Started by leopoldij at 25,May,15 10:38  other posts of leopoldij
Similar topics: 1.Another button -- agree or disagree? 2.FAKE! 3.Why delete only the "fake" profile? 4.Easy test to spot fake pictures 5.Who is Dgraff ? New CommentComments: |
"I will take the "miscellaneous" category for $20.00, Alex."
Alex asks, "And the answer is; 'not many but stay SUPER SEXY' "
Not all, but a few of the women who your boyfriend has had contact with here you've tried creating trouble and stirring shit up about them. I can see a pattern forming here...
Take a step back and look at this behaviour. If you knew how to make an honest argument you will see why I have called your BEHAVIOUR fake, not you yourself fake as you've lead people to believe I've said. So next time you write a blog about me make sure you give your audience the full story, not a story of half truths.
Recently, she called a SYD member and myself as "arsehole". It seems that it got her knickers in a knot when the SYD member commented on the cemetery picture. My response to the comment posted by the SYD member was that I understood how he felt because in the region/state of the United States that he lives in, there were a number of battles fought and that many men that died.
Im sure her emotions are running high. You see, she considers him to be her "boyfriend" and he probably doesn't see her as anything beyond an interesting fu@k. I wonder if there could ever be a meaningful relationship between a woman, who is probably 20 years his senior and is old enough to be his momma?
I did see that drama as well. It's all good and well to take photos and fuck where you like. However when you start sharing them online and they aren't to everyone's taste you have to accept that as well without being rude. Once someone has to resort to nasty name calling they've already lost the argument and lost respect.
What? The picture of the clothespins attached to her worn out pussy didn't give you an instant boner?
I'm gonna have to read all of this when I'm a bit more sober.
2) They're a hot female
3) They're a hung male
4) They've got a sexual username (for eg. 'cumsponge69')
4b) They've got a number in their username
5) Their photos are of professional quality
6) Their photos are watermarked with another site's name/logo
7) Their photos are "of a friend"
8.) They say "baby" in conversation casually
9) They want to kik/text/cyber
10) They want to 'meet up'
11) They ask for your credit card number
Now, don't get me wrong, there's a *chance* that some or all combinations of those things apply to legitimate members here, and there are surely exceptions everyone can bring to mind but it's important to remember those are the *exceptions*...
BTW, text me your credit card number and we'll meet up later, baby
With regard to a "fake" having their pictures watermarked with another site/logo, SYD/SYC does not require their membership to be EXCLUSIVE to SYD/SYC. There are a number of amateur adult sites, so to say that a match was found wherever, is not conclusive.
There are a number of members, mainly SYD members, that post pictures of their "gf", yeah, right! There are SYC members that post pictures of their female friends. In both instances, how can that be challenged?
Are you really suggesting members should be suspect of "hot" females and "hung" males? Then I am suspicious of you!
I'm at a loss for words.....
He could add they always have an excuse for not skyping
Get real 1000's of the site members are just fakes of the core 200 members.
I'm sure you've noticed that there are members whose profiles reflect that they have a crazy number of uploaded pictures yet "you" might only see 10. This suggests to me that the other pictures are for "friends only" OR that the member sends a lot of private pictures. So for "us" to embrace the fact that their few friends know who they are is ludicrous! That seems like a perfect recipe to create fake accounts, if you know what I mean.
If so, wow! I hadn't thought of that!
That's why I posed the question in this thread. Sometimes I hear some wise things (well, especially from you, you're the wise one around here...)
There is way to much verification on here from people who have no idea if the member is real or not. I call those people the verification junkies
While 2&3 above are not evidence of a fake, a large number of fakes do fall within those categories.
5 is interesting, as there are many great quality images on here, but some just do have a 'feel' of being a fake. Eastern European porn has a certain qualitty to it's images for example. But again, I search for evidence.
6 is a warning light - but mainly if it is a 'professional' site, not a tumblr account or some other amateur posting site. HOWEVER, I do take admin's point that anyone who has posted elsewhere would surely post the original unwatermarked images here, rather than the downloads from the other site.
As for 7, this is SYD/SYC not Show Your Friends dick/cunt. We can never know the truth about these 'friends' or their permission having been given to post the images.
I could go on, but in the end we ALL sometimes get a feeling about a member and if we have evidence to support that feeling we should report it, and if not leave them be.
If a member is reported don't vote blindly, do your own research it only takes a couple of minutes at most.
I can honestly say that I DO NOT know how to do a reverse search from my phone, so I do rely upon and research the links when the member provides that information, plus, they're supposed to provide proof.
Thank you, Big9inch21!
Oh wait just one minute! According to numbers 4 and 4b, you are a fake! Your profile name is of a sexual nature AND you have a number in your name! Forget I even asked for your credit card numbers, you would have probably given me phony numbers!
So, will you being sending your credit card information by way of PM or will you be posting the information requested here?
Take a male member who posts pics of himself and pics of his "girlfriend" in various sexy and explicit poses. Whenever he posts pics of his cock they are sharp, crystal clear and of high resolution. Whenever he posts pics of the "girlfriend" with, say, legs open and a finger in her pussy, the pics are blurry, small, and of abysmally low resolution. As if they are screenshots from a Web chat cam. None, not even one, of her pics are of any quality. But all his pics are of good quality.
So this means that, on one occasion, he's using his camera, but, on the other, he's taking screenshots (while, probably, masturbating).
That, in my view, is a fake page. Any member doing so is deceiving (or trying to deceive) us into thinking that he doesn't only have sex with himself but that he also fucks a woman. Except that the woman is not real. It's a low resolution image of a woman behind the screen that he's never met.
What do you think?
Another clue is when the avatar is a chick with enormous tits and no public photos.
And, yes, I've seen those avatars too.
At any rate, I still can't understand the need to pretend to be something else of what you are.
l find women that message my boyfriend telling him they have a tight cunt fake...especially when they spend all their days telling everyone lm fake..*lix*
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
Youll be amazed by how many people are fake.. and how many females on this site is actually a male posting pics of theyr wife slash girlfriend acting as her.. true % of females chatting on this site is really low
There seems to be a number of members that cannot tolerate copyright infringement, while others want to afford the reported member an opportunity to correct the problem. What I personally have an issue with is someone that will use another member's picture or pictures as their own. It's like when you steal from a SYC/SYD member, you're stealing from "family". I don't like members posting compromising pictures and title them with "si.ster", "mother", etc. I'm quick to vote to delete when there's the tone of the picture appears to be besti@lity. And when it is detected that the member was under.age when they opened their profile and began posting pictures. It's been a while since that type of situation was reported, however it was dismissed because the member was now over 18.
This community is like our real, everyday life, what can you do.....sometimes "we" get it right and sometimes not.
Real members who want to chat or start up a real friendship here, will not ask for your credit card. That was never the purpose of this site.
As far as attractiveness goes, there some very beautiful female real members here. Part of this site was to show your body, and if you're hot show it off, also part of it is to celebrate all sizes, shapes, and figures. So to think that a member is not real, because they are too "attractive" is not accurate. "Real" can't be defined as one particular body type.
Also those who have face pics, especially women are not necessarily fake. The jury is still out on whether that is a good indicator for a fake. Many of us feel, that we will show our face, and try not to worry about it. But sometimes too many face pics coupled with other factors can make you come to the conclusion that someone is a fake.
Also, just because someone's face is blurred out doesn't make them real. Just because they don't show up in TinEye or Google doesn't make them real.
Also how they act in the forum. If they are going on and on and I'm like I am, there is a good chance they are real. But it is never a guarantee, however.
If they are a premium member, there is a good chance they are real. Because why would a fake member, buy a membership. But again, it's never a guarantee.
Where original thought gets stifled by compulsive liars and ignorance.
Oh,you were talking about here...
The member that posts them then says "Oh... I'm on that site" its total bullshit.
You seem very vociferous in your defence of these people....Hmmmmm
But anyways, when I see a profile of a chubby 20 something with enormous tits as an avatar, has a couple pictures posted that are not those huge titties, seems to have way too many points to be accumulated by said non-titty pictures, and that can't construct a half decent sentence to save their ass... That's when I deem it a false profile.