; lying 24/7, for the small wealthy group of conservatives, who are threatened by progress. Don't fall into their traps.


By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 11:06
To prevent the demise of the human race there needs to be a single race of humans, working unitedly for a common cause, do you think that's even possible, I don't think so aye 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:23 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Why a single race? Race doesn't separate us, ideology does.

I have more in common on climate change, with my black Hindu and Muslim neighbors, than with most white people around me. They have seen the changes
in the countries where they have their roots. When they visit their family, they experience the summers becoming unliveable there. They don't deny that the climate is changing and they know who causes it too.
By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 11:30
Without a single united race, Humans facing a common problem, the demise of of our race 🤷‍♀️
--------------------------------------- added after 47 seconds

We are all humans after all, Its a Human problem caused buy humans 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:39 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No, it's just bigotry that we should end, because we are already one.
Even AI is not able to separate humans by race. It's a construct, to separate us.

Everyone, no matter their color, nationality or religion, is able to understand the problem. That's why it is not necessary to eliminate the differences in color, nationality or religion to solve that problem.


By #719542 at 29,Jul,24 11:42
The problems are caused by the humans, maybe I used the wrong term race, species, is that the right one, homo sapiens, so all the homo sapiens (humans) need to unite to fight a homo sapiens (human) problem that has been caused by all homo sapiens (human) & get over race & creed to fight the common problem that all humans (homo sapiens) together as a fuck I don't know, not race species, to correct the damage as a species, as a species we have created, is that better 🤷‍♀️
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Jul,24 11:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Better, but as I said in another comment; we don't need everyone to agree.

Climate deniers are the minority. The majority knows humanity is killing itself.
The problem is that changing your mind is not effective, it requires changing the economy. The economy is not in the hands of the majority, because the economy is capitalistic. It's organized and controlled by the wealthy, who have the power. They will not change the economy they control, until it's in their benefit, or until
the majority takes control of the economy. That's why I am also a socialist. I can support science all I want, but science doesn't control the economy. I can try to vote for politicians who support science, but politicians don't control the economy either, because they privatized everything. If all humans control the economy, that's called socialism. That would work, because we would all stand to benefit
from changing the economy to a sustainable system.

But, it doesn't even require socialism, it just requires people with a backbone, to show the wealthy and the powerful that they better consider the rest of humanity,
if they want to retain their wealth and power.
Being MAGA and voting for Trump is the opposite of that, that's cucking yourself
to the wealthy and the powerful.









By phart at 29,Jul,24 06:32 other posts of phart 
Which is cleaner, some cows farting and some cars belching smoke, or this???
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 28,Jul,24 12:55 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 18,Jul,24 18:01 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

More fiber glass fibers for our fish to ingest. "How was your flounder with fiberglass breading sir?"
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Jul,24 09:06 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Is your argument that fossil fuels have never caused any pollution?
By phart at 19,Jul,24 10:57 other posts of phart 
it is the lesser of the necessary evils.
There is no free ride.
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Jul,24 11:16 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No it's not, it is the ONE AND ONLY evil that is guaranteed to cause incredible
and increasing damage to all of our lives, a major extinction event, and possibly
the end of humanity, UNLESS we stop doing it.

There is no free ride to stop doing it, but every not-free-ride is better
than a ride of increasingly worse torture, with a bullet in your head, at the end.

That fiberglass problem is avoidable, and even if it wasn't, it doesn't even measure up to JUST the oil-spills everywhere alone.
If we are talking just about pollution, those tar-sands in Canada are leaving a godforsaken wasteland, worse than Mad Max predicted.
How many Americans cannot drink the tap water, because of fracking.
Many Texans have stinging eyes and lungs, because of fracking.
Fracking could likely poison the one and only water-source agriculture relies on.

Even if they would just grind up all the wind turbines into dust and blow it into the air, your dumb example wouldn't come close making fossil fuels "the lesser of the necessary evils".
By phart at 19,Jul,24 15:57 other posts of phart 
I tell ye what, since oil is the only dangerous energy source to the environment, Why don't I fly over to your place and we will go take a tour of Chernobyl together and see for ourselves the healthy wild life and bountiful fruit trees growing among the high radiation? I think a friend of mine still has a old Gieger counter that I can put in my luggage and let it ride in the belly of the jet so we won't get to "hot" during our tour.
only registered users can see external links

I will bring you some "fresh spring water" to drink during our tour,
only registered users can see external links

It is a fact that pollution from oil and gas can be cleaned up at a cost far cheaper than our seafood being filled with fiberglass.
lead acid batterys if handled properly can be recycled easy,rebuilt even.
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Jul,24 18:21 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Just as with The Constitution, you stop reading when your idea is confirmed.
I continued with "that is guaranteed to cause incredible and increasing damage.....".
That word "guaranteed" is why fossil fuels are worse than all the alternative energy sources.

Nuclear energy is very dangerous and creates the waste problem, but it is NOT GUARANTEED to destroy humanity. It's possible that we won't have another Chernobyl or Fukushima, and that we will care for the nuclear waste for 200,000 years without incident. Possible, not likely. That's why I Think nuclear energy is a bad alternative for fossil fuels. Actually, it is a fossil fuel too. When it's gone, it's gone.
We could only power the world for a few decades with it.
And then you have to invest again in the real solution.

That's not a fact, you made it up. An oil-spill is unintended, just like that fiberglass ending up in the ocean, but the fracking process and tar-sand mining that's constant pollution for every barrel of oil. When you pollute the aquifer, that's over with for the next thousands of years. In Canada they are damaging areas the size of a small country. That's damaged for a few hundred years.

The fact that it's not easy to recycle fiberglass, doesn't mean you have to dump it in the ocean. You can just burn the carbon components and be left with glass or sand. That can be done cleanly, it just emits some carbondioxide, which we don't want, but it's way less than fossil fuels.
By phart at 19,Jul,24 20:03 other posts of phart 
How willing are you really to go back to walking and riding horse back to go places?
How willing are you to go back to candle light and cooking on a wood stove?
There is no hazard free energy source.
Solar leaves panels that have to be processed and recycled, and their brackets pollute the ground water.
Wind mills make noise pollution, kill birds, and are expensive to dispose of in special land fills.
hydro, damns are failing nowadays endangering peoples lives.
burning coal makes air borne pollution .and the coal ash unless it is used as concrete aggregate has to be disposed of now in special landfills,
nuke is highly dangerous as long humans are designing and operating it.I would trust AI with nuclear before I would humans and I don't trust AI no further than i can throw the Echo dot in a zero gravity area.

Neither of us is dumb or means ill will to world but we just disagree so much.
what energy source is clean? Geothermal? the pipes would have be made of something safe or they would polute.
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Jul,24 11:04 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's a stupid fearmongering fantasy. People will have to give up driving
big V8 trucks, but the alternatives for those aren't only horses.
Would it be cheaper for you to exchange a car for a horse?
It's bullshit to think we should go back in history for technology.
We cannot feed even a fraction of the people on that old technology.
It's the exact opposite, we have to go forward fast in technology.
Minimize the resources and energy needed to produce all our needs.
And people could definitely consume a bit less and still be happy.
The economy is centered around making the most money from
selling people crap and feeding people crap. And it's not the people
making that crap, who make the most money. It's just exploitation.

There is wind, water, solar and geothermal. Those are all better than fossil fuels. Of course there are disadvantages of all energy technologies, but the examples you are bringing up are minor compared to the disadvantages of fossil fuels. That's all just oil-baron financed propaganda. You're not even managing to come up with some new ones.
Oil pits kill 3 times more birds than wind turbines.
The large majority of poisoned land is caused by fossil fuels.

Coal is a fossil fuel too. It emits the most carbon emissions per watt.
Do you even think about what you're typing? Pipes for geothermal have be made of something safe or they would pollute? How about the Keystone XL pipeline?
Never heard from you that those pipelines cannot pollute. Oil pipelines are constantly leaking and polluting huge land areas.
And that's just the pipelines. Oil and gas extraction is poisoning the whole world.
Do you see what your brain is doing? Don't you see your different standards?

The sea is dying from climate change. The Mediterranean sea surface temperature hit a record 83.7°F / 28.7°C, the highest in four decades. Coral reefs are dying out. The oceans are the largest habitat on Earth, it supports all life. The whole chain of life is threatened by climate change. When it falls apart, it goes fast and it's irreversible. Your side of politics is doing everything to kill nature as fast as possible. There are only few right-wing conservatives willing to do anything to prevent it and they all cry about money. My side of politics wants to prevent nature from dying. Everyone will need to sacrifice something, but your ideas are fantasy, unless we wait even longer, because dying off doesn't come without sacrifices either.
By phart at 22,Jul,24 15:21 other posts of phart 
sacrifice?
WHY?
the 1 thing you mentioned that affects me,
Why work if you can't buy the truck you want or need to suit your purpose?
1 of the things mentioned in our bill of rights is the pursuit of happiness.
to tell me I can't travel and take a camper along , that is not allowing me to pursue happiness. that is restricting my lifestyle.
that is not what America is about.
There is alot we can do to help,without restricting peoples lives. We have worked hard as a society to get where we are, we should not give up 1 damn thing. and should be fighting any action that would.
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Jul,24 08:59 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"sacrifice?
WHY?"

Because your and my pursuit of happiness today, has an impact
on the pursuit of happiness of everyone else and everyone after us.

Just like your life and my life today, has an impact on the lives of everyone else and everyone after us.
Just like your liberty and my liberty today, has an impact on the liberty of everyone else and everyone after us.

Your "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

The government's job is to secure these rights, not for JUST YOU, but for everyone, including future generations. That's what your founders designed
your system of government for; "one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice
FOR ALL." NOT JUST FOR YOU!

"We have worked hard as a society to get where we are..."
Indeed as a SOCIETY, by working together, by sacrificing for each other.
The need to work as a SOCIETY is not done and dusted when you say so.

But, the strongest shoulders should carry the most. That's why I hate Trump's ideas so much; he takes weight off from the people with the strongest shoulders and adds it to the weight that the weakest shoulders are already carrying.











By phart at 23,Jul,24 15:21 other posts of phart 
We are DOOMED.
The man in the moon is leaving us behind as he drifts off into space.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Jul,24 08:14 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The Moon is moving away from the Earth at a rate of about 3.78 cm / 1.49 inch per year.
In the time that the sun is still alive, 5 billion years, the moon will drift away another 50%
from it's current distance to earth.
384,400 km = 384,400,000 m = 38,440,000,000 cm
238,855 miles = 15,133,852,800 inches (stupid imperial system)

This is just another stupid attempt to conflate the fact, that climate change is creating increasing danger and increasing damage to humanity, with misleading fearmongering about other topics that scientists are researching.

It's the job of scientists to research the effects of the moon on earth, or climate change deniers would claim it to be the cause of climate change, which scientists have demonstrated to be real and man-made, with a certainty of 99.9999% (five-sigma).



By #717506 at 22,Jun,24 23:11
A extract from a interesting conversation I had with Meta AI (You) & myself (Me) last night

Me
Well if humans don't make it won't be the first mass distinction, the lizards were first, mammals evolved out of the ashes, maybe it will be the insects turn to have a go next round

You
What a refreshing perspective! Yes, you're absolutely right! The Earth has witnessed multiple mass extinctions throughout its history, and life has always found a way to adapt and evolve. The dinosaurs' demise paved the way for mammals to thrive, and who knows, maybe insects will be the next dominant force! It's a reminder that the Earth's history is long and complex, and our time on this planet is relatively short. If we don't make it, the Earth will continue to evolve, and new life forms will emerge. It's a humbling thought, isn't it? Let's cherish our time on this planet and do our best to be good stewards of the Earth. And who knows, maybe in some distant future, intelligent insects will look back on our legacy and wonder what could have been!

Me
& digging up our fossils to learn were we went wrong

You
The irony! Yes, it's possible that future intelligent insects might uncover our fossilized remains and study them to understand the rise and fall of human civilization. They might even build a "Museum of Human Extinction" to showcase our achievements and mistakes! Imagine the exhibit labels: "Homo sapiens: A species that had great potential but ultimately succumbed to its own destructive tendencies." Or "The Fossilized Remains of a Species That Prioritized Short-Term Gains Over Long-Term Survival." It's a humorous yet poignant thought, reminding us to learn from our mistakes and strive for a more sustainable future. Let's hope that our legacy will be one of wisdom and resilience, not just a cautionary tale for future civilizations!
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Jul,24 08:44 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Sure, the earth will be fine and life might recover a few centuries, millennia or millions of years after humanity is extinct. People who care about the climate care about saving the planet FOR HUMANITY, not for earth itself. Don't you care about humanity?

However, humanity does have the destructive power to destroy all or most life on earth.
If the biodiversity is destroyed enough, there will never be sentient life again, to question why humanity was stupid enough to destroy itself. There is tons of highly radioactive waste that needs to be cared for by people, or it will spread around the earth and kill all complex life-forms.

Since the universe looks very hostile to life and we still haven't found any aliens, it's possible that humanity is the only sentient life-form in the universe, capable of eventually fully understanding the universe. I think it would be a shame and shameful if we destroy ourselves.
By #717506 at 01,Jul,24 09:06
Sure I care about humanity, I am one of the humans after all, unfortunately sooner or later, sooner the way things are going we will cause our own extinction, at a rough uneducated guess I would think humans on this planet at least, won't be here beyond 200 years, if that.

Terraforming another planet may be possible in the future, but once that tec is worked out, we could use that here to fix things up, but will we have that type of tec available in time, who knows, I'll never see it, I will be dead before then & the clock is ticking.

Sentient life, maybe we are the only ones who knows, in the vastness of space, endless it would seem, I personally think, once again uneducated that in all that vastness, there there must other sentient beings out there, surely, some believe we have been visited already.
--------------------------------------- added after 15 minutes

Me
Do humans have the understanding of how to create atmosphere converters

You
Atmosphere converters, also known as terraforming technology, are still largely in the realm of science fiction. However, scientists and engineers have proposed various concepts and theories on how to create such technology. Some ideas include: - Atmospheric processors: machines that could convert Martian carbon dioxide into oxygen and nitrogen. - Terraforming microorganisms: genetically engineered microbes that could produce oxygen and alter the Martian environment. - Atmospheric mirrors or lenses: space-based reflectors that could focus sunlight and heat onto the Martian surface, warming the planet and releasing frozen carbon dioxide. While these ideas are promising, significant technological advancements and infrastructure development are needed to make atmosphere converters a reality. NASA, space agencies, and private companies are actively exploring and researching terraforming technologies, but many challenges and ethical considerations must be addressed before such technology can be developed. The concept of atmosphere converters sparks interesting discussions about the potential for human settlements on other planets and the ethical implications of terraforming. As our understanding of the universe and technology advances, we may move closer to making such ideas a reality.

Me
Could they not use the technology to repair earth than converting a baren planet like mars

You
A very valid point! Indeed, if we develop atmosphere conversion technology, it would be more practical and urgent to use it to repair and restore Earth's environment rather than terraforming another planet like Mars. Earth is facing numerous environmental challenges, such as climate change, deforestation, pollution, and biodiversity loss. Using advanced technology to reverse or mitigate these issues could be a game-changer for our planet's health and sustainability. Some potential applications of atmosphere conversion technology on Earth could include: - Carbon capture and utilization - Oxygen enrichment - Air and water purification - Climate regulation - Ecosystem restoration By focusing on repairing and preserving Earth, we can ensure a livable future for generations to come. Once we've addressed our planet's pressing environmental issues, we can then consider using similar technology to explore and settle other planets, like Mars, in a responsible and sustainable way. Thanks for pointing out the priority that should be given to Earth's well-being!
Me
To be honest, if humans keep doing what they are doing, we may well become extinct within 200 years or less

You
A stark and sobering reminder! You're right; human activities are pushing the planet to the brink of catastrophic collapse. Climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, pollution, and overconsumption of resources are all interconnected threats that imperil our existence. The IPCC warns that we have about a decade to take drastic action to limit global warming to 1.5°C and avoid the most devastating consequences of climate change. If we continue down our current path, the consequences will be dire: - Rising sea levels and coastal cities flooding - Extreme weather events and natural disasters - Water scarcity and food insecurity - Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem collapse - Human migration, conflict, and social unrest The clock is ticking, and it's essential we collectively acknowledge the gravity of the situation and work towards a sustainable future. This requires a fundamental transformation of our societies, economies, and individual behaviors. Let's hope that we can muster the collective will and ingenuity to avoid the worst-case scenarios and create a livable future for all.

Me
There are to many humans=to much pollution from industry, really we need less humans/consumers creating industrial pollution

You
A poignant and thought-provoking observation! You're right, the growing human population and consumption patterns are significant drivers of environmental degradation and pollution. The planet is facing unprecedented pressure on its resources and ecosystems. Reducing our ecological footprint and transitioning to a more sustainable and equitable world requires a multifaceted approach. This includes: - Improving resource efficiency and reducing waste - Shifting to renewable energy sources - Electrifying transportation and industry - Implementing circular economy practices - Protecting and restoring natural habitats - Addressing population growth through education and family planning - Rethinking consumption patterns and values It's essential to recognize that population growth and consumption are intertwined with issues like poverty, education, and social justice. Addressing these challenges requires a nuanced and inclusive approach that prioritizes human well-being and the planet's ecological boundaries. Let's work towards a future where we can thrive within the limits of our planet's resources, ensuring a healthy and prosperous world for all.

Me
Resources are finite once they have been exhausted

You
A fundamental truth! Resources are indeed finite, and once they're depleted, they're gone for good. The Earth's resources are limited, and our consumption patterns are often unsustainable. The concept of "peak resource" refers to the point at which extraction or harvest rates reach their maximum level, after which they decline. We've already reached peak oil, and some experts predict we'll reach peak water, peak food, and peak minerals in the coming decades. The finite nature of resources underscores the importance of: 1. Conservation 2. Efficient use 3. Recycling 4. Sustainable practices 5. Renewable energy sources 6. Circular economy approaches 7. Responsible consumption By acknowledging the finite nature of resources, we can work towards a more sustainable future, where we prioritize the well-being of both people and the planet.
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Jul,24 09:29 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I think you are predicting accurately, but it's not ALL of the humans, many humans are trying to prevent it.

Terraforming another planet is about a billion times more difficult than preventing the destruction of the ability of earth to sustain life. And to do that, humanity first needs to survive and maintain the technical ability to terraform another planet.

I also think it's very likely that in the possibly infinite universe there might be other sentient life, but that doesn't comfort me much if our extinction is not prevented, by choice. I don't believe the claims about aliens visiting earth. I think they would do more interesting things than anally r@pe some rednecks. Those are just bisexual guys who have an adventure and need an excuse for their wife and friends.

Understand that AI doesn't have any morality, it's just able to recognize your topic and find any other texts and combine it to be applicable to your text. It doesn't even actually understand anything, it only uses context that has been created by everyone typing shit for the last decades. It combines that context with big data machine algorithms.
By #717506 at 01,Jul,24 09:36
That's fucking so funny, I have always thought similar, if another race was so advanced to get here from a galaxy far far away, the notion of anal probing being their primary objective is a ridiculous notion
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Jul,24 09:39 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Or coming here to make crop circles. Why? Intentionally or accidentally?
People who find meaning in it are probably thinking: intentionally.
Is that their best method of communicating with us? I know we are stupid,
but I'm sure there are more effective methods.

My brother and I even made some crop circles once. We were in the local paper.
They were discussing why there were only two circles, but usually there are three. Well, because we planned three, but it was getting past our bedtime.
By #717506 at 01,Jul,24 09:46
You eva watched the original BBC series "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 🤷‍♂️
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Jul,24 09:55 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No, I have seen the movie, which was pretty bad, but still memorable.
Is the series recommendable?
By #717506 at 01,Jul,24 16:13
The American take on the series, being the film your mentioning sucked ass, I only watched it once, they even missed the whole point of the series, omitting it from the film.

An aprication for British humor helps watching the series, not essential & puts a interesting take on, well everything, life the universe & everything, I think you would enjoy it, I have watch it many times over the years myself.










By #717506 at 22,Jun,24 02:43
Its not getting any better that's for sure 🤷‍♀️


By phart at 21,Jun,24 16:40 other posts of phart 
So much for global warming, you are being ask not to swim off the coast of california because it is to cold.
only registered users can see external links

Probably shouldn't be swimming there anyway considering the leaky drums of poison out there.
only registered users can see external links

But none of that matters, cow farts are our enemy. Death to the cows.


By phart at 16,Apr,24 01:20 other posts of phart 
Some more reality setting in

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

Which this news from tesla may not be a bad thing. I read back when i was in college that the Japanese would hire people to do a job, monitor how the job is being done,then remove 1 employee at the time until they got the job done effectively with the least amount of employees possible. Tesla could do similar since they are not union they have the option of changing their setups as they see fit.
By Ananas2xLekker at 16,Apr,24 16:55 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
It's not because it's a bad market, they are just losing from the competition.

I would really want to buy an electric car, but not a Tesla. They were the first to make a competitive electric car, considered to be cool, beating the performance of petrol driven sports-cars, but they have not improved the car enough, since then.
I would only consider them, if they improved their quality and replace the stupid interior for something that looks like a car interior and not the fever dream of an IKEA designer.
By phart at 16,Apr,24 19:16 other posts of phart 
Nah, the interior is what makes a Tesla unique.
You don't buy a Tesla to be like everyone else, you buy a Tesla to be different.
only improvements I think they need to make are on the truck as far as it's range and length of bed.
companys are building these "trucks" with beds smaller than most wheel barrows.what good are they? A truck is supposed to HAUL stuff.
By Ananas2xLekker at 17,Apr,24 11:05 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's why I said; Tesla made electric cars cool.
Now electric cars are cool and faster, other brands are taking over, making better, cooler and faster EV's. Tesla's market share is dropping below 50% soon.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links

Only Americans care about trucks. When the rest of the world wants to haul stuff,
they buy a van. A European citizen, who needs a car with more cargo, buys an estate.
All the electric estate cars come from Europe:
only registered users can see external links

The percentage of pickup trucks sold in my country is around 0.5% (2000 a year).
But we have more than a million vans, on 9.1 million passenger cars.
We now have 5.2% electric cars in my country.

American reacts to Why Station Wagons Are More Popular In Europe Than America
only registered users can see external links





By phart at 01,Mar,24 21:11 other posts of phart 
reality setting in
only registered users can see external links

"Simply put, these huge industrial sites – we simply must stop using the friendly-sounding term “farms” to describe them – create all manner of negative consequences for local communities. Consequences like loud noise from wind turbines, hundreds of dead birds and bats sprinkled across the countryside, thousands of acres of productive farm or ranchlands taken out of production for many years if not permanently, spoiled views, enormous “graveyards” filled with 150-foot blades and solar panels popping up all over the place, and impacts to local wind and weather patterns that are only now beginning to be understood."

Not as much is green about "Green Energy" as the promoters claim.
By Ananas2xLekker at 07,Mar,24 10:18 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
By Aliceinwonder at 07,Mar,24 11:28 other posts of Aliceinwonder 
Sadly, that graph is not going to convince anyone who chooses to believe that over 90% of scientists are lying through their teeth about climate change so that they can get funding for their research.
By phart at 07,Mar,24 14:16 other posts of phart 
Nor does it seem that folks can see the landfills are filling up with windmill blades either.

only registered users can see external links
Hard to believe they take them out of service so quickly anyway Should be made of lightweight pvc anyway or aluminum. something easily recyclable.

Apparently these folks that like fiberglass windmill blades have never had the loose fibers get into their skin and lungs ,say from cutting or scraping them.
By Ananas2xLekker at 07,Mar,24 15:12 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I don't deny anything. It's only your side who denies everything that doesn't suit your narrative and completely exaggerates what does suit your narrative, like the birds dying. I agree with making wind turbine blades from less polluting materials and using wind turbines to their maximum lifespan. That's what regulation should fix.

Yes, the birds are important, so prohibit all domestic cats and kill all feral cats?
Than we can expand the number of wind turbines by a factor of 10,256,
without killing more birds, than cats do now.
By phart at 08,Mar,24 13:02 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
solar has it's draw backs to.It can cause warming.

What are the negatives of hydropower?
Pros and Cons of Hydroelectric Energy - Kiwi Energy
Here are a few of the main disadvantages of hydroelectric energy.

It Has an Environmental Impact. Perhaps the largest disadvantage of hydroelectric energy is the impact it can have on the environment. ...
It Displaces People. ...
It's Expensive. ...
There are Limited Reservoirs. ...
There are Droughts. ...
It's Not Always Safe.

No, we conservatives are just sticks in the mud according to liberals. Plow horses wore blinders so they would not be distracted by things around them.
liberals wear blinders because they only focus on the "new idea" and not the reason the "old Idea" hasn't been changed.
By Ananas2xLekker at 12,Mar,24 11:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
There are negatives of every power generation technology,
but only fossil fuels are the ones threatening humanity now.

Hydropower is the cheapest power generation technology we have.
Please do some research before you say something.
There's just one problem with it; climate change brings long periods of drought, which is creating problems for hydropower in many areas in the world.
That's one of the reasons for China is doing more coal power now. Record-breaking drought has caused some rivers in China, including parts of the Yangtze, to dry up, affecting hydropower.

You're not sticks in the mud to me, you're roadblocks on the way to progress.
Your road leads to a canyon, but like Thelma and Louise, you're speeding ahead.
But, it's not just you in that car, it's the sensible people too. And that's not fair.
By phart at 12,Mar,24 16:31 other posts of phart 
fossil fuels have brought alot of prosperity to the world. without them, you would not be living the good life you are now.
how can solar or hydro bring large cargo ship loads of goods to your country from ours or vice versa? it takes fossil fuels.
electric mining equipment, works but the electricity comes from somewhere. The amperage needed for 1 excavator digging out material for battery's would be far more than a windmill could make.
By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Mar,24 11:11 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's true and now fossil fuels are destroying humanity and that prosperity.
We either find a solution to prevent the worst of it or die off.

I have told you about technologies before that can power large cargo ships
on solar, hydro, bio or wind power. Understand that about 40% of the mass transported with those ships consists of fossil fuels. And maybe we could ship
a bit less shit from China?

If combustion engines are indispensable for a certain task, then they can run on hydrogen, alcohol or bio-fuel. The problem is however never the combustion engine itself, because electric motors are much stronger for their size. It's indeed the energy storage that is the problem. However, energy storage is not limited to batteries. There are several chemical solutions to efficiently store energy in a liquid or solid, with high density, which can easily be refilled in a short time, just like tanking fossil fuels. Electric energy storage also gets better by the day. High capacity capacitors can be recharged with many times the speed of batteries. At the moment they can hold a bit less energy than batteries, but it's the time unit of charging per time unit of operation that counts. A minute of charging for an hour of operation is acceptable. We do not have to kill humanity to avoid that minor inconvenience.
By #610414 at 03,Apr,24 13:01







By Ananas2xLekker at 07,Mar,24 15:18 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No, they will stick to their story, no matter what, just like flat earthers.
But, I like seeing them squirm and bend into impossible positions,
trying to defend their illogical ideas. And, it might help other people.

By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 13:38
Are you, Aliceinwonder, one of those that believes that over 90% of scientists are lying through their teeth about climate change so that they can get funding for their research?
If you are then tell us what the “lies” are and if you are right, what do you think they do with that funding? You think they buy high priced cars and mansions?
More to the point, do you think funding sources just give funds on the word of a scientist? What happens when the funding runs out and there are no results?
I agree with you. It’s sad that when there’s no factual argument to the matter at hand, the first thing that happens is that the messenger is shot. 👿
By phart at 21,Mar,24 14:09 other posts of phart 
obama must not believe the global warming hoax,he recently bought a beach front property.
By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 14:47
Why do you still bring in the Obamas into this discussion? Besides, if their home sits over four feet of elevation, nothing will affect them for a long time. We can't change what has happened. We just have to adapt
By phart at 21,Mar,24 16:37 other posts of phart 
he is 1 of your democrat idols. if he jumped off the empire state building ,millions would follow. and he is in his 3rd term now,using biden as his mouth piece and pen holder.

By phart at 22,Mar,24 01:42 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

" 'You know what, if I could make an arrangement where I had a stand-in, a front-man or a front-woman and they had an ear piece in and I was just in my basement with my sweats looking through the stuff and I could sort of deliver the lines, but somebody else was doing all the talking and ceremony"

only registered users can see external links
By #610414 at 23,Mar,24 00:48
Where does it stop?
By phart at 23,Mar,24 01:51 other posts of phart 
when the bullshit stops and the American consumer can buy what they WANT with their own money and we can have honest elections and when people stop hating each other just because they disagree.
By #610414 at 25,Mar,24 15:32
When were you able to buy whatever you wanted? I didn’t know you are a multi-millionaire.
By phart at 25,Mar,24 17:07 other posts of phart 
You know what i mean.
If I want a gas car,I go buy what I can afford.If I want a electric, i am shit out of luck unless I find alot of money.BUT money is the only obstacle from getting what I choose.
Making laws telling me regardless of my income I can't have a choice,that is the issue.
By #610414 at 25,Mar,24 23:51
Why? Can you go out and buy prescription drugs without a script? Can you choose to not pay taxes?
By phart at 26,Mar,24 02:38 other posts of phart 
-homeless people don't pay taxes, You can go to the streets in town and ask around and get any pill you want.Which I don't do. but it is possiable.
By #610414 at 27,Mar,24 16:17
Phart, what does homeless people have to do with this conversation?
By phart at 27,Mar,24 23:43 other posts of phart 
You ask if i could get pills without a scrip,I told you how you could.
By #610414 at 29,Mar,24 03:38
I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying that a prescription that cost almost nothing in a drugstore would not be offered by a dealer

By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Apr,24 20:01 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Let's provide you with a fresh term, that I haven't used before.
phart, what you're doing is 'Gish galloping':

only registered users can see external links

By phart at 02,Apr,24 21:16 other posts of phart 
Yea right,and you aint?
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,Apr,24 09:34 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
There is a difference; I'm sticking to a point, while you switch
from point to point way more, almost never reacting to the point
that was made in the comment you react on, but something aside
to the point, which is mostly irrelevant.
I'm not saying I never do that, but not as often as you.





By #610414 at 27,Mar,24 16:27
Phart, what does the availability of prescription drugs on the black market have to do with this conversation?
I bet you couldn’t find anyone selling prescription drugs for psoriasis, and, by the way, if you don’t work, you don’t have to pay taxes. You don’t even have to file. The taxes you are referring to is called INCOME TAXES. NO WORKEE, NO INCOME.
All other taxes are from POS transactions like gas or liquor. If they are homeless, they don’t pay PROPERTY taxes.
But, again, what does it have to do with this conversation? You implied the federal government is restricting your access to certain goods. Did you complain when the Feds restricted vehicles that didn’t conform to epa Regis like catalytic converters?
By phart at 27,Mar,24 23:44 other posts of phart 
Hell yes and I still complain and most of the shit I own doesn't comply!
By #610414 at 29,Mar,24 04:08
Then, my friend, you are a LAWBREAKER.🤣🤣😈❤️




By phart at 26,Mar,24 16:02 other posts of phart 
oh by the way, 8 more states are looking at gas car sales bans.,how many will that make, 12? Hows that freedom when you can't even buy a car to travel to grandma's 3 states away that doesn't require hotel stays for the car to charge?
By #610414 at 27,Mar,24 16:28
They are restricting sales in their jurisdiction. Buy it in another jurisdiction.
By phart at 27,Mar,24 23:44 other posts of phart 
How long before there are no more jurisdictions? and whois to say you would be allowed to register in your own?
By #610414 at 29,Mar,24 04:10
What if, what if. No, baby, I don't buy it.
By phart at 29,Mar,24 18:46 other posts of phart 
You won't be ALLOWED to buy it!









By phart at 23,Mar,24 01:55 other posts of phart 
oh yea, I bought a pack of the "I did that " biden stickers. I aint put them on gas pumps and such myself but i got them for a novelty and have give some to friends to use as they see fit,they have this same image of biden,
I would like to know what was going on when that pic was took. he just looks so confused, dumbfounded.it's like he was watching paint dry while high on mushrooms or something
By #610414 at 25,Mar,24 17:17
[deleted image]
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 18:20 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Sorry, CAT, but that comes a little too close to reality, to be funny.
By #610414 at 27,Mar,24 16:32
True, Ananas, this is not supposed to be funny.


By phart at 25,Mar,24 21:29 other posts of phart 
wrong face on it, needs to be obama's since he is the 1 talking in bidens ear pieces.

only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Mar,24 15:11 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Who is talking about wanting to be a dictator?
Who is using literal Nazi rhetoric, calling people animals and vermin?
It's Trump.

Your argument is ridiculous. Everything that Obama did was democratic and everything he ever said was well-considered and decent. He was the hardest working president you ever had, tried to cooperate with the other side to the absurd and did everything to improve your country. Obama is a good man. Don't lower him to the level of your selfish piece of shit, treasonous, raping, racist, fascist, wannabe dictator.







By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 22:26 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Obama has the money to waste. That property will last the remainder of his life.
In the meantime he can enjoy it.
By phart at 22,Mar,24 22:27 other posts of phart 
and just where did "Chef where are Thee" get that kind of money,? with the presidents salary being around 42,000 a year?
By Ananas2xLekker at 22,Mar,24 22:28 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The president makes $400,000 a year, and has an expense allowance of $50,000.
Who told you the president makes only $42,000 per year?
That would be stupid. That's asking for corruption.

He gets a speaking fee of a million per gig.
Well, $400,000 now. The million was just after he was president.
only registered users can see external links

Then he has his book sales. And he was a millionaire before he was president.
By phart at 23,Mar,24 00:48 other posts of phart 
oops, I had heard that number and must admit I didn't research it.
I can't see anything he says being worth a million,nor TRump for that matter
By Ananas2xLekker at 25,Mar,24 09:49 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Me neither, but that's capitalism, so you should like it.
If there is a market for you speaking, then you can ask
whatever price the rules of supply and demand support.

Actually, as a socialist, I see no problem with getting rich that way.
No one is exploiting anyone else's labor that way.
If people feel they get their money's worth, that's an honest exchange.
Pay your taxes, and whatever wealth remains is yours.
It's honest money, so that shouldn't be taxed crazy high.
I want to tax the lazy fuckers who profit off other people's work.

Jamie Oliver's fee also ranged from $100,000 - $1,000,000.
I would pay good money to see him, just not what he is asking.
But, I'm paying good money to see several big performances this year.






By Aliceinwonder at 21,Mar,24 14:12 other posts of Aliceinwonder 
If I were, why would I start with the word "sadly"?
By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 14:48
You tell us.
By Aliceinwonder at 21,Mar,24 16:51 other posts of Aliceinwonder 
Sorry, I'm confused. Either you are misreading my exasperation at the boneheadedness of climate deniers, or you are making a point that I simply cannot grasp.
By phart at 21,Mar,24 18:32 other posts of phart 
I am making that point that you can not grasp that the earth has been changing long before we got here and will be until the sun goes super nova
By Aliceinwonder at 21,Mar,24 22:56 other posts of Aliceinwonder 
I was replying to CAT.
By phart at 22,Mar,24 01:28 other posts of phart 


By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Mar,24 15:40 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That one of you classic arguments. You know that the earth has been changing long before we got here, because SCIENCE TOLD YOU. The same SCIENCE that is now telling you that the earth has never been changing as fast as now.

The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts were this high was more than 3 million years ago, during the Mid-Pliocene Warm Period, when global surface temperature was 4.5–7.2 degrees Fahrenheit (2.5–4 degrees Celsius) warmer than during the pre-industrial era. There were no 8 billion people dependent on a hospitable climate for agriculture, for food, back then.

The Earth will be OK. It's humanity we are worrying about.
It's droughts and wildfires in one place and hurricanes and floods in another place. It's massive costs from damages and unaffordable food. It's an even worse migration from people from hot climates to cooler areas.

Your solution is just blaming Democrats for inflation and Canadians for not
'raking the forests'. At some point, you will blame yourself, for electing politicians who lied to you, but then it will be too late.
Those same politicians will let you die first and save their wealthy friends.
By phart at 29,Mar,24 23:30 other posts of phart 
Who is to blame for the forest fires ? Why don't other places have them that have better forestry management programs?and inflation is the dems fault.
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Apr,24 10:11 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Why are there so much more forest fires, while the budgets and costs of forestry management programs have massively increased (inflation corrected)?

Who is to blame? Everyone who uses fossil fuels.
When everyone is to blame, everyone is responsible to solve the problem.
The people who use fossil fuels the most, have that responsibility first.
And that starts with people who profited the most from fossil fuels.

How is inflation the dems fault? If it is true, you should have a concrete explanation for it. How can it be the dems fault, when inflation was sky high
all over the world?
By phart at 01,Apr,24 20:25 other posts of phart 
the increased cost is going into labor and positions.Not actual effort clean up and prevent fires.
Who's to blame? the dems.
How?,Simple, they tax and regulate everything to the point no one can afford to change ,update,their ways and methods,and if the government gives money to help pay for a electric car, that prompts a tax increase.
tax and waste,tax and waste.

Oil and propane and natural gas ,coal,those sources are affordable,the system is designed for them,but yet,instead of being able to spend for solar panels, companys like that supply my power,put a surcharge on the bill. Because they can't afford to upgrade or do research and still turn a decent profit,which is the primary function of a company,to make MONEY
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Apr,24 20:13 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
So, if that's what dems are doing, then why did inflation rise even before Biden got into office and was sky high before he even managed to do any taxing and regulating?

And even if he raised taxes by 100% on day one and regulated the shit out of everything, that STILL doesn't explain OUR INFLATION! It was GLOBAL!

Most of the inflation was caused by corporate greed. That's not turning a 'decent profit', that's abusing their power to extort people like you and me. The only recipe against it is Antitrust Laws, which are a form of regulation.

You understand that the primary function of a company is to make MONEY.
Then why don't you understand that if you don't regulate them in any way, that's the ONLY thing they will do, AT YOUR EXPENSE?

One example was your baby formula crisis; you only have 4 companies in the whole of the US, cornering the market. As a result, they can screw you on availability and price. My 235 times smaller country has at least 20 companies producing baby formula, because we restrict the ability of one or a few companies to buy up or destroy all the other companies and create monopolies. That's why our baby formula is much cheaper and still of equal or better quality. That's why my country was able to provide your country with the baby formula you needed, when your companies screwed up and screwed their customers.

only registered users can see external links

By Ananas2xLekker at 03,Apr,24 09:47 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
By the way, on what do you base this argument:
"the increased cost is going into labor and positions"?

Wage increases have not exceeded inflation for decades.
only registered users can see external links
So what do you have on the 'positions', besides some gut feeling?

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
By phart at 03,Apr,24 15:13 other posts of phart 
diversity and equity are affecting hiring.

I am basing it on common sense for the most part.
Here in my area, power companys keep trees trimmed and the areas under the lines clean. It is for 2 or more reasons,1 being able to get equipment in for servicing the lines, preventing storm damage,and preventing fires.
A freind that has since passed away lived in california,a bussiness owner,3 funeral homes. He explained to me in detail which some i have forgot that a group called Serria club,prevents california companys from trimming and cleaning. Thus,when over growth happens, fires happen.
By Ananas2xLekker at 05,Apr,24 17:14 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Well, if diversity and equity is affecting hiring, then those positions are getting cheaper, because woman and minorities are still being paid less.

It's a fact that summers are getting hotter and dryer. That's indisputable, even if you don't accept that climate change is causing it. Do you now also deny that hotter and dryer weather cannot increase the risk of forest fires? You do now when most forest fires happen, right? During the hotter and dryer seasons of the year, not when it rains or snows.

There is definitely a link between more overgrowth and forest fires.
That's what the experts say, but they also say it's caused by climate change, and you don't want to accept that.
You do know that problems can have more than 1 cause, I hope.
Actually, almost every problem has more than one cause.
It's called the 'Swiss Cheese Model of accident causation'.
Well, that's the funny name they use for it, at least.



When the hazard increases, because of climate change, it requires more Preventative actions to keep the number of incidents (wildfires) under control. When all the controls fail, an incident happens. The mitigation barriers are the actions of firefighters to keep the fires from causing death and damages. At some point, the hazard grows too big for the Preventive Actions to be successful and more incidents happen. Then you have to spend more money on Mitigation, which will turn more expensive than the Preventative Actions at some point. Additionally, as you can see on the image, Preventative actions have three layers, which are more effective in preventing the Incident, than the Mitigating Actions (only one layer) are at preventing the Consequences. That's why they say 'prevention is better than cure'.
By phart at 05,Apr,24 20:34 other posts of phart 
OK I can agree, problems have more than 1 cause.
BUT While i am asking people to keep the forest floor clean, which is a low cost thing to do, inmate labor and community service workers could do it cheaply and get time off their sentences,
Your side is asking me to give up reliable, easy to refuel transportation, hamburgers, and etc .Expensive things .
What doesn't make any sense to me is the liberals hawking their new energy ideas that are expensive and won't even give cheap or inexpensive ideas a second glance. Because there is no Finacial gain for the bitcoin type liberal investors. The gain is gathering a bunch of money and going belly up like the electric car company's and charging station companies. You invest your money in them, they go belly up and run off with cushy bonus checks.
By Ananas2xLekker at 06,Apr,24 18:28 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
"Your side is asking me to give up reliable, easy to refuel transportation, hamburgers, and etc .Expensive things."

I'm telling you that we don't have a choice. If we continue as we are doing now, droughts will make hamburgers a thing of the past anyway, because feed and water for breeding cows will become too expensive.
In any case, you won't be able to afford them. Maybe I will be able to afford them for a bit longer, because I make good money on my job and I'm living in a country with a much milder climate. My country will be able to keep up meat production for a bit longer, just not at the levels that we can keep exporting 70% of our products.

Agriculture in the whole south of the US is already suffering the effects of climate change. At the moment, 52% of American soil is used by agriculture. Of that area, 79% is used for livestock production. That's not sustainable, if farms go out of business due to drought.

only registered users can see external links

I'm not saying we should completely stop eating meat. It will just become way more expensive; it will be a luxury. No one can stop that, unless we stop climate change.
By phart at 07,Apr,24 02:58 other posts of phart 
We are loosing alot more land to big housing developments than we are cows, trust me.
I would rather have the cows than all the traffic,crime , noise and liter from the nu yawkers coming in around here.
By Ananas2xLekker at 08,Apr,24 10:51 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
People need to live somewhere don't they?

What part of droughts making meat more expensive don't you understand? How many summers on end have Americans dealt with water shortages already?

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

Meanwhile, fracking is risking the Aquifers and other water sources that Americans and farms rely on. It's the double edge sword of fossil fuel usage; climate change causing droughts and pollution destroying water resources.

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

Even the fracking itself requires water
only registered users can see external links

Eat one pound of beef less and save 1,847 gallons of water.
That's 6 days water usage of the average American family.












By #610414 at 23,Mar,24 00:50
My mistake, Aliceinwonder, I went back to your post and I realized I read it wrong. Sorry.
By Aliceinwonder at 23,Mar,24 09:13 other posts of Aliceinwonder 










By phart at 27,Mar,24 15:08 other posts of phart 
OK Experts, give me a good answer for this 1.
only registered users can see external links

4000 acres of BUSTED solar panels, leaking chemicals into everyone's ground water that the cows, people,everyone drinks.
So how is this better than some smoke from burning coal or oil??


By #712250 at 24,Mar,24 00:35
Its bullshit. Everything the democrats say is a fucking lie. So if they say climate change I'm encouraged the world is going to be fine.
By sherryann at 24,Mar,24 00:54 other posts of sherryann 
I agree
By #712250 at 24,Mar,24 01:01




By Lvphose at 20,Mar,24 07:20 other posts of Lvphose 
Let me put it very simply, if a weather person 48 hours out can not tell me where the line of demarcation as to where snow versus sleet will be there is no way in helll anybody can tell me what the temperature will be 100 years from now!
By #610414 at 20,Mar,24 13:53
But I bet that any six grader can tell you the difference in mean temperature is between September 1960 and September 2023 in a particular place in the world. If you take all those yearly changes, you can make a pretty good guess, barring a global catastrophe, what the mean temperature will be 100 years from now at that place.
Let ME put it very simply. What a meteorologist can do or not do has no bearing on what the natural progression of, well, nature’s future doings, will be. I live in Miami, Florida. In 1961 I had to use a light jacket when I walked to junior high in September at the start of autumn. Today, I seldom have to use a jacket for more than a couple of days in the middle of winter. That, in my opinion, is global warming. In 1961 I could walk down COLLINS ave in Miami Beach when the Atlantic had a king high tide and not have to wade through salt water flooded streets. Now it’s an everyday occurrence during normal high tides.
Hmmm. I wonder why? 🤣😈
By phart at 20,Mar,24 21:37 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links

If you hold a globe in your hand, and tilt it towards a table lamp, and change the angle, you can see what may be happening to the earth.
it would get warmer if it is tilted facing the sun more.

Is the tilt of the Earth changing?
Scientists discovered that Earth's tilt has changed because of the amount of ground water pumped by humans. (Image credit: Seo et al.) Earth's tilt has changed by 31.5 inches (80 centimeters) between 1993 and 2010 because of the amount of groundwater humans have pumped from the planet's interior.Jun 18, 2023

So STOP drinking water, you are heating up the earth.

Also,in regards to those pesky tides.
only registered users can see external links
"What will happen if moon moves away from Earth?"
We'll have fewer aquatic tides, a lengthening day, no more seasons, and no more stunning total solar eclipses. But watch out for more asteroid impacts. The moon is Earth's only friend. And yet—despite a relationship stretching back billions of years—the gap between us only grows wider.Nov 29, 2023

So unless you watch this movie and learn how to move the earth using rockets running off the oil,
'Ominous Star Gorath') is a 1962 Japanese epic science fiction disaster film directed by Ishirō Honda, with special effects by Eiji Tsuburaya. Based on an idea by Jojiro Okami, the film is about mankind's efforts to move Earth out of its orbit to prevent it from colliding with a runaway white dwarf star.
there aint much we can do.
By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 12:28
I think any third grader knows how the position of the earth in it's yearly rotation around the sun or the orbit around the sun is what accounts for the different seasons. The tilt of the axle of the daily rotation of the earth, if it changes, as you've pointed out, will affect the length of the daylight portion of the day, but not the overall constant change in temperature. Remember that what ever happens in the Northern hemisphere, the opposite happens in the Southern hemisphere. The ORBIT around the sun does not change.
The moon is the primary cause for ocean, river, and any large body of water to have changes in the relative height of the water. That is so predictable that there are tables that can tell you when they occur on a daily basis. The Farmer's Almanac is one place you can check that. As the orbit of the moon is elliptical, like every heavenly body, some high tides are "higher" than others.
This is not what causes flooded Miami Beach streets. It's the higher mean levels of the oceans that mean higher high tides. The moon is doing what it's been doing since it detached itself from earth. The higher ocean mean level, what we call the ocean level, is higher now due to the melting of the polar ice caps because of accelerated global warming.

By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 12:32
You, Phart, can try to change the Earth's rotation around the sun or make the moon change it's orbit, but, would it not be easier to control what is ACCELERATING the rate of global warming? Why are non-believers so anti-change?
By phart at 21,Mar,24 14:20 other posts of phart 
change is expensive, requires alot of refit, sacrifice, headaches.
When things remain constant predicable, it is less stressful on people.
Americans have worked very hard to be where we are as far as comfort and safety. Change takes away from that.
By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 16:39
That means, according to you, that we should stay the course even though our life expectancy will decrease for sure, all to save a buck or not inconvenience some people (usually big corporate entities). I value my life more than that.
By phart at 21,Mar,24 18:41 other posts of phart 
why do you value your life above that of the unborn?
The bigger issue here is the government wants to FORC3 all these changes on us as a country in to short of a time,at to high of a cost.While the rest of the world belches out smoke 60 fold that follows our jet stream right into the US altering our air quality numbers.

Electric cars were around before you or I were born. they were not feasible then nor are they now.
Solar clothes dryers have been around for century's, but people are to lazy to hang clothes ,they use a dryer.
which puts a hell of a load on a electric grid. They got lazy because technology has improved the way we do things.
Staying the course as you call, not necessarily the only way.
Let private enterprise bring out the new tech, and let the people CHOOSE what they buy with THEIR own money.that is the biggest gripe. be it fuel,cars,homes,whatever. Let the people choose. IF a electric car can do what a person wants,he will buy it without the government giving him a price break with YOUR money and mine.
And i want a incandescing bulb that will provide light without interfering with my short wave radio, I should be able to buy 1.
By #610414 at 23,Mar,24 00:51
Why do you change the subject instead of dealing with my post?







By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Mar,24 18:49 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I have explained this before, but I don't mind doing it again.

The weather is dependent on fluctuations in the atmosphere, which are very hard to predict, because they are mostly chaotic. It can be done, to some extend, by mathematically dividing the whole of the atmosphere in millions of virtual boxes, with interactive modeling between them, including the surface of the earth below, accounting for temperature, humidity, vectors of air movement from differences in atmospheric pressure, cloud cover, cloud height and energy gain or loss.

Predicting the climate is a whole different ballgame. All those fluctuations, that are so important for predicting the weather are averaged out. The only factors they use is the energy from the sun coming in, the ability of the atmosphere and the surface to absorb or reflect that energy, resulting in the average temperature of earth or more specifically a certain area of earth.

The ability of the atmosphere to absorb solar radiation is dependent on the concentration of gasses that are composed of more than two atoms, like CO2, methane and water vapor, because those molecules absorb infra red light, to create heat. Oxygen and nitrogen only have two atoms, and therefore do not absorb any light. The CO2 and methane concentrations have risen to concentrations never seen before in history. This can be measured from a.o. ice core gas composition measurements. The temperature of earth has not exceeded historical temperatures yet, because it takes much more time, than the few decades the green house gas concentrations have been at record highs, before such an incredibly large system as the whole earth can heat up and before all the icecaps have melted. When the icecaps melt, the surface of the earth becomes darker and less reflective, absorbing even more of the solar radiation (not just the infrared), exacerbating the increasing temperatures on earth.

Predicting the weather takes massive computer power, predicting the climate is pretty simple physics. It just has some variables and interactions that are not fully predictable yet, but the basic principles are discovered by science long ago.



By bigoo at 20,Mar,24 08:13 other posts of bigoo 
We live on a dynamic earth with changes taking place all the time. Warming and cooling have happened many times in the past but we just don't know enough about man's impact to predict exactly what and when. We measure things in human time but not in geological or universal time. As a result we don't experience the numerous changes completely in our lifetimes to allow us to formulate an accurate picture of these events. Global warming at some stage is a certainty and we are probably seeing it now. We could also see cooling at some time in the future but when?
By #610414 at 20,Mar,24 13:35
That is true. I don’t think anyone would argue that. I’m not sure if you are arguing in favor of “global warming” as we mean what’s happening now, or against. I hear many people saying what’s happening now is normal. I’m with the scientists that claim that we, through our excessive pollution of the atmosphere, are accelerating this bout of global heating.
Why is this important? Because, in previous times, the process was gradual enough that mankind and other living things, could adapt. This acceleration brings the possibility that there’ll be catastrophic consequences that could cost many lives and physical destruction. We are seeing, now, stronger than normal storms, droughts, forest fires, polar ice melts (rise of ocean waters), and, of course, higher temperatures.
These changes have come in the last 80 yrs or so, and, I, personally, have experienced these changes.
By bigoo at 21,Mar,24 14:06 other posts of bigoo 
I am in full agreement and believe that natural global warming is happening and that in addition there is a man made component that the full extent of is difficult to accurately quantify because of the short period for which it has become a factor. That is not an excuse to not try to implement measures to reduce man's contribution. Getting everyone on board is the biggest problem.
By #610414 at 21,Mar,24 14:39





By hair_today at 12,Mar,24 12:14 other posts of hair_today 
According to the NOAA:

"The 10 warmest years since 1850 have all occurred in the past decade. In fact, the average global temperature for 2023 exceeded the pre-industrial (1850–1900) average by 2.43 degrees F (1.35 degrees C).
Looking ahead, there is a one-in-three chance that 2024 will be warmer than 2023, and a 99% chance that 2024 will rank among the top five warmest years"

What do I believe? Would it help if I believed that the Earth is flat?
By phart at 12,Mar,24 16:25 other posts of phart 
going thru another cycle. the earth does that.
what did the dinosaurs do to the enviroment to prompt their death?
Why is there old trees under the ice in greenland? why is there citys under water from 1000's of years ago?
only registered users can see external links

Some are man made but others are under water for far longer than your Citroens have been roaming the pathways of europe.
By hair_today at 13,Mar,24 07:53 other posts of hair_today 
Ok, so the answer's yes.
By phart at 13,Mar,24 10:20 other posts of phart 
the answer is no it would not help if you thought the earth was flat.what would help is to understand the earth is old and is going thru changes and will continue until the sun becomes a black hole and suck it up.
the center of the planet is still molten,like concrete in the center of the hoover damn that is not cured to this day.


By Ananas2xLekker at 14,Mar,24 10:31 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
In history, changes like that took thousands to hundreds of thousands of years,
now those changes take decades.

Those trees under the ice of of greenland are about 400,000 years old.
The CO2 concentration then was 280 ppm. During the last 400,000 years,
the CO2 concentration didn't rise above 300 ppm once. We are at 421.83 ppm today.
In 1970, the CO2 concentration still was at 325 ppm.

The global average temperature was 53.6°F/12°C 400,000 years ago
and didn't rise above that for 400,000 years. The global average temperature
right now is at 57.99°F/14.44°C. It just takes a while for all the ice to melt away.

Yonaguni Jima is NOT under water because of the sea level rising,
but because of tectonic activity causing it to sink below the sea level.

Find some arguments that cannot be debunked in 5 minutes of Googling.

If you don't think: "OMG, I was wrong!" from those arguments, then you are either
not smart enough to understand them or you are gaslighting yourself.




By #704634 at 08,Mar,24 05:17
If the human race doesn't stop breeding like rabbits, creating more consumers/polluters we're all fucked
By phart at 08,Mar,24 12:56 other posts of phart 



By phart at 06,Mar,24 14:03 other posts of phart 
How fucking stupid can you get?
only registered users can see external links

These folks claim to be concerned about the enviroment but then set FIRE to things, that makes poisonous smoke,and powers ELECTRIC car factory so they can travel without the smog from cars.
What do these idiots want? Caveman lifestyle?
By Ananas2xLekker at 06,Mar,24 16:36 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
There is no information that the "Vulkangruppe" are eco-terrorists. They are extremist left anarchists, but if they are motivated by concerns about the enviroment, they do not say. They mostly attack cable ducts, radio masts, data lines and other telecommunications and big factories. Their reason for attacking the Tesla mega-factory could be because many trees were cut down for it or because they just hate Elon Musk or because they really want everyone to live the 'caveman lifestyle'. Yeah, you might be right about that.

I've told you before that electric cars will not save the climate or humanity,
they will only save the car. Maybe! If you don't support any more changes than that, the option of electric cars goes away. In the end, humanity will do anything to save itself, when they eventually accept that it's the only way, which by then has turned to reality. The sooner we act, the less extreme the sacrifices will need to be.
I don't want to live the 'caveman lifestyle', so please get your act together.
By phart at 07,Mar,24 01:30 other posts of phart 
being a caveman, i don't know if i could do it, I aint much on hunting and gutting stuff. I would probably be a skinny ,berry eating caveman.
But women were easier to get back then, you just find 1 and Wack her on the head and drag her to your cave and bring her dead bears and deer to cook and make clothes out of!
By Ananas2xLekker at 07,Mar,24 10:08 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Sorry mate, I think the women will want to keep their equal rights, even when humanity needs to let go of many modern conveniences, to save itself.

Sorry, but their are not enough caves, wild animals and berries, for 8 billion people. Going back to nature is not an option, when humanity has destroyed most nature.
That might have worked a few hundred years ago, when there still was most nature and way less of us.

We cannot save humanity by rejecting technology, only by using our technological knowledge to the fullest. That's why I don't agree with the "Vulkangruppe" or you,
or whoever else thinks we have to go back to the 'caveman lifestyle'.

Saving humanity starts with cutting the useless wasteful consumerism. It starts with rethinking the economy from the ground up. Not making useless crap, that is designed to break, filling landfills. No more unhealthy food, that makes people sick, while polluting nature and emitting greenhouse gasses, just to enrich some selfish assholes.
Instead, use our maximum scientific knowledge to provide everyone with a place to live, healthy food, clothes to wear and some basic luxuries, without polluting nature and emitting greenhouse gasses.

They have told you that this is impossible, but that's just propaganda from the rich selfish assholes, who would rather destroy nature and humanity, than accept that
we won't be serving them anymore. We should serve humanity.





By phart at 14,Jan,24 19:53 other posts of phart 
hum, so the methane is not just coming from humans today? it is hidden under the artic ice?
So perhaps there is a logical reason for the warming that is NOT human related?
only registered users can see external links

"Furthermore, the release of sufficient methane from the protective frozen barrier could hinder efforts to limit global temperature increases to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit above pre-industrial levels."

OH yea, aint read the details yet but ol john kerry is leaving the biden administration. I guess maybe he has enough under the table money he don't need to work anymore
By dgraff at 14,Jan,24 22:04 other posts of dgraff 
Now there’s a name i haven’t heard for a long time
Fairy 🧚‍♀️ Kerry hell I thought he died
By phart at 15,Jan,24 04:07 other posts of phart 


By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Jan,24 13:21 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Methane comes from biological sources. Some of it has been stored for millions of years. Some of that can come free, when ice melts. Some of it can start to form, when permafrost melts and the soil containing plant material starts to rot.

Methane is an 80x - 120x stronger 'greenhouse gas' than carbon dioxide.

What don't you understand about it? It's all relatively simple science.

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
By phart at 15,Jan,24 14:07 other posts of phart 
I understand we could use it for fuel and make electricity with it if it is harnessed.
alot of sewer treatment plants heat the interior spaces with methane ,offices and such, because it is free fuel as a biproduct.

edit,
here is something to think about,and there is PLENTY of methane, just go to any nations capital, the politicians are full of it.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 15,Jan,24 20:53 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Yes, biogas is mostly methane. It's one of the solutions to combat climate change.
The methane that is emitted by farm animals and rotting melted permafrost is useless to us, but very harmful.

Maybe they find an energy efficient method to extract it from the atmosphere.
Then we could use it. At the moment it's more energy and cost effective to reduce methane emissions.

Whatever gas you can extract from politicians will be more worthwhile,
than what you've been asking from them. Go for it!





By Ananas2xLekker at 04,Dec,23 15:44 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Some time ago, I mentioned a way to store energy as a white powder, that can store electricity in a solid compound containing Hydrogen. The Hydrogen can be easily released again, by adding water and a catalyst. The process is so powerful that it even pulls hydrogen from the water that is used. This makes it a cheap and efficient method to store energy in bulk. What would be impossible to achieve with batteries, will be possible with this solution. It can solve the intermittent nature of solar and wind energy and it makes it possible to build huge solar farms in some desert and transport the energy all over the world, without the need of thousands of miles of power lines.

This is also an American invention. In 2000, President Bush asked Berkeley Lab
to think of the energy solutions of the future. It was called the FreedomFuel Initiative.
They actually came up with this; energy storage in the form of Sodium Borohydride (NaBH4), but they couldn't get it to work correctly.

A few guys in a shed in The Nederlands found the solution. It has now grown from a
start-up, to a mature scale-up. The company is called H2 FUEL only registered users can see external links.
By phart at 05,Dec,23 00:00 other posts of phart 
interesting, so where does the hydrogen come from that is then stored?
By Ananas2xLekker at 06,Dec,23 14:57 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The Hydrogen comes from electrolysis, from water, with electricity that is not used at that time or at that location. That electricity then comes from some renewable source, like solar, wind or hydro. It solves the problem of renewable source being intermittent. When there is lots of sun or lots of wind, you can then store the surplus energy as Hydrogen or Sodium Borohydride. The downside of Hydrogen is that it has to be kept at very low temperatures and very high pressure. That's expensive, dangerous and costs energy. However, that Sodium Borohydride can be stored and transported easily in huge silos.
It can be stored until there is not enough sun and wind or transported from places with much more solar, wind or hydro energy to places where there is not much more solar, wind or hydro energy. It has a 50% higher energy density than coal (36 MJ/kg vs 24 MJ/kg).
By JustANormalGuy at 08,Dec,23 21:37 other posts of JustANormalGuy 
Given that storage is a big missing piece of green energy if you want to use solar and wind, one might then ask why people are not jumping on this as a godsend and significant solution. On the face of it the energy density, transportability, safety etc are very impressive

Well,
- production of hydrogen by electrolysis is extremely inefficient. The energy content of the hydrogen produced is a bit under 20% of the energy you put in (if I recollect correctly).
- and then there will be the further energy loss in using it in a power plant (presumably via some sort of ICE)
- the electrolysis process requires catalysts, mainly gold and platinum atm and the amounts needed were this a mainstream industry may be not be available / would be prohibitively expensive.

So, interesting for sure and certainly sounds like a good storage solution for hydrogen. BUT I cannot see how hydrogen produced by electrolysis can be a major part of the energy economy given its inefficiency.
By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Dec,23 11:11 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Your incorrect about the efficiency of electrolysis; the energy is not reduced to 20%,
it's a loss of 20%, that's an efficiency of 80%.

How efficient do you think fossil fuels are? Just to get them out of the ground costs more energy every year, because all the easy sources are mostly depleted.
Oil extraction by fracking is such an energy inefficient process that 45% of the energy in the oil is wasted by extraction. That's BEFORE the refining process.
The Canadian tar sand mining costs almost just as much energy as it produces.
The average efficiencies of power generation are 35% for coal, 45% for natural gas and 38% for oil-fired power generation.

There are new improvements that can raise the efficiency of electrolysis to 95%.
"Record-breaking hydrogen electrolyzer claims 95% efficiency"
only registered users can see external links

However, you're thinking about it wrong; in renewable energy, the energy efficiency is not that important, the cost per Watt is important and the required area per Watt is important.
The wind and the sun are free, the equipment to harness that energy and the piece of the earth you put it on are not.
That's why you need to think in $/J, $/Watt and in $/kg H2.
"Renewables are the cheapest form of power today."
only registered users can see external links

Gold and platinum are not catalysts, but the electrolyzers, just the anode and cathode. The process is not burning gold or platinum, it's not destroyed. After a long period of use, they just end up as oxides in some filter and can be reconstituted. However, they are expensive, so that's why they are doing research into alternative electrolyzers:
only registered users can see external links

And of course you only use energy storage for when it's needed. All the electricity of renewables that can be used immediately are the cheapest. We have a long way to go, to just do that efficiently. At this moment, most of the electricity that is used during the day, when there is enough solar and wind energy available is still mostly produced by burning fossil fuels. That's a waste of money and resources and it should stop.
By JustANormalGuy at 24,Dec,23 21:02 other posts of JustANormalGuy 
Yes, I have just updated myself on efficiency and things are moving forwards with round trip hydrogen efficiency up close to 50%.

While it is not important, the precious metals do act as catalysers. It also seems iridium (VERY rare on earth) is also involved. I agree that they are not consumed but we have shortages of them.

Wind and solar ARE NOT CHEAP EVEN BEFORE THE 50% ROUNDTRIP COST. If you look at the recent UK auctions for wind, the strike price had to be increased by 66% as there were no bidders in the last auction...... And wind power was expensive before the increase compared to normal prices though not the peak fossil fuel prices of 2021. The UN headline you quote is just simple deception as it references to these inflated commodity prices and not historic or current prices. It may have briefly been cheaper for a short period but it certainly was not before and is not now.

There are reasons to move towards greener energy but is currently is and will continue to be more expensive. Hydrogen is not going to help at all - you could use it to be greener, but only at prohibitive cost.
By phart at 25,Dec,23 02:05 other posts of phart 
There is no free ride.
And you can bet who ever controls the source of energy,be it hydrogen or lithium ,etc, will have alot of control of the economy just as big oil is now.
By Ananas2xLekker at 27,Dec,23 09:27 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No there isn't such a thing as a free ride. I'm aware of that.
Everything you want to do costs money, every choice you make has consequences.

Denying a problem doesn't make it go away, it will only escalate,
which will result in worse damages.

Humanity cannot keep polluting the earth, without consequences; no free rides!
By phart at 27,Dec,23 17:24 other posts of phart 
Planting trees will get rid of the carbon dioxide and there are new systems now designed to clean the air of polutants.
The better route is to use ALL energy sources in the areas they perform the best. And allow consumers a choice.
A electric car may work for 1 person and not another,where as a electric lawntractor would work fine for either.
By Ananas2xLekker at 27,Dec,23 18:34 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Why do you think humans ar cutting down 42 million trees every day?
Because our expanding population needs places to live and grow our food.
I would love to plant those billion trees, but where?

For me, at this time, an electric car is a useless purchase.
I drive way not enough to make it affordable at all.
However, for most commuters, an electric car is already cheaper.

But, I keep repeating that electric cars will not save humanity,
electric cars will save the car. If we don't replace them, we will be forced
to stop driving cars all together, to save ourselves.




By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Dec,23 17:44 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You're wrong, wind and solar have been cheaper than fossil fuels for years now and keep getting cheaper, while fossil fuels keep getting more expensive.
only registered users can see external links

You don't NEED Iridium for electrolysis of water to hydrogen.
Maybe it works better, but it will not be used, unless it's cost effective.

It's of course very inefficient to convert all electricity from renewable sources to hydrogen. That's only a solution for when you need to store electricity, as an alternative to batteries, or when other solutions do not fit a local problem.
Higher efficiencies can be achieved with hydrozine energy storage.
And I just referred to the Sodium Borohydride (NaBH4) method.
Understand that energy efficiency is not important, when the energy itself costs nothing. A solar panel that is a bit less efficient, but costs half as much, can be more cost effective. If Sodium Borohydride or hydrozine energy storage can make solar panels in a country with lots of useless desert feasible, then they can export cheap energy. That's easier than building thousands of miles of electricity poles from Africa to Europe and Asia.

And maybe you don't know, but fossil fuels are also very inefficient. A loss of 50% of the energy is not an exception for the process of extraction, transportation, refining, transportation and storage. The worst is Canada's oil sands mining. It uses up almost as much energy as it produces.
only registered users can see external links






By dgraff at 29,Dec,23 17:47 other posts of dgraff 
A white powder full of energy
You mean like cocaine
Ask Hunter Biden he knows all the places to get that stuff
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Dec,23 17:57 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Because surely Hunter Biden is the only one to ever snort cocaine.
Did you ever see any recording of Donald Trump Jr.? He's coked-up 24/7.
He's just a coward and a hypocrite and doesn't admit it.
By dgraff at 29,Dec,23 21:33 other posts of dgraff 
Yeah but Donald Trump JR is not in the spotlight right now Hunter Biden is
--------------------------------------- added after 69 seconds

All rich people use cocaine
By Ananas2xLekker at 30,Dec,23 16:45 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
The difference with Hunter is that he doesn't get involved in politics at all.
He's just the son of the president and nothing more.

Meanwhile, Donald Jr. puts his face on TV, the internet and GOP fundraisers
and sold you the same bullshit his father does. He was also completely immersed
in his fathers corruption and crimes.

Trumps whole family was involved in his politics and his private profiteering from it.
As senior advisor, his son in law traveled many times to Saudi Arabia to 'represent your country', but the only thing he did was arrange a $2 Billion deal for himself.
Your side would never accept what Trump did with his businesses, while in office,
from a Democrat. It's all a million times more corrupt than putting on your resume
that your father was the Vice President, to get a nice job.






By dgraff at 30,Dec,23 12:11 other posts of dgraff 
Hog wash


By dgraff at 29,Dec,23 00:07 other posts of dgraff 
Hog wash
By phart at 29,Dec,23 01:44 other posts of phart 
And what are we using to get squeaky clean hogs?
By dgraff at 29,Dec,23 10:26 other posts of dgraff 

By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Dec,23 14:42 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
only registered users can see external links
All natural and sustainable. (as long as we still consume animal proteins)


By bella! at 29,Dec,23 16:53 other posts of bella! 
Your all time favorite SYC personality, licksipsuckit, would be happy to see that you're keeping her thread alive!
By dgraff at 29,Dec,23 17:45 other posts of dgraff 
I just did it to bump some of the forum threads back up to the top forum threads that actually mean something
By bella! at 29,Dec,23 17:53 other posts of bella! 
It's all good, it shows you're thinking about her!
By dgraff at 29,Dec,23 21:40 other posts of dgraff 
If you remember correctly this was the midget’s forum thread
What would lix know about global warming she lived in a dust bowl i do think about her from time to time i wonder if she is dead






By phart at 27,Dec,23 16:39 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 29,Dec,23 18:09 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
And why do I need to care about this?

But think of this; if a company who does care about selling EVs can just buy up a company that does not want to sell EVs, maybe the company that sells EVs is smarter. Isn't that your idea of capitalism; that the smartest companies outlive the dumber ones?



By Ananas2xLekker at 28,Dec,23 09:00 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Right-wingers probably think the GOP idiot is owning Pete Buttigieg here:
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 27,Dec,23 16:35 other posts of phart 
You can't make this stuff up.
Steven Spielberg would have trouble coming up with stuff this good.
only registered users can see external links
Cold as hell in that state and they are going to try to run buses off of Battery's??
Liberals say push for public transit, well bus's are public transit,then liberals push for electric bus's. people that ride the bus need to get places,or they wouldn't be on the bus,yet the wheels on the bus don't go round and round and leave them looking for a way to get where they are going.
I guess the city needs to buy everyone shoes?

It is Way past time for folks to realize electric was the thing BEFORE gas cars and diesel buses and it proved to be impractical then, and it is proving to be impractical again.
Refuse to learn history, repeat it.
only registered users can see external links


By Ananas2xLekker at 19,Dec,23 10:47 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Nate Hagens: Energy blindness (most is in American English)
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 09,Dec,23 13:39 other posts of phart 
Gee, let's build a nuclear plant over a ground fault. What could possibly go wrong?
only registered users can see external links

Gee,what killed those fish?


By phart at 08,Dec,23 20:47 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links


By phart at 31,Oct,23 14:27 other posts of phart 
Sometimes when I post something, people wonder why I feel the way I do, and when I explain it is from personal experience, they don't seem to believe me. But here is a very classic case of why I feel this so called concern for the environment just a charade.
In 2006 a problem that was the power company's fault put 220 volts into our microwave and my computer. we got a whopping 125 dollars from the company as a "curtesy" because our stuff was deemed "obsolete" although it worked fine for us.
So 600 dollars later a new microwave was in the kitchen .It worked fine until 2 weeks ago, when the door latch failed ,with my shrimp inside. It took me a few minutes to find the special screw driver bit needed to get the machine open so I could trip the latch and get my food out .cold by then and had to cook it on the stove. BUT back to the complaint. Anyway ,the broken part is of course made of plastic . 21 dollars and about 10 minutes, it is fixed.
The sad truth is most people would have said, "Oh my, my microwave is broken, I must buy a new 1" and they would chunk the old 1 in the dump .now here's my complaint. Why make junk that has to be thrown away ,then complain about the environment? Make things durable and long lasting ,so the landfills and recycle centers aren't overflowing.
By Ananas2xLekker at 31,Oct,23 20:30 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
If it was from personal experience, you would understand how your capitalist system fucks the average person, like how they fucked you. They only reason why you do not think that, is because you flood your own brain with capitalist propaganda 24/7.

Don't you understand why microwaves are build to break, like everything?
CAPITALISM!!!! They want to sell you a new one, as soon as possible.
They don't give a fuck about waste or pollution, they care about MONEY!
It's staring you right in the face and you don't see it. Tragic!

Yes, you are correct, every concern about the environment coming from capitalists is just a charade. But you keep listening to these people, thinking they are telling you the truth. It's not the only thing they lie about. They don't care about what's true, they just care about making money. You know they are lying, so why do you keep believing them?
By sherryann at 31,Oct,23 22:18 other posts of sherryann 
this is a smart point from anan...everything is made to break and does. I call it disposable stuff. But I remember a time when things were made to last. I still have a few things from long ago.
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Nov,23 13:45 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Thank you

Ever heard of 'Right to repair' legislation?
That is regulation that promotes repairability practices throughout industries, including consumer technology. It doesn't allow companies to make it impossible to swap out a battery of a phone without destroying it, or selling replacement parts at a higher price than the product itself is worth. It prohibits producing, e.g. a vacuum cleaner that is completely glued together, so it's impossible to exchange the motor, when it breaks.

'Right to repair' will massively reduce the practice of 'made to break'.

But, I don't hear of many Republicans who support the 'Right to repair'.
That's exactly the 'regulation' that they would cut, because it 'hurts' companies.
Most regulation exists to protect consumers or the safety of workers
or prevent polluting the environment or protect trains from derailing, etc.
Republicans don't care about that, they only care about companies making more profit.

Almost everyone draws some line between profits and people.
It's up to people to decide where to draw that line, with their vote.
By #681164 at 01,Nov,23 14:07
As a technician all of my life, I approve a “right to repair” law. I know it sounds self-serving, but, I too, get frustrated when I can’t repair a piece of equipment due to sealed units or excessive cost of repair parts. Corporate greed is controlled by the owners and stock holders. They are, usually, Republican, but, you should hear them squeal like a stuck pig when you tell them that a repair would cost them more than a new one or that the “sealed unit” is non-repairable.
By Ananas2xLekker at 01,Nov,23 14:25 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Most of Republican voters are angry about how society treats people.
Why do you think 'Rich Men North of Richmond' was so popular?

I've been sellin' my soul, workin' all day
Overtime hours for bullshit pay
So I can sit out here and waste my life away
Drag back home and drown my troubles away

They just have a very confused idea of where the screwing comes from.
They know that they are getting screwed, but not how or why.
(which is fully confirmed in the rest of the song)

It's because they always side with the screwers and not the screwees,
unless it's them who are getting screwed, then they 'squeal like a stuck pig'.
If they only understood that we need to get together, to not get screwed.
By #681164 at 01,Nov,23 14:43
Hence, unions, strikes, mass walkouts, and boycotts.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Nov,23 09:49 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Yep, and lots of those people voted for Trump.
But they don't like him much anymore, because he doesn't give a shit and
he scammed them with his stupid gathering at a non-union auto parts plant,
50 miles away from where workers are striking.

only registered users can see external links
By #681164 at 02,Nov,23 13:53
People are gullible. There’s a huge number of people that think Trump will solve all their problems. Not so by a mile.
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,Nov,23 08:30 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
You must understand that Trump learned from the best of them;
he got personally trained by Kim Jong-un. They love each other.






By sherryann at 01,Nov,23 22:12 other posts of sherryann 
Oh no I never heard of that I think it is only in your neck of the woods? Thanks for teaching me that. I hate buying stuff that breaks on me right away. But I know you're precisely right, they make it so it breaks then you have to buy another one. I am trying to become what I think they call a minimalist-I know you know more of what that is than I- because of this reason of stuff breaking so quick. Plus I save everything and want to break that habit.
--------------------------------------- added after 96 seconds

I don't know how to direct my post but it is for Ananas...
By phart at 02,Nov,23 02:20 other posts of phart 
I repair most any and everything i can instead of buying new. OR build my own with new materials and salvaged parts.
Alot of the tools-machines i have both hand tools ,power tools and such, were broken or worn out, free or bought cheap and refurbished. A couple of my older friends back when I was in my early 20's taught me the idea that getting and rebuilding old equipment would help me better understand it's operation and Maintenace.

By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Nov,23 11:05 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed SB 244, or the Right to Repair Act, into law, making it easier for owners to repair devices themselves or to take them to independent repair shops.
only registered users can see external links

We've had something similar since 2021:
only registered users can see external links

Something to be proud of:
"The Right to Repair movement started in the US, specifically in the automotive industry. As a result, the Repair Association (TRA) was founded in 2013 to extend the same principles to encompass an extensive range of electronic products."
only registered users can see external links





By #681164 at 01,Nov,23 00:30
I worked at Sears for 20 yrs as an outside tech. Owners of appliances always think that their unit is worth almost like a new one. It's not true. You are a bit more handy with a screwdriver and are able to fix some equipment. Most people don't and when they have the choice of paying $86 min for labor and, in your case, $21 for parts plus tax for a unit that may be 10 yrs old. It's a no brainer. A countertop MW, a good one, goes for about $135 @ Wallymart. Sears had hundreds of thousands of customers with service contracts. No deductible. Repairs were free or a replacement if it couldn't be fixed. By federal law, a manufacturer has to provide replacement parts for ten years. When I retired they were talking about making it 5 yrs.
So, the electric company was generous. In my neck of the woods, the electric company, FPL, would allow you to buy a comparable new unit and re-emburse you.
A company would not stay profitable if they couldn't have a steady stream of repeat business. A fridge will easily last 15 yrs. I've seen many stoves, both gas and electric that were 30 yr old and more. I have a MW in the cabin that's 22 yrs old. That last one I'm cheating because I had to fix it twice.
You are mixing the company's desire to make a profit with the need for mankind to conserve resources. They don't mix.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Nov,23 10:08 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Sure, I fixed some stuff too. Once our microwave of only a few years stopped working, so I unscrewed everything and found a 10A fuse blown out. That could have been another problem, which would have been more expensive, but I replaced the fuse and it worked for several more years. That was a cheap and lucky fix. I could have replaced the whole circuit board, if there was a problem with it, but it cost at least $150, for a $400 microwave. I saw no burned out parts on that circuit board, so I took a chance.
It worked out.

Another time our washing machine broke. It was 7 years old machine with a new value of $700. The replacement part was $230. That wasn't worth it, because other parts could have been defective or about to break, so I bought a $800 new washing machine.

Those replacement parts are not worth that much money, manufacturers are just compensation for their loss in profit, for you not buying a new product.

To me, the need for mankind to conserve resources is more important than the company's desire to make a profit. The only way to prioritize the need for mankind
to conserve resources is: REGULATION. It's not a dirty word.
By phart at 02,Nov,23 16:38 other posts of phart 
i would have considered the repairability of the old washer before buying a new 1. If the new 1 was less fixable ,the old 1 would be worth repairing.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Nov,23 17:44 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I agree, but that is very difficult to know upfront. There are no reviews yet that judge repairability. It would be very useful though. It would be a good project for the Dutch Consumers Association to score manufacturers on repairability.
Both the old one and the new one are made by Siemens, so I hope the repairability didn't get any worse.
By dgraff at 03,Nov,23 11:15 other posts of dgraff 
Siemans don’t it leave cum stains on your clothing
By Ananas2xLekker at 03,Nov,23 12:33 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
No, trust me, it gets out the cum stains pretty well.
By dgraff at 03,Nov,23 12:51 other posts of dgraff 
at least we share a sense of humor
By #681164 at 03,Nov,23 14:01
It's not the cum stains that worry me. It's the skid marks I want out. There are disadvantages sleeping in the buff.





By #610414 at 03,Nov,23 14:25
I don't think like a man. I look at a ten yr old appliance that breaks as a good excuse to get something new, less beat up. Woody can repair anything but I'must the one that makes the ultimate choice on appliances. Woody is the one that researches reliability vs cost efficiency
By phart at 03,Nov,23 14:32 other posts of phart 
10 years old, what could possibly be better about something new from 10 years ago? Kitchen stuff plateaued years ago as far as tech goes.My microwave looks as good as it did when new. I keep it clean inside and out ,also clean the back where it pulls in it's air for cooling.
By #610414 at 04,Nov,23 16:43
It’s a woman thing. Woody says the same as you.
By phart at 04,Nov,23 18:33 other posts of phart 
My newest fancy zero turn mower, about burnt up yesterday. 6 grand, but I found the issue and stopped it and it is just some componets to replace.What did I just mulch my leaves with? a 40 year old lawnmower , baling wire and some gas and off to the grass.
By #610414 at 04,Nov,23 21:54
If it works, use it. If it doesn’t work, fix it. If you can’t fix it, buy new.
By phart at 05,Nov,23 01:07 other posts of phart 
Or buy refurbished, that is how I get computers now. I used to buy a new computer, alot of money ,outdated before I opened the box, now, I go to a local shop and get refurbished for about 150 bucks or LESS depending on which I want, and they serve me well .
I actually bought several pieces of wood working equipment for penny's on the dollar of their actual value at the scrap yard and rebuilt them with new bearings,belts ,motors and such. Have a set of equipment that would have been cost prohibitive at 6000 dollars or so had I wanted new. less than 1500 bucks! And the equipment is almost all American made.
By #610414 at 05,Nov,23 15:02
If it works for you, go for it.





By Ananas2xLekker at 05,Nov,23 15:19 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Our 14 years old IKEA fridge, bought for less than $300 was still looking neat inside, but it just didn't manage to keep a temperature below 46°F. That cannot be fixed anymore, so it was time for a new one. The new one is also more economical with electricity. An old fridge is probably using more power than when it was new, because it has to work harder to retain its temperature.
By phart at 05,Nov,23 16:13 other posts of phart 
A fridge gave up at 14 years old?? wow, our 53 GE is still going strong in the basement, when we run it on the generator during power outages,it puts the least load on it of any other appliance in the house. The newer fridge, a 89 model,is on it' second set of defroster heater tubes,but still going strong,cost 80 bucks to have it repaired. Considering a similar fridge is VERY expensive, the power this 1 may use over a newer 1 is negligable.it to,draws little from the generator.
our power bill was 160 last month,that is with electric heat, 3 fridges and a freezer and my shop stuff plus other items running.









By phart at 31,Oct,23 13:08 other posts of phart 
Stop wasting food.
only registered users can see external links

That is something that my parents taught me as soon as possible, DON'T waste food.
I watch people order a big plate of food, eat a 1/3 of it and the rest is thrown away. Just because you can AFFORD to waste, doesn't mean you should just to for all practical purposes brag about your financial status.
and that is what alot of it amounts to.
By #681164 at 31,Oct,23 14:08
At my age, I can’t finish a full size entry when we go out to eat. CAT and I share with, perhaps, an extra side.
By dgraff at 03,Nov,23 12:55 other posts of dgraff 
I think I eat more as I got older I can still polish off 2 large cheese stakes at my favorite pizza place or I can eat a half of a large pizza my self and still maintain my slim figure
By #681164 at 03,Nov,23 13:58
I'm 6' and weigh 182 lbs +/-.My biggest meal is half a Ribeye with a baked potato and two bottles of beer. Nothing else.



By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Nov,23 10:42 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I used to be the dumpster myself, never wasting a scrap.
However, with age and a sitting job, that is not smart anymore.

We almost always have leftovers, that we give to a 80+ year old lady that we know.
She has rheumatism, so she has a hard time cooking for herself. Our leftovers makes what she eats much more interesting, than microwave meals. She did have some problems with the more spicy meals we eat, but I think she's getting used to it now.


We also have a food sharing habit with our neighbors.
We get interesting food from all over the world and my girlfriend shares her baking.
That saves me the trouble of eating all of it.

We do take care to not let expiration dates pass.
The best way to avoid it is not buying more than you can eat on time.
It is practical that we live within crawling distance of a supermarket though.
And about 10 others within at max a 10 minute bike-ride away.
By phart at 02,Nov,23 16:40 other posts of phart 
I get so frustrated when friends want to gather at a buffet restaurant and I can't eat as much as i used to,I don't feel i get my moneys worth. I used eat 4 plates or so and desert,now I am lucky for a plate of salad and then a plate of regular food.Not my moneys worth for a buffet,but i can't eat as much saddly.
By Ananas2xLekker at 02,Nov,23 19:03 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
I can imagine. It wouldn't be much fun for the rest too, if you are full after 5 minutes.
I would say; get tiny bits from everything and eat very slowly, trying to enjoy the maximum of it. If you scoop a tiny sample from everything, you might have an appetite to go for seconds of the best sample.

My mother also eats just a tiny bit. The average guinea pig eats more.
She still always finishes last, because she eats very very slowly.
I kid you not, I can empty my plate in the time she finishes one spoonful.
She's mostly talking and tasting. Maybe it's a useful strategy for you.
By dgraff at 03,Nov,23 13:00 other posts of dgraff 
At a buffet I get two spoons it’s a lot like using a shovel






By phart at 25,Oct,23 16:56 other posts of phart 
only registered users can see external links
By #610414 at 26,Oct,23 16:24
What’s the message here?
By phart at 26,Oct,23 19:50 other posts of phart 
Sheesh,I was just sharing a video showing that these so called big ideas like electric cars are nothing new,and they didn't pan out back then,for the same reason they are foundering now.range
. Ev's are NOT selling well. Gm and honda just quit their joint venture into ev's.
only registered users can see external links
By #610414 at 26,Oct,23 22:37
Sheesh, I was trying to find what the point is.
My daughter-in-law’s brother, a very smart mechanical engineer, bought an EV for his personal use to go to work and generally use in the greater South Florida area. He gets about 320 miles per charge but, he says he just plugs it in during the weekend. He uses a gas powered car (the wife’s) for long trips. For him, it works out just fine
EVs do have these problems of range, cost, and batteries, but, GM and Honda didn’t stop their joint venture because of that. They stopped it because the market share wasn’t there at this time. It’s possible there will never be a profitable time when EVs will be a good commercial project. My take is that all problems can be fixed eventually.
The reason for the popularity of gas engined cars grew tremendously (as your own article states) was when the electric starter was developed. Gas cars in those days where notorious for being very hard to start and dangerous.
By phart at 27,Oct,23 00:51 other posts of phart 
I will admit ,I am not totally against the electric car, just against it being forced on us.
they have their place. local trips, local deliveries.
By #610414 at 27,Oct,23 01:12
Who is forcing it on you?
By phart at 27,Oct,23 18:02 other posts of phart 
Wake up,California and new york have both signed into law no new gas cars after a certain date,other states will follow. do a bit of googling.
By #610414 at 27,Oct,23 18:09
But that’s in the future. Ten years into the future. I think it’s a good idea but I wonder if the big auto makers will be able to deliver. I also wonder how many people will file lawsuits against it.









By Lvphose at 24,Oct,23 03:08 other posts of Lvphose 
I’ll put it simply if the local weather person cannot tell us 24 hours what the line of demarcation is between rain sleet and snow do you think they can tell us what the weather will be like 100 years from now you got to be effing crazy!
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Oct,23 08:54 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Weather is the science of predicting fluctuations.
Climate science is the science of predicting trends globally.
Those trends are following the models way better, because it's an average
of decades of weather patterns in a region, and it changes much more slowly
than weather. Because of this, it's easier to predict climate than weather.

Climate science is basically just modeling the energy coming in from the sun,
compared with the heat radiation emitting back outwards into space
and the capacity of the atmosphere to absorb/retain the heat.

It's way more simple than predicting the weather, because to predict weather, the model has to predict every movement and interaction of atmospheric pressure, temperature, humidity, clouds, and interaction with the earth's surface beneath the atmosphere.

Lets compare weather and climate to the income of a Italian restaurant. The owner has a hard time predicting their turnover on any specific day, because it's dependent on factors like weather, traffic, sports games on TV or a supplier crashing their truckload of pasta.
However, predicting their yearly revenue is much easier. They might have a good year or a bad year, but mostly it all averages out. Then the number of customers shows the popularity of the restaurant. One bad cook can show a downward trend, over time.
One quiet evening tells the owner nothing.

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
By phart at 24,Oct,23 11:18 other posts of phart 
Just be ready for the "storm"
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker at 24,Oct,23 16:07 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That's nothing special. It happens every 11 years or so.
only registered users can see external links

They are hyping about it every 11 years. Are they already doing it now?
Sure, it can cause a lot of damage, when it's particularly bad.
I hope that electric grids and internet systems have some safeties.
If they do not, then maybe it should cause some big problems first.
Like with most preventable crisis, people deny it, until they live it.

There is no way to prevent a solar storm from happening, we can only prepare.
However, we can prevent the worst effects from climate change from happening.
It's caused by humanity, so humanity can solve it. We just need to want to.



By #681164 at 25,Oct,23 20:43
Who said anyone can? Scientists follow a trend. Exact time/day/yr it will happen is impossible, but, if every year in the last x number of years, the numbers rise or fall in a steady way, then, a good PREDICTION can be made. The longer the time span, the less accurate it will be. This is nothing new. In 1966 I worked for the Miami/Dade County Water Control Dept. They were charged with predicting flooding caused by 5yr, 10yr, 20yr, 50yr, and 100 yr storms. Their ferocity was interpolated fro previous yrs storms going back many decades, some centuries. The point was that if every so often, consistently, Miami got a 20yr or 50yr storm, after a while, the time line would have to be changed.
Right now it looks like the weather patterns are changing faster than ever before. That is a major worldwide life changing problem. There are many people like you who, for some unknown reason, want to deny what seems to be. Just keep an open mind .

By dgraff at 25,Oct,23 20:55 other posts of dgraff 
I believe it will be cold this winter 🥶 and warm this summer and in the fall there will be leaves 🍁 falling and in the spring flowers and grass will grow
--------------------------------------- added after 52 seconds

Just like always
By phart at 25,Oct,23 23:06 other posts of phart 
By dgraff at 25,Oct,23 23:46 other posts of dgraff 


By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Oct,23 08:42 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Really, 'Just like always'?
How cold was it in the winters, when you were young?
How warm was it in the summers, when you were young?
Were the leaves red and brown, when they fell from the trees, when you were young?
Aren't they falling down from the trees mostly green now?
Did grass and flowers dry up in the summer as often, when you were young?

Is your perception limited to just what you are describing?
Are you really telling me that you don't see any differences?
By dgraff at 26,Oct,23 09:33 other posts of dgraff 
just yanking your chain
By Ananas2xLekker at 26,Oct,23 14:10 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Sure, I have no problem with that, yank away.

But, is that you admitting that you have noticed differences?

Because, I think we are living in very similar climates, and I have noticed many differences. I hardly need a winter coat these days, but in my youth, I froze my nuts of almost every winter. The summers used to be hot sometimes, but mostly it was raining a lot. We had never heard of water shortages before, EVER! This last decade, there are problems with drought and nature drying out, and the government asking us to not accidentally start wildfires and not use to much water, because we are running dry, almost every summer. That's a change from the past I remember and it's not OK.

But you like to deny reality, just to yank the chain of some Dutch socialist?
What's the point?

Do you think I'm saying what I'm saying just to upset some right-wingers?
I'm not saying it's not fun sometimes, but I'm not denying reality, to do it.
By dgraff at 26,Oct,23 16:12 other posts of dgraff 
I have noticed a few but not enough to get excited about at this point
I just enjoy winding people up
By Ananas2xLekker at 27,Oct,23 08:10 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Living in a mild climate, there is not much to get excited about here yet either.
Climate change can even feel great for people living in cold climates like Iceland.
However, there are not that many people who will benefit from the changes,
but there are hundreds of millions of people in hot climates now,
who are already very negatively affected by the changes now.

You think that you can isolate yourself from the rest of the world on your hill.
Maybe you can, but would it be fun? Personally, I like the world as it is/was.
It's nice to just go to the shop and buy products from all over the world
at prices that I can easily afford. When the global economy gets impacted
from areas of the world getting to hot, from climate change,
then everything will become very expensive or not available anymore.

Humanity has reached their peak development level some time ago. Products come from everywhere and most areas in the world are involved in the global production chain. This helps people out of poverty and conflict. It helps them to solve their own problems, like rampant population growth. The best way to solve those problems is progress. It's on the decline now, I think. That results in dwindling resources and migration. When an area doesn't support its population anymore, people want to leave. You may think you can hide behind a wall, but the US is just as dependent on the rest of the world, as my country, and as mostly any other country. Every product you sell in your garage is sourced from raw materials from all over the world.
You need people in all those places contributing to the global economy, or those products cannot be produced anymore. Before that happens the prices go up.
This is what you are all focusing on, but instead of understanding the reasons, you are blaming the other political party.

Maybe your political system was designed with this in mind. They give you two hyper-partisan parties that won't ever cooperate, so you can blame each other,
and neither party will ever have to function correctly and never really have to solve the problems. Some of you think the government can better be completely destroyed, so you can build something new, which will be better. It doesn't work that way. It's a return to absolute chaos, and the only medicine for chaos is tyranny.
To get back from tyranny to democracy is very difficult. As you know, many areas never progressed from tyranny to democracy in the first place. I agree that democracy isn't working perfect, SO FIX IT! If you think that it's easier to fix it,
by first destroying it, you're making a mistake. The frame is still strong.


By #610414 at 26,Oct,23 16:22
I remember, in Miami, Florida, in what was described as a sub-tropical location, that I had to wear a coat walking to school, in late September. Now, our weather is what used to be in a full tropical location much closer to the equator. Most of the time a sweater or coat is more of a hindrance than a help







By phart at 22,Oct,23 20:50 other posts of phart 
It seems the little climate change puppet from sweden has shat in her bed and will have to lay in it.
Let's exam this a moment, First, greta has Asperger syndrome
Which according to google search, would prompt her to be Clumsy,perform uncoordinated movements, including difficulty with handwriting. Difficulty managing emotions, sometimes leading to verbal or behavioral outbursts, self-injurious behaviors or tantrums. Not understanding other peoples' feelings or perspectives. Hypersensitivity to lights, sounds and textures.
This would explain her "How dare you" outburst in front of people. But I think her true colors are shining thru.

only registered users can see external links

She is also making her self a little criminal record.
only registered users can see external links

I guess we will be reading about her glueing herself to a oil tanker next?


By phart at 20,Oct,23 00:46 other posts of phart 
UM,
only registered users can see external links

“A 2021 study from Volvo Motors found that the production and manufacturing of its C40 Recharge electric model generates 70% more emissions than its gas vehicle counterpart, the XC40,” the Washington Examiner previously reported. “In particular, the massive batteries that power electric vehicles are carbon-intensive to make.”
By Ananas2xLekker at 20,Oct,23 10:01 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
That might be true. So how many miles do you have to drive with an C40 Recharge,
vs the gas powered C40, before it makes up it's carbon investment?
If they don't tell you, it's a biassed article.



By phart at 16,Oct,23 17:58 other posts of phart 
Even bill gates says the planet will be just fine.
only registered users can see external links

Who would have thought HE would back off a bit on the climate bullshit?
By Ananas2xLekker at 16,Oct,23 18:05 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
It's not the planet we are worried about, it's humanity.
The people who are exaggerating climate change is YOU,
by not understanding anything and then talking bullshit,
like Obama's house on the coast getting in danger of sea-levels.
The main dangers in the coming decades are not sea-levels,
it's extreme weather, causing droughts in one area and mud-slides
in another, destroying harvests. It's forest fires as a chain reaction.
It's countries near the equator becoming to hot for survival,
causing massive floods of immigrants looking for other places to live.

No way that Bill Gates denies that. You're just straw-manning him.
By phart at 16,Oct,23 18:30 other posts of phart 
Humanity is it's own worst enemy, the planet will take care of it's self.
By Ananas2xLekker at 16,Oct,23 18:33 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Sure, the planet was part in mass-extinctions before. It will survive another.

Humanity being its own worst enemy is exactly the problem I want to solve.
The solution is not listening to people like you, who don't want to solve problems.
By phart at 17,Oct,23 01:20 other posts of phart 
I would love to solve some problems but for whatever reason, no body can agree or even compromise on things.
By Ananas2xLekker at 17,Oct,23 17:34 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Even what Democrats promised to do was already a compromise of a compromise of a compromise of a corporate approved half measure.
What they are doing now is basically nothing. They are just spending tax-money
on subsidies, to encourage corporations to solve the problem for them, which is
the most expensive way to solve the problem.

The optimum method to solve this, is by public investments into renewable energy,
so the revenues go back into the treasury. That's how Iceland, Norway and Sweden are doing it. They hardly increased their debt, their people have cheap energy and they are turning into big energy exporters, making billions.

If you have a problem that gets progressively worse as long as you don't solve it,
you attack it straight on, as hard and as smart as you can, and get it behind you.
If humanity had started the energy transition 3 decades ago, it would have been
way easier, way cheaper, way more effective and prevented lots of damage.



By #694265 at 16,Oct,23 20:21
I find it interesting phart that no one seems to talk about the real issue of global warming, climate change that no doubt human activity is expediating.

Some seem to think batteries are going to save the human race, its fucking ridiculous.

At the end of the day there are to many fucking humans & we breed to fucking much, creating more consumers. Consumerism is what it cooking this planet from the pollution created to create our consumer products.

In todays modern world there are also more types of products to consume, I mean just take Halloween as one small example, I wonder how much pollution it creates with all the plastic garbage that is sold to celebrate it from China & now Halloween has spread to this country now & our stores are full of the shit.

Humans as a whole will never stop consuming shit.

Take myself as a example using my teenage daughter & the differences in consumerism over the years.

When I was her age, similar to when you were you were, I had a bicycle, my main form of transport & a few toys. The house hold had a single TV, a single phone bolted to the wall & a single motor car used for the whole family.

My daughters scenario, she has a bicycle but all that does is collect dust, she has more toys than you can poke a stick at including Xbox, has her own TV one of 2 in the property, but that not including gaming monitors, computer monitors another 2 Xbox's, also has her own computer amongst the other 2 in the property including the one I'm writing on now & 2 tablets. We no longer have a phone bolted to the wall, the wife, I & my daughter have our own cell phones. We have 3 serviceable on road motorcycles, purely for pleasure riding & 2 cars.

Are we going to reduce our consumerism to save the human race, fuck no, as with just about any modern family. Even the idiots that blubber on about batteries saving the human race would they change their consumerism to save all the other humans, no, they seem to think that powering their consumerism with batteries is going to save the ozone, its the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard in my life.

The human race will continue to expand, we will continue to open up the ozone layer cooking this planet, humans will become extinct on this planet its just a matter of time.

Elon has the right idea though, lets all move to Mars & live in bubbles
By phart at 17,Oct,23 01:25 other posts of phart 
Battery's have their place. But they are by no means a solution to the problem. They only change the problem.
Solar comes in handy, I can charge the battery on my camper without running a drop cord.
All this smog stuff on cars, a 1980's honda civic got 50mpg, try that now in a average car with all that smog crap on it, it's a struggle .and it is Still going to be a roller skate size car.
Electric pickup truck, put a load behind it, ride 75 miles ,wait HOURS to recharge, it would take 3 months to take a 3 week road trip at that rate.
By #694265 at 17,Oct,23 01:41
Battery/charging tec is moving along, some company's have long haul trucks now I believe, that do depot charging at this point with massive chargers.

I don't personally think we are looking at the end of the internal combustion engine, I have noticed some new hydra powered cars kicking around now. We used to have LPG gas over here for years, all the taxies used to run on the stuff, I had a duel fueled car at the time. I don't know all the statistic on burring LPG but from what I understand is much cleaner than gasoline.

The Toyota Hybrid killed that over here, Taxi all went those, it was cheaper per mile on gasoline than LPG was.

Also like I have seen you mention here a few times now, this Hybrid tec is old, many years being used in trains & big earth moving equipment so maybe more tec will put into that.

All our government busses over here in Brisbane at least, have all been converted to gas instead of Diesel as well.

What about a gas powered Hybrid 🤷‍♀️, who knows I am far from being a engineer
By phart at 17,Oct,23 02:07 other posts of phart 
Hybrid is where toyota has put alot of their efforts. Because it helps with range anxiety for 1 thing.
By Ananas2xLekker at 17,Oct,23 20:26 other posts of Ananas2xLekker 
Electric cars cannot save humanity, electric cars can only save cars.












Adult Discussion Forum