Recent Posts of member soundsgreat87


Group moderator new member notifications not working right? 19,Sep,15 04:13
Guys who've had their frenulums cut/removed as adults? 23,Nov,14 03:17
Admin - transcode videos on upload? 02,Oct,14 15:58
The somewhat disturbing end of 22,Jul,14 14:08
Are video downloads supposed to be this slow? 16,Apr,14 12:04
Downloading videos from SYD on a mobile device? 16,Dec,13 15:57
Would you like a group about keeping your foreskin back? 29,Jun,13 17:03
What category should sounding be under? 11,Nov,12 15:57


By soundsgreat87 at 25,Sep,19 00:07
I think it was just momentum and network effects. For some reason it became popular on porn sites. I only got it to chat with people from porn sites!

By soundsgreat87 at 25,Sep,19 00:05
It seems like the Friday Sept 27th date is a hoax or something. But it is shutting down. So that the company can... uh... fight the SEC about their cryptocurrency? Which wouldn't exist without the messenger? Sounds like a pretty stupid move to me.

Telegram works. I've heard Signal is good too.

By soundsgreat87 at 28,Jul,19 13:03
Check out this dude: /member.php?w=511925

By soundsgreat87 at 26,Jul,19 14:42
Nothing's gonna go up your dick.

By soundsgreat87 at 08,Jan,19 19:17
All the time.

By soundsgreat87 at 09,Dec,18 15:57
I've done it for over 3 years now, just cause I like the look and feel. Not interested in circumcision. ;P

I have a group for it too: /groups.php?id=4076

By soundsgreat87 at 17,Nov,18 11:58
I dunno, I didn't like that level of sensitivity. If you do, that's fine

By soundsgreat87 at 16,Nov,18 16:34
If you keep at it, it will desensitize!

By soundsgreat87 at 29,Sep,18 15:17
Huh, alright.

By soundsgreat87 at 29,Sep,18 13:06
He was in college, and over 18. Not a m i n o r.

I seem to recall similar witchhunts resulting in the impeachment of a sitting president, although that was entirely consensual behavior...

By soundsgreat87 at 28,Sep,18 13:48
What, you mean like this?

By soundsgreat87 at 27,Sep,18 14:33
So when republicans do it, it's righteous, but when democrats do it, it's low and reprehensible. Got it!

Supreme court appointments are for *life.* It only makes sense that the candidates are properly vetted beforehand, regardless of party.

By soundsgreat87 at 27,Sep,18 13:23
it amazes me that people can blame "the liberals" for "stooping so low" when we have...... clear, obvious, not-that-long-ago proof that the repubs do the exact same thing.

Oh, but I'm sure that's "the media" or something. "Can't trust it." Right?

By soundsgreat87 at 21,Aug,18 15:49
did you also read that aliens are stealing your thoughts?

By soundsgreat87 at 18,Aug,18 17:08
Or whining about the democratic leaders who - again - are in the minority and aren't in any real power

By soundsgreat87 at 17,Aug,18 15:45
Exactly - I can't understand why they KEEP whining about the clintons and obamas, neither of whom are in power any more

By soundsgreat87 at 21,Jul,18 23:29
yeah, conservatives really can't get over it. they keep moaning about obama and hillary two years after the election and even as they control all the branches of the federal government... shut uppppppppppppppppppp

By soundsgreat87 at 08,Jul,18 15:47
That's awesome. Your foreskin definitely looks a lot looser than it used to, too. Look at that!

By soundsgreat87 at 07,Jul,18 02:11
No one else??

By soundsgreat87 at 01,Jul,18 17:05
Meee! Three years now

Here's a group I made for guys who do it: /groups.php?id=4076

By soundsgreat87 at 01,Jul,18 17:05
cause developing an app is a significant effort unlikely to be undertaken by the one guy who runs this site.

By soundsgreat87 at 28,Feb,18 20:19
And it looks great on you. You were lucky to start young enough that you grew out of your foreskin, too!

What got you started doing it anyway?

By soundsgreat87 at 28,Feb,18 20:15
Absolutely. I did it!

For a while I just tugged on the tip for like 30, 40 minutes a day while watching TV. After a few months it was noticeably longer.

By soundsgreat87 at 18,Feb,18 00:29
Confirmed that it now displays properly with adblock enabled - though of course the message still pops up

Why are ad blockers important? I know you have a very different perspective as a site administrator, but for many users ads are distracting, frustrating, waste time, waste bandwidth (especially on mobile), present a security problem, etc. At least on this site, most of the ads are unobtrusive, but there are a few that redirect to some other site that are REALLY unpleasant.

You said "adblock doesn't protect you from serious exploits" and while that's true, it does *greatly* reduce the likelihood. It blocks HTTP requests so that does prevent many vectors of attack. You're right though that cosmetic filtering (hiding elements) does nothing to protect users. Anecdotally, I have had zero malware infections since I started to use an ad blocker, and the only malware I got before then was from malicious ads.

Ad blocker software is run by large communities, and there are thousands of sites, all of which display ads in different ways. Sometimes a rule that is supposed to block ads on one site inadvertently block important content on another. Lots of people use ad blockers on porn sites too, so it's extremely unlikely that someone is targeting *this site* to make it break

Whether ads work, or are a valid revenue stream, is kind of a big philosophical question of the modern internet and where things will go from here. I don't think either of us can answer it.

By soundsgreat87 at 17,Feb,18 16:09
I really doubt it was done intentionally. Just having a little diagnostic session here, and at least in uBlock Origin, there is a CSS rule that is preventing the chat from displaying:

center + hr + table[width="800"][align="center"]

which, to be fair, is a pretty common way for ads to be embedded in pages. tables are common, 800 is a common width, centering is common etc.

You can fix this by simply removing the hr tag, or - even better - replacing the outdated center tag with something more appropriate, like a header tag with a class that centers it (margin: 0 auto).

By soundsgreat87 at 17,Feb,18 15:19
Fair enough, but the message about "stupid greedy monkeys" is a little disingenuous. It's not like adblockers are making money off of blocking ads.

By soundsgreat87 at 07,Feb,18 20:47
Yep, I've done it to myself. I can only say good things about it. I never noticed any change in the sensations, only their location.

By soundsgreat87 at 01,Jan,18 01:31
dinkydick seems to be just fine... or do you mean just their video chat?

By soundsgreat87 at 29,Nov,17 00:42
"he was raring to go and I don't think he was prepared to give a completely objective analysis of the difference between sex with a circumcised penis vs with an intact one"

That describes an awful lot of guys who get cut as adults. Most of them have a fetish for it and will swear up and down that it's so much better.

By soundsgreat87 at 15,Nov,17 13:47
Not my cock but one of my favorite flaccid ones:

Isn't it the most beautiful cockhead?

By soundsgreat87 at 15,Nov,17 13:45
Skin forward...

And back!

By soundsgreat87 at 16,Jun,17 19:29
I've had mine back for just about two years now.

By soundsgreat87 at 16,Jun,17 19:27
You mean like this?


By soundsgreat87 at 24,Jan,17 19:16
It really suits your cock

By soundsgreat87 at 24,Jan,17 19:00
This is called a frenulectomy (if it's removed) or frenulotomy (if they just cut into it). It's a simple routine procedure. If you tell your doctor that your frenulum is uncomfortable when you pull the foreskin back, then they'll be happy to do it for you.

By soundsgreat87 at 09,Oct,16 12:26
Huh, interesting!

By soundsgreat87 at 08,Oct,16 12:44
Was your foreskin ever tight while you were growing up?

By soundsgreat87 at 08,Oct,16 11:30
Stupid censoring. Whose cock are you talking about?

I think the length of the foreskin is partly due to genetics, but also due to how tight it is when you go through puberty. Guys with tighter foreskins seem to end up with longer foreskins, and looser foreskins end up shorter. The dick grows, but the foreskin isn't held on it, and so it doesn't stretch as much.

That's just my theory though. Was your foreskin tighter when you were young?

By soundsgreat87 at 06,Oct,16 14:05
Agreed, though have you bought a TV lately? They're kinda like that now...

By soundsgreat87 at 24,Apr,16 12:28
I'm on sertraline as well but..... I've been like that for my whole life, even years before going on it!

By soundsgreat87 at 18,Mar,16 00:04
It looks uncut because of the foreskin.

I don't know where this idea of "when hard, an uncut dick is the same as a cut dick" came from because it is really, really not true at all

By soundsgreat87 at 06,Dec,15 14:42

By soundsgreat87 at 23,Oct,15 02:42
Most of the guys I've talked to either get no sensation or negative sensation from their nipples. The guys who enjoy it are the lucky ones it seems!

By soundsgreat87 at 20,Sep,15 02:10
Just got a proper notification now, so it's definitely fixed!

By soundsgreat87 at 19,Sep,15 14:07
Well I am a programmer

And great, thanks!

By soundsgreat87 at 12,Sep,15 04:07
I had something similar. It's a temporary bond between the foreskin and glans that is there from birth, and in most guys separates by age 5, but in some can last until 10 or 15. Mine had a little bit that separated around 10 or 11 as well. But your glans likely would have been fine, since in the process of infant circumcision, the foreskin has to be forcibly stripped from the glans anyway.

By soundsgreat87 at 10,Sep,15 04:26
I would say but it seems to be in its death throes.. other than that I don't know of any other cock-centric amateur sites quite like SYD!

By soundsgreat87 at 09,Sep,15 21:37
Opinions may not be facts, but some opinions are very much more supported by facts than other opinions. Having an opinion does not make it valid.

I'm very much against circumcision forced upon minors for anything other than legitimate medical reasons. The line between "legitimate" and "illegitimate" is something that still needs to be addressed in American culture, too. So often intact b o y s are circumcised because they can't pull their foreskins back, or because they had paraphimosis, or because they had a yeast infection, even though these problems are either harmless, easily fixable, preventable, or all of the above. I think a lot of well-meaning American parents who leave their b o y s intact don't know about some of these issues, having grown up in a cut culture themselves, and a lot of guys grow up having problems with their dicks as a result.

I'm totally fine with adults getting cut, though I'm of course sad when they do it, especially since there's such a dearth of them around me already I don't see it as any different than any other elective cosmetic surgery. I myself have modified my otherwise natural dick by cutting my frenulum. I did it cause I wanted to, and that's all the reason anyone needs to change their own bodies.

I've talked to enough people in enough places to feel like the whole "sensitivity" thing is a wash. I personally get A LOT of pleasure from my foreskin, but I know not everyone does. I don't get much pleasure from my glans or frenulum, but I know A LOT of guys do. Different people are wired differently, and if someone feels that having their glans exposed gives them more pleasure than having the foreskin rolling over it, I'm not gonna say they're wrong about that.

I also feel that despite its admirable goals, the intactivist movement has developed a problem with referring to cut dicks as "mutilated," or claiming that there are supposed persistent psychological effects from being circumcised as an infant. This unfairly stigmatizes guys who didn't have a say in the matter, who are the the exact people we should be convincing not to cut their own s o n s!

I also see people arguing over whether or not male circumcision is equivalent to female circumcision. This is a red herring. It doesn't matter how "severe" the modification is, it is still modification. Why is ALL modification of g i r l s i l l e g al in the US but b o y s have zero protection? Does this not violate the equal protection clause?

Lastly I don't respect "tradition" or "religion" as justifications for continuation of the procedure. As Sinjid306 said, not all traditions make sense. We have clear laws in most of our countries that protect religious expression so long as it doesn't violate anyone else's rights. We don't allow ritual sacrifice, or retribution killing, or parental neglect due to religious views; why do we allow circumcision?

By soundsgreat87 at 09,Sep,15 21:11
I think that's a very fair assessment.

By soundsgreat87 at 28,Aug,15 14:40
Very cool! "sounding" and "docking" tags would be much appreciated